Report an error
Associate Professor salaries in the US correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Urban Honolulu, Hawaii | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
The number of insurance claims and policy processing clerks in California | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
The number of airline pilots, copilots, and flight engineers in Illinois | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
The number of crane operators in Oregon | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Colombia | r=0.88 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Robberies in Alaska | r=0.88 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Crocodile Attacks in South-East Asia & Australia | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.84 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Wins for the Chicago Cubs | r=0.82 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dalvin | r=0.81 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Jupiter and Venus | r=0.73 | 13yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 6th grade | r=0.71 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Princess | r=0.69 | 13yrs | No |
The number of private detectives in Nevada | r=0.66 | 13yrs | No |
Air quality in Boulder | r=0.62 | 13yrs | No |
Total views on 'Be Smart' science YouTube videos | r=0.58 | 9yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Earth | r=0.57 | 13yrs | No |
Associate Professor salaries in the US also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)