about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,650 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Dalvin and the second variable is Associate Professor salaries in the US.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Dalvin fell out of favor, so did the demand for people named Dalvin to become Associate Professors. With fewer Dalvins pursuing this career, there was less competition for Associate Professor positions, leading to a decrease in salaries for all. It's a classic case of Dalvin demand and Associate Professor salary adjustment!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a scene from a Disney movie. In the foreground, depict a group of young individuals, all named Dalvin, confidently striding through bustling city streets. Each Dalvin is adorned with oversized gold chains and exudes an air of charisma. In the background, show a group of Associate Professors discussing their dwindling salaries with expressions reflecting concern as they observe the Dalvins gaining popularity as rappers. The scene should capture the contrast between the two groups within the vibrant cityscape. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Cyber folk 3D Pixar Style Cute cartoon An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US, in the following situation: People with the name Dalvin were all choosing to become rapper. As a result, there was less demand for Associate Professors, leading to a decrease in their salaries. This also coincided with a rise in the purchase of large gold chains.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst a backdrop of bustling city streets, a group of young individuals, all of whom are named Dalvin, are confidently striding through, each adorned with oversized gold chains and exuding an air of charisma. Meanwhile, in the background, a group of Associate Professors are discussing their dwindling salaries, their expressions reflecting concern as they observe the Dalvins gaining popularity as rappers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: Amidst a backdrop of bustling city streets, a group of young individuals, all of whom are named Dalvin, are confidently striding through, each adorned with oversized gold chains and exuding an air of charisma. Meanwhile, in the background, a group of Associate Professors are discussing their dwindling salaries, their expressions reflecting concern as they observe the Dalvins gaining popularity as rappers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a scene from a Disney movie. In the foreground, depict a group of young individuals, all named Dalvin, confidently striding through bustling city streets. Each Dalvin is adorned with oversized gold chains and exudes an air of charisma. In the background, show a group of Associate Professors discussing their dwindling salaries with expressions reflecting concern as they observe the Dalvins gaining popularity as rappers. The scene should capture the contrast between the two groups within the vibrant cityscape.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Dalvin caused Associate Professor salaries in the US to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks

Journal of Socioeconomic Naming Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

With each passing year, the landscape of academia undergoes its own metamorphosis, shaped not only by scholarly pursuits but also by the peculiar nuances of human behavior. Curiously, one such facet of academic life that has received scant attention is the influence of first names on the salaries of Associate Professors. In our foray into this uncharted territory, we home in on the enigmatic conundrum surrounding the first name "Dalvin" and its potential impact on the financial fortunes of teaching scholars in the United States.

While initial contemplation of this topic may evoke a lighthearted chuckle, our inquiry ventures beyond the realm of whimsy into the empirically grounded terrain of data analysis and statistical inquiry. The allure of delving into this unorthodox association lies in the prospect of unraveling an unexpected thread woven into the intricate tapestry of academic remuneration.

Our study draws from a fusion of disparate data sources, amalgamating information from the US Social Security Administration - a repository of nomenclatural trends - and the National Center for Education Statistics, a bastion of educational and employment metrics. Through this marriage of data sets, we embark on a statistical odyssey spanning over a decade, scrutinizing the period from 2009 to 2021 with an unwavering commitment to precision and rigor.

The nexus between the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors emerges as an intriguing anomaly, eliciting a healthy dose of skepticism and intrigue. Our initial analyses hint at a compelling correlation, with a correlation coefficient that beckons attention and a p-value that piques scientific curiosity.

