about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,662 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Argentina.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time a Republican vote was cast, a secret signal was sent to the cows in Argentina, prompting them to produce extra-potent methane gas, the key fuel for Biomass power. It's like the politicians were unknowingly moo-tivating the Argentinian bovine population to create gas with their votes!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Create an image showing a beautiful rural farm in Argentina during sunset. Republican votes in Georgia are being cast in the background, with a subtle nod to the political event. In the foreground, a serene scene of a herd of cows grazing peacefully, with a focus on their interaction. Suddenly, depict an artistic representation of a secret signal being sent out, causing the cows to release methane gas into the air. Finally, illustrate the collection and harnessing of this potent gas to power a nearby biomass plant, symbolizing the generation of sustainable energy for the local community. The lighting should reflect the tranquil atmosphere of the farm, with emphasis on the sustainability theme through the integration of the biomass plant. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Macabre Concept art Cutsy graphics Pop art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina, in the following situation: Every time a Republican vote was cast, a secret signal was sent to the cows in Argentina, prompting them to produce extra-potent methane gas, the key fuel for Biomass power. It's like the politicians were unknowingly moo-tivating the Argentinian bovine population to create gas with their votes!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a rural farm in Argentina, as Republican votes were cast in Georgia, a herd of cows grazed peacefully. Suddenly, a secret signal was sent out, causing the cows to release extra-potent methane gas into the air. This potent gas was swiftly collected and harnessed to power a nearby biomass plant, generating sustainable energy for the local community.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In a rural farm in Argentina, as Republican votes were cast in Georgia, a herd of cows grazed peacefully. Suddenly, a secret signal was sent out, causing the cows to release extra-potent methane gas into the air. This potent gas was swiftly collected and harnessed to power a nearby biomass plant, generating sustainable energy for the local community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Create an image showing a beautiful rural farm in Argentina during sunset. Republican votes in Georgia are being cast in the background, with a subtle nod to the political event. In the foreground, a serene scene of a herd of cows grazing peacefully, with a focus on their interaction. Suddenly, depict an artistic representation of a secret signal being sent out, causing the cows to release methane gas into the air. Finally, illustrate the collection and harnessing of this potent gas to power a nearby biomass plant, symbolizing the generation of sustainable energy for the local community. The lighting should reflect the tranquil atmosphere of the farm, with emphasis on the sustainability theme through the integration of the biomass plant.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Republican votes for Senators in Georgia caused Biomass power generated in Argentina to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots

The Journal of Geopolitical Bioenergy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The interplay between politics and energy is a subject often shrouded in complexities and nuances. As we delve into the vast expanse of this relationship, it becomes evident that the connections are not always readily apparent. However, through meticulous analysis and interdisciplinary exploration, unexpected patterns and correlations can emerge, enlightening us with the surprising dances of power and influence across borders and disciplines.

In this paper, we tackle the perplexing alliance between the voting tendencies of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. While on the surface, these may seem as distant as the North and South Poles, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying threads that intricately weave these seemingly disconnected entities into a compelling narrative of interdependency.

The state of Georgia has long been a pivotal player in the political landscape, with its Republican senators wielding significant influence in shaping policies and agendas. Concurrently, Argentina has been harnessing the potential of biomass power generation as part of its renewable energy portfolio, capitalizing on the abundant agricultural and forestry residues available in the region. At first glance, the confluence of these disparate elements may appear to be akin to fitting a square peg into a round hole – an endeavor that, by all accounts, should be nothing short of an exercise in futility. However, as explorers of the enigmatic, we are driven to unravel these mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom and unearth the intricate tapestry of connections that lie beneath the surface.

Our investigation spans several decades, delving into the annals of political history in Georgia and the evolution of biomass power in Argentina. Leveraging a comprehensive array of data sources, we meticulously unravel the patterns and trends that link the political choices of Georgia's Republican senators to the robust generation of biomass power in Argentina. Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a strikingly low p-value, beckoning us to explore further and uncover the deeper undercurrents that bind these seemingly incongruous entities.

As we embark on this expedition of discovery, we invite our fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in this delightful tango of data, where the steps of statistical significance and analytical rigor harmoniously intertwine with the melodies of unexpected discoveries and serendipitous revelations. With every twist and turn, we aim to shed light on the unexpected "power play" that underpins this Georgia-Argentina connection – a phrase that takes on a whole new meaning in the realms of both politics and energy.

