about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,776 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and the second variable is Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies increased, so did the level of interest in security and locking mechanisms. With a deeper understanding of military-grade locks, these graduates couldn't help but engage in discussions sparked by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. Whether it was to showcase their newfound expertise or to debate the intricacies of lock design, these highly qualified individuals inadvertently unlocked a whole new dimension of commentary on the channel. With their specialized knowledge, they raised the bar for discussions and proved to be the key to a higher average number of comments.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a group of graduates with Master's degrees in Military technologies standing around a computer, engaged in deep discussion while watching a LockPickingLawyer video. Their focused and excited expressions reveal their keen interest in security and locking mechanisms. The scene should capture the elevated level of expertise and heightened understanding they bring to the discussions, visibly increasing the number and quality of comments on the channel. Incorporate elements of Celtic art in the surroundings to give the image a unique and compelling aesthetic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Cutsy art illustration Cutsy graphics Cutsy art illustration Pop art
ChatGPT: Military technologies: Celtic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies increased, so did the level of interest in security and locking mechanisms. With a deeper understanding of military-grade locks, these graduates couldn't help but engage in discussions sparked by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. Whether it was to showcase their newfound expertise or to debate the intricacies of lock design, these highly qualified individuals inadvertently unlocked a whole new dimension of commentary on the channel. With their specialized knowledge, they raised the bar for discussions and proved to be the key to a higher average number of comments.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of graduates holding Master's degrees in Military technologies gather around a computer, eagerly watching a LockPickingLawyer video. Their focused expressions show their deep interest in security and locking mechanisms. Excitedly discussing and debating the intricacies of lock design, their specialized expertise elevates the quality of comments, unlocking a whole new dimension of commentary on the channel. The average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's videos noticeably increases as these individuals bring their heightened understanding to the discussions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Military technologies: Celtic art ] and depicting this scene: A group of graduates holding Master's degrees in Military technologies gather around a computer, eagerly watching a LockPickingLawyer video. Their focused expressions show their deep interest in security and locking mechanisms. Excitedly discussing and debating the intricacies of lock design, their specialized expertise elevates the quality of comments, unlocking a whole new dimension of commentary on the channel. The average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's videos noticeably increases as these individuals bring their heightened understanding to the discussions. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a group of graduates with Master's degrees in Military technologies standing around a computer, engaged in deep discussion while watching a LockPickingLawyer video. Their focused and excited expressions reveal their keen interest in security and locking mechanisms. The scene should capture the elevated level of expertise and heightened understanding they bring to the discussions, visibly increasing the number and quality of comments on the channel. Incorporate elements of Celtic art in the surroundings to give the image a unique and compelling aesthetic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies caused Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments

The Journal of Military Technology and LockPicking Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The ever-evolving landscape of technology has permeated numerous aspects of modern life, often in unforeseen and perplexing ways. One such puzzling intersection lies at the nexus of military technologies and the unexpected realm of YouTube comments on lock-picking videos. The increasing prevalence of Master's degrees in military technologies and the burgeoning popularity of LockPickingLawyer's instructional videos raise the inquiry: could there be a correlation between these disparate domains?

As we embark on this inquiry, it is important to acknowledge the inherent enigma of this connection. One might find oneself pondering how the pursuit of advanced knowledge in military technologies could possibly intersect with the fervent discussions and musings found in the depths of YouTube comment sections. Yet, it is precisely this curiosity, tinged with a hint of incredulity, that drives our investigation.

LockPickingLawyer, a prominent figure in the online lock-picking community, has garnered a substantial following engrossed in the esoteric art of manipulating locks. As he adeptly navigates the intricacies of various locking mechanisms, his audience fervently engages through comments, creating an ecosystem of dialogue and discourse. Meanwhile, in the realm of academia, the conferment of Master's degrees in military technologies represents a culmination of scholarly pursuit and specialized knowledge, typically positioned within the sphere of defense and security.

These apparently incongruous components have converged in the backdrop of our study, prompting us to explore the potential interplay between the commendable pursuit of advanced degrees in military technologies and the peculiar allure of lock-picking content on YouTube. While the initial inclination may be to dismiss this juxtaposition as a mere curiosity, our inquiry has unearthed compelling data that demands scrutiny and analysis.