As we navigate this labyrinth of empirical inquiry and wry amusement, our aim is twofold: to shed light on the peculiar partnership between nomenclature and professional compensation, and, perhaps more subtly, to inject a dose of levity into the often austere domain of academic research. In melding the whimsical with the weighty, this study endeavors to unravel the Dalvin dilemma - a name intertwined with a clandestine influence on the financial destinies of Associate Professors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
With each passing year, the landscape of academia undergoes its own metamorphosis, shaped not only by scholarly pursuits but also by the peculiar nuances of human behavior. Curiously, one such facet of academic life that has received scant attention is the influence of first names on the salaries of Associate Professors. In our foray into this uncharted territory, we home in on the enigmatic conundrum surrounding the first name "Dalvin" and its potential impact on the financial fortunes of teaching scholars in the United States.
While initial contemplation of this topic may evoke a lighthearted chuckle, our inquiry ventures beyond the realm of whimsy into the empirically grounded terrain of data analysis and statistical inquiry. The allure of delving into this unorthodox association lies in the prospect of unraveling an unexpected thread woven into the intricate tapestry of academic remuneration.
Our study draws from a fusion of disparate data sources, amalgamating information from the US Social Security Administration - a repository of nomenclatural trends - and the National Center for Education Statistics, a bastion of educational and employment metrics. Through this marriage of data sets, we embark on a statistical odyssey spanning over a decade, scrutinizing the period from 2009 to 2021 with an unwavering commitment to precision and rigor.
The nexus between the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors emerges as an intriguing anomaly, eliciting a healthy dose of skepticism and intrigue. Our initial analyses hint at a compelling correlation, with a correlation coefficient that beckons attention and a p-value that piques scientific curiosity.
As we navigate this labyrinth of empirical inquiry and wry amusement, our aim is twofold: to shed light on the peculiar partnership between nomenclature and professional compensation, and, perhaps more subtly, to inject a dose of levity into the often austere domain of academic research. In melding the whimsical with the weighty, this study endeavors to unravel the Dalvin dilemma - a name intertwined with a clandestine influence on the financial destinies of Associate Professors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.'s Investigation of Name-based Salary Disparities," the authors find a dearth of scholarly attention devoted to the curious correlation between first names and academic remuneration, paving the way for our present inquiry. This absence of rigorous examination is puzzling, given the potential ramifications for equitable compensation within the academic sphere. Expanding on this theme, Doe and Jones, in "The Naming Game: Unearthing the Cryptic Links Between Moniker and Money," further underscore the lacuna in academic discourse regarding the nuanced impact of nomenclature on professional salaries.

Venturing beyond the confines of academia, "The Tyranny of Names" by John Smith dissects the societal significance of names, offering a comprehensive exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions that underpin our choices in nomenclature. On a more whimsical note, Terry Doe's "The Name Effect: How Your Name Determines Your Destiny" delves into the curious notion of nominative determinism, positing that one's name might inexorably shape their professional trajectory.

Turning to fiction, the evocative title "Dalvin's Dilemma" by Anna Jones invites readers into a world where the eponymous protagonist grapples with academic aspirations and cryptic patterns associated with his peers' names. In a similar vein, "The Naming Conspiracy" by William Smith interweaves themes of intrigue and nomenclatural mystique, drawing unexpected parallels between character names and their professional fortunes.

In the digital realm, social media posts have yielded captivating insights, with one particularly lively discussion on Twitter, "#NameGate: Unmasking the Secret Society of Dalvins," sparking spirited debates on the clandestine influence of specific names on career trajectories. The proliferation of such informal commentary underscores the pervasive curiosity surrounding the intersection of names and professional success, signifying a burgeoning interest in this unconventional subject matter.

As we synthesize these diverse sources of insight, we are beckoned into a captivating odyssey of nomenclatural intrigue and academic allure, where the idiosyncrasies of names intertwine with the weighty implications for professional prosperity. Armed with a blend of empirical rigor and a dash of levity, our exploration of the Dalvin dilemma promises to unravel the enigmatic connections between nomenclature and the financial destinies of Associate Professors, offering a lighthearted yet compelling foray into the annals of academic peculiarity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
With each passing year, the landscape of academia undergoes its own metamorphosis, shaped not only by scholarly pursuits but also by the peculiar nuances of human behavior. Curiously, one such facet of academic life that has received scant attention is the influence of first names on the salaries of Associate Professors. In our foray into this uncharted territory, we home in on the enigmatic conundrum surrounding the first name "Dalvin" and its potential impact on the financial fortunes of teaching scholars in the United States.
While initial contemplation of this topic may evoke a lighthearted chuckle, our inquiry ventures beyond the realm of whimsy into the empirically grounded terrain of data analysis and statistical inquiry. The allure of delving into this unorthodox association lies in the prospect of unraveling an unexpected thread woven into the intricate tapestry of academic remuneration.
Our study draws from a fusion of disparate data sources, amalgamating information from the US Social Security Administration - a repository of nomenclatural trends - and the National Center for Education Statistics, a bastion of educational and employment metrics. Through this marriage of data sets, we embark on a statistical odyssey spanning over a decade, scrutinizing the period from 2009 to 2021 with an unwavering commitment to precision and rigor.
The nexus between the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors emerges as an intriguing anomaly, eliciting a healthy dose of skepticism and intrigue. Our initial analyses hint at a compelling correlation, with a correlation coefficient that beckons attention and a p-value that piques scientific curiosity.
As we navigate this labyrinth of empirical inquiry and wry amusement, our aim is twofold: to shed light on the peculiar partnership between nomenclature and professional compensation, and, perhaps more subtly, to inject a dose of levity into the often austere domain of academic research. In melding the whimsical with the weighty, this study endeavors to unravel the Dalvin dilemma - a name intertwined with a clandestine influence on the financial destinies of Associate Professors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the correlation between the frequency of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States, our research employed a multidimensional approach, blending data mining, statistical analysis, and a dash of whimsy in equal measure. The first step in our convoluted yet exhilarating methodological journey involved accessing the treasure trove of nomenclatural records maintained by the US Social Security Administration and cross-referencing it with the troves of academic employment data curated by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Our data collection process was akin to combing through a vast library, curling up with colossal spreadsheets and sifting through the digital leaves of endless databases. We meticulously extracted information on the frequency of the name "Dalvin" and the respective salaries of Associate Professors across the expanse of the United States, embracing the digital odyssey with equal parts dedication and digital prowess.

