Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Madagascar | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Percentage of Americans with social media profiles | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
The Travelers Companies' stock price (TRV) | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America | r=0.94 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of gas plant operators in Alabama | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Total U.S. grain export volume | r=0.8 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)