about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,610 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and the second variable is Google searches for 'i have the flu'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The crisp, clean air in Manchester, New Hampshire inspired people to engage in vigorous outdoor activities like snowshoeing and ice skating. Unfortunately, their exuberant activity levels led to a surge in accidental collisions and falls, creating the perfect environment for the flu virus to spread. Remember, even a flu shot can't protect you from a well-aimed snowball to the face! Stay safe out there, folks.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover depicting a bustling snowy park in Manchester, New Hampshire. Show people engaging in outdoor activities like ice skating and snowshoeing on a bright, clear day, capturing the joyous atmosphere. Amidst the lively scene, subtly convey the unintentional spread of the flu as people check their phones. Focus on the contrast between the vibrant outdoor fun and the hidden threat of illness. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Macabre Surrealism A TIME magazine cover image a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu', in the following situation: The crisp, clean air in Manchester, New Hampshire inspired people to engage in vigorous outdoor activities like snowshoeing and ice skating. Unfortunately, their exuberant activity levels led to a surge in accidental collisions and falls, creating the perfect environment for the flu virus to spread. Remember, even a flu shot can't protect you from a well-aimed snowball to the face! Stay safe out there, folks.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: On a clear, chilly day in Manchester, New Hampshire, people flock to the snowy parks for outdoor activities. The air is fresh and invigorating as people twirl around on ice skates and trek through the snow with snowshoes. However, the joyous activity also leads to accidental collisions and falls. Amidst the laughter and cheers, some individuals are searching "i have the flu" on their phones, unknowingly spreading the virus in the midst of the lively outdoor scene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: On a clear, chilly day in Manchester, New Hampshire, people flock to the snowy parks for outdoor activities. The air is fresh and invigorating as people twirl around on ice skates and trek through the snow with snowshoes. However, the joyous activity also leads to accidental collisions and falls. Amidst the laughter and cheers, some individuals are searching "i have the flu" on their phones, unknowingly spreading the virus in the midst of the lively outdoor scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover depicting a bustling snowy park in Manchester, New Hampshire. Show people engaging in outdoor activities like ice skating and snowshoeing on a bright, clear day, capturing the joyous atmosphere. Amidst the lively scene, subtly convey the unintentional spread of the flu as people check their phones. Focus on the contrast between the vibrant outdoor fun and the hidden threat of illness.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire caused i have the flu (Google searches for 'i have the flu') to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'

Journal of Environmental Health and Social Media Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Air quality has been a topic of great interest in the realm of public health, with a focus on its potential impact on various health outcomes and behaviors. In recent years, the use of Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring public health trends and behaviors. This raises the question: is there a connection between air quality and online searches related to flu-like symptoms? It seems that researchers are now searching for answers not only in laboratories but also in search engine data!

The city of Manchester, New Hampshire, offers a unique setting for investigating this intriguing relationship. With its fluctuating air quality influenced by various environmental and anthropogenic factors, the city provides a microcosm for observing the impact of air quality on public behavior. It's as if Manchester is serving as a petri dish for this air pollution and flu search experiment – the ultimate flu-guinea pig, if you will!

The aim of this study is to explore the potential correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we sought to unravel this puzzling connection. It's almost like we're on a digital detective mission, sniffing out the hidden relationship between air pollutants and flu-related cyberspace inquiries.

Employing statistical analysis, we identified a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between poor air quality and an increase in online searches related to flu-like symptoms. It appears that bad air quality not only affects physical health but also triggers an upsurge in virtual hypochondria – talk about air pollution leaving its digital footprint!

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of scientific curiosity, highlighting the potential influence of environmental factors on public health behaviors and perceptions. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's as if we're navigating through virtual smog to uncover the truth about the impact of air quality on public health perceptions.

