about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,924 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Snowfall in Chicago.  The chart goes from 2016 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the snow piles up, so does our understanding of history, thanks to these chill-inducing video titles. It's like each flake brings a new perspective, coating our brains in a fresh layer of knowledge. Clearing the way for some seriously enlightening content, this winter wonderland is definitely not flaking out when it comes to sparking curiosity. So, grab a blanket, cozy up, and get ready to have your mind snowverhauled with these insightful Oversimplified video titles. Remember, when it comes to learning, the forecast calls for a blizzard of brilliance! Stay toasty, stay curious, and let it snow, let it Oversimplify!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Snowfall in Chicago: Enhanced Realism ] Generate an image of a serene, snow-covered street in Chicago during a snowfall. The city skyline should be visible in the distance, outlined against the wintery sky. In a cozy window, depict a computer screen displaying a series of glowing, insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles. Each title should shimmer softly, as if illuminated by individual snowflakes. The snowflakes should appear to cascade gently down the window, creating a blizzard of brilliance as they highlight different layers of historical insight within the titles. The overall scene should exude a sense of tranquility and intellectual wonder. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Concept art Parallax art Vaporwave Realistic
ChatGPT: Snowfall in Chicago: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago, in the following situation: As the snow piles up, so does our understanding of history, thanks to these chill-inducing video titles. It's like each flake brings a new perspective, coating our brains in a fresh layer of knowledge. Clearing the way for some seriously enlightening content, this winter wonderland is definitely not flaking out when it comes to sparking curiosity. So, grab a blanket, cozy up, and get ready to have your mind snowverhauled with these insightful Oversimplified video titles. Remember, when it comes to learning, the forecast calls for a blizzard of brilliance! Stay toasty, stay curious, and let it snow, let it Oversimplify!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a tranquil, snow-covered street in Chicago, with the city skyline in the background. Amidst the winter wonderland, a computer screen is visible through a cozy window, displaying a series of brilliant and insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles. The titles shimmer softly, as each snowflake seems to illuminate a new layer of historical insight, creating a blizzard of brilliance.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Snowfall in Chicago: Realistic ] and depicting this scene: Picture a tranquil, snow-covered street in Chicago, with the city skyline in the background. Amidst the winter wonderland, a computer screen is visible through a cozy window, displaying a series of brilliant and insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles. The titles shimmer softly, as each snowflake seems to illuminate a new layer of historical insight, creating a blizzard of brilliance. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Snowfall in Chicago: Enhanced Realism ] Generate an image of a serene, snow-covered street in Chicago during a snowfall. The city skyline should be visible in the distance, outlined against the wintery sky. In a cozy window, depict a computer screen displaying a series of glowing, insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles. Each title should shimmer softly, as if illuminated by individual snowflakes. The snowflakes should appear to cascade gently down the window, creating a blizzard of brilliance as they highlight different layers of historical insight within the titles. The overall scene should exude a sense of tranquility and intellectual wonder.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are caused Snowfall in Chicago to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago

The Journal of Pseudoscientific Snow Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01 for 2016 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The mesmerizing dance of snowflakes as they gracefully descend upon the bustling city of Chicago has long captivated both residents and meteorologists alike. The intricate relationship between atmospheric conditions and snowfall has been the subject of extensive scientific inquiry, but the influence of seemingly unrelated factors such as YouTube video titles has remained an enigma. This study sets out to unravel this snow-stifying mystery and shed light on the chilling connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in the city of broad shoulders.

As we embark on this frosty foray, it is essential to acknowledge the seemingly non sequitur nature of our research theme. One may wonder, "What do OverSimplified YouTube video titles have to do with the winter whims of Chicago?" Our investigation, much like a well-crafted pun, aims to reveal the unexpected yet significant interplay between seemingly unrelated variables, demonstrating the intrinsic humor of statistical correlation.

"Did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average."

Through this study, we endeavor to provide empirical evidence that transcends mere statistical correlations and encapsulates the essence of the human experience. Just as a clever pun can illuminate a seemingly mundane conversation, our findings seek to inject insight and witticism into the world of empirical research.

Frosty statistical associations and whimsical wordplay aside, the objective of this investigation remains grounded in the rigorous principles of scientific inquiry. We aim to navigate the complexities of statistical analysis while also embracing the quirkiness of our chosen variables, walking the fine line between academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity.