In the following sections, we unveil the intricacies of our methodology, present the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By peeling back the layers of this captivating symbiosis, we inch closer to understanding the undercurrents that ripple across borders, disciplines, and ideologies, transforming the mundane into the extraordinary and the peculiar into the profound.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The interplay between politics and energy is a subject often shrouded in complexities and nuances. As we delve into the vast expanse of this relationship, it becomes evident that the connections are not always readily apparent. However, through meticulous analysis and interdisciplinary exploration, unexpected patterns and correlations can emerge, enlightening us with the surprising dances of power and influence across borders and disciplines.
In this paper, we tackle the perplexing alliance between the voting tendencies of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. While on the surface, these may seem as distant as the North and South Poles, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying threads that intricately weave these seemingly disconnected entities into a compelling narrative of interdependency.
The state of Georgia has long been a pivotal player in the political landscape, with its Republican senators wielding significant influence in shaping policies and agendas. Concurrently, Argentina has been harnessing the potential of biomass power generation as part of its renewable energy portfolio, capitalizing on the abundant agricultural and forestry residues available in the region. At first glance, the confluence of these disparate elements may appear to be akin to fitting a square peg into a round hole – an endeavor that, by all accounts, should be nothing short of an exercise in futility. However, as explorers of the enigmatic, we are driven to unravel these mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom and unearth the intricate tapestry of connections that lie beneath the surface.
Our investigation spans several decades, delving into the annals of political history in Georgia and the evolution of biomass power in Argentina. Leveraging a comprehensive array of data sources, we meticulously unravel the patterns and trends that link the political choices of Georgia's Republican senators to the robust generation of biomass power in Argentina. Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a strikingly low p-value, beckoning us to explore further and uncover the deeper undercurrents that bind these seemingly incongruous entities.
As we embark on this expedition of discovery, we invite our fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in this delightful tango of data, where the steps of statistical significance and analytical rigor harmoniously intertwine with the melodies of unexpected discoveries and serendipitous revelations. With every twist and turn, we aim to shed light on the unexpected "power play" that underpins this Georgia-Argentina connection – a phrase that takes on a whole new meaning in the realms of both politics and energy.
In the following sections, we unveil the intricacies of our methodology, present the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By peeling back the layers of this captivating symbiosis, we inch closer to understanding the undercurrents that ripple across borders, disciplines, and ideologies, transforming the mundane into the extraordinary and the peculiar into the profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generated in Argentina has spurred a wide array of scholarly inquiry. A multitude of studies have probed this fascinating intersection, seeking to untangle the complex web of connections between political choices in Georgia and the realm of biomass power in Argentina.

Smith et al. (2017) delved into the historical underpinnings of political ideologies in Georgia, tracing the evolution of Republican voter behavior through the shifting landscapes of policy agendas and electoral influences. Their work provides valuable insights into the intricate tapestry of political dynamics that form the backdrop for understanding the contemporary voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia.

Doe and Jones (2019) conducted an extensive analysis of biomass power generation in Argentina, delving into the economic and environmental ramifications of this renewable energy source. Their comprehensive examination elucidates the multifaceted nature of biomass power and its significance within the broader context of Argentina's energy portfolio.

Adding further depth to the exploration of energy dynamics, "The Economics of Renewable Energy" by Author X (2015) presents a comprehensive overview of renewable energy sources, shedding light on the global landscape of sustainable power generation. Similarly, "Political Power and Influence" by Author Y (2018) offers a nuanced examination of the intricate interplay between politics and influence, providing a framework for understanding the complexities inherent in political decision-making processes.

Transitioning to fiction works that seemingly tangentially relate to the subject matter at hand, "Biomass and Ballots: A Tale of Political Intrigue" by Fictional Author A (2020) weaves a captivating narrative that brings to life the unexplored connections between biomass power and political maneuvers. In a similar vein, "Georgia on My Mind: A Saga of Electoral Epiphanies" by Fictional Author B (2016) immerses readers in the enigmatic world of Georgia politics, offering a fictionalized account that intertwines the realm of political choices with the captivating allure of the Southern state.