The objective of this study is to dissect and elucidate the correlation, if any, between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Through a methodical and rigorous examination of relevant data spanning several years, we endeavor to shed light on this captivating and unexpected association, offering insight into the underlying dynamics that underpin such a curious linkage.

By peering into this uncharted intersection, we seek to unravel the cryptic relationship between academic pursuits in military technologies and the digital discourse fermenting within the unconventional realm of lock-picking videos. Ultimately, our findings may not only unveil an intriguing correlation but also furnish a springboard for broader discussions and reflections on the intricate interconnections that permeate the contemporary landscape of technological and cultural phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The ever-evolving landscape of technology has permeated numerous aspects of modern life, often in unforeseen and perplexing ways. One such puzzling intersection lies at the nexus of military technologies and the unexpected realm of YouTube comments on lock-picking videos. The increasing prevalence of Master's degrees in military technologies and the burgeoning popularity of LockPickingLawyer's instructional videos raise the inquiry: could there be a correlation between these disparate domains?
As we embark on this inquiry, it is important to acknowledge the inherent enigma of this connection. One might find oneself pondering how the pursuit of advanced knowledge in military technologies could possibly intersect with the fervent discussions and musings found in the depths of YouTube comment sections. Yet, it is precisely this curiosity, tinged with a hint of incredulity, that drives our investigation.
LockPickingLawyer, a prominent figure in the online lock-picking community, has garnered a substantial following engrossed in the esoteric art of manipulating locks. As he adeptly navigates the intricacies of various locking mechanisms, his audience fervently engages through comments, creating an ecosystem of dialogue and discourse. Meanwhile, in the realm of academia, the conferment of Master's degrees in military technologies represents a culmination of scholarly pursuit and specialized knowledge, typically positioned within the sphere of defense and security.
These apparently incongruous components have converged in the backdrop of our study, prompting us to explore the potential interplay between the commendable pursuit of advanced degrees in military technologies and the peculiar allure of lock-picking content on YouTube. While the initial inclination may be to dismiss this juxtaposition as a mere curiosity, our inquiry has unearthed compelling data that demands scrutiny and analysis.
The objective of this study is to dissect and elucidate the correlation, if any, between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Through a methodical and rigorous examination of relevant data spanning several years, we endeavor to shed light on this captivating and unexpected association, offering insight into the underlying dynamics that underpin such a curious linkage.
By peering into this uncharted intersection, we seek to unravel the cryptic relationship between academic pursuits in military technologies and the digital discourse fermenting within the unconventional realm of lock-picking videos. Ultimately, our findings may not only unveil an intriguing correlation but also furnish a springboard for broader discussions and reflections on the intricate interconnections that permeate the contemporary landscape of technological and cultural phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In a study by Smith et al. (2017) titled "The Impact of Master's Degrees in Military Technologies on Modern Society," the authors find a surging trend in the conferral of Master's degrees in military technologies over the past decade. This surge is accompanied by a commensurate increase in discussions and debates surrounding the integration of military technologies into various facets of contemporary life. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) posit in their work "Technological Advancements in Military Defense" that the exponential growth of technological innovations in the defense sector has spurred a burgeoning interest in advanced degrees focusing on military technologies. These serious investigations into the realm of military technologies set the stage for our exploration of the curious correlation between such academic pursuits and the world of lock-picking videos on YouTube.

Turning to pertinent non-fiction literature that tangentially addresses the relationship between technological expertise and digital communities, works such as "The Art of Intricacies: Understanding Lock Mechanisms in Modern Society" by Johnson (2016), and "Defensive Dynamics: Unraveling the Mysteries of Military Technologies" by Anderson (2019) provide insightful discussions on the evolving landscape of security and technological intricacies, shedding light on the broader context in which our inquiry is situated.

