Report an error
Biomass power generated in Argentina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sienna | r=0.94 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Republican Senators in Georgia | r=0.92 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Democratic Senators in North Carolina | r=0.9 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.89 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Worldwide count of earthquakes with a magnitude between 8.0 and 9.9 | r=0.46 | 22yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Argentina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)