Download png, svg
AI explanation
The more Drew Barrymore movies people watched, the more they realized the importance of personal freedom and non-intervention in their lives. All those feel-good romantic comedies and heartwarming dramas must have sparked a desire for individual liberty, leading to a surge in support for Libertarian candidates in Alabama. It's like her on-screen charm and charisma were casting a spell of political awakening across the state.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a charming Alabama town. In the illustration, a cozy living room is filled with a group of people watching a heartwarming movie marathon on TV, featuring Drew Barrymore. As the credits roll, they engage in lively discussions and debates about personal freedom and individual rights, inspired by the movies. Outside, a line forms at a polling station where voters proudly cast their ballots for Libertarian candidates. The enchanting influence of Drew Barrymore's movies seems to have ignited a newfound appreciation for personal liberty among the people of Alabama. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Oragami Cutsy art illustration Scalar art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama, in the following situation: The more Drew Barrymore movies people watched, the more they realized the importance of personal freedom and non-intervention in their lives. All those feel-good romantic comedies and heartwarming dramas must have sparked a desire for individual liberty, leading to a surge in support for Libertarian candidates in Alabama. It's like her on-screen charm and charisma were casting a spell of political awakening across the state.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a charming Alabama town, a group of people gather in a cozy living room for a movie marathon. The TV screen lights up with the familiar face of Drew Barrymore, as they watch one heartwarming movie after another. As the credits roll, they engage in lively discussions and debates about personal freedom and individual rights, inspired by the themes in the movies. Outside, a line forms at a polling station, where a surge of voters proudly cast their ballots for Libertarian candidates. The enchanting influence of Drew Barrymore's movies seems to have ignited a newfound appreciation for personal liberty among the people of Alabama.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a charming Alabama town, a group of people gather in a cozy living room for a movie marathon. The TV screen lights up with the familiar face of Drew Barrymore, as they watch one heartwarming movie after another. As the credits roll, they engage in lively discussions and debates about personal freedom and individual rights, inspired by the themes in the movies. Outside, a line forms at a polling station, where a surge of voters proudly cast their ballots for Libertarian candidates. The enchanting influence of Drew Barrymore's movies seems to have ignited a newfound appreciation for personal liberty among the people of Alabama. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a charming Alabama town. In the illustration, a cozy living room is filled with a group of people watching a heartwarming movie marathon on TV, featuring Drew Barrymore. As the credits roll, they engage in lively discussions and debates about personal freedom and individual rights, inspired by the movies. Outside, a line forms at a polling station where voters proudly cast their ballots for Libertarian candidates. The enchanting influence of Drew Barrymore's movies seems to have ignited a newfound appreciation for personal liberty among the people of Alabama.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in caused Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama to increase.
AI academic paper
Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings The Journal of Cinematic Insights and Socio-Political Dynamics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 for 1978 to 2002.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of political analysis, uncovering unexpected relationships and connections between seemingly unrelated variables is akin to stumbling upon a hidden plot twist in a suspenseful thriller. Our study focuses on one such unlikely pairing – the number of movies in which the illustrious Drew Barrymore has graced the silver screen and the Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. It's a pairing that seems as mismatched as a rom-com protagonist and a zombie apocalypse, yet our research sets out to explore the veracity of this unexpected correlation.
The concept that an actress known for her endearing charm and captivating performances could have any bearing on the political leanings of a specific demographic may initially elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction elicited by a well-crafted dad joke. However, as we delve into the data, we aim to approach this investigation with the seriousness it deserves, while also acknowledging the occasional opportunity to inject a touch of humor into our findings.
As we embark on this unconventional academic escapade, we are reminded of the words of Drew Barrymore herself: "Life is very interesting. In the end, some of your greatest pains become your greatest strengths." Similarly, in the realm of empirical research, the most unexpected correlations can sometimes yield the most enlightening insights, akin to the zing of a well-timed punchline.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, drawing on data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The methodology employed in this research echoes the precision and attention to detail that one might expect from a Barrymore performance, emphasizing the importance of rigorous analysis in uncovering the nuances of this intriguing correlation.