In light of these findings, further exploration of the implications for public health messaging and interventions is warranted. Additionally, the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends presents an exciting avenue for future research. It's as if the world of public health research now has a new pair of digital binoculars trained on the virtual behaviors triggered by environmental factors.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on the unanticipated relationship between air quality and the virtual quest for flu-related information. As we present our findings, we hope this research infuses a breath of fresh air into the understanding of the influence of air pollution on public health perceptions. After all, it appears that even in the digital realm, air quality can leave an indelible mark on our quest for health information.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air quality has been a topic of great interest in the realm of public health, with a focus on its potential impact on various health outcomes and behaviors. In recent years, the use of Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring public health trends and behaviors. This raises the question: is there a connection between air quality and online searches related to flu-like symptoms? It seems that researchers are now searching for answers not only in laboratories but also in search engine data!
The city of Manchester, New Hampshire, offers a unique setting for investigating this intriguing relationship. With its fluctuating air quality influenced by various environmental and anthropogenic factors, the city provides a microcosm for observing the impact of air quality on public behavior. It's as if Manchester is serving as a petri dish for this air pollution and flu search experiment – the ultimate flu-guinea pig, if you will!
The aim of this study is to explore the potential correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we sought to unravel this puzzling connection. It's almost like we're on a digital detective mission, sniffing out the hidden relationship between air pollutants and flu-related cyberspace inquiries.
Employing statistical analysis, we identified a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between poor air quality and an increase in online searches related to flu-like symptoms. It appears that bad air quality not only affects physical health but also triggers an upsurge in virtual hypochondria – talk about air pollution leaving its digital footprint!
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of scientific curiosity, highlighting the potential influence of environmental factors on public health behaviors and perceptions. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's as if we're navigating through virtual smog to uncover the truth about the impact of air quality on public health perceptions.
In light of these findings, further exploration of the implications for public health messaging and interventions is warranted. Additionally, the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends presents an exciting avenue for future research. It's as if the world of public health research now has a new pair of digital binoculars trained on the virtual behaviors triggered by environmental factors.
In conclusion, this study sheds light on the unanticipated relationship between air quality and the virtual quest for flu-related information. As we present our findings, we hope this research infuses a breath of fresh air into the understanding of the influence of air pollution on public health perceptions. After all, it appears that even in the digital realm, air quality can leave an indelible mark on our quest for health information.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018) has investigated the impact of environmental factors on public health perceptions and behaviors. Smith's study revealed intriguing associations between air quality and respiratory conditions, while Doe's work delved into the influence of environmental cues on public health information-seeking behaviors. These studies form the foundation for our exploration of the relationship between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'I have the flu'. It's as if these studies set the stage for our research, like the opening act before the main flu-ster of our show.

Moreover, Jones (2020) examined the use of digital data, including online search patterns, as a tool for monitoring public health trends. Their findings underscore the potential of Google search data as a dynamic resource for understanding public health behaviors. It's almost as if they were uncovering hidden treasures in the virtual oceans of cyberspace - ahoy, there's a correlation on the digital horizon!

Drawing from wider interdisciplinary perspectives, the work of Lopez and Wong (2017) comprehensively explored the relationship between environmental factors and public health outcomes. Their study provided a holistic view of the interconnectedness of environmental exposures and health behaviors, offering valuable insights for our investigation into the digital manifestations of air pollution's impact on flu-related queries. It's like they were shining a light on the underground tunnels of public health, and we stumbled upon a virtual cartography mapping out the connection between air quality and Google searches.

Turning to related non-fiction literature, the seminal work of "The Air We Breathe: Understanding Air Quality and Its Influence on Health" by Johnson (2019) offers comprehensive insights into the implications of air quality on public health. In a similar vein, "The Virtual Health Detective: Navigating Online Behaviors in Public Health" by Garcia (2016) delves into the use of digital data for understanding public health trends. It's as if these books were laying the informational bricks for our intellectual house, building a foundation sturdy enough to withstand even the gustiest implications of poor air quality on digital behavior.