With these guiding principles in mind, our study delves into the intricate interplay between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the snowfall patterns of Chicago, uncovering the frosty undercurrents that bind these unlikely bedfellows. So, without further ado, let us embark on this snow-covered statistical adventure that promises to both inform and entertain, much like a well-timed dad joke.

"Research on snow and YouTube titles may seem like a flaky endeavor, but with the right approach, we can uncover some snow-lid insights that are simply ice-tatic!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The mesmerizing dance of snowflakes as they gracefully descend upon the bustling city of Chicago has long captivated both residents and meteorologists alike. The intricate relationship between atmospheric conditions and snowfall has been the subject of extensive scientific inquiry, but the influence of seemingly unrelated factors such as YouTube video titles has remained an enigma. This study sets out to unravel this snow-stifying mystery and shed light on the chilling connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in the city of broad shoulders.
As we embark on this frosty foray, it is essential to acknowledge the seemingly non sequitur nature of our research theme. One may wonder, "What do OverSimplified YouTube video titles have to do with the winter whims of Chicago?" Our investigation, much like a well-crafted pun, aims to reveal the unexpected yet significant interplay between seemingly unrelated variables, demonstrating the intrinsic humor of statistical correlation.
"Did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average."
Through this study, we endeavor to provide empirical evidence that transcends mere statistical correlations and encapsulates the essence of the human experience. Just as a clever pun can illuminate a seemingly mundane conversation, our findings seek to inject insight and witticism into the world of empirical research.
Frosty statistical associations and whimsical wordplay aside, the objective of this investigation remains grounded in the rigorous principles of scientific inquiry. We aim to navigate the complexities of statistical analysis while also embracing the quirkiness of our chosen variables, walking the fine line between academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity.
With these guiding principles in mind, our study delves into the intricate interplay between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the snowfall patterns of Chicago, uncovering the frosty undercurrents that bind these unlikely bedfellows. So, without further ado, let us embark on this snow-covered statistical adventure that promises to both inform and entertain, much like a well-timed dad joke.
"Research on snow and YouTube titles may seem like a flaky endeavor, but with the right approach, we can uncover some snow-lid insights that are simply ice-tatic!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that insightful YouTube video titles have a measurable impact on viewer engagement and retention, indicating the potential influence of such titles on a variety of user behaviors. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" demonstrate the critical role of cognitive priming in shaping individuals' responses to external stimuli, underscoring the relevance of seemingly incongruent factors in the formulation of behavioral patterns.

Turning to an unlikely source of inspiration, "Snowfall Forecasting: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Weatherman Winters emphasizes the multifaceted nature of snowfall prediction, acknowledging the need to consider both traditional meteorological factors and unexpected variables. On a more lighthearted note, "The Snowy Secret: Unraveling the Mysteries of Winter" by Frosty McSnowface offers an unconventional perspective on the enigmatic relationship between seasonal phenomena and unconventional influencers, hinting at the intriguing connections that lie beneath the surface.

Shifting gears to the realm of fictional literature, "The Snow Queen" by Hans Christian Andersen and "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" by C.S. Lewis provide imaginative depictions of wintry landscapes, inviting readers to contemplate the fantastical aspects of snow-laden narratives. Despite their fictional nature, these timeless stories serve as a reminder of the enduring fascination with wintery settings and the captivating allure of unexpected plot twists.

In the realm of animated entertainment, "Frozen" and "The Simpsons" offer playful interpretations of wintery themes, incorporating humor and unexpected plot developments to engage audiences of all ages. Through their creative storytelling and whimsical portrayals of snowfall, these animated works underscore the broader cultural fascination with wintry motifs and the potential for unlikely elements to shape narrative arcs.

With these diverse sources as backdrop, our research endeavors to enrich the scholarly discourse by unraveling the intricate connection between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Chicago. By embracing the unexpected and infusing humor into empirical investigation, our study aims to elevate the discourse while offering a snow-verload of entertainment along the way.

"Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center . You used data from 2016 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The mesmerizing dance of snowflakes as they gracefully descend upon the bustling city of Chicago has long captivated both residents and meteorologists alike. The intricate relationship between atmospheric conditions and snowfall has been the subject of extensive scientific inquiry, but the influence of seemingly unrelated factors such as YouTube video titles has remained an enigma. This study sets out to unravel this snow-stifying mystery and shed light on the chilling connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in the city of broad shoulders.
As we embark on this frosty foray, it is essential to acknowledge the seemingly non sequitur nature of our research theme. One may wonder, "What do OverSimplified YouTube video titles have to do with the winter whims of Chicago?" Our investigation, much like a well-crafted pun, aims to reveal the unexpected yet significant interplay between seemingly unrelated variables, demonstrating the intrinsic humor of statistical correlation.
"Did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average."
Through this study, we endeavor to provide empirical evidence that transcends mere statistical correlations and encapsulates the essence of the human experience. Just as a clever pun can illuminate a seemingly mundane conversation, our findings seek to inject insight and witticism into the world of empirical research.
Frosty statistical associations and whimsical wordplay aside, the objective of this investigation remains grounded in the rigorous principles of scientific inquiry. We aim to navigate the complexities of statistical analysis while also embracing the quirkiness of our chosen variables, walking the fine line between academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity.
With these guiding principles in mind, our study delves into the intricate interplay between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the snowfall patterns of Chicago, uncovering the frosty undercurrents that bind these unlikely bedfellows. So, without further ado, let us embark on this snow-covered statistical adventure that promises to both inform and entertain, much like a well-timed dad joke.
"Research on snow and YouTube titles may seem like a flaky endeavor, but with the right approach, we can uncover some snow-lid insights that are simply ice-tatic!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the tantalizing nexus between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago, our research team relied on a combination of cutting-edge AI analysis and good old-fashioned statistical grunt work. This hodgepodge of high-tech wizardry and number-crunching prowess formed the bedrock of our methodological escapade, akin to a mad scientist donning a lab coat embroidered with punchlines.

Harnessing the power of AI, we deployed a sophisticated program to scrape and scrutinize thousands of OverSimplified video titles, teasing out the nuanced insights and thought-provoking summaries encapsulated within. Much like a detective solving a cerebral riddle, our AI tool sifted through an avalanche of video titles to extract the essence of wit and wisdom, plucking out potential correlations like cherries on a statistical sundae.

To capture the frosty flipside of our investigation, we turned to the formidable data repository of the NOAA National Climate Data Center. Here, we gathered snowfall data for the city of Chicago from 2016 to 2022, immersing ourselves in a blizzard of meteorological records and numerical flurries. Armed with this treasure trove of climatological data, we proceeded to conduct a symphony of statistical analyses, transforming raw data into the dulcet tones of statistical significance.

"Did you hear about the snowman who had a meltdown during the statistical analysis? He couldn't handle the heat of the T-test!"

With our dataset primed and our AI insights at the ready, we embarked on a harmonious dance between numerical precision and algorithmic intuition, much like a waltz where the music is replaced by the rhythmic hum of data processing. Our first step was to perform a series of correlation analyses, where we probed the interplay between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the capricious snowfall patterns in the city of Chicago. This analytical tango led us to the discovery of a correlation coefficient that stood as tall and formidable as the Sears Tower, firmly establishing the strength of the relationship between our variables.

But we didn't stop at mere correlation; oh no, we delved deeper into the statistical toolbox, employing regressions to unravel the complex strands of causality woven within our dataset. By teasing apart the influence of OverSimplified video titles on snowfall patterns, we unfurled a narrative as captivating as a frost-laden fairy tale, illuminating the underlying dynamics with the precision of a laser-guided snow blower.

"Statistics may seem like a dry subject, but our regression analysis added the perfect amount of 'flaky' intrigue to the mix!"

In addition to these analytic exploits, we also indulged in a series of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure that our findings were as sturdy as a snow fort in a blizzard. Sensitivity to snow jokes aside, these methodological safeguards allowed us to traverse the frozen landscape of statistical validation with confidence, ensuring that our conclusions withstood the gusts of skepticism and remained as steadfast as a snowbound pine tree.

With our methodological odyssey complete, we emerged from the statistical storm with a trove of empirical evidence and a newfound appreciation for the serendipitous connections that weave through the fabric of our world. Our journey, much like a well-crafted dad joke, merged the realms of inquiry and amusement, illuminating the cold yet captivating contours of statistical investigation with a wry smile and a hearty chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center .

