about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,917 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Monica and the second variable is The marriage rate in Nevada.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Why did the marriage rate in Nevada decrease? It seems that fewer Monicas meant fewer "Monica, will you marry me?" moments. It just goes to show, when it comes to tying the knot, Monicas really did have a monopoly in Nevada!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vast, sandy desert landscape in Nevada under the clear blue sky. In the background, depict a declining graph labeled "Marriage Rate" to symbolize the declining trend, with this graph slowly fading into the distance. In the foreground, group several individuals wearing name tags that read "Monica," engaging in handshakes. As the image progresses forward, depict fewer and fewer individuals engaged in handshakes, representing the declining popularity of the name "Monica." Scatter a few engagement rings on the ground, subtly signaling the decrease in "Monica, will you marry me?" moments. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s 3D Pixar Style Magic realism Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada, in the following situation: Why did the marriage rate in Nevada decrease? It seems that fewer Monicas meant fewer "Monica, will you marry me?" moments. It just goes to show, when it comes to tying the knot, Monicas really did have a monopoly in Nevada!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A desert landscape in Nevada, with a declining graph labeled "Marriage Rate" in the background. In the foreground, a group of people with name tags that say "Monica" are shaking hands with fewer and fewer people, symbolizing the declining popularity of the name Monica in the state. A few scattered engagement rings are lying on the ground, showing the decrease in "Monica, will you marry me?" moments.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: A desert landscape in Nevada, with a declining graph labeled "Marriage Rate" in the background. In the foreground, a group of people with name tags that say "Monica" are shaking hands with fewer and fewer people, symbolizing the declining popularity of the name Monica in the state. A few scattered engagement rings are lying on the ground, showing the decrease in "Monica, will you marry me?" moments. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vast, sandy desert landscape in Nevada under the clear blue sky. In the background, depict a declining graph labeled "Marriage Rate" to symbolize the declining trend, with this graph slowly fading into the distance. In the foreground, group several individuals wearing name tags that read "Monica," engaging in handshakes. As the image progresses forward, depict fewer and fewer individuals engaged in handshakes, representing the declining popularity of the name "Monica." Scatter a few engagement rings on the ground, subtly signaling the decrease in "Monica, will you marry me?" moments.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Monica caused The marriage rate in Nevada to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

Journal of Eccentric Linguistic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and CDC National Vital Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intersection of personal nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of curiosity and amusement. From the influence of names on academic and professional success to the proneness of certain monikers to conjure specific visual images, the impact of names on individuals and their environment is a topic that continues to captivate both researchers and laypeople alike. In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.

While one might initially perceive this investigation as mere whimsy, a cursory examination of the data has unveiled a startling statistical relationship that demands both attention and explanation. Through the meticulous analysis of information garnered from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 has been revealed, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. Such findings, while intriguing, also invite a degree of skepticism and incredulity, for it seems improbable that the choice of nomenclature could exert such a palpable influence over marital decisions in a specific geographic locale.

The prominence of the name "Monica" itself has experienced fluctuations over time, echoing both the ebb and flow of popular culture and the caprices of naming trends. Whether it brings to mind the resilient and wise Monica Geller of Friends fame, or the iconic pop sensation Monica, whose musical contributions filled the airwaves in the 1990s, the very mention of the name evokes a specific place and time in the collective consciousness. Nevertheless, the question remains: could the existence of a substantial populace of Monicas exert an appreciable impact on the institution of marriage in the state of Nevada, or are we merely observing an elaborate statistical jest?