In a departure from traditional scholarly sources, the authors found unexpected inspiration in a most unlikely place, culminating in a revelatory epiphany during the course of this literature review. It was discovered that the back covers of unassuming shampoo bottles, with their cryptic promises of voluminous tresses and lustrous locks, held a wealth of inadvertent wisdom that resonated surprisingly well with the mysterious nexus between Georgia's political landscape and Argentina's biomass power generation. While the academic world may raise an eyebrow at this unconventional source of insight, the authors are confident in the revelatory potential of these overlooked repositories of knowledge.

In the following sections, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, unravel the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By traversing the scholarly terrain and embracing unanticipated sources of inspiration, we aim to elucidate the enigmatic connections that underpin this compelling Georgia-Argentina alliance, shedding light on the unexpected "power play" that animates this enthralling convergence of politics and energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The interplay between politics and energy is a subject often shrouded in complexities and nuances. As we delve into the vast expanse of this relationship, it becomes evident that the connections are not always readily apparent. However, through meticulous analysis and interdisciplinary exploration, unexpected patterns and correlations can emerge, enlightening us with the surprising dances of power and influence across borders and disciplines.
In this paper, we tackle the perplexing alliance between the voting tendencies of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. While on the surface, these may seem as distant as the North and South Poles, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying threads that intricately weave these seemingly disconnected entities into a compelling narrative of interdependency.
The state of Georgia has long been a pivotal player in the political landscape, with its Republican senators wielding significant influence in shaping policies and agendas. Concurrently, Argentina has been harnessing the potential of biomass power generation as part of its renewable energy portfolio, capitalizing on the abundant agricultural and forestry residues available in the region. At first glance, the confluence of these disparate elements may appear to be akin to fitting a square peg into a round hole – an endeavor that, by all accounts, should be nothing short of an exercise in futility. However, as explorers of the enigmatic, we are driven to unravel these mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom and unearth the intricate tapestry of connections that lie beneath the surface.
Our investigation spans several decades, delving into the annals of political history in Georgia and the evolution of biomass power in Argentina. Leveraging a comprehensive array of data sources, we meticulously unravel the patterns and trends that link the political choices of Georgia's Republican senators to the robust generation of biomass power in Argentina. Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a strikingly low p-value, beckoning us to explore further and uncover the deeper undercurrents that bind these seemingly incongruous entities.
As we embark on this expedition of discovery, we invite our fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in this delightful tango of data, where the steps of statistical significance and analytical rigor harmoniously intertwine with the melodies of unexpected discoveries and serendipitous revelations. With every twist and turn, we aim to shed light on the unexpected "power play" that underpins this Georgia-Argentina connection – a phrase that takes on a whole new meaning in the realms of both politics and energy.
In the following sections, we unveil the intricacies of our methodology, present the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By peeling back the layers of this captivating symbiosis, we inch closer to understanding the undercurrents that ripple across borders, disciplines, and ideologies, transforming the mundane into the extraordinary and the peculiar into the profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

As intrepid explorers in the realm of data analysis, we set forth to untangle the perplexing web of interconnectedness between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generation in Argentina. Our methodology, akin to a carefully choreographed dance, involved a multi-faceted approach to collect and analyze data, ensuring that every step adhered to the rigorous standards of academic inquiry and statistical rigor.

Data Collection:
Our journey commenced with an exhaustive quest for data, traversing the vast expanse of the internet in search of reliable sources to fuel our investigation. We scoured the realms of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, all the while keeping a discerning eye for datasets spanning from 1980 to 2021. Unearthing these treasures of information was akin to seeking hidden artifacts in an intellectual archaeological dig, where the prize lay not in gold, but in rows and columns of meticulously organized data.

The Hunt for Correlations:
With our treasure trove of data in hand, we embarked on the arduous task of uncovering correlations between the political landscape in Georgia and the burgeoning biomass power sector in Argentina. Employing statistical techniques reminiscent of a seasoned detective piecing together clues, we delved into the intricacies of time-series analysis and econometric modeling to reveal the elusive relationships that lay concealed amidst the sea of data points.

Cross-Border Statistical Inquiries:
To address the complex interplay between Republican votes in Georgia and biomass power generation in Argentina, we ventured into the realm of cross-border statistical inquiries. This involved employing sophisticated methodologies to account for the unique characteristics of each region while teasing out the underlying connections. Our statistical toolkit included robust time series analysis, structural equation modeling, and a touch of multivariate regression – each serving as a Sherlock Holmes of the statistical domain, sniffing out subtle patterns and relationships that often elude casual observation.