As our analyze and un-Barry-ble the intricate web of data and correlations, we invite readers to join us on this exhilarating journey, where empirical inquiry and unexpected laughter intersect in ways that challenge traditional assumptions about the fabric of political behavior.
In the pages that follow, we invite you to suspend disbelief, as we unravel the captivating tale of "Berry(more) Votes" and the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political persuasions intersect. After all, as Drew Barrymore herself once quipped, "I want people to love me, but it's not going to hurt me if they don't." Much like Ms. Barrymore's unassuming wit, our findings may surprise, but we aim to approach them with academic rigor and an occasional nod to the delight of the unexpected.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of political analysis, uncovering unexpected relationships and connections between seemingly unrelated variables is akin to stumbling upon a hidden plot twist in a suspenseful thriller. Our study focuses on one such unlikely pairing – the number of movies in which the illustrious Drew Barrymore has graced the silver screen and the Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. It's a pairing that seems as mismatched as a rom-com protagonist and a zombie apocalypse, yet our research sets out to explore the veracity of this unexpected correlation.
The concept that an actress known for her endearing charm and captivating performances could have any bearing on the political leanings of a specific demographic may initially elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction elicited by a well-crafted dad joke. However, as we delve into the data, we aim to approach this investigation with the seriousness it deserves, while also acknowledging the occasional opportunity to inject a touch of humor into our findings.
As we embark on this unconventional academic escapade, we are reminded of the words of Drew Barrymore herself: "Life is very interesting. In the end, some of your greatest pains become your greatest strengths." Similarly, in the realm of empirical research, the most unexpected correlations can sometimes yield the most enlightening insights, akin to the zing of a well-timed punchline.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, drawing on data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The methodology employed in this research echoes the precision and attention to detail that one might expect from a Barrymore performance, emphasizing the importance of rigorous analysis in uncovering the nuances of this intriguing correlation.
As our analyze and un-Barry-ble the intricate web of data and correlations, we invite readers to join us on this exhilarating journey, where empirical inquiry and unexpected laughter intersect in ways that challenge traditional assumptions about the fabric of political behavior.
In the pages that follow, we invite you to suspend disbelief, as we unravel the captivating tale of "Berry(more) Votes" and the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political persuasions intersect. After all, as Drew Barrymore herself once quipped, "I want people to love me, but it's not going to hurt me if they don't." Much like Ms. Barrymore's unassuming wit, our findings may surprise, but we aim to approach them with academic rigor and an occasional nod to the delight of the unexpected.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Our quest to explore the peculiar relationship between the number of films featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama compelled us to first examine scholarly works that evaluated the influence of popular culture on political ideologies. In "The Role of Pop Culture in Political Behavior" by Smith et al., the authors investigated the impact of celebrity endorsements and media representations on voter preferences. While their study focused on the broader influence of pop culture, it resonated with our inquiry, prompting us to consider the potential role of a beloved actress in shaping political inclinations.
As we traversed the landscape of academic literature, we encountered Doe's "Celebrity Influence and Political Allegiances," which delved into the nuances of how public figures can sway public opinion. Drawing parallels between the persuasive power of celebrities and the allure of compelling narratives, the authors' perspective encouraged us to contemplate the potential significance of Drew Barrymore's cinematic presence in the political domain.
In the purview of our investigation, it became apparent that delving into non-traditional sources of influence was imperative. Thus, we turned to works such as "Cinema and Society: Exploring the Intersection of Art and Politics" by Jones, which expounds upon the myriad ways in which films and their protagonists can capture the imagination of audiences and, potentially, influence their perceptions of reality. This insightful exploration guided our approach, underscoring the significance of the cultural landscape in shaping societal attitudes and, indeed, political leanings.
As we ventured further into our scholarly exploration, we stumbled upon a treasure trove of fictitious narratives that evoked themes of skepticism and unconventional alliances, reminiscent of our own study's unexpected correlation. Works such as "The Unlikely Veep: A Political Comedy" and "Rebel with a Cause: Tales of Libertarian Mischief" sparked our curiosity, infusing a sense of levity into our academic pursuit and validating our propensity for whimsical investigation.