As we embark on this empirical odyssey, our aim is not only to examine this perplexing correlation but also to contribute to the broader discussion on the interconnectedness of individual attributes and societal phenomena. In doing so, we strive to uphold the tradition of scholarly inquiry, albeit with a dash of levity, into the whimsical and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Indeed, the mysterious bond between Monica's moniker and the marital musings in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that beckons further examination, as we endeavor to unravel this curious conundrum with both rigor and a wry grin.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of personal nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of curiosity and amusement. From the influence of names on academic and professional success to the proneness of certain monikers to conjure specific visual images, the impact of names on individuals and their environment is a topic that continues to captivate both researchers and laypeople alike. In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.
While one might initially perceive this investigation as mere whimsy, a cursory examination of the data has unveiled a startling statistical relationship that demands both attention and explanation. Through the meticulous analysis of information garnered from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 has been revealed, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. Such findings, while intriguing, also invite a degree of skepticism and incredulity, for it seems improbable that the choice of nomenclature could exert such a palpable influence over marital decisions in a specific geographic locale.
The prominence of the name "Monica" itself has experienced fluctuations over time, echoing both the ebb and flow of popular culture and the caprices of naming trends. Whether it brings to mind the resilient and wise Monica Geller of Friends fame, or the iconic pop sensation Monica, whose musical contributions filled the airwaves in the 1990s, the very mention of the name evokes a specific place and time in the collective consciousness. Nevertheless, the question remains: could the existence of a substantial populace of Monicas exert an appreciable impact on the institution of marriage in the state of Nevada, or are we merely observing an elaborate statistical jest?
As we embark on this empirical odyssey, our aim is not only to examine this perplexing correlation but also to contribute to the broader discussion on the interconnectedness of individual attributes and societal phenomena. In doing so, we strive to uphold the tradition of scholarly inquiry, albeit with a dash of levity, into the whimsical and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Indeed, the mysterious bond between Monica's moniker and the marital musings in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that beckons further examination, as we endeavor to unravel this curious conundrum with both rigor and a wry grin.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The Esoteric Equation: Monica and Matrimony
Smith (2005) observes a curious relationship between personal nomenclature and societal dynamics in their study, "Names and Their Significance." While their work primarily focuses on the influence of names on career prospects, it raises intriguing questions about the potential impact of monikers on other aspects of life. Similarly, Doe (2010) delves into the psychological implications of personal names in "The Power of Naming," shedding light on the subtle ways in which names can shape individual identity and interpersonal interactions. These serious scholarly endeavors set the stage for our investigation into the inexplicable connection between the prevalence of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.

Turning to non-fiction works, the exploratory nature of this study aligns with the subject matter in "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, which delves into unexpected correlations and unconventional avenues of inquiry. In a similar vein, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell examines the unconscious processes that guide decision-making, providing a lens through which we may scrutinize the subconscious forces at play in the marriage rates of Nevadans named Monica.

In the realm of fiction, the evocative power of a name is a recurring motif in the works of Gabriel Garcia Marquez. His novel "One Hundred Years of Solitude" weaves a tapestry of magical realism, where names carry weighty significance and shape the destinies of characters in unforeseen ways. Furthermore, J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series introduces the concept of "nomen est omen" with characters like Sirius Black and Remus Lupin, hinting at the underlying influence of names on one's nature and actions.

In the pursuit of a broad and unconventional understanding, the research team embarked on an unorthodox method of exploration, perusing CVS receipts in a desperate attempt to uncover hidden clues in the purchasing patterns of individuals named Monica. While the endeavor yielded no tangible insights, it did provide a comical interlude as we pondered the enigmatic allure of Monica and matrimony.

The interplay between Monica's moniker and the marital milieu in Nevada continues to perplex and bemuse, beckoning us to embark on this scholarly expedition with intellectual rigor and a lighthearted spirit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and CDC National Vital Statistics . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of personal nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of curiosity and amusement. From the influence of names on academic and professional success to the proneness of certain monikers to conjure specific visual images, the impact of names on individuals and their environment is a topic that continues to captivate both researchers and laypeople alike. In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.
While one might initially perceive this investigation as mere whimsy, a cursory examination of the data has unveiled a startling statistical relationship that demands both attention and explanation. Through the meticulous analysis of information garnered from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 has been revealed, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. Such findings, while intriguing, also invite a degree of skepticism and incredulity, for it seems improbable that the choice of nomenclature could exert such a palpable influence over marital decisions in a specific geographic locale.
The prominence of the name "Monica" itself has experienced fluctuations over time, echoing both the ebb and flow of popular culture and the caprices of naming trends. Whether it brings to mind the resilient and wise Monica Geller of Friends fame, or the iconic pop sensation Monica, whose musical contributions filled the airwaves in the 1990s, the very mention of the name evokes a specific place and time in the collective consciousness. Nevertheless, the question remains: could the existence of a substantial populace of Monicas exert an appreciable impact on the institution of marriage in the state of Nevada, or are we merely observing an elaborate statistical jest?
As we embark on this empirical odyssey, our aim is not only to examine this perplexing correlation but also to contribute to the broader discussion on the interconnectedness of individual attributes and societal phenomena. In doing so, we strive to uphold the tradition of scholarly inquiry, albeit with a dash of levity, into the whimsical and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Indeed, the mysterious bond between Monica's moniker and the marital musings in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that beckons further examination, as we endeavor to unravel this curious conundrum with both rigor and a wry grin.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data for this study was collected from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, providing a comprehensive overview of the popularity of the first name Monica and marriage rates in the state of Nevada from 1999 to 2021. The datasets were meticulously curated by our team, who scoured the depths of the internet in search of this quirky correlation.

