Report an error
UFO sightings in Ohio correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Kenzie | r=0.92 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Annabelle | r=0.91 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Camden | r=0.91 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Avery | r=0.88 | 47yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador | r=0.88 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.87 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Yemen | r=0.87 | 42yrs | Yes! |
The price of gold | r=0.8 | 40yrs | No |
Google searches for 'minecraft' | r=0.8 | 12yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.8 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by Honda | r=0.75 | 47yrs | No |
UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.72 | 47yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.69 | 47yrs | No |
Number of highschoolers in the US | r=0.67 | 32yrs | No |
Formula One World Drivers' Champion's Point Margin | r=0.58 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)