Next, armed with our compendium of data, we unleashed the formidable arsenal of statistical tools upon our treasure trove. Utilizing advanced statistical software and programming wizardry, we meticulously calculated correlation coefficients and p-values, unraveling the clandestine rapport between the moniker "Dalvin" and the fiscal fortunes of Associate Professors.

Furthermore, to ensure the utmost rigor and precision, we embarked on a series of robust sensitivity analyses, exploring the veracity of our findings under various statistical lenses. This multifaceted approach allowed us to traverse the tangled thickets of data and emerge with a nuanced understanding of the enigmatic interplay between nomenclature and remuneration.

In the grand tradition of academic inquiry, our thorough methodology married precision with an equitably generous sprinkling of whimsy, providing a delightful balance between statistical exactitude and the joyous pursuit of unraveling the curious quilt of "Dalvin" and its potential sway over academic salaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8138104, r-squared of 0.6622874, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
With each passing year, the landscape of academia undergoes its own metamorphosis, shaped not only by scholarly pursuits but also by the peculiar nuances of human behavior. Curiously, one such facet of academic life that has received scant attention is the influence of first names on the salaries of Associate Professors. In our foray into this uncharted territory, we home in on the enigmatic conundrum surrounding the first name "Dalvin" and its potential impact on the financial fortunes of teaching scholars in the United States.
While initial contemplation of this topic may evoke a lighthearted chuckle, our inquiry ventures beyond the realm of whimsy into the empirically grounded terrain of data analysis and statistical inquiry. The allure of delving into this unorthodox association lies in the prospect of unraveling an unexpected thread woven into the intricate tapestry of academic remuneration.
Our study draws from a fusion of disparate data sources, amalgamating information from the US Social Security Administration - a repository of nomenclatural trends - and the National Center for Education Statistics, a bastion of educational and employment metrics. Through this marriage of data sets, we embark on a statistical odyssey spanning over a decade, scrutinizing the period from 2009 to 2021 with an unwavering commitment to precision and rigor.
The nexus between the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors emerges as an intriguing anomaly, eliciting a healthy dose of skepticism and intrigue. Our initial analyses hint at a compelling correlation, with a correlation coefficient that beckons attention and a p-value that piques scientific curiosity.
As we navigate this labyrinth of empirical inquiry and wry amusement, our aim is twofold: to shed light on the peculiar partnership between nomenclature and professional compensation, and, perhaps more subtly, to inject a dose of levity into the often austere domain of academic research. In melding the whimsical with the weighty, this study endeavors to unravel the Dalvin dilemma - a name intertwined with a clandestine influence on the financial destinies of Associate Professors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon meticulously analyzing the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics for the period of 2009 to 2021, a compelling association between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the remuneration of Associate Professors in the United States was unveiled. The correlation coefficient of 0.8138104, with an r-squared value of 0.6622874, and a p-value less than 0.01, underpinned a statistically significant relationship between the two variables.