First, the popularity of the first name Monica was examined through the US Social Security Administration records, which yielded a wealth of information on the frequency of this moniker over the years. It was observed that the popularity of the name Monica experienced fluctuations, akin to the swaying of a fickle breeze, capturing the ebbs and flows of naming trends and cultural zeitgeists. Our team combed through these data with a metaphorical fine-tooth comb, leaving no statistical stone unturned in our pursuit of the truth behind Monica’s matrimonial mystique.

Next, the marriage rates in the state of Nevada were scrutinized using the CDC National Vital Statistics. These records provided a rich tapestry of matrimonial metrics, allowing us to paint a picture of the marital landscape in the Silver State. We navigated through these datasets with the precision of a cartographer, mapping out the rise and fall of marriage rates with a keen eye for any correlation to the prevalence of the name Monica. It was akin to embarking on a scholarly treasure hunt, seeking the elusive link between nuptial statistics and a name that seemed to cast a peculiar spell over the whimsical world of matrimony.

To investigate the relationship between the moniker "Monica" and the marriage rates in Nevada, our team employed advanced statistical analyses. The magnitude of this correlation was quantified using a Pearson correlation coefficient, which revealed a remarkably high correlation of 0.9945119. The p-value, which reached the statistically significant threshold of less than 0.01, further underscored the robustness of this unusual association.

The rigorous statistical analyses conducted by our team exhibited the painstaking precision of a mathematician untangling a web of perplexing probabilities. Through this methodical approach, we sought to unveil the mysterious magnetism between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada, shedding light on a correlation that stood out amidst the labyrinth of statistical relationships.

In conclusion, the systematic collection and analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics formed the bedrock of our investigation into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada. Our zealous pursuit of this peculiar correlation was driven by a dedication to unraveling the enigmatic ties that bind personal nomenclature and societal phenomena, all with a touch of scholarly enthusiasm and a wink to the whimsical nature of this peculiar pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and CDC National Vital Statistics .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9945119, r-squared of 0.9890539, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of personal nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of curiosity and amusement. From the influence of names on academic and professional success to the proneness of certain monikers to conjure specific visual images, the impact of names on individuals and their environment is a topic that continues to captivate both researchers and laypeople alike. In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.
While one might initially perceive this investigation as mere whimsy, a cursory examination of the data has unveiled a startling statistical relationship that demands both attention and explanation. Through the meticulous analysis of information garnered from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 has been revealed, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. Such findings, while intriguing, also invite a degree of skepticism and incredulity, for it seems improbable that the choice of nomenclature could exert such a palpable influence over marital decisions in a specific geographic locale.
The prominence of the name "Monica" itself has experienced fluctuations over time, echoing both the ebb and flow of popular culture and the caprices of naming trends. Whether it brings to mind the resilient and wise Monica Geller of Friends fame, or the iconic pop sensation Monica, whose musical contributions filled the airwaves in the 1990s, the very mention of the name evokes a specific place and time in the collective consciousness. Nevertheless, the question remains: could the existence of a substantial populace of Monicas exert an appreciable impact on the institution of marriage in the state of Nevada, or are we merely observing an elaborate statistical jest?
As we embark on this empirical odyssey, our aim is not only to examine this perplexing correlation but also to contribute to the broader discussion on the interconnectedness of individual attributes and societal phenomena. In doing so, we strive to uphold the tradition of scholarly inquiry, albeit with a dash of levity, into the whimsical and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Indeed, the mysterious bond between Monica's moniker and the marital musings in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that beckons further examination, as we endeavor to unravel this curious conundrum with both rigor and a wry grin.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada from 1999 to 2021 yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.9890539 further confirms the strength of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variation in the marriage rate in Nevada can be explained by the popularity of the name Monica. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada. The scatterplot draws a clear line, quite literally, between the frequencies of the name Monica and the marriage rates in the Silver State. The tight clustering of data points reinforces the robustness of the relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there exists a definitive association between Monica's moniker and matrimonial matters in Nevada.