For the time period 2016 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9718254, r-squared of 0.9444447, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The mesmerizing dance of snowflakes as they gracefully descend upon the bustling city of Chicago has long captivated both residents and meteorologists alike. The intricate relationship between atmospheric conditions and snowfall has been the subject of extensive scientific inquiry, but the influence of seemingly unrelated factors such as YouTube video titles has remained an enigma. This study sets out to unravel this snow-stifying mystery and shed light on the chilling connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in the city of broad shoulders.
As we embark on this frosty foray, it is essential to acknowledge the seemingly non sequitur nature of our research theme. One may wonder, "What do OverSimplified YouTube video titles have to do with the winter whims of Chicago?" Our investigation, much like a well-crafted pun, aims to reveal the unexpected yet significant interplay between seemingly unrelated variables, demonstrating the intrinsic humor of statistical correlation.
"Did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average."
Through this study, we endeavor to provide empirical evidence that transcends mere statistical correlations and encapsulates the essence of the human experience. Just as a clever pun can illuminate a seemingly mundane conversation, our findings seek to inject insight and witticism into the world of empirical research.
Frosty statistical associations and whimsical wordplay aside, the objective of this investigation remains grounded in the rigorous principles of scientific inquiry. We aim to navigate the complexities of statistical analysis while also embracing the quirkiness of our chosen variables, walking the fine line between academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity.
With these guiding principles in mind, our study delves into the intricate interplay between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the snowfall patterns of Chicago, uncovering the frosty undercurrents that bind these unlikely bedfellows. So, without further ado, let us embark on this snow-covered statistical adventure that promises to both inform and entertain, much like a well-timed dad joke.
"Research on snow and YouTube titles may seem like a flaky endeavor, but with the right approach, we can uncover some snow-lid insights that are simply ice-tatic!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In examining the relationship between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago from 2016 to 2022, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9718254, indicating a substantial linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding demonstrates a near-perfect positive linear association that is bound to make even the most seasoned researchers snow-mewhat excited!

Not content with merely showcasing a strong correlation, our analysis yielded an r-squared value of 0.9444447, indicative of the explanatory power of OverSimplified YouTube video titles in predicting snowfall patterns in the city that works.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, further reinforcing the statistical significance of our findings and solidifying the frosty connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and Chicago's snowfall. It's safe to say that our results snowballed into something truly snow-vellous!

Fig. 1 is a scatterplot demonstrating the robust correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago. The visualization showcases the striking linear relationship between the variables, leaving little room for doubt about the chilling influence of OverSimplified YouTube video titles on the snowfall patterns in the city, much like a well-timed dad joke leaves little room for doubt about its comedic impact.

"Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that insightful YouTube video titles have a measurable impact on viewer engagement and retention, indicating the potential influence of such titles on a variety of user behaviors. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" demonstrate the critical role of cognitive priming in shaping individuals' responses to external stimuli, underscoring the relevance of seemingly incongruent factors in the formulation of behavioral patterns.
Turning to an unlikely source of inspiration, "Snowfall Forecasting: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Weatherman Winters emphasizes the multifaceted nature of snowfall prediction, acknowledging the need to consider both traditional meteorological factors and unexpected variables. On a more lighthearted note, "The Snowy Secret: Unraveling the Mysteries of Winter" by Frosty McSnowface offers an unconventional perspective on the enigmatic relationship between seasonal phenomena and unconventional influencers, hinting at the intriguing connections that lie beneath the surface.
Shifting gears to the realm of fictional literature, "The Snow Queen" by Hans Christian Andersen and "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" by C.S. Lewis provide imaginative depictions of wintry landscapes, inviting readers to contemplate the fantastical aspects of snow-laden narratives. Despite their fictional nature, these timeless stories serve as a reminder of the enduring fascination with wintery settings and the captivating allure of unexpected plot twists.
In the realm of animated entertainment, "Frozen" and "The Simpsons" offer playful interpretations of wintery themes, incorporating humor and unexpected plot developments to engage audiences of all ages. Through their creative storytelling and whimsical portrayals of snowfall, these animated works underscore the broader cultural fascination with wintry motifs and the potential for unlikely elements to shape narrative arcs.
With these diverse sources as backdrop, our research endeavors to enrich the scholarly discourse by unraveling the intricate connection between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Chicago. By embracing the unexpected and infusing humor into empirical investigation, our study aims to elevate the discourse while offering a snow-verload of entertainment along the way.
"Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!"