The relationship between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors is vividly depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot graph that artistically captures the robust correlation between these seemingly divergent phenomena.

While some may find it preposterous to draw a connection between a first name and academic salaries, our findings resolutely attest to the contrary. The compelling statistical evidence elucidates a parallel trajectory between the prevalence of the moniker "Dalvin" and the financial prosperity of Associate Professors, establishing an unanticipated linkage that transcends traditional notions of nomenclature neutrality.

It is worth noting that the statistical significance of this relationship surpasses mere coincidence, compelling one to ponder the enigmatic forces at play in the academic ecosystem. The juxtaposition of the whimsical nature of first names with the weighty matter of professional compensation prompts a reevaluation of the underappreciated influence of nomenclature on the economics of academia.

In unveiling this peculiar correlation, we impart a lighthearted yet profound inquiry into the intricate interplay of societal naming tendencies and the fiscal status of the scholarly cohort. Our results not only spark curiosity but also usher in a renewed appreciation for the quirky intricacies that underpin the dynamics of academic life.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.'s Investigation of Name-based Salary Disparities," the authors find a dearth of scholarly attention devoted to the curious correlation between first names and academic remuneration, paving the way for our present inquiry. This absence of rigorous examination is puzzling, given the potential ramifications for equitable compensation within the academic sphere. Expanding on this theme, Doe and Jones, in "The Naming Game: Unearthing the Cryptic Links Between Moniker and Money," further underscore the lacuna in academic discourse regarding the nuanced impact of nomenclature on professional salaries.
Venturing beyond the confines of academia, "The Tyranny of Names" by John Smith dissects the societal significance of names, offering a comprehensive exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions that underpin our choices in nomenclature. On a more whimsical note, Terry Doe's "The Name Effect: How Your Name Determines Your Destiny" delves into the curious notion of nominative determinism, positing that one's name might inexorably shape their professional trajectory.
Turning to fiction, the evocative title "Dalvin's Dilemma" by Anna Jones invites readers into a world where the eponymous protagonist grapples with academic aspirations and cryptic patterns associated with his peers' names. In a similar vein, "The Naming Conspiracy" by William Smith interweaves themes of intrigue and nomenclatural mystique, drawing unexpected parallels between character names and their professional fortunes.
In the digital realm, social media posts have yielded captivating insights, with one particularly lively discussion on Twitter, "#NameGate: Unmasking the Secret Society of Dalvins," sparking spirited debates on the clandestine influence of specific names on career trajectories. The proliferation of such informal commentary underscores the pervasive curiosity surrounding the intersection of names and professional success, signifying a burgeoning interest in this unconventional subject matter.
As we synthesize these diverse sources of insight, we are beckoned into a captivating odyssey of nomenclatural intrigue and academic allure, where the idiosyncrasies of names intertwine with the weighty implications for professional prosperity. Armed with a blend of empirical rigor and a dash of levity, our exploration of the Dalvin dilemma promises to unravel the enigmatic connections between nomenclature and the financial destinies of Associate Professors, offering a lighthearted yet compelling foray into the annals of academic peculiarity.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon meticulously analyzing the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics for the period of 2009 to 2021, a compelling association between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the remuneration of Associate Professors in the United States was unveiled. The correlation coefficient of 0.8138104, with an r-squared value of 0.6622874, and a p-value less than 0.01, underpinned a statistically significant relationship between the two variables.
The relationship between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors is vividly depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot graph that artistically captures the robust correlation between these seemingly divergent phenomena.
While some may find it preposterous to draw a connection between a first name and academic salaries, our findings resolutely attest to the contrary. The compelling statistical evidence elucidates a parallel trajectory between the prevalence of the moniker "Dalvin" and the financial prosperity of Associate Professors, establishing an unanticipated linkage that transcends traditional notions of nomenclature neutrality.
It is worth noting that the statistical significance of this relationship surpasses mere coincidence, compelling one to ponder the enigmatic forces at play in the academic ecosystem. The juxtaposition of the whimsical nature of first names with the weighty matter of professional compensation prompts a reevaluation of the underappreciated influence of nomenclature on the economics of academia.
In unveiling this peculiar correlation, we impart a lighthearted yet profound inquiry into the intricate interplay of societal naming tendencies and the fiscal status of the scholarly cohort. Our results not only spark curiosity but also usher in a renewed appreciation for the quirky intricacies that underpin the dynamics of academic life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected revelation of a discernible correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors presents a quizzical, albeit thought-provoking juncture in the realm of academic inquiry. While it may seem whimsical to consider the impact of nomenclature on professional remuneration, our findings align with prior works on the topic and lend credence to the notion that names might wield surreptitious influence over career trajectories.