Additionally, to grasp the public's perception and fascination with lock-picking and security devices, an understanding of popular culture and fictional narratives is paramount. Thus, fiction works such as "The Secret Vault" by Brown (2015) and "Ciphers and Safes: Unraveling the Enigma" by Robinson (2017) offer fictionalized narratives that delve into the captivating world of locks and security systems. While not empirical in nature, these fictional accounts may hold within them kernels of truth and glimpses into the collective fascination with the art of lock-picking.

As our investigation delves deeper into the uncharted territory of military technologies and lock-picking, it is important to note that a comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing a wide array of sources. In addition to scholarly articles and books, unconventional mediums such as Reddit threads, online forums, and even the backs of shampoo bottles were considered in this extensive pursuit of knowledge. After all, one must not discount the potential insights gleaned from the unlikeliest of sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The ever-evolving landscape of technology has permeated numerous aspects of modern life, often in unforeseen and perplexing ways. One such puzzling intersection lies at the nexus of military technologies and the unexpected realm of YouTube comments on lock-picking videos. The increasing prevalence of Master's degrees in military technologies and the burgeoning popularity of LockPickingLawyer's instructional videos raise the inquiry: could there be a correlation between these disparate domains?
As we embark on this inquiry, it is important to acknowledge the inherent enigma of this connection. One might find oneself pondering how the pursuit of advanced knowledge in military technologies could possibly intersect with the fervent discussions and musings found in the depths of YouTube comment sections. Yet, it is precisely this curiosity, tinged with a hint of incredulity, that drives our investigation.
LockPickingLawyer, a prominent figure in the online lock-picking community, has garnered a substantial following engrossed in the esoteric art of manipulating locks. As he adeptly navigates the intricacies of various locking mechanisms, his audience fervently engages through comments, creating an ecosystem of dialogue and discourse. Meanwhile, in the realm of academia, the conferment of Master's degrees in military technologies represents a culmination of scholarly pursuit and specialized knowledge, typically positioned within the sphere of defense and security.
These apparently incongruous components have converged in the backdrop of our study, prompting us to explore the potential interplay between the commendable pursuit of advanced degrees in military technologies and the peculiar allure of lock-picking content on YouTube. While the initial inclination may be to dismiss this juxtaposition as a mere curiosity, our inquiry has unearthed compelling data that demands scrutiny and analysis.
The objective of this study is to dissect and elucidate the correlation, if any, between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Through a methodical and rigorous examination of relevant data spanning several years, we endeavor to shed light on this captivating and unexpected association, offering insight into the underlying dynamics that underpin such a curious linkage.
By peering into this uncharted intersection, we seek to unravel the cryptic relationship between academic pursuits in military technologies and the digital discourse fermenting within the unconventional realm of lock-picking videos. Ultimately, our findings may not only unveil an intriguing correlation but also furnish a springboard for broader discussions and reflections on the intricate interconnections that permeate the contemporary landscape of technological and cultural phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this investigation was designed to rigorously examine the association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Our research team conducted a comprehensive data collection process spanning the years 2015 to 2021, leveraging information from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube's platform. The utilization of data from these sources provided a diverse and expansive dataset, illuminating the nuanced relationship under scrutiny.

To commence our inquiry, we compiled information on the annual number of Master's degrees conferred in military technologies from accredited institutions. This encompassed a broad spectrum of military-related disciplines, including but not limited to defense technology, weaponry systems, cybersecurity, and strategic studies. The acquisition of this data involved traversing numerous academic databases, institutional records, and authoritative publications to ensure a comprehensive representation of advanced degrees within the purview of military technologies.

Simultaneously, the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos was meticulous assessed, requiring a systematic approach to gather and aggregate viewer engagement metrics from a multitude of videos posted during the specified timeframe. The LockPickingLawyer's channel, replete with a wealth of instructional demonstrations and insightful commentary, presented a unique platform for exploring the communal discourse surrounding lock-picking endeavors.

Upon amassing the requisite datasets for Master's degrees in military technologies and LockPickingLawyer's YouTube video comments, statistical analyses were conducted to ascertain patterns and discernible trends. The establishment of a robust correlation matrix, as well as inferential statistical tests, facilitated the quantification and validation of any apparent relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

Furthermore, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation, a qualitative analysis of select YouTube comments was conducted, allowing for a deeper understanding of the nature of engagement within the lock-picking community. This qualitative component served to supplement the quantitative findings, offering a richer contextualization of the digital discourse permeating the 'locksport' landscape.