Unveiling the Enigmatic Landscape:
The culmination of our methodology lay in the unveiling of the enigmatic landscape that bound together the seemingly disparate realms of political preferences and renewable energy generation. Through our meticulous foray into the annals of data analysis, we sought to cast a light on the unexpected correlations and patterns that underscored the Georgia-Argentina connection – a pursuit that at times felt akin to unraveling a cryptic crossword puzzle, with each new insight serving as an answer that brought clarity to the enigma at hand.

In essence, our methodology was a carefully orchestrated symphony of data collection, statistical analyses, and intellectual exploration. It was a journey that embodied the spirit of scholarly curiosity, embarking on a quest to reveal the concealed network of relationships that defy conventional boundaries. With our methodology as our compass, we embarked on an academic odyssey that sought to unveil the threads that bound together the "power play" of Republican votes in Georgia and the spectacle of biomass power generation in Argentina – a journey that ultimately led us to the intriguing findings presented in the following sections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9199986, r-squared of 0.8463974, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The interplay between politics and energy is a subject often shrouded in complexities and nuances. As we delve into the vast expanse of this relationship, it becomes evident that the connections are not always readily apparent. However, through meticulous analysis and interdisciplinary exploration, unexpected patterns and correlations can emerge, enlightening us with the surprising dances of power and influence across borders and disciplines.
In this paper, we tackle the perplexing alliance between the voting tendencies of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. While on the surface, these may seem as distant as the North and South Poles, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying threads that intricately weave these seemingly disconnected entities into a compelling narrative of interdependency.
The state of Georgia has long been a pivotal player in the political landscape, with its Republican senators wielding significant influence in shaping policies and agendas. Concurrently, Argentina has been harnessing the potential of biomass power generation as part of its renewable energy portfolio, capitalizing on the abundant agricultural and forestry residues available in the region. At first glance, the confluence of these disparate elements may appear to be akin to fitting a square peg into a round hole – an endeavor that, by all accounts, should be nothing short of an exercise in futility. However, as explorers of the enigmatic, we are driven to unravel these mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom and unearth the intricate tapestry of connections that lie beneath the surface.
Our investigation spans several decades, delving into the annals of political history in Georgia and the evolution of biomass power in Argentina. Leveraging a comprehensive array of data sources, we meticulously unravel the patterns and trends that link the political choices of Georgia's Republican senators to the robust generation of biomass power in Argentina. Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a strikingly low p-value, beckoning us to explore further and uncover the deeper undercurrents that bind these seemingly incongruous entities.
As we embark on this expedition of discovery, we invite our fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in this delightful tango of data, where the steps of statistical significance and analytical rigor harmoniously intertwine with the melodies of unexpected discoveries and serendipitous revelations. With every twist and turn, we aim to shed light on the unexpected "power play" that underpins this Georgia-Argentina connection – a phrase that takes on a whole new meaning in the realms of both politics and energy.
In the following sections, we unveil the intricacies of our methodology, present the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By peeling back the layers of this captivating symbiosis, we inch closer to understanding the undercurrents that ripple across borders, disciplines, and ideologies, transforming the mundane into the extraordinary and the peculiar into the profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a substantial and eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generated in Argentina from 1980 to 2021. The r-squared value of 0.8463974 further solidifies the strength of this relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 firmly asserts the statistical significance of our findings. These results provide compelling evidence for a surprising and robust connection between these seemingly disparate variables, encapsulating a marriage of biomass and ballots that defies conventional wisdom.

The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 visually reinforces the formidable nature of this correlation, showcasing a clear trend that belies the geographic and conceptual distance between the two elements. As the data points converge along the plotted line, it becomes evident that the influence of Republican votes in Georgia extends far beyond their immediate political sphere, resonating across international borders and intertwining with the generation of biomass power in Argentina. It is as if the ballots cast in the Peach State wield a silent, transcontinental sway, entwining with the very fibers of biomass power in distant lands.

Our findings prompt a thoughtful reevaluation of established paradigms and challenge conventional boundaries, beckoning us to delve deeper into the intricacies of this enthralling connection. The unexpected intersection of Republican votes in Georgia and biomass power in Argentina offers a glimpse into the enigmatic intersections of politics and energy, teasing our perception of causality and influence. It is a linkage that underscores the dynamism and unpredictability of the world we seek to decipher, presenting a web of connections that is at once unexpected and undeniably real.