Delving into the literature on name-based salary disparities, we encountered the peculiar absence of comprehensive examinations into the intricate intertwinement of monikers and money. Smith et al.'s seminal work highlighted this scholarly oversight, laying the groundwork for our own empirical exploration, while Doe and Jones further underscored the pressing need for concerted research in this terrain. Despite the initial levity invoked by the notion of the so-called "naming game," the literature consistently nudges us to recognize the implicit impact of names on professional fortunes, urging a reappraisal of their purportedly trivial role.

Our empirical analysis aligns with this scholarly exhortation, revealing a marked correlation coefficient and p-value that surpass conventional thresholds for statistical significance. Drawing a parallel to the findings of Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, our results substantiate the intricate interplay between nomenclature and professional compensation, casting a quixotic spotlight on the clandestine forces at play within the academic ecosystem. The whimsical notion of nominative determinism, often relegated to the annals of jest, assumes an unexpected foothold in the empirical landscape, urging us to contemplate the disquieting yet intriguing potential of names to shape destinies.

In acknowledging the robust association between the prevalence of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors, we invite a reconsideration of the hitherto overlooked influence of nomenclature on the economics of academia. Our findings underscore the need to transcend traditional conceptions of nomenclature as inconsequential labels, compelling a contemplation of the multifaceted impact of names on the professional sphere.

In paving the path for future inquiries, our investigation not only imparts a lighthearted yet profound inquiry into the intricate interplay of societal naming tendencies and the fiscal status of the scholarly cohort but also instigates a renewed appreciation for the whimsical intricacies that underpin the dynamics of academic life. As we navigate this unconventional terrain, our research also beckons further scrutiny into other names and their potentially surreptitious influences, thereby unfurling an expansive canvas of comedic yet compelling scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dalvin and Associate Professor salaries in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.

Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.

As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
With each passing year, the landscape of academia undergoes its own metamorphosis, shaped not only by scholarly pursuits but also by the peculiar nuances of human behavior. Curiously, one such facet of academic life that has received scant attention is the influence of first names on the salaries of Associate Professors. In our foray into this uncharted territory, we home in on the enigmatic conundrum surrounding the first name "Dalvin" and its potential impact on the financial fortunes of teaching scholars in the United States.
While initial contemplation of this topic may evoke a lighthearted chuckle, our inquiry ventures beyond the realm of whimsy into the empirically grounded terrain of data analysis and statistical inquiry. The allure of delving into this unorthodox association lies in the prospect of unraveling an unexpected thread woven into the intricate tapestry of academic remuneration.
Our study draws from a fusion of disparate data sources, amalgamating information from the US Social Security Administration - a repository of nomenclatural trends - and the National Center for Education Statistics, a bastion of educational and employment metrics. Through this marriage of data sets, we embark on a statistical odyssey spanning over a decade, scrutinizing the period from 2009 to 2021 with an unwavering commitment to precision and rigor.
The nexus between the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors emerges as an intriguing anomaly, eliciting a healthy dose of skepticism and intrigue. Our initial analyses hint at a compelling correlation, with a correlation coefficient that beckons attention and a p-value that piques scientific curiosity.
As we navigate this labyrinth of empirical inquiry and wry amusement, our aim is twofold: to shed light on the peculiar partnership between nomenclature and professional compensation, and, perhaps more subtly, to inject a dose of levity into the often austere domain of academic research. In melding the whimsical with the weighty, this study endeavors to unravel the Dalvin dilemma - a name intertwined with a clandestine influence on the financial destinies of Associate Professors.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon meticulously analyzing the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics for the period of 2009 to 2021, a compelling association between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the remuneration of Associate Professors in the United States was unveiled. The correlation coefficient of 0.8138104, with an r-squared value of 0.6622874, and a p-value less than 0.01, underpinned a statistically significant relationship between the two variables.
The relationship between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors is vividly depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot graph that artistically captures the robust correlation between these seemingly divergent phenomena.
While some may find it preposterous to draw a connection between a first name and academic salaries, our findings resolutely attest to the contrary. The compelling statistical evidence elucidates a parallel trajectory between the prevalence of the moniker "Dalvin" and the financial prosperity of Associate Professors, establishing an unanticipated linkage that transcends traditional notions of nomenclature neutrality.
It is worth noting that the statistical significance of this relationship surpasses mere coincidence, compelling one to ponder the enigmatic forces at play in the academic ecosystem. The juxtaposition of the whimsical nature of first names with the weighty matter of professional compensation prompts a reevaluation of the underappreciated influence of nomenclature on the economics of academia.
In unveiling this peculiar correlation, we impart a lighthearted yet profound inquiry into the intricate interplay of societal naming tendencies and the fiscal status of the scholarly cohort. Our results not only spark curiosity but also usher in a renewed appreciation for the quirky intricacies that underpin the dynamics of academic life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has brought to the forefront an unexpected and thought-provoking correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the seemingly whimsical nature of this inquiry may evoke a whimsical chuckle, the robust statistical evidence we have presented demands earnest consideration.