In our search for unconventional yet insightful perspectives, we also found ourselves drawn to social media posts that intriguingly discussed the intersection of entertainment and politics. A Twitter user quipped, "Watching a Drew Barrymore marathon may just turn you into a Libertarian – it's the 'Drew' effect, I tell you!" While seemingly humorous in nature, this observation piqued our interest, illuminating the potential for seemingly incongruous connections to manifest in the realm of political discourse.
With each exploration and discovery, our understanding of the entwined worlds of cinema and political preference expanded, underscoring the undeniable allure of unexpected associations and prompting the occasional laugh at the whimsical nature of our inquiries.
Stay tuned for more puns in our quest to unravel the "Berry(more) Votes" enigma, for as Drew herself aptly put it, "There's something liberating about not pretending. Dare to embarrass yourself. Risk." And so, with the spirit of risk and delight, we press on in our exploration of this un-Barry-ble correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1978 to 2002
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of political analysis, uncovering unexpected relationships and connections between seemingly unrelated variables is akin to stumbling upon a hidden plot twist in a suspenseful thriller. Our study focuses on one such unlikely pairing – the number of movies in which the illustrious Drew Barrymore has graced the silver screen and the Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. It's a pairing that seems as mismatched as a rom-com protagonist and a zombie apocalypse, yet our research sets out to explore the veracity of this unexpected correlation.
The concept that an actress known for her endearing charm and captivating performances could have any bearing on the political leanings of a specific demographic may initially elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction elicited by a well-crafted dad joke. However, as we delve into the data, we aim to approach this investigation with the seriousness it deserves, while also acknowledging the occasional opportunity to inject a touch of humor into our findings.
As we embark on this unconventional academic escapade, we are reminded of the words of Drew Barrymore herself: "Life is very interesting. In the end, some of your greatest pains become your greatest strengths." Similarly, in the realm of empirical research, the most unexpected correlations can sometimes yield the most enlightening insights, akin to the zing of a well-timed punchline.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, drawing on data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The methodology employed in this research echoes the precision and attention to detail that one might expect from a Barrymore performance, emphasizing the importance of rigorous analysis in uncovering the nuances of this intriguing correlation.
As our analyze and un-Barry-ble the intricate web of data and correlations, we invite readers to join us on this exhilarating journey, where empirical inquiry and unexpected laughter intersect in ways that challenge traditional assumptions about the fabric of political behavior.
In the pages that follow, we invite you to suspend disbelief, as we unravel the captivating tale of "Berry(more) Votes" and the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political persuasions intersect. After all, as Drew Barrymore herself once quipped, "I want people to love me, but it's not going to hurt me if they don't." Much like Ms. Barrymore's unassuming wit, our findings may surprise, but we aim to approach them with academic rigor and an occasional nod to the delight of the unexpected.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To start our investigation, we gathered data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, covering the years 1978 to 2002. The primary focus of our study was to analyze the correlation between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. As we delved into this unique endeavor, our research team did not simply rely on conventional statistical methods; instead, we devised a methodology as quirky and captivating as one of Ms. Barrymore's iconic performances.
We commenced our analysis by employing a distinctive algorithm known as the "Drew-llinear Regression," a synthesis of linear regression and Drew Barrymore's cinematic oeuvre. This distinctive approach involved quantifying the actress's on-screen appearances as a predictor variable, while juxtaposing this against the Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama as the outcome variable. This algorithm ingeniously accounted for the Barrymore effect, encapsulating the essence of the actress's influence on political predilections.
Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our analysis, we incorporated a "Scream for Accuracy" technique, inspired by Ms. Barrymore's role in the eponymous thriller film. This involved subjecting our statistical models to rigorous scrutiny, akin to the suspenseful unfolding of a cinematic plot. Through this meticulous process, we meticulously assessed the reliability and validity of our findings, all the while infusing the analysis with a delightful hint of cinematic flair.
In addition, to capture the dynamic nature of Ms. Barrymore's career, we implemented a "50 First Dates" time series analysis, accounting for the temporal evolution of both her filmography and the political landscape in Alabama. This comprehensive approach allowed us to discern any temporal patterns and fluctuations in the relationship between Drew Barrymore's cinematic presence and Libertarian voting trends, mirroring the ever-changing dynamics of the silver screen and political theater.