[[RESULTS]]
In examining the relationship between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago from 2016 to 2022, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9718254, indicating a substantial linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding demonstrates a near-perfect positive linear association that is bound to make even the most seasoned researchers snow-mewhat excited!
Not content with merely showcasing a strong correlation, our analysis yielded an r-squared value of 0.9444447, indicative of the explanatory power of OverSimplified YouTube video titles in predicting snowfall patterns in the city that works.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, further reinforcing the statistical significance of our findings and solidifying the frosty connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and Chicago's snowfall. It's safe to say that our results snowballed into something truly snow-vellous!
Fig. 1 is a scatterplot demonstrating the robust correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago. The visualization showcases the striking linear relationship between the variables, leaving little room for doubt about the chilling influence of OverSimplified YouTube video titles on the snowfall patterns in the city, much like a well-timed dad joke leaves little room for doubt about its comedic impact.
"Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value in our analysis unequivocally support the chilling influence of OverSimplified YouTube video titles on snowfall in Chicago. Our findings align with prior research by Smith et al., highlighting the profound impact of insightful video titles on viewer engagement. This underscores the snow-stounding potential of seemingly innocuous elements in influencing not only online behaviors but also real-world phenomena, such as snowfall patterns.

The remarkable strength of the association uncovered in our study emphasizes the snow-achingly clear relationship between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago. It seems that the more insightful the video title, the more likely it is to precipitate notable snowfall, much like a well-designed experiment is likely to yield snow-gnificant results. These findings echo the work of Doe and Jones, illustrating the role of cognitive priming in shaping responses to external stimuli, lending further snow-pport to the notion that unexpected variables, even in the form of YouTube titles, can exert a significant influence on outcomes.

Our results also snow-confirm the multifaceted nature of snowfall prediction, as advanced by Weatherman Winters. The unexpected connection between YouTube video titles and snowfall adds a frosty layer of complexity to the existing understanding of meteorological factors, reminding us that predictions should embrace the unexpected, just like a sudden blizzard amidst a clear forecast. Furthermore, the present study offers a snow-teworthy correlation that aligns with the unconventional perspectives of Frosty McSnowface, revealing the intricate web of connections underlying seemingly unrelated variables.

With the r-squared value snow-bolstering the explanatory power of OverSimplified YouTube video titles in predicting snowfall, it's evident that these titles may not just inform and entertain but also hold a chilly sway over meteorological phenomena. This unexpected yet compelling influence parallels the surprise twists in "The Snow Queen" and "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe," emphasizing the snow-nique and captivating nature of the relationship between video titles and snowfall.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles on snowfall in Chicago, demonstrating the snow-citing potential for unlikely variables to shape real-world outcomes. As researchers continue to explore the unexpected connections underlying diverse phenomena, it's essential to embrace the snow-stalgia of unpredictable relationships and the potential for playful elements, much like a well-timed dad joke, to snow-prise and delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Chicago. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.

It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.

"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The mesmerizing dance of snowflakes as they gracefully descend upon the bustling city of Chicago has long captivated both residents and meteorologists alike. The intricate relationship between atmospheric conditions and snowfall has been the subject of extensive scientific inquiry, but the influence of seemingly unrelated factors such as YouTube video titles has remained an enigma. This study sets out to unravel this snow-stifying mystery and shed light on the chilling connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in the city of broad shoulders.
As we embark on this frosty foray, it is essential to acknowledge the seemingly non sequitur nature of our research theme. One may wonder, "What do OverSimplified YouTube video titles have to do with the winter whims of Chicago?" Our investigation, much like a well-crafted pun, aims to reveal the unexpected yet significant interplay between seemingly unrelated variables, demonstrating the intrinsic humor of statistical correlation.
"Did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average."
Through this study, we endeavor to provide empirical evidence that transcends mere statistical correlations and encapsulates the essence of the human experience. Just as a clever pun can illuminate a seemingly mundane conversation, our findings seek to inject insight and witticism into the world of empirical research.
Frosty statistical associations and whimsical wordplay aside, the objective of this investigation remains grounded in the rigorous principles of scientific inquiry. We aim to navigate the complexities of statistical analysis while also embracing the quirkiness of our chosen variables, walking the fine line between academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity.
With these guiding principles in mind, our study delves into the intricate interplay between insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the snowfall patterns of Chicago, uncovering the frosty undercurrents that bind these unlikely bedfellows. So, without further ado, let us embark on this snow-covered statistical adventure that promises to both inform and entertain, much like a well-timed dad joke.
"Research on snow and YouTube titles may seem like a flaky endeavor, but with the right approach, we can uncover some snow-lid insights that are simply ice-tatic!"

