Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google searches for 'why do i have a migraine' | r=1 | 10yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Kazakhstan | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'i am dizzy' | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Dominican Republic | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| The number of chiropractors in Florida | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.99 | 7yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'buy a house' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Afghanistan | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Hong Kong | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Wind power generated in Bosnia and Herzegovina | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Points scored by the Tennessee Titans | r=0.78 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)