Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of cooks, short order in Illinois | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Petroluem consumption in Argentina | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of childcare workers in Kentucky | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the Detroit Tigers | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in California | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Wins for the Pittsburgh Pirates | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Wins for the Baltimore Orioles | r=0.92 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| The number of zoologists in Wyoming | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the Baltimore Orioles | r=0.91 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Wednesdays | r=0.9 | 8yrs | No |
| Wins for the San Diego Padres | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Michigan | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in New Jersey | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
| Wins for the Detroit Tigers | r=0.88 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Season wins for the New England Patriots | r=0.83 | 11yrs | No |
| Air quality in Ukiah, California | r=0.8 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Wins for the New York Yankees | r=0.71 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)