Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Business correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of librarians in New York | r=1 | 7yrs | No |
The number of plumbers in South Dakota | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of accountants and auditors in Michigan | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Poland | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with AT&T | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Hot days in Paris | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Seattle Seahawks | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
The number of civil engineers in Virginia | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
The number of fashion designers in Washington | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
The number of electrical engineers in Arizona | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Arizona Cardinals | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
Instructor salaries in the US | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=-0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Business also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)