Our findings illustrate a compelling association, with a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes and a p-value that beckons further reflection. The notion that a name could hold sway over academic remuneration may seem like a flight of fancy, but our data paints a different picture.

Amidst the rigors of statistical analysis and the allure of empirical exploration, the steadfast intertwining of "Dalvin" with professional compensation emerges as a quirky yet undeniable phenomenon. As we ponder this curious juxtaposition, we are reminded that the tapestry of academic life teems with enigmatic threads waiting to be unraveled.

Yet, as we draw the curtains on this peculiar research endeavor, we must acknowledge the gravity of our findings. The Dalvin dilemma, once shrouded in whimsy, now stands as a testament to the serendipitous coalescence of nomenclature and monetary matters in academia.

In light of these revelatory findings, it is evident that no further research into this area is needed. The Dalvin dilemma stands as a capstone in the annals of playful yet scholarly inquiry, casting a jovial light on the unsuspected influence of first names on the academic realm.

All puns about "association" and "correlation" aside, the convoluted dance of data has led us to a delightful discovery that will surely leave a lasting mark on the intersection of statistics and nomenclature. So, let us bid adieu to the Dalvin dilemma, secure in the knowledge that its enigmatic allure has been both uncovered and, perhaps, appropriately, "named."

No further study is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Socioeconomic Naming Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eccentric Anthropological Research and Studies (SEARS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Dalvin Dilemma: Pinpointing the Penchant for Popular Names and Professorial Paychecks with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Dalvin" and the salaries of Associate Professors in the United States. While the topic may seem whimsical at first glance, our findings uncover a statistically significant relationship that raises eyebrows and prompts a closer look at the impact of nomenclature on academic remuneration.
Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we meticulously examined the period spanning 2009 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8138104 with a p-value less than 0.01, suggesting a robust association between the popularity of the name "Dalvin" and the financial standing of Associate Professors.
As we unravel this quirky connection, we illuminate the curious interplay between societal naming trends and professional compensation, shedding light on a hitherto overlooked facet of academic life. Amid the sea of data and statistical significance, this research presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking inquiry into the curious case of "Dalvin" and its clandestine influence on professorial paychecks.

ChatGPT:

Dalvin, popular names, academic salaries, Associate Professors, United States, US Social Security Administration, National Center for Education Statistics, naming trends, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, academic compensation, societal influence of names, academic paychecks

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Dalvin
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Dalvin
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Dalvin

Associate Professor salaries in the US
Detailed data title: Average salary of full-time instructional faculty on 9-month contracts in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by academic rank of Associate Professor
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associate Professor salaries in the US

Correlation r = 0.8138104 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6622874 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Associate Professor salaries in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Dalvin) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00071. 0.0007113312451988336000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.071% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,406 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Dalvin (Babies born)16151519101623222124221911
Associate Professor salaries in the US (Salary)96455958099440893901944549572897231979129789797811985099678092222




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16,15,15,19,10,16,23,22,21,24,22,19,11,])
array_2 = np.array([96455,95809,94408,93901,94454,95728,97231,97912,97897,97811,98509,96780,92222,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Dalvin"
array_2_name = "Associate Professor salaries in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2650 · Black Variable ID: 4250 · Red Variable ID: 1202
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0