These findings prompt the contemplation of various speculations and dispel the notion that the linkage between a name and nuptials is purely happenstance. One is left to ponder whether an influx of Monicas in a given time period could indeed exert some inexplicable influence on the collective marital decisions of Nevadans, or if perhaps there exists an unseen force at play that binds the name Monica with the institution of marriage in this specific geographic locale.

The remarkably high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value suggest that there may be something more to the story of Monica and matrimony in Nevada. Further theoretical exploration and empirical inquiry are warranted to unravel the complexities of this eccentric connection and shed light on the underlying mechanisms at work. This enigmatic relationship between Monica's moniker and marital metrics in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that piques curiosity and invites further investigation into the whimsical correlations that permeate our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The Esoteric Equation: Monica and Matrimony
Smith (2005) observes a curious relationship between personal nomenclature and societal dynamics in their study, "Names and Their Significance." While their work primarily focuses on the influence of names on career prospects, it raises intriguing questions about the potential impact of monikers on other aspects of life. Similarly, Doe (2010) delves into the psychological implications of personal names in "The Power of Naming," shedding light on the subtle ways in which names can shape individual identity and interpersonal interactions. These serious scholarly endeavors set the stage for our investigation into the inexplicable connection between the prevalence of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.
Turning to non-fiction works, the exploratory nature of this study aligns with the subject matter in "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, which delves into unexpected correlations and unconventional avenues of inquiry. In a similar vein, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell examines the unconscious processes that guide decision-making, providing a lens through which we may scrutinize the subconscious forces at play in the marriage rates of Nevadans named Monica.
In the realm of fiction, the evocative power of a name is a recurring motif in the works of Gabriel Garcia Marquez. His novel "One Hundred Years of Solitude" weaves a tapestry of magical realism, where names carry weighty significance and shape the destinies of characters in unforeseen ways. Furthermore, J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series introduces the concept of "nomen est omen" with characters like Sirius Black and Remus Lupin, hinting at the underlying influence of names on one's nature and actions.
In the pursuit of a broad and unconventional understanding, the research team embarked on an unorthodox method of exploration, perusing CVS receipts in a desperate attempt to uncover hidden clues in the purchasing patterns of individuals named Monica. While the endeavor yielded no tangible insights, it did provide a comical interlude as we pondered the enigmatic allure of Monica and matrimony.
The interplay between Monica's moniker and the marital milieu in Nevada continues to perplex and bemuse, beckoning us to embark on this scholarly expedition with intellectual rigor and a lighthearted spirit.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada from 1999 to 2021 yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.9890539 further confirms the strength of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variation in the marriage rate in Nevada can be explained by the popularity of the name Monica. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada. The scatterplot draws a clear line, quite literally, between the frequencies of the name Monica and the marriage rates in the Silver State. The tight clustering of data points reinforces the robustness of the relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there exists a definitive association between Monica's moniker and matrimonial matters in Nevada.
These findings prompt the contemplation of various speculations and dispel the notion that the linkage between a name and nuptials is purely happenstance. One is left to ponder whether an influx of Monicas in a given time period could indeed exert some inexplicable influence on the collective marital decisions of Nevadans, or if perhaps there exists an unseen force at play that binds the name Monica with the institution of marriage in this specific geographic locale.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value suggest that there may be something more to the story of Monica and matrimony in Nevada. Further theoretical exploration and empirical inquiry are warranted to unravel the complexities of this eccentric connection and shed light on the underlying mechanisms at work. This enigmatic relationship between Monica's moniker and marital metrics in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that piques curiosity and invites further investigation into the whimsical correlations that permeate our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study provide compelling evidence of an almost surreal association between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada. The remarkably high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value lend credence to the notion that there might be more than meets the eye in the interplay between Monica's moniker and matrimonial matters in the Silver State.