In the realm of fiction, the evocative narrative of "The Flu Files: A Digital Odyssey" by Stone (2015) weaves a tale of intrigue, where online search patterns hold the keys to unraveling a mysterious outbreak of flu-like symptoms. Similarly, the dystopian depiction of "Airpocalypse Now: The Digital Fallout" by Green (2018) paints a vivid picture of a world where air quality directly shapes virtual epidemics and online behavior. It's almost as if these fictional works were prophetic echoes of the unexpected connection we uncovered – a digital flu-demic!

Beyond conventional scholarly sources, the authors also draw on unconventional resources, including the informative labels of household and personal care products. It seems that even the back of a shampoo bottle can offer surprising insights into the chemistry of cleaning and perhaps, the secret to digital health queries. After all, a little humor and creativity can go a long way in the serious world of research – it's like adding a pinch of fun to an otherwise bland research soup!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air quality has been a topic of great interest in the realm of public health, with a focus on its potential impact on various health outcomes and behaviors. In recent years, the use of Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring public health trends and behaviors. This raises the question: is there a connection between air quality and online searches related to flu-like symptoms? It seems that researchers are now searching for answers not only in laboratories but also in search engine data!
The city of Manchester, New Hampshire, offers a unique setting for investigating this intriguing relationship. With its fluctuating air quality influenced by various environmental and anthropogenic factors, the city provides a microcosm for observing the impact of air quality on public behavior. It's as if Manchester is serving as a petri dish for this air pollution and flu search experiment – the ultimate flu-guinea pig, if you will!
The aim of this study is to explore the potential correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we sought to unravel this puzzling connection. It's almost like we're on a digital detective mission, sniffing out the hidden relationship between air pollutants and flu-related cyberspace inquiries.
Employing statistical analysis, we identified a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between poor air quality and an increase in online searches related to flu-like symptoms. It appears that bad air quality not only affects physical health but also triggers an upsurge in virtual hypochondria – talk about air pollution leaving its digital footprint!
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of scientific curiosity, highlighting the potential influence of environmental factors on public health behaviors and perceptions. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's as if we're navigating through virtual smog to uncover the truth about the impact of air quality on public health perceptions.
In light of these findings, further exploration of the implications for public health messaging and interventions is warranted. Additionally, the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends presents an exciting avenue for future research. It's as if the world of public health research now has a new pair of digital binoculars trained on the virtual behaviors triggered by environmental factors.
In conclusion, this study sheds light on the unanticipated relationship between air quality and the virtual quest for flu-related information. As we present our findings, we hope this research infuses a breath of fresh air into the understanding of the influence of air pollution on public health perceptions. After all, it appears that even in the digital realm, air quality can leave an indelible mark on our quest for health information.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The research team collected air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, encompassing measurements of pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone. These measurements were obtained from monitoring stations in Manchester, New Hampshire, and covered the period from 2004 to 2023. The air quality data was scrutinized more closely than a scientist examining a newly discovered compound under a microscope!

As for the Google search data, the team utilized Google Trends to extract the frequency of searches for the term 'I have the flu' within the geographical area of Manchester, New Hampshire. This data, spanning the same period as the air quality measurements, was scrutinized with the intensity of a virtual detective on the trail of a cybercriminal. The search interest values provided by Google Trends were normalized and scaled on a range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the peak popularity of the search term during the specified time period.

Data Analysis:
To examine the relationship between air quality and Google search activity, the research team employed statistical analysis techniques. A correlation analysis was conducted to determine the degree of association between air pollutants and the frequency of 'I have the flu' searches. The correlation coefficient was calculated with the precision of a mathematician solving a complex equation, and statistical significance was assessed through p-values, capturing the impact of air quality on the likelihood of flu-related internet queries.

In addition, a time-series analysis was performed to explore the temporal patterns of air quality and Google search activity. This involved delving into the seasonal variations and trends in both datasets, akin to navigating through the nuances of a musical composition to discern its underlying rhythm. The fluctuating nature of air quality and search behavior was carefully examined to unravel any discernible patterns or synchronicity between the two variables.

Data Filtering:
Prior to the analysis, the research team carefully filtered the datasets to ensure data accuracy and reliability. Outliers and missing values were addressed with the thoroughness of a librarian cataloging rare manuscripts, ensuring that the integrity of the datasets remained intact throughout the analytical process.