Overall, the methodological framework adopted in this investigation sought to combine quantitative precision with qualitative insights, engendering a holistic approach to unveil the cryptic connection between academic pursuits in military technologies and the digital engagement concomitant with lock-picking content on YouTube.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9890523, r-squared of 0.9782244, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The ever-evolving landscape of technology has permeated numerous aspects of modern life, often in unforeseen and perplexing ways. One such puzzling intersection lies at the nexus of military technologies and the unexpected realm of YouTube comments on lock-picking videos. The increasing prevalence of Master's degrees in military technologies and the burgeoning popularity of LockPickingLawyer's instructional videos raise the inquiry: could there be a correlation between these disparate domains?
As we embark on this inquiry, it is important to acknowledge the inherent enigma of this connection. One might find oneself pondering how the pursuit of advanced knowledge in military technologies could possibly intersect with the fervent discussions and musings found in the depths of YouTube comment sections. Yet, it is precisely this curiosity, tinged with a hint of incredulity, that drives our investigation.
LockPickingLawyer, a prominent figure in the online lock-picking community, has garnered a substantial following engrossed in the esoteric art of manipulating locks. As he adeptly navigates the intricacies of various locking mechanisms, his audience fervently engages through comments, creating an ecosystem of dialogue and discourse. Meanwhile, in the realm of academia, the conferment of Master's degrees in military technologies represents a culmination of scholarly pursuit and specialized knowledge, typically positioned within the sphere of defense and security.
These apparently incongruous components have converged in the backdrop of our study, prompting us to explore the potential interplay between the commendable pursuit of advanced degrees in military technologies and the peculiar allure of lock-picking content on YouTube. While the initial inclination may be to dismiss this juxtaposition as a mere curiosity, our inquiry has unearthed compelling data that demands scrutiny and analysis.
The objective of this study is to dissect and elucidate the correlation, if any, between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Through a methodical and rigorous examination of relevant data spanning several years, we endeavor to shed light on this captivating and unexpected association, offering insight into the underlying dynamics that underpin such a curious linkage.
By peering into this uncharted intersection, we seek to unravel the cryptic relationship between academic pursuits in military technologies and the digital discourse fermenting within the unconventional realm of lock-picking videos. Ultimately, our findings may not only unveil an intriguing correlation but also furnish a springboard for broader discussions and reflections on the intricate interconnections that permeate the contemporary landscape of technological and cultural phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data unveiled a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Over the period from 2015 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 was observed, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated domains. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9782244 suggests that approximately 97.8% of the variability in the average number of YouTube comments can be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies. Moreover, the significance level of p < 0.01 accentuates the robustness of this correlation, thereby holding statistical and substantive implications.

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the unequivocal correlation between the two variables, portraying a compelling linear relationship that underscores the profound intertwining of these divergent spheres. The salient point of this visual representation is the striking alignment of the data points along a clear trajectory, leaving little room for doubt regarding the presence of a substantive connection. This depiction serves as a poignant visual testament to the unexpected alignment of academic pursuits and digital engagement, underscoring the depth and complexity of this enigmatic relationship.

The implications of these findings are both thought-provoking and intriguing, begging further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and potential causative factors that link the pursuit of Master's degrees in military technologies to the fervent discourse within lock-picking communities. The unanticipated convergence of these domains prompts reflection on the multifaceted nature of contemporary cultural phenomena and technological pursuits, affording an opportunity for contemplation on the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate facets of modern society.

This discovery challenges preconceived notions about the boundaries of academic pursuits and online engagement, inviting a reevaluation of the interconnections that permeate the fabric of contemporary life. The unexpected association uncovered in this investigation beckons further inquiry into the dynamic forces that drive human engagement in unconventional areas, unveiling a rich tapestry of interconnectedness that transcends traditional disciplinary delineations.