The striking correlation observed in our study raises a multitude of questions and intrigues, extending an invitation to further scholarly inquiry and in-depth exploration. As we contemplate the implications of these findings, one cannot help but marvel at the rich tapestry of interconnections that weaves through the seemingly disparate realms of politics and energy. This research not only expands our understanding of the intricate dynamics at play but also emphasizes the inherent complexity and depth of the interactions that shape our global landscape - indeed, an illuminating testament to the adage that truth can be stranger than fiction.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generated in Argentina has spurred a wide array of scholarly inquiry. A multitude of studies have probed this fascinating intersection, seeking to untangle the complex web of connections between political choices in Georgia and the realm of biomass power in Argentina.
Smith et al. (2017) delved into the historical underpinnings of political ideologies in Georgia, tracing the evolution of Republican voter behavior through the shifting landscapes of policy agendas and electoral influences. Their work provides valuable insights into the intricate tapestry of political dynamics that form the backdrop for understanding the contemporary voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia.
Doe and Jones (2019) conducted an extensive analysis of biomass power generation in Argentina, delving into the economic and environmental ramifications of this renewable energy source. Their comprehensive examination elucidates the multifaceted nature of biomass power and its significance within the broader context of Argentina's energy portfolio.
Adding further depth to the exploration of energy dynamics, "The Economics of Renewable Energy" by Author X (2015) presents a comprehensive overview of renewable energy sources, shedding light on the global landscape of sustainable power generation. Similarly, "Political Power and Influence" by Author Y (2018) offers a nuanced examination of the intricate interplay between politics and influence, providing a framework for understanding the complexities inherent in political decision-making processes.
Transitioning to fiction works that seemingly tangentially relate to the subject matter at hand, "Biomass and Ballots: A Tale of Political Intrigue" by Fictional Author A (2020) weaves a captivating narrative that brings to life the unexplored connections between biomass power and political maneuvers. In a similar vein, "Georgia on My Mind: A Saga of Electoral Epiphanies" by Fictional Author B (2016) immerses readers in the enigmatic world of Georgia politics, offering a fictionalized account that intertwines the realm of political choices with the captivating allure of the Southern state.
In a departure from traditional scholarly sources, the authors found unexpected inspiration in a most unlikely place, culminating in a revelatory epiphany during the course of this literature review. It was discovered that the back covers of unassuming shampoo bottles, with their cryptic promises of voluminous tresses and lustrous locks, held a wealth of inadvertent wisdom that resonated surprisingly well with the mysterious nexus between Georgia's political landscape and Argentina's biomass power generation. While the academic world may raise an eyebrow at this unconventional source of insight, the authors are confident in the revelatory potential of these overlooked repositories of knowledge.
In the following sections, we delve into the intricacies of our methodology, unravel the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By traversing the scholarly terrain and embracing unanticipated sources of inspiration, we aim to elucidate the enigmatic connections that underpin this compelling Georgia-Argentina alliance, shedding light on the unexpected "power play" that animates this enthralling convergence of politics and energy.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a substantial and eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generated in Argentina from 1980 to 2021. The r-squared value of 0.8463974 further solidifies the strength of this relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 firmly asserts the statistical significance of our findings. These results provide compelling evidence for a surprising and robust connection between these seemingly disparate variables, encapsulating a marriage of biomass and ballots that defies conventional wisdom.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 visually reinforces the formidable nature of this correlation, showcasing a clear trend that belies the geographic and conceptual distance between the two elements. As the data points converge along the plotted line, it becomes evident that the influence of Republican votes in Georgia extends far beyond their immediate political sphere, resonating across international borders and intertwining with the generation of biomass power in Argentina. It is as if the ballots cast in the Peach State wield a silent, transcontinental sway, entwining with the very fibers of biomass power in distant lands.
Our findings prompt a thoughtful reevaluation of established paradigms and challenge conventional boundaries, beckoning us to delve deeper into the intricacies of this enthralling connection. The unexpected intersection of Republican votes in Georgia and biomass power in Argentina offers a glimpse into the enigmatic intersections of politics and energy, teasing our perception of causality and influence. It is a linkage that underscores the dynamism and unpredictability of the world we seek to decipher, presenting a web of connections that is at once unexpected and undeniably real.
The striking correlation observed in our study raises a multitude of questions and intrigues, extending an invitation to further scholarly inquiry and in-depth exploration. As we contemplate the implications of these findings, one cannot help but marvel at the rich tapestry of interconnections that weaves through the seemingly disparate realms of politics and energy. This research not only expands our understanding of the intricate dynamics at play but also emphasizes the inherent complexity and depth of the interactions that shape our global landscape - indeed, an illuminating testament to the adage that truth can be stranger than fiction.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study provide compelling evidence supporting the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generation in Argentina. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986, along with the r-squared value of 0.8463974 and a p-value of less than 0.01, underscore the unexpectedly strong linkage between these seemingly unrelated variables. These findings align with prior research by Smith et al. (2017), which illuminated the historical underpinnings of Republican voter behavior in Georgia. The intricate tapestry of political dynamics explored by Smith et al. resonates with our discovery of a substantial correlation, suggesting an enduring impact of political choices on international energy generation. Admittedly, the connection between Georgia's political landscape and Argentina's biomass power generation may seem as improbable as finding deep wisdom on a shampoo bottle – but as our results demonstrate, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, or in this case, more captivating than shampoo bottle revelations.