Delving into the literature, one cannot help but recall the peculiar, albeit seemingly unrelated, investigations into the subconscious influences of names set forth in Levitt and Dubner's "Freakonomics" and Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink." While these works initially seem to drift into the realm of whimsy, our findings bring their underlying themes into sharp relief. The implicit suggestion that names exert a subtle yet persuasive force on human behavior finds unexpected corroboration in our study's uncovering of a near-perfect positive linear relationship between the name Monica and marriage rates in Nevada. It appears that Monica's moniker may indeed harbor a mysterious sway over matrimonial decisions in the Silver State, akin to the enchanting allure of a siren's song.

Furthermore, the non-fictional pursuits of Smith and Doe in uncovering the influence of names on societal dynamics find resonance in our investigation. While their endeavors centered on different aspects of life, their questioning of the potential impact of monikers has found an unexpected echo in our findings. The statistical robustness of the link between the prevalence of the name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada implies that names may wield a subtler, yet significant, influence beyond mere linguistic labels.

Turning to the scatterplot, the visual depiction of a nearly contiguous line between the frequencies of the name Monica and the marriage rates in Nevada underscores the remarkable coherence of our results. This robust relationship, as encapsulated in the tight clustering of data points, serves as a lighthearted yet trenchant reminder that sometimes, truth may indeed be stranger than fiction. The implications of this finding beckon further exploration into the delicately intertwined nature of nomenclature and societal phenomena, challenging us to ponder the unseen forces at play in the world of statistics.

The prospect of delving into the depths of Monica's moniker and its enigmatic ties to the institution of marriage in Nevada conjures an image of unraveling a whimsical, yet deeply intricate, tapestry of correlations. Much like the unfolding plot of a mystery novel, our study piques curiosity and invites further scholarly scrutiny into this anomalous connection. The capricious dance between Monica's moniker and marital metrics in Nevada stands as a testament to the unfathomable whims of statistical serendipity, providing an intellectual puzzle that commands attention and entices further theoretical and empirical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Monica and The marriage rate in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of personal nomenclature and societal phenomena has long been a subject of curiosity and amusement. From the influence of names on academic and professional success to the proneness of certain monikers to conjure specific visual images, the impact of names on individuals and their environment is a topic that continues to captivate both researchers and laypeople alike. In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the state of Nevada.
While one might initially perceive this investigation as mere whimsy, a cursory examination of the data has unveiled a startling statistical relationship that demands both attention and explanation. Through the meticulous analysis of information garnered from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 has been revealed, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. Such findings, while intriguing, also invite a degree of skepticism and incredulity, for it seems improbable that the choice of nomenclature could exert such a palpable influence over marital decisions in a specific geographic locale.
The prominence of the name "Monica" itself has experienced fluctuations over time, echoing both the ebb and flow of popular culture and the caprices of naming trends. Whether it brings to mind the resilient and wise Monica Geller of Friends fame, or the iconic pop sensation Monica, whose musical contributions filled the airwaves in the 1990s, the very mention of the name evokes a specific place and time in the collective consciousness. Nevertheless, the question remains: could the existence of a substantial populace of Monicas exert an appreciable impact on the institution of marriage in the state of Nevada, or are we merely observing an elaborate statistical jest?
As we embark on this empirical odyssey, our aim is not only to examine this perplexing correlation but also to contribute to the broader discussion on the interconnectedness of individual attributes and societal phenomena. In doing so, we strive to uphold the tradition of scholarly inquiry, albeit with a dash of levity, into the whimsical and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Indeed, the mysterious bond between Monica's moniker and the marital musings in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that beckons further examination, as we endeavor to unravel this curious conundrum with both rigor and a wry grin.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada from 1999 to 2021 yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.9890539 further confirms the strength of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variation in the marriage rate in Nevada can be explained by the popularity of the name Monica. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada. The scatterplot draws a clear line, quite literally, between the frequencies of the name Monica and the marriage rates in the Silver State. The tight clustering of data points reinforces the robustness of the relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there exists a definitive association between Monica's moniker and matrimonial matters in Nevada.
These findings prompt the contemplation of various speculations and dispel the notion that the linkage between a name and nuptials is purely happenstance. One is left to ponder whether an influx of Monicas in a given time period could indeed exert some inexplicable influence on the collective marital decisions of Nevadans, or if perhaps there exists an unseen force at play that binds the name Monica with the institution of marriage in this specific geographic locale.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value suggest that there may be something more to the story of Monica and matrimony in Nevada. Further theoretical exploration and empirical inquiry are warranted to unravel the complexities of this eccentric connection and shed light on the underlying mechanisms at work. This enigmatic relationship between Monica's moniker and marital metrics in Nevada presents an intellectual puzzle that piques curiosity and invites further investigation into the whimsical correlations that permeate our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in Nevada from 1999 to 2021 has revealed a connection so strong, it's as if there's a matrimonial magnet pulling Monicas and marriage rates together. The findings of a nearly perfect positive linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.9945119 and an r-squared value of 0.9890539 astound even the most ardent skeptics, leaving them pondering the inexplicable influence of Monica's moniker on the collective matrimonial decisions of Nevadans. Could it be that the mere presence of Monicas in a given time period triggers a surge in wedding bells? Or is there some mysterious force at play, orchestrating the amorous escapades of those bearing this storied name?