It's almost like the research team donned digital hazmat suits, meticulously sifting through the sea of data to extract the nuggets of information relevant to the study's objectives. With these rigorous data filtering measures in place, the subsequent analyses were conducted on a robust and dependable foundation.

The application of rigorous statistical methods and the careful curation of data allowed for a comprehensive examination of the relationship between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'I have the flu'. This methodological approach ensured that the findings could be interpreted with confidence and rigor, setting the stage for the elucidation of this intriguing and unexpected correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8727036, r-squared of 0.7616116, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Air quality has been a topic of great interest in the realm of public health, with a focus on its potential impact on various health outcomes and behaviors. In recent years, the use of Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring public health trends and behaviors. This raises the question: is there a connection between air quality and online searches related to flu-like symptoms? It seems that researchers are now searching for answers not only in laboratories but also in search engine data!
The city of Manchester, New Hampshire, offers a unique setting for investigating this intriguing relationship. With its fluctuating air quality influenced by various environmental and anthropogenic factors, the city provides a microcosm for observing the impact of air quality on public behavior. It's as if Manchester is serving as a petri dish for this air pollution and flu search experiment – the ultimate flu-guinea pig, if you will!
The aim of this study is to explore the potential correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we sought to unravel this puzzling connection. It's almost like we're on a digital detective mission, sniffing out the hidden relationship between air pollutants and flu-related cyberspace inquiries.
Employing statistical analysis, we identified a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between poor air quality and an increase in online searches related to flu-like symptoms. It appears that bad air quality not only affects physical health but also triggers an upsurge in virtual hypochondria – talk about air pollution leaving its digital footprint!
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of scientific curiosity, highlighting the potential influence of environmental factors on public health behaviors and perceptions. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's as if we're navigating through virtual smog to uncover the truth about the impact of air quality on public health perceptions.
In light of these findings, further exploration of the implications for public health messaging and interventions is warranted. Additionally, the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends presents an exciting avenue for future research. It's as if the world of public health research now has a new pair of digital binoculars trained on the virtual behaviors triggered by environmental factors.
In conclusion, this study sheds light on the unanticipated relationship between air quality and the virtual quest for flu-related information. As we present our findings, we hope this research infuses a breath of fresh air into the understanding of the influence of air pollution on public health perceptions. After all, it appears that even in the digital realm, air quality can leave an indelible mark on our quest for health information.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a notable correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8727036, indicating a strong positive relationship between these variables. This correlation coefficient is as strong as the immune system of a person who takes their vitamins daily - no flu can penetrate that defense!

Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.7616116 suggests that approximately 76.16% of the variability in flu-related Google searches can be explained by changes in air quality. It's almost as if the air quality is calling the shots in the flu hunt, dictating when people turn to the internet for health-related information - air quality, the unseen conductor of the virtual flu symphony!

The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the significance of this relationship, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation due to random chance alone is quite slim. It's as if this correlation is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistics - a fortuitous and statistically meaningful discovery!

These statistical findings are visually represented in Fig. 1, a scatterplot displaying the tight clustering of data points along a positively sloped trend line. The plot is as revealing as a microscope in a biology lab, bringing into focus the striking association between air quality and online flu-related searches. It's almost as if the scatterplot is saying, "Let's clear the air on this flu-related search behavior once and for all!"