In light of these compelling findings, it becomes evident that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains, a web of correlation and interdependence may be intricately woven, awaiting discovery and explication. These results prompt a reexamination of the boundaries that demarcate academic and digital spaces, urging a reconsideration of the nuances and subtleties that underpin the contemporary landscape of knowledge dissemination and cultural engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In a study by Smith et al. (2017) titled "The Impact of Master's Degrees in Military Technologies on Modern Society," the authors find a surging trend in the conferral of Master's degrees in military technologies over the past decade. This surge is accompanied by a commensurate increase in discussions and debates surrounding the integration of military technologies into various facets of contemporary life. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) posit in their work "Technological Advancements in Military Defense" that the exponential growth of technological innovations in the defense sector has spurred a burgeoning interest in advanced degrees focusing on military technologies. These serious investigations into the realm of military technologies set the stage for our exploration of the curious correlation between such academic pursuits and the world of lock-picking videos on YouTube.
Turning to pertinent non-fiction literature that tangentially addresses the relationship between technological expertise and digital communities, works such as "The Art of Intricacies: Understanding Lock Mechanisms in Modern Society" by Johnson (2016), and "Defensive Dynamics: Unraveling the Mysteries of Military Technologies" by Anderson (2019) provide insightful discussions on the evolving landscape of security and technological intricacies, shedding light on the broader context in which our inquiry is situated.
Additionally, to grasp the public's perception and fascination with lock-picking and security devices, an understanding of popular culture and fictional narratives is paramount. Thus, fiction works such as "The Secret Vault" by Brown (2015) and "Ciphers and Safes: Unraveling the Enigma" by Robinson (2017) offer fictionalized narratives that delve into the captivating world of locks and security systems. While not empirical in nature, these fictional accounts may hold within them kernels of truth and glimpses into the collective fascination with the art of lock-picking.
As our investigation delves deeper into the uncharted territory of military technologies and lock-picking, it is important to note that a comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing a wide array of sources. In addition to scholarly articles and books, unconventional mediums such as Reddit threads, online forums, and even the backs of shampoo bottles were considered in this extensive pursuit of knowledge. After all, one must not discount the potential insights gleaned from the unlikeliest of sources.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data unveiled a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Over the period from 2015 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 was observed, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated domains. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9782244 suggests that approximately 97.8% of the variability in the average number of YouTube comments can be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies. Moreover, the significance level of p < 0.01 accentuates the robustness of this correlation, thereby holding statistical and substantive implications.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the unequivocal correlation between the two variables, portraying a compelling linear relationship that underscores the profound intertwining of these divergent spheres. The salient point of this visual representation is the striking alignment of the data points along a clear trajectory, leaving little room for doubt regarding the presence of a substantive connection. This depiction serves as a poignant visual testament to the unexpected alignment of academic pursuits and digital engagement, underscoring the depth and complexity of this enigmatic relationship.
The implications of these findings are both thought-provoking and intriguing, begging further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and potential causative factors that link the pursuit of Master's degrees in military technologies to the fervent discourse within lock-picking communities. The unanticipated convergence of these domains prompts reflection on the multifaceted nature of contemporary cultural phenomena and technological pursuits, affording an opportunity for contemplation on the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate facets of modern society.
This discovery challenges preconceived notions about the boundaries of academic pursuits and online engagement, inviting a reevaluation of the interconnections that permeate the fabric of contemporary life. The unexpected association uncovered in this investigation beckons further inquiry into the dynamic forces that drive human engagement in unconventional areas, unveiling a rich tapestry of interconnectedness that transcends traditional disciplinary delineations.
In light of these compelling findings, it becomes evident that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains, a web of correlation and interdependence may be intricately woven, awaiting discovery and explication. These results prompt a reexamination of the boundaries that demarcate academic and digital spaces, urging a reconsideration of the nuances and subtleties that underpin the contemporary landscape of knowledge dissemination and cultural engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The findings of this study substantiate and build upon the prior research that examines the intersection of academic pursuits in military technologies and digital engagement within the lock-picking community. As anticipated, the notable correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos not only verifies the existence of this unexpected relationship, but also highlights its robustness and significance.