As we untangled the Barrymore-thread of correlation, we integrated a "Never Been Kissed" sensitivity analysis to gauge the impact of potential outliers and influential observations. Much like the protagonist in the film, this method gracefully navigated the complexities of our data, ensuring that our findings remained resilient in the face of unexpected outliers – a reflection of the resilience that underpins both empirical inquiry and engaging storytelling.
Moreover, to account for potential confounding variables, we embraced a "Music and Lyrics" instrumental variable approach, leveraging secondary indicators from Ms. Barrymore's multi-faceted career, such as musical performances and screenplay contributions, to fortify the validity of our findings. This method ingeniously harmonized the diverse facets of the actress's contributions, much like the harmonious blend of melodies and lyrics in her cinematic repertoire.
Lastly, to quantify the extent of Drew Barrymore's influence, we utilized a "Charlie's Angels" meta-analysis framework, synthesizing findings from previous studies on the impact of actors on political behaviors. This comprehensive synthesis provided a panoramic view of the broader landscape of celebrity influence, ensuring that our interpretation of the Barrymore effect was situated within the broader context of celebrity dynamics and political engagement.
In summary, the methodology for our study bore the indelible stamp of whimsy, innovation, and thoroughness, reflecting not only the complexity of our analytical pursuit but also the enchanting allure of Ms. Barrymore's cinematic legacy. Through this distinctive approach, our research aimed to celebrate the curiosity and creativity that underpin empirical inquiry, reminding us that even the most unconventional connections can yield profound insights when explored with intellectual rigor and a dash of cinematic charm.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .
For the time period 1978 to 2002, you found a correlation 0.9926865, r-squared of 0.9854264, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of political analysis, uncovering unexpected relationships and connections between seemingly unrelated variables is akin to stumbling upon a hidden plot twist in a suspenseful thriller. Our study focuses on one such unlikely pairing – the number of movies in which the illustrious Drew Barrymore has graced the silver screen and the Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. It's a pairing that seems as mismatched as a rom-com protagonist and a zombie apocalypse, yet our research sets out to explore the veracity of this unexpected correlation.
The concept that an actress known for her endearing charm and captivating performances could have any bearing on the political leanings of a specific demographic may initially elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction elicited by a well-crafted dad joke. However, as we delve into the data, we aim to approach this investigation with the seriousness it deserves, while also acknowledging the occasional opportunity to inject a touch of humor into our findings.
As we embark on this unconventional academic escapade, we are reminded of the words of Drew Barrymore herself: "Life is very interesting. In the end, some of your greatest pains become your greatest strengths." Similarly, in the realm of empirical research, the most unexpected correlations can sometimes yield the most enlightening insights, akin to the zing of a well-timed punchline.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, drawing on data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The methodology employed in this research echoes the precision and attention to detail that one might expect from a Barrymore performance, emphasizing the importance of rigorous analysis in uncovering the nuances of this intriguing correlation.
As our analyze and un-Barry-ble the intricate web of data and correlations, we invite readers to join us on this exhilarating journey, where empirical inquiry and unexpected laughter intersect in ways that challenge traditional assumptions about the fabric of political behavior.
In the pages that follow, we invite you to suspend disbelief, as we unravel the captivating tale of "Berry(more) Votes" and the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political persuasions intersect. After all, as Drew Barrymore herself once quipped, "I want people to love me, but it's not going to hurt me if they don't." Much like Ms. Barrymore's unassuming wit, our findings may surprise, but we aim to approach them with academic rigor and an occasional nod to the delight of the unexpected.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama from 1978 to 2002, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and an r-squared of 0.9854264. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating statistical significance.
Our findings can be summed up with a Drew-themed dad joke: "Why did the dataset go to see a Drew Barrymore movie? Because it heard she was reel-y good at influencing political preferences!"
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually demonstrates the robust and undeniable relationship between the variables, providing a glimpse into the unexpected convergence of cinematic presence and political preferences in the Heart of Dixie. The figure undoubtedly lends itself to another dad joke: "What do movies with Drew Barrymore and Libertarian voters in Alabama have in common? They both have a plot that's 'Barrymore' than meets the eye!"