In summary, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. This unexpected connection between environmental factors and virtual health-seeking behaviors not only adds a breath of fresh air to public health research but also leaves a digital footprint in the quest for understanding human responses to air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018) has investigated the impact of environmental factors on public health perceptions and behaviors. Smith's study revealed intriguing associations between air quality and respiratory conditions, while Doe's work delved into the influence of environmental cues on public health information-seeking behaviors. These studies form the foundation for our exploration of the relationship between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'I have the flu'. It's as if these studies set the stage for our research, like the opening act before the main flu-ster of our show.
Moreover, Jones (2020) examined the use of digital data, including online search patterns, as a tool for monitoring public health trends. Their findings underscore the potential of Google search data as a dynamic resource for understanding public health behaviors. It's almost as if they were uncovering hidden treasures in the virtual oceans of cyberspace - ahoy, there's a correlation on the digital horizon!
Drawing from wider interdisciplinary perspectives, the work of Lopez and Wong (2017) comprehensively explored the relationship between environmental factors and public health outcomes. Their study provided a holistic view of the interconnectedness of environmental exposures and health behaviors, offering valuable insights for our investigation into the digital manifestations of air pollution's impact on flu-related queries. It's like they were shining a light on the underground tunnels of public health, and we stumbled upon a virtual cartography mapping out the connection between air quality and Google searches.
Turning to related non-fiction literature, the seminal work of "The Air We Breathe: Understanding Air Quality and Its Influence on Health" by Johnson (2019) offers comprehensive insights into the implications of air quality on public health. In a similar vein, "The Virtual Health Detective: Navigating Online Behaviors in Public Health" by Garcia (2016) delves into the use of digital data for understanding public health trends. It's as if these books were laying the informational bricks for our intellectual house, building a foundation sturdy enough to withstand even the gustiest implications of poor air quality on digital behavior.
In the realm of fiction, the evocative narrative of "The Flu Files: A Digital Odyssey" by Stone (2015) weaves a tale of intrigue, where online search patterns hold the keys to unraveling a mysterious outbreak of flu-like symptoms. Similarly, the dystopian depiction of "Airpocalypse Now: The Digital Fallout" by Green (2018) paints a vivid picture of a world where air quality directly shapes virtual epidemics and online behavior. It's almost as if these fictional works were prophetic echoes of the unexpected connection we uncovered – a digital flu-demic!
Beyond conventional scholarly sources, the authors also draw on unconventional resources, including the informative labels of household and personal care products. It seems that even the back of a shampoo bottle can offer surprising insights into the chemistry of cleaning and perhaps, the secret to digital health queries. After all, a little humor and creativity can go a long way in the serious world of research – it's like adding a pinch of fun to an otherwise bland research soup!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a notable correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8727036, indicating a strong positive relationship between these variables. This correlation coefficient is as strong as the immune system of a person who takes their vitamins daily - no flu can penetrate that defense!
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.7616116 suggests that approximately 76.16% of the variability in flu-related Google searches can be explained by changes in air quality. It's almost as if the air quality is calling the shots in the flu hunt, dictating when people turn to the internet for health-related information - air quality, the unseen conductor of the virtual flu symphony!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the significance of this relationship, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation due to random chance alone is quite slim. It's as if this correlation is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistics - a fortuitous and statistically meaningful discovery!
These statistical findings are visually represented in Fig. 1, a scatterplot displaying the tight clustering of data points along a positively sloped trend line. The plot is as revealing as a microscope in a biology lab, bringing into focus the striking association between air quality and online flu-related searches. It's almost as if the scatterplot is saying, "Let's clear the air on this flu-related search behavior once and for all!"
In summary, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. This unexpected connection between environmental factors and virtual health-seeking behaviors not only adds a breath of fresh air to public health research but also leaves a digital footprint in the quest for understanding human responses to air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide substantial support for the prior research conducted by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018), who also explored the impact of environmental factors on public health perceptions and behaviors. It's as if our results were the main act after the opening flu-ster! The significant correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and Google searches for 'I have the flu' echoes Smith's revelations about the associations between air quality and respiratory conditions. It's as if these correlations were as clear as the air on a crisp autumn day, unveiling the covert influence of air pollution on public health behaviors.

Similarly, our findings align with the work of Jones (2020), underscoring the potential of Google search data as a dynamic resource for understanding public health behaviors. Our study's significant correlation coefficient is a virtual treasure amidst the digital oceans, mirroring the potential of Google search data in understanding public health trends. It's as if we were the explorers discovering a correlation on the digital horizon - the digital health detectives!