Smith et al. (2017) and Doe and Jones (2018) initially laid the groundwork for our investigation by addressing the escalating interest and pursuit of advanced degrees in military technologies. Their scholarly inquiries underscore the burgeoning scholarly engagement in this specialized domain, paving the way for our examination of its connection to the realm of lock-picking videos. The compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 observed in our study serves to solidify the premise posited by these earlier works, affirming the pronounced influence of academic developments in military technologies on societal conversations and digital interactions.

Moreover, the inadvertent allure of tangential literary and fictional works, such as those discussed in the literature review, unexpectedly held relevance in bolstering our understanding of the intricate intertwining of technological expertise and the fascination with security mechanisms. While Johnson's (2016) and Anderson's (2019) serious treatises enriched the theoretical underpinnings of our investigation, the fictional narratives of Brown (2015) and Robinson (2017) inadvertently provided nuanced insights that resonated with our empirical findings, revealing a serendipitous alignment between seemingly disparate sources of knowledge.

The correlations uncovered in this study are undeniably remarkable and raise captivating questions about the unanticipated intersections that underpin contemporary societal dynamics. While our approach is steeped in conventional academic methodology, it is imperative to recognize that our pursuit of knowledge delved into unconventional channels, alluding to the potential for unexpected discoveries from the most unexpected sources. In line with the overarching theme of this research, it may be said that the interplay between masterful academic pursuits and captivating YouTube commentaries on lock-picking embodies a unique blend of scholarly pursuit and digital engagement, proving that the most unexpected connections often hold the most intriguing revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies and Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The ever-evolving landscape of technology has permeated numerous aspects of modern life, often in unforeseen and perplexing ways. One such puzzling intersection lies at the nexus of military technologies and the unexpected realm of YouTube comments on lock-picking videos. The increasing prevalence of Master's degrees in military technologies and the burgeoning popularity of LockPickingLawyer's instructional videos raise the inquiry: could there be a correlation between these disparate domains?
As we embark on this inquiry, it is important to acknowledge the inherent enigma of this connection. One might find oneself pondering how the pursuit of advanced knowledge in military technologies could possibly intersect with the fervent discussions and musings found in the depths of YouTube comment sections. Yet, it is precisely this curiosity, tinged with a hint of incredulity, that drives our investigation.
LockPickingLawyer, a prominent figure in the online lock-picking community, has garnered a substantial following engrossed in the esoteric art of manipulating locks. As he adeptly navigates the intricacies of various locking mechanisms, his audience fervently engages through comments, creating an ecosystem of dialogue and discourse. Meanwhile, in the realm of academia, the conferment of Master's degrees in military technologies represents a culmination of scholarly pursuit and specialized knowledge, typically positioned within the sphere of defense and security.
These apparently incongruous components have converged in the backdrop of our study, prompting us to explore the potential interplay between the commendable pursuit of advanced degrees in military technologies and the peculiar allure of lock-picking content on YouTube. While the initial inclination may be to dismiss this juxtaposition as a mere curiosity, our inquiry has unearthed compelling data that demands scrutiny and analysis.
The objective of this study is to dissect and elucidate the correlation, if any, between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Through a methodical and rigorous examination of relevant data spanning several years, we endeavor to shed light on this captivating and unexpected association, offering insight into the underlying dynamics that underpin such a curious linkage.
By peering into this uncharted intersection, we seek to unravel the cryptic relationship between academic pursuits in military technologies and the digital discourse fermenting within the unconventional realm of lock-picking videos. Ultimately, our findings may not only unveil an intriguing correlation but also furnish a springboard for broader discussions and reflections on the intricate interconnections that permeate the contemporary landscape of technological and cultural phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data unveiled a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Over the period from 2015 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 was observed, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated domains. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9782244 suggests that approximately 97.8% of the variability in the average number of YouTube comments can be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies. Moreover, the significance level of p < 0.01 accentuates the robustness of this correlation, thereby holding statistical and substantive implications.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the unequivocal correlation between the two variables, portraying a compelling linear relationship that underscores the profound intertwining of these divergent spheres. The salient point of this visual representation is the striking alignment of the data points along a clear trajectory, leaving little room for doubt regarding the presence of a substantive connection. This depiction serves as a poignant visual testament to the unexpected alignment of academic pursuits and digital engagement, underscoring the depth and complexity of this enigmatic relationship.
The implications of these findings are both thought-provoking and intriguing, begging further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and potential causative factors that link the pursuit of Master's degrees in military technologies to the fervent discourse within lock-picking communities. The unanticipated convergence of these domains prompts reflection on the multifaceted nature of contemporary cultural phenomena and technological pursuits, affording an opportunity for contemplation on the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate facets of modern society.
This discovery challenges preconceived notions about the boundaries of academic pursuits and online engagement, inviting a reevaluation of the interconnections that permeate the fabric of contemporary life. The unexpected association uncovered in this investigation beckons further inquiry into the dynamic forces that drive human engagement in unconventional areas, unveiling a rich tapestry of interconnectedness that transcends traditional disciplinary delineations.
In light of these compelling findings, it becomes evident that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains, a web of correlation and interdependence may be intricately woven, awaiting discovery and explication. These results prompt a reexamination of the boundaries that demarcate academic and digital spaces, urging a reconsideration of the nuances and subtleties that underpin the contemporary landscape of knowledge dissemination and cultural engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The elucidation of a robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos substantiates an unexpected and intriguing linkage between these ostensibly incongruous realms. The findings not only defy conventional expectations but also impart a humbling recognition of the intricate and often whimsical interconnections that permeate the modern landscape of knowledge dissemination and cultural engagement.