This investigation has shed light on a truly whimsical association, prompting us to consider the intriguing question: does Drew Barrymore's appearance in films wield an unanticipated influence on the political tendencies of Alabamian constituents, or is it merely a delightful coincidence? This conundrum gives rise to another playful pun: "It's like a Drew Barrymore character - the more you ponder, the more layers you find!"
Our research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political inclinations intersect. As we contemplate the statistical stardom of Drew Barrymore's filmography and its curious correlation with Libertarian votes in Alabama, we invite fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected and to remember that even in the realm of empirical analysis, surprises may abound—even more than a Barrymore film marathon.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Our quest to explore the peculiar relationship between the number of films featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama compelled us to first examine scholarly works that evaluated the influence of popular culture on political ideologies. In "The Role of Pop Culture in Political Behavior" by Smith et al., the authors investigated the impact of celebrity endorsements and media representations on voter preferences. While their study focused on the broader influence of pop culture, it resonated with our inquiry, prompting us to consider the potential role of a beloved actress in shaping political inclinations.
As we traversed the landscape of academic literature, we encountered Doe's "Celebrity Influence and Political Allegiances," which delved into the nuances of how public figures can sway public opinion. Drawing parallels between the persuasive power of celebrities and the allure of compelling narratives, the authors' perspective encouraged us to contemplate the potential significance of Drew Barrymore's cinematic presence in the political domain.
In the purview of our investigation, it became apparent that delving into non-traditional sources of influence was imperative. Thus, we turned to works such as "Cinema and Society: Exploring the Intersection of Art and Politics" by Jones, which expounds upon the myriad ways in which films and their protagonists can capture the imagination of audiences and, potentially, influence their perceptions of reality. This insightful exploration guided our approach, underscoring the significance of the cultural landscape in shaping societal attitudes and, indeed, political leanings.
As we ventured further into our scholarly exploration, we stumbled upon a treasure trove of fictitious narratives that evoked themes of skepticism and unconventional alliances, reminiscent of our own study's unexpected correlation. Works such as "The Unlikely Veep: A Political Comedy" and "Rebel with a Cause: Tales of Libertarian Mischief" sparked our curiosity, infusing a sense of levity into our academic pursuit and validating our propensity for whimsical investigation.
In our search for unconventional yet insightful perspectives, we also found ourselves drawn to social media posts that intriguingly discussed the intersection of entertainment and politics. A Twitter user quipped, "Watching a Drew Barrymore marathon may just turn you into a Libertarian – it's the 'Drew' effect, I tell you!" While seemingly humorous in nature, this observation piqued our interest, illuminating the potential for seemingly incongruous connections to manifest in the realm of political discourse.
With each exploration and discovery, our understanding of the entwined worlds of cinema and political preference expanded, underscoring the undeniable allure of unexpected associations and prompting the occasional laugh at the whimsical nature of our inquiries.
Stay tuned for more puns in our quest to unravel the "Berry(more) Votes" enigma, for as Drew herself aptly put it, "There's something liberating about not pretending. Dare to embarrass yourself. Risk." And so, with the spirit of risk and delight, we press on in our exploration of this un-Barry-ble correlation.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama from 1978 to 2002, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and an r-squared of 0.9854264. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating statistical significance.
Our findings can be summed up with a Drew-themed dad joke: "Why did the dataset go to see a Drew Barrymore movie? Because it heard she was reel-y good at influencing political preferences!"
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually demonstrates the robust and undeniable relationship between the variables, providing a glimpse into the unexpected convergence of cinematic presence and political preferences in the Heart of Dixie. The figure undoubtedly lends itself to another dad joke: "What do movies with Drew Barrymore and Libertarian voters in Alabama have in common? They both have a plot that's 'Barrymore' than meets the eye!"
This investigation has shed light on a truly whimsical association, prompting us to consider the intriguing question: does Drew Barrymore's appearance in films wield an unanticipated influence on the political tendencies of Alabamian constituents, or is it merely a delightful coincidence? This conundrum gives rise to another playful pun: "It's like a Drew Barrymore character - the more you ponder, the more layers you find!"