Furthermore, our results resonate with Lopez and Wong's (2017) comprehensive exploration of the relationship between environmental factors and public health outcomes. The significant correlation we found between air quality and flu-related searches sheds light on the interconnectedness of environmental exposures and health behaviors, reinforcing the digital cartography mapped out by Lopez and Wong. It's as if our study was adding another block to the virtual cartography, depicting the connection between air quality and Google searches in vivid detail.

In line with the seminal work of Johnson (2019) and Garcia (2016), our findings emphasize the substantial influence of air quality on public health perceptions and the potential use of digital data for understanding public health trends. It's like our results were the sturdy bricks laid upon the informational foundation of these works, building a comprehensive understanding of the implications of air quality on digital behavior. After all, a pinch of fun in the serious world of research can go as far as a pinch of flu-season spray in warding off sniffles!

These correlations were not only statistically meaningful but also practically significant, emphasizing the potential impact of air pollution on public health perceptions and behaviors. Just as air quality influences breathing, it seems to have a hand in the digital flu hunt. This unexpected connection adds a breath of fresh air to public health research and highlights the potential for using Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends.

In conclusion, our study offers valuable insights into the connection between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information. It's as if our findings were leaving readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the digital flu epidemic! So, remember to take a deep breath of fresh air and keep those virtual tissues handy – you never know when the virtual flu season might strike!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google searches for 'i have the flu'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!

Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Air quality has been a topic of great interest in the realm of public health, with a focus on its potential impact on various health outcomes and behaviors. In recent years, the use of Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring public health trends and behaviors. This raises the question: is there a connection between air quality and online searches related to flu-like symptoms? It seems that researchers are now searching for answers not only in laboratories but also in search engine data!
The city of Manchester, New Hampshire, offers a unique setting for investigating this intriguing relationship. With its fluctuating air quality influenced by various environmental and anthropogenic factors, the city provides a microcosm for observing the impact of air quality on public behavior. It's as if Manchester is serving as a petri dish for this air pollution and flu search experiment – the ultimate flu-guinea pig, if you will!
The aim of this study is to explore the potential correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we sought to unravel this puzzling connection. It's almost like we're on a digital detective mission, sniffing out the hidden relationship between air pollutants and flu-related cyberspace inquiries.
Employing statistical analysis, we identified a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between poor air quality and an increase in online searches related to flu-like symptoms. It appears that bad air quality not only affects physical health but also triggers an upsurge in virtual hypochondria – talk about air pollution leaving its digital footprint!
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of scientific curiosity, highlighting the potential influence of environmental factors on public health behaviors and perceptions. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's as if we're navigating through virtual smog to uncover the truth about the impact of air quality on public health perceptions.
In light of these findings, further exploration of the implications for public health messaging and interventions is warranted. Additionally, the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends presents an exciting avenue for future research. It's as if the world of public health research now has a new pair of digital binoculars trained on the virtual behaviors triggered by environmental factors.
In conclusion, this study sheds light on the unanticipated relationship between air quality and the virtual quest for flu-related information. As we present our findings, we hope this research infuses a breath of fresh air into the understanding of the influence of air pollution on public health perceptions. After all, it appears that even in the digital realm, air quality can leave an indelible mark on our quest for health information.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a notable correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8727036, indicating a strong positive relationship between these variables. This correlation coefficient is as strong as the immune system of a person who takes their vitamins daily - no flu can penetrate that defense!
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.7616116 suggests that approximately 76.16% of the variability in flu-related Google searches can be explained by changes in air quality. It's almost as if the air quality is calling the shots in the flu hunt, dictating when people turn to the internet for health-related information - air quality, the unseen conductor of the virtual flu symphony!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the significance of this relationship, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation due to random chance alone is quite slim. It's as if this correlation is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistics - a fortuitous and statistically meaningful discovery!
These statistical findings are visually represented in Fig. 1, a scatterplot displaying the tight clustering of data points along a positively sloped trend line. The plot is as revealing as a microscope in a biology lab, bringing into focus the striking association between air quality and online flu-related searches. It's almost as if the scatterplot is saying, "Let's clear the air on this flu-related search behavior once and for all!"
In summary, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. This unexpected connection between environmental factors and virtual health-seeking behaviors not only adds a breath of fresh air to public health research but also leaves a digital footprint in the quest for understanding human responses to air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study offers a lungful of insights into the unexpected relationship between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and the virtual "flu hunt" via Google searches. It's as if poor air quality served as a not-so-subtle nudge, prompting more internet users to digitally inquire about their flu-like symptoms – the internet becoming a virtual waiting room for flu-related queries!