The unexpected nature of this relationship prompts a reevaluation of established paradigms and challenges conventional boundaries, inviting further scholarly inquiry into the enthralling connection between political choices and energy dynamics. While the correlation observed in our study may seem whimsical at first glance, it offers a testament to the interconnectedness of our global landscape and echoes the adage that "power" – whether in the form of ballots or biomass – can wield influence that transcends geographic and conceptual boundaries.

As we move forward, it becomes clear that this research not only expands our understanding of the intricate dynamics at play but also emphasizes the inherent complexity and depth of the interactions that shape our global landscape. It is a reminder that academic inquiry, much like the convergence of seemingly disparate variables, holds the potential for unexpected revelations and illuminating discoveries.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and Biomass power generated in Argentina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The interplay between politics and energy is a subject often shrouded in complexities and nuances. As we delve into the vast expanse of this relationship, it becomes evident that the connections are not always readily apparent. However, through meticulous analysis and interdisciplinary exploration, unexpected patterns and correlations can emerge, enlightening us with the surprising dances of power and influence across borders and disciplines.
In this paper, we tackle the perplexing alliance between the voting tendencies of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. While on the surface, these may seem as distant as the North and South Poles, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying threads that intricately weave these seemingly disconnected entities into a compelling narrative of interdependency.
The state of Georgia has long been a pivotal player in the political landscape, with its Republican senators wielding significant influence in shaping policies and agendas. Concurrently, Argentina has been harnessing the potential of biomass power generation as part of its renewable energy portfolio, capitalizing on the abundant agricultural and forestry residues available in the region. At first glance, the confluence of these disparate elements may appear to be akin to fitting a square peg into a round hole – an endeavor that, by all accounts, should be nothing short of an exercise in futility. However, as explorers of the enigmatic, we are driven to unravel these mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom and unearth the intricate tapestry of connections that lie beneath the surface.
Our investigation spans several decades, delving into the annals of political history in Georgia and the evolution of biomass power in Argentina. Leveraging a comprehensive array of data sources, we meticulously unravel the patterns and trends that link the political choices of Georgia's Republican senators to the robust generation of biomass power in Argentina. Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a strikingly low p-value, beckoning us to explore further and uncover the deeper undercurrents that bind these seemingly incongruous entities.
As we embark on this expedition of discovery, we invite our fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in this delightful tango of data, where the steps of statistical significance and analytical rigor harmoniously intertwine with the melodies of unexpected discoveries and serendipitous revelations. With every twist and turn, we aim to shed light on the unexpected "power play" that underpins this Georgia-Argentina connection – a phrase that takes on a whole new meaning in the realms of both politics and energy.
In the following sections, we unveil the intricacies of our methodology, present the empirical findings that challenge preconceived notions, and engage in a spirited discussion that invites new perspectives and interpretations. By peeling back the layers of this captivating symbiosis, we inch closer to understanding the undercurrents that ripple across borders, disciplines, and ideologies, transforming the mundane into the extraordinary and the peculiar into the profound.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a substantial and eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generated in Argentina from 1980 to 2021. The r-squared value of 0.8463974 further solidifies the strength of this relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 firmly asserts the statistical significance of our findings. These results provide compelling evidence for a surprising and robust connection between these seemingly disparate variables, encapsulating a marriage of biomass and ballots that defies conventional wisdom.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 visually reinforces the formidable nature of this correlation, showcasing a clear trend that belies the geographic and conceptual distance between the two elements. As the data points converge along the plotted line, it becomes evident that the influence of Republican votes in Georgia extends far beyond their immediate political sphere, resonating across international borders and intertwining with the generation of biomass power in Argentina. It is as if the ballots cast in the Peach State wield a silent, transcontinental sway, entwining with the very fibers of biomass power in distant lands.
Our findings prompt a thoughtful reevaluation of established paradigms and challenge conventional boundaries, beckoning us to delve deeper into the intricacies of this enthralling connection. The unexpected intersection of Republican votes in Georgia and biomass power in Argentina offers a glimpse into the enigmatic intersections of politics and energy, teasing our perception of causality and influence. It is a linkage that underscores the dynamism and unpredictability of the world we seek to decipher, presenting a web of connections that is at once unexpected and undeniably real.
The striking correlation observed in our study raises a multitude of questions and intrigues, extending an invitation to further scholarly inquiry and in-depth exploration. As we contemplate the implications of these findings, one cannot help but marvel at the rich tapestry of interconnections that weaves through the seemingly disparate realms of politics and energy. This research not only expands our understanding of the intricate dynamics at play but also emphasizes the inherent complexity and depth of the interactions that shape our global landscape - indeed, an illuminating testament to the adage that truth can be stranger than fiction.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the unexpected and "powerful" connection between Republican votes for Senators in Georgia and biomass power generation in Argentina. The robust correlation coefficient and strikingly low p-value underscore the compelling interplay between these seemingly disparate variables, challenging traditional boundaries and beckoning us to explore the deeper undercurrents that bind them. The findings of our study not only expand our understanding of political and energy dynamics but also highlight the unpredictability and complexity of the global landscape.

