Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Science technologies correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| US Bottled Water Consumption per Person | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| US production of sour cream | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Motor vehicle thefts in Iowa | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
| Sysco's stock price (SYY) | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Motor vehicle thefts in Oregon | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to immigrate to switzerland' | r=0.85 | 11yrs | No |
| Rain in Houston | r=0.73 | 7yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Science technologies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)