The significant correlation coefficient, akin to a statistical Eureka moment, implies that changes in air quality are closely linked to variations in the frequency of flu-related online searches. It's almost as if the air quality is whispering to the public, "Ah-choo looking for flu information?"

The r-squared value, suggesting that over 76% of the fluctuation in flu-related searches is tied to air quality changes, paints a picture of air quality as an unlikely but influential player in the digital health information scene. It's as if air quality is pulling the strings in this digital play, curating the virtual experience of flu queries with finesse – the unseen maestro of the flu-infested symphony!

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the unlikelihood of this strong correlation occurring purely by chance. It's almost as if this finding is as rare as a scientifically-minded unicorn - a statistical gem that beckons further exploration!

Based on these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It's as if this study has blown away the fog, leaving the field of air quality-related flu searches as clear as a digital bell. After all, when it comes to the relationship between air quality and the digital flu quest, our findings leave little room for further uncertainty. With these puns, our conclusions become undeniable facts!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Health and Social Media Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Aerosol Epidemiology and Online Search Patterns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Flu-Glue: The Relationship Between Air Quality in Manchester, New Hampshire and Google Searches for 'I Have the Flu' with an abstract of This study examines the correlation between air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire, and the frequency of Google searches for 'I have the flu'. The research team utilized data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to conduct a thorough analysis of this curious connection. The results reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8727036 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
Our findings suggest that air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire has a substantial impact on the public's perception of flu-like symptoms, as evidenced by the increase in internet searches related to flu during periods of poor air quality. This correlation sheds light on the potential influence of air pollution on public health in unexpected and amusing ways – it seems that bad air quality not only affects breathing but also has the flu feeling it's being searched for!
Furthermore, this study emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in influencing public health behaviors and perceptions. Future research may explore the implications of this correlation for public health messaging and interventions, as well as the potential use of Google search data as a complementary tool for monitoring public health trends. In conclusion, we hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air in understanding the unexpected link between air quality and the virtual hunt for flu-related information!

ChatGPT:

air quality, Manchester New Hampshire, flu, Google searches, public health, environmental factors, correlation coefficient, public health messaging, Google Trends, air pollution, public health trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Manchester-Nashua, NH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire

Google searches for 'i have the flu'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i have the flu' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i have the flu'

Correlation r = 0.8727036 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7616116 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i have the flu') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.2E-7. 0.0000005204753509995037000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 5.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,921,321 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire (Good air quality)96.994594.794596.438495.068597.267898.630197.808299.178198.360799.72699.72699.452199.180399.72610010010099.452110098.3516
Google searches for 'i have the flu' (Rel. search volume)3.333334.583334.083333.916676.9166728.583311.166715.166716.666723.521.083319.416718.833324.1667343033.2521.333329.333317.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([96.9945,94.7945,96.4384,95.0685,97.2678,98.6301,97.8082,99.1781,98.3607,99.726,99.726,99.4521,99.1803,99.726,100,100,100,99.4521,100,98.3516,])
array_2 = np.array([3.33333,4.58333,4.08333,3.91667,6.91667,28.5833,11.1667,15.1667,16.6667,23.5,21.0833,19.4167,18.8333,24.1667,34,30,33.25,21.3333,29.3333,17.6667,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Manchester, New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i have the flu'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5610 · Black Variable ID: 20868 · Red Variable ID: 1528
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0