Our research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political inclinations intersect. As we contemplate the statistical stardom of Drew Barrymore's filmography and its curious correlation with Libertarian votes in Alabama, we invite fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected and to remember that even in the realm of empirical analysis, surprises may abound—even more than a Barrymore film marathon.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
In the aftermath of our statistical quest, the compelling correlation we unraveled between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama from 1978 to 2002 lends credence to the curious yet captivating nature of our inquiry. This unexpected correlation adds a touch of whimsy to the rigorous realm of empirical analysis, almost like stumbling upon a scene-stealing comedic relief in an otherwise serious political saga.
Our study stood on the shoulders of prior research that explored the sway of popular culture on political inclinations. The findings from Smith et al. and Doe regarding the impact of celebrity endorsements and media representations on voter preferences resonated with the whimsical spirit of our investigation. The serious consideration of such connections certainly contrasts with the lighthearted eyebrow-raising entailed in our Drew Barrymore-inspired pursuits – it's almost as if our study is a caper of its own, entwining the glitz of Hollywood with the ballots of Alabama.
As we reflect on our results, it’s worth noting that our statistical revelatory revelation aligns with the lighthearted comments we encountered in our literature review - who knew that a Twitter jibe about a Drew Barrymore marathon influencing political leanings may hold a kernel of truth? It’s as if the whimsical musings of a Twitter user have, against all odds, found empirical expression in our investigation. The improbable connection between cinematic prominence and the sway of political preferences almost feels like a Drew Barrymore rom-com plot, full of unexpected twists and turns.
Moreover, our results align with the broader insights from works such as Jones' "Cinema and Society: Exploring the Intersection of Art and Politics," highlighting the potential for films and their protagonists to shape societal attitudes, even political leanings. The unlikely alliance between Drew Barrymore's cinematic presence and Libertarian inclinations in Alabama mirrors the unpredictable narratives explored in fictional works like "The Unlikely Veep: A Political Comedy" and "Rebel with a Cause: Tales of Libertarian Mischief." It’s as if our own research narrative mirrors the offbeat tales we encountered in our literary pursuits, underscoring the unexpected allure of our correlation.
In essence, our findings have adorned the serious subject of political behavior with a lighthearted touch, akin to a Drew Barrymore film adding a dash of charm to a thought-provoking narrative. As we ponder the "Barrymore" than meets the eye nature of our statistical stardom, we invite fellow researchers to embrace the delightful surprise that our results embody - a reminder that in the world of empirical analysis, the unexpected thrives, much like a Drew Barrymore character awaiting discovery beneath the surface.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!"
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of political analysis, uncovering unexpected relationships and connections between seemingly unrelated variables is akin to stumbling upon a hidden plot twist in a suspenseful thriller. Our study focuses on one such unlikely pairing – the number of movies in which the illustrious Drew Barrymore has graced the silver screen and the Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. It's a pairing that seems as mismatched as a rom-com protagonist and a zombie apocalypse, yet our research sets out to explore the veracity of this unexpected correlation.
The concept that an actress known for her endearing charm and captivating performances could have any bearing on the political leanings of a specific demographic may initially elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction elicited by a well-crafted dad joke. However, as we delve into the data, we aim to approach this investigation with the seriousness it deserves, while also acknowledging the occasional opportunity to inject a touch of humor into our findings.
As we embark on this unconventional academic escapade, we are reminded of the words of Drew Barrymore herself: "Life is very interesting. In the end, some of your greatest pains become your greatest strengths." Similarly, in the realm of empirical research, the most unexpected correlations can sometimes yield the most enlightening insights, akin to the zing of a well-timed punchline.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, drawing on data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The methodology employed in this research echoes the precision and attention to detail that one might expect from a Barrymore performance, emphasizing the importance of rigorous analysis in uncovering the nuances of this intriguing correlation.
As our analyze and un-Barry-ble the intricate web of data and correlations, we invite readers to join us on this exhilarating journey, where empirical inquiry and unexpected laughter intersect in ways that challenge traditional assumptions about the fabric of political behavior.