The scatterplot, which draws a clear line between the frequencies of the name Monica and the marriage rates in Nevada, seems to suggest that there's more to this correlation than meets the "I." The clustering of data points reinforces the robustness of the relationship, leaving little room for doubt that there exists a definitive association between Monica's moniker and matrimonial matters in Nevada. It's as if the Monicas of the world are unwittingly casting their matrimonial magic over the Silver State, turning it into a haven for those seeking wedded bliss.

While the statistical significance of our findings is hard to deny, the enigma of the Monica-marriage nexus persists, beckoning further inquiry and inviting us to unravel the complexities of this curious connection. Our study not only sheds light on this whimsical correlation but also highlights the broader theme of the interconnectedness of individual attributes and societal phenomena. Indeed, the magnetic allure of Monica's moniker and its impact on marriage metrics is a scholarly conundrum that elicits fascination and curiosity, akin to a captivating cliffhanger in a romantic comedy.

In light of these findings, it is our solemn academic duty to assert that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between Monica's moniker and the marriage rate in Nevada has been sufficiently elucidated, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the whimsical and inexplicable correlations that shape our world. It seems that when it comes to Monicas and matrimony in Nevada, there's no need for further investigation – the data speaks for itself, loud and clear, like a chapel bell ringing in celebration of a joyous union.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Eccentric Linguistic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Quantitative Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Monica's Matrimonial Measure: Examining the Eccentric Link between Monica's Moniker and Marriage Metrics in Nevada with an abstract of This research delves into the peculiar connection between the popularity of the first name Monica and the marriage rate in the Silver State of Nevada. Delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and the CDC National Vital Statistics, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9945119, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2021. The findings suggest that there may be something more than meets the "I" in the synergy between Monica's moniker and the matrimonial musings in Nevada. The results pose an intriguing enigma that beckons further investigation to unravel the mysterious magnetic pull between a moniker and marital matters in this wondrous world of whimsical correlations.

ChatGPT:

Monica, marriage rate, Nevada, Monica's name, first name popularity, US Social Security Administration data, CDC National Vital Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, 1999-2021, marital matters, correlation, moniker, marriage metrics, Nevada marriage rate, enigma, investigation, whimsical correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Monica
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Monica
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Monica

The marriage rate in Nevada
Source: CDC National Vital Statistics
See what else correlates with The marriage rate in Nevada

Correlation r = 0.9945119 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9890539 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The marriage rate in Nevada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Monica) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.5E-22. 0.0000000000000000000004467656
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 4.5E-20% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,238,310,201,143,508,074,496 random variables You don't actually need 2 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.99, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Monica (Babies born)2134199118021778161315211409136311901064972887779723597577556521472498456404413
The marriage rate in Nevada (Marriage rate)82.372.269.667.463.962.157.452.148.642.340.338.336.935.132.280131.85131.017928.392328.556326.734225.894821.02526.2043




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2134,1991,1802,1778,1613,1521,1409,1363,1190,1064,972,887,779,723,597,577,556,521,472,498,456,404,413,])
array_2 = np.array([82.3,72.2,69.6,67.4,63.9,62.1,57.4,52.1,48.6,42.3,40.3,38.3,36.9,35.1,32.2801,31.851,31.0179,28.3923,28.5563,26.7342,25.8948,21.025,26.2043,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Monica"
array_2_name = "The marriage rate in Nevada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5917 · Black Variable ID: 2142 · Red Variable ID: 19765
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0