As we navigate the intricate web of connections unearthed by our research, it becomes clear that the ramifications of this enigmatic alliance extend far beyond conventional wisdom. The dance of statistical significance and analytical rigor has led us to a newfound appreciation for the serendipitous revelations and unexpected discoveries that characterize this fascinating tango of data. However, while our findings yield valuable insights, it's important to remember that correlation does not imply causation. The inherent complexity of the social and environmental factors at play warrants cautious interpretation of our results.

Nevertheless, we boldly assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. The sheer unexpectedness of our findings almost begs for an end to new studies on this topic. However, we must resist the temptation to categorically label this as a mere "fluke" and instead embrace the whimsical and fascinating intricacies that lie beneath the surface. The "power play" of biom(ass) and ballots remains a captivating enigma, one that teases our perception of causality and invites us to marvel at the curious dances of influence and connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geopolitical Bioenergy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Geopolitical Agroecology and Electoral Dynamics (IGAED)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Power Play: Unraveling the Georgia-Argentina Connection Through Biomass And Ballots with an abstract of In this study, we aimed to unravel the intriguing intersection between the voting patterns of Republican senators in Georgia and the biomass power generation in Argentina. Leveraging comprehensive data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2021. Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9199986 with an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an unexpectedly strong linkage that demands further investigation to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political choices in Georgia and biomass power output in Argentina. This research highlights the complex interplay between seemingly disparate factors, demonstrating the importance of exploring beyond traditional boundaries in the pursuit of knowledge – or perhaps even unraveling a truly "powerful" connection.

ChatGPT:

Georgia, Argentina, biomass power generation, Republican senators, voting patterns, correlation coefficient, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, political choices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Georgia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia

Biomass power generated in Argentina
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Argentina in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Argentina

Correlation r = 0.9199986 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8463974 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Argentina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia) over the 14 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-6. 0.0000031800612507854135000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00032% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 314,459 random variables You don't actually need 314 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198619921996199820022004200820102014201620202021
Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia (Total votes)8036863371966012411708400107397091854010713501864200309513014899001358090213581048887404408830
Biomass power generated in Argentina (Billion kWh)0.10.10.10.10.350.470.871.21.5761.1651.1731.5322.6072.607




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([803686,337196,601241,1708400,1073970,918540,1071350,1864200,3095130,1489900,1358090,2135810,4888740,4408830,])
array_2 = np.array([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.35,0.47,0.87,1.2,1.576,1.165,1.173,1.532,2.607,2.607,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Argentina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 5662 · Black Variable ID: 26224 · Red Variable ID: 23464
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0