The unearthing of this correlation prompts contemplation on the multifaceted nature of human pursuits, underscoring the serendipitous encounters and entwined destinies that often elude rational comprehension. The unexpected alignment of academic accomplishments with digital engagement invites introspection on the enigmatic forces that steer human behaviors, transcending categorical distinctions and unveiling the whimsy of human pursuits.

As we grapple with the implications of these findings, it becomes evident that the boundaries of scholarly pursuits and online engagement harbor an underlying tapestry of cohesion, awaiting recognition and exploration. The fortuitous juxtaposition of military technology expertise and lock-picking curiosity exemplifies the unexpected encounters that punctuate our quest for knowledge and amusement, reminding us of the uncharted territories that await discovery within the labyrinth of human endeavors.

In the wake of these revelatory findings, it is incumbent upon the scholarly community to acknowledge the capricious nature of human pursuits and the inexhaustible reservoir of improbable connections that await elucidation. While the mystique surrounding the relationship between Master's degrees in military technologies and LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos has been unveiled, it beckons a deeper comprehension of the whimsical and often inexplicable intertwining of human endeavors.

With this, we assert that the elucidation of this correlation between Master's degrees in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos renders further scrutiny unnecessary. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate domains stands as a testament to the capricious encounters that punctuate human existence, prompting a reevaluation of the boundaries and expectations that delineate scholarly pursuits and digital engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Military Technology and LockPicking Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Advanced Military Technology Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unlocking the Connection: A Masterful Investigation into the Relationship Between Military Technology Master's Degrees and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Comments with an abstract of This study investigates the often-overlooked relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in military technologies and the average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2015 to 2021. Remarkably, our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9890523 with a significance level of p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between these seemingly disparate areas. The implications of these results, as well as the underlying mechanisms at play, are discussed in detail, shedding light on this peculiar yet intriguing phenomenon.

ChatGPT:

military technology master's degrees, LockPickingLawyer YouTube, relationship, comments, correlation coefficient, significance level, National Center for Education Statistics, YouTube data analysis, military technologies, YouTube video comments, relationship investigation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Military technologies and applied sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies

Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9890523 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9782244 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies) over the 7 years from 2015 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-5. 0.0000239446971889664230000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.0024% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 41,763 random variables You don't actually need 41 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies (Degrees awarded)71152274355572839958
Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos (Average Comments)159.193119.3497.24901.0731391.682360.212327.76




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([71,152,274,355,572,839,958,])
array_2 = np.array([159.193,119.3,497.24,901.073,1391.68,2360.21,2327.76,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5776 · Black Variable ID: 1331 · Red Variable ID: 25758
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0