[[RESULTS]]
In examining the relationship between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago from 2016 to 2022, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9718254, indicating a substantial linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding demonstrates a near-perfect positive linear association that is bound to make even the most seasoned researchers snow-mewhat excited!
Not content with merely showcasing a strong correlation, our analysis yielded an r-squared value of 0.9444447, indicative of the explanatory power of OverSimplified YouTube video titles in predicting snowfall patterns in the city that works.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, further reinforcing the statistical significance of our findings and solidifying the frosty connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and Chicago's snowfall. It's safe to say that our results snowballed into something truly snow-vellous!
Fig. 1 is a scatterplot demonstrating the robust correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in Chicago. The visualization showcases the striking linear relationship between the variables, leaving little room for doubt about the chilling influence of OverSimplified YouTube video titles on the snowfall patterns in the city, much like a well-timed dad joke leaves little room for doubt about its comedic impact.
"Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unearthed a snow-mazing connection between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and snowfall in the city of Chicago. The substantial correlation coefficient and p-value provide unequivocal evidence for the chilling influence of YouTube video titles on the winter wonderland that is Chicago. It's snow joke that the impact of seemingly unrelated factors can manifest in such a snow-nique manner!

Our findings highlight the snow-boggling nature of statistical relationships and accentuate the whimsical interplay between variables that might seem as incongruous as a sunbathing penguin - surprising, yet undeniably present. It's as if the statistical gods themselves orchestrated this snow-mewhat peculiar association for our amusement.

As we wrap up this frosty expedition, let's remember that a well-crafted statistical model is as satisfying as a perfectly timed dad joke - it illuminates the obscure and brings unexpected delight. However, just like a dad joke, there comes a time to stop and appreciate the empirical humor, recognizing that no more research is needed in this chilly, yet oddly entertaining, domain.

After all, as every good dad joke connoisseur knows, sometimes the best punchline is knowing when to stop. And on that note, we bid adieu to this captivating correlation, leaving it to dwell in the annals of statistically significant whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pseudoscientific Snow Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Wacky Weather Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled SnowWay! The Chilling Influence of OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles on Snowfall in Chicago with an abstract of This paper presents a groundbreaking exploration of the uncharted territory linking OverSimplified YouTube video titles with snowfall in the illustrious city of Chicago. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the NOAA National Climate Data Center, our research team delved into this cold case with unprecedented rigor.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718254 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between the insightful OverSimplified video titles and the unpredictable snowfall patterns in the Windy City.
It's evident that when it comes to snowfall in Chicago, the impact of OverSimplified YouTube video titles is not to be taken lightly. The data point to a snow-negligible relationship that snowballed into a remarkable statistical association, leaving researchers and viewers alike snow-boggled.
"Did you hear about the mathematician who's afraid of negative numbers? He'll stop at nothing to avoid them!

ChatGPT:

YouTube video titles, snowfall in Chicago, correlation coefficient, AI analysis, NOAA National Climate Data Center, OverSimplified video titles, snowfall patterns, statistical association, impact of YouTube titles, snowfall research, Chicago climate data, snowfall correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are

Snowfall in Chicago
Detailed data title: Total Annual Snowfall at CHICAGO MIDWAY AIRPORT 3 SW, IL US
Source: NOAA National Climate Data Center
See what else correlates with Snowfall in Chicago

Correlation r = 0.9718254 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9444447 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Snowfall in Chicago) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are) over the 7 years from 2016 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00025. 0.0002520635176843712400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.025% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,967 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2016201720182019202020212022
How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are (Insightful score (out of 10))7.56.758.58.16677.66678.66678.5
Snowfall in Chicago (Inches of snow)31.816.243.343.330.854.845.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.5,6.75,8.5,8.1667,7.6667,8.6667,8.5,])
array_2 = np.array([31.8,16.2,43.3,43.3,30.8,54.8,45.1,])
array_1_name = "How insightful OverSimplified YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Snowfall in Chicago"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5924 · Black Variable ID: 25630 · Red Variable ID: 25240
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0