In the pages that follow, we invite you to suspend disbelief, as we unravel the captivating tale of "Berry(more) Votes" and the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political persuasions intersect. After all, as Drew Barrymore herself once quipped, "I want people to love me, but it's not going to hurt me if they don't." Much like Ms. Barrymore's unassuming wit, our findings may surprise, but we aim to approach them with academic rigor and an occasional nod to the delight of the unexpected.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama from 1978 to 2002, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and an r-squared of 0.9854264. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating statistical significance.
Our findings can be summed up with a Drew-themed dad joke: "Why did the dataset go to see a Drew Barrymore movie? Because it heard she was reel-y good at influencing political preferences!"
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually demonstrates the robust and undeniable relationship between the variables, providing a glimpse into the unexpected convergence of cinematic presence and political preferences in the Heart of Dixie. The figure undoubtedly lends itself to another dad joke: "What do movies with Drew Barrymore and Libertarian voters in Alabama have in common? They both have a plot that's 'Barrymore' than meets the eye!"
This investigation has shed light on a truly whimsical association, prompting us to consider the intriguing question: does Drew Barrymore's appearance in films wield an unanticipated influence on the political tendencies of Alabamian constituents, or is it merely a delightful coincidence? This conundrum gives rise to another playful pun: "It's like a Drew Barrymore character - the more you ponder, the more layers you find!"
Our research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the unforeseen connections that emerge when the worlds of cinema and political inclinations intersect. As we contemplate the statistical stardom of Drew Barrymore's filmography and its curious correlation with Libertarian votes in Alabama, we invite fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected and to remember that even in the realm of empirical analysis, surprises may abound—even more than a Barrymore film marathon.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In confluence with our offbeat premise, our research has brought to light the striking correlation between the number of Drew Barrymore movies and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alabama. The statistical significance of this relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01, has tickled our intellect and teased our sense of what is feasible in the realm of political behavior analysis. It's as if this unexpected discovery crept into our data like a well-timed, un-barriered punchline in the most serious of conversations.
Our findings hint at the potential influence of cinematic charisma on political predispositions, raising the question: Could the 'Drew Love' be the unsung hero of Libertarian allure in the Heart of Dixie, or is it merely a delightful coincidence? As we reflect on this unexpected connection, we're reminded of a dad joke: "Why does Drew Barrymore love data? Because it's 'ROOT'ed in statistical significance!"
Our research stitches a thread of amusement into the fabric of political analysis, underscoring the unpredictability of correlations and the rich tapestry of human behavior. Just like a Drew Barrymore movie, the more you ponder, the more layers you find – and the same can be said for the intricate web of political proclivities. Our whimsical exploration certainly leaves no doubt that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!
In the world of empirical inquiry, surprises may abound even more than a Barrymore film marathon. However, as the curtain falls on this unique correlation, we maintain that further research in this area is unwarranted. After all, in the words of yet another dad joke: "Why do we need to stop researching Drew Barrymore's influence on political preferences? Because we've already found the reel deal!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Cinematic Insights and Socio-Political Dynamics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Cinematic Studies and Political Philosophy
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings with an abstract of In this study, we set out to unearth the unlikely connection between the number of movies featuring Drew Barrymore and Libertarian votes for Senators in the state of Alabama. Utilizing data extracted from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a quest as adventurous as one of Ms. Barrymore's on-screen exploits, aiming to shed light on this curious correlation.
As we delved into the data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9926865 and p < 0.01 from 1978 to 2002. This statistical revelatory revelation sent shockwaves through our team, prompting us to exclaim: "Well, tickle my Barrymore! Could it be that the presence of the actress extraordinaire is intertwined with political persuasions in the Heart of Dixie?"
Although the notion may seem like a Barrymore-ble proposition at first glance, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of cinematic charms on political proclivities. As we reflect on these unexpected results, we couldn't help but ponder: "Is it Drew love that sways the ballots, or merely the 'Barry More' independence that draws Alabamian affinity towards Libertarian inclinations?"
In conclusion, our research adds a dash of whimsy to the serious subject of political behavior, reminding us that even the most unlikely connections can emerge when you least expect them. As we polish off our paper, we leave you with this parting pun: "In the world of data, as in the world of cinema, it seems that Drew Barrymore's influence is truly 'un-Barry-ble'!
ChatGPT:
Drew Barrymore, libertarian votes, movies, correlation, senators, Alabama, The Movie DB, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political behavior
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared inSource: The Movie DB
Additional Info: Cat's Eye (1985); Riding in Cars with Boys (2001); Music and Lyrics (2007); Never Been Kissed (1999); Fever Pitch (2005); Firestarter (1984); Guncrazy (1992); Home Fries (1998); Poison Ivy (1992); My Date with Drew (2005); EverAfter (1998); Everyone Says I Love You (1996); Babes in Toyland (1986); Olive, The Other Reindeer (1999); Beverly Hills Chihuahua (2008); Doppelganger (1993); The Amy Fisher Story (1993); Grey Gardens (2009); Wishful Thinking (1999); Big Miracle (2012); A Conspiracy of Love (1987); Miss You Already (2015); Star Fairies (1985); Going the Distance (2010); The No Show (1987); Saturday Morning: Cartoons' Greatest Hits (1995); The Stand In (2020); 'Donnie Darko': Production Diary (2004); E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982); 50 First Dates (2004); Lucky You (2007); Charlie's Angels (2000); The Wedding Singer (1998); Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002); Duplex (2003); Everybody's Fine (2009); Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003); Curious George (2006); Far from Home (1989); Mad Love (1995); No Place To Hide (1992); Blended (2014); Most Shocking Celebrity Moments of the 80s (2007); Madame X Presents: Madame Xtra Q&A (2021); EPCOT Center: The Opening Celebration (1982); Triple Fisher: The Lethal Lolitas of Long Island (2012); Titan A.E. (2000); Boys on the Side (1995); Irreconcilable Differences (1984); Sketch Artist (1992); Making a Scene: Fever Pitch (2005); E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial 20th Anniversary Special (2002); Adam Sandler: The Kennedy Center Mark Twain Prize (2023); Donnie Darko (2001); Whip It (2009); Bad Girls (1994); See You in the Morning (1989); Saturday Night Live: The Best of Will Ferrell (2002); Saturday Night Live: The Best of Amy Poehler (2009); The Tom Green Cancer Special (2000); Disneyland's 30th Anniversary Celebration (1985); Family Guy Presents: And Then There Were Fewer (2010); Ramones: Raw (2004); Family Guy Presents: Road to the North Pole (2010); The Making of 'E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial' (1996); Family Guy Presents: Stewie Griffin: The Untold Story (2005); Mariah Carey: Merry Christmas to All! (2022); Batman Forever (1995); He's Just Not That Into You (2009); Best Men (1997); Bert Stern: Original Madman (2011); Playboy: Celebrity Centerfolds (2006); Altered States (1980); Spielberg (2017); The Chuck Barris Story: My Life On The Edge (2006); Scream (1996); Skipped Parts (2000); A Castle for Christmas (2021); Citizen Steve (1987); The 'E.T.' Journals (2012); Wayne's World 2 (1993); Inside the Goldmine (1994); SNL Presents: A Very Gilly Christmas (2009); Freddy Got Fingered (2001); Who Are You, Charlie Brown? (2021); Motorama (1991); 2021 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony (2021); Waxwork II: Lost in Time (1992); Scream (2022); Bogie (1980); Saturday Night Live: 25th Anniversary Special (1999); Suddenly, Love (1978); Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy (2010)
See what else correlates with The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alabama
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Alabama
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alabama
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9854264 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in) over the 6 years from 1978 through 2002.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.004E-5. 0.0000800363331467006700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.008004% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,494 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.93, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1978 | 1980 | 1984 | 1992 | 1996 | 2002 | |
The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in (Movie appearances) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alabama (Total votes) | 6006 | 13098 | 12191 | 31811 | 21550 | 20234 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,2,2,5,3,3,])
array_2 = np.array([6006,13098,12191,31811,21550,20234,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in"
array_2_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alabama"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of movies Drew Barrymore appeared in
- Line chart for only Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alabama
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Berry(more) Votes: The Drew Connection Between Movies and Libertarian Leanings
Big thanks for reviewing!
Correlation ID: 5868 · Black Variable ID: 26536 · Red Variable ID: 26196