about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,601 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of babies named Ezequiel rose, so did the demand for personalized mini American flags, leading to a spike in support for the Democrat candidate in Washington. Remember, when in doubt, just wave it out!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic bustling street in Washington, D.C., filled with a diverse crowd of parents holding personalized mini American flags, waving them proudly. In the midst of the crowd, a group of new parents joyfully presents their newborn baby named Ezequiel, also holding the same mini American flag. In the background, a large banner prominently displays strong support for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Capture the energy of the scene and the growing popularity of the name Ezequiel, as well as the increasing support for the Democratic candidate, symbolized by the waving mini American flags in Washington. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Cutsy graphics High-tech Concept art Low poly
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, in the following situation: As the number of babies named Ezequiel rose, so did the demand for personalized mini American flags, leading to a spike in support for the Democrat candidate in Washington. Remember, when in doubt, just wave it out!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling street in Washington, many parents are seen with personalized mini American flags in hand, waving them proudly. Among the crowd, a group of new parents are happily showing off their newborn baby named Ezequiel, while holding the same mini flags. In the background, a banner is seen with strong support for the Democratic Presidential candidate. The scene illustrates the rising popularity of the name Ezequiel as well as the increasing support for the Democratic candidate, both symbolized by the waving mini American flags in Washington.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling street in Washington, many parents are seen with personalized mini American flags in hand, waving them proudly. Among the crowd, a group of new parents are happily showing off their newborn baby named Ezequiel, while holding the same mini flags. In the background, a banner is seen with strong support for the Democratic Presidential candidate. The scene illustrates the rising popularity of the name Ezequiel as well as the increasing support for the Democratic candidate, both symbolized by the waving mini American flags in Washington. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic bustling street in Washington, D.C., filled with a diverse crowd of parents holding personalized mini American flags, waving them proudly. In the midst of the crowd, a group of new parents joyfully presents their newborn baby named Ezequiel, also holding the same mini American flag. In the background, a large banner prominently displays strong support for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Capture the energy of the scene and the growing popularity of the name Ezequiel, as well as the increasing support for the Democratic candidate, symbolized by the waving mini American flags in Washington.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Ezequiel caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic

The Journal of Political Punditry and Pun-alysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intricacies of human behavior and decision-making have long fascinated researchers across various disciplines. One particularly intriguing area of study lies at the intersection of names and political preferences. Names can carry connotations and associations that extend well beyond their literal meaning, and our research seeks to untangle the web of connections between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting patterns for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.

Now, don't let the seriousness of the subject fool you – we're about to dive into a sea of data with the buoyancy of a buoy named Ezequiel. This research aims to bring levity to the often-solemn world of statistical analysis and draw attention to the delightful quirks that make our findings more than just numbers on a page. After all, as any good dad joke enthusiast knows, a little humor can go a long way, much like the impact of a name on electoral outcomes.

Step aside, political pundits, because Ezequiel is about to become the star of the show – and not just because it's a fun name to say. We embark on this journey armed with a boatload of data and a pun-tastic spirit, ready to uncover the surprising relationship between a moniker and electoral inclinations. So buckle up, fellow researchers, as we navigate the seas of statistics and jokes, because the correlation coefficient may be high, but the laughter is even higher.

But before we plunge headfirst into our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer pun-omenal nature of our research topic. They say that laughter is the best medicine, but I think we can all agree that a good pun comes in at a close second. With that in mind, we invite you to join us on this whimsical yet enlightening journey into the world of Ezequiel and the ballot box – where statistical significance meets the punchline. And remember, if all else fails, just blame it on the Ezequiel effect!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricacies of human behavior and decision-making have long fascinated researchers across various disciplines. One particularly intriguing area of study lies at the intersection of names and political preferences. Names can carry connotations and associations that extend well beyond their literal meaning, and our research seeks to untangle the web of connections between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting patterns for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Now, don't let the seriousness of the subject fool you – we're about to dive into a sea of data with the buoyancy of a buoy named Ezequiel. This research aims to bring levity to the often-solemn world of statistical analysis and draw attention to the delightful quirks that make our findings more than just numbers on a page. After all, as any good dad joke enthusiast knows, a little humor can go a long way, much like the impact of a name on electoral outcomes.
Step aside, political pundits, because Ezequiel is about to become the star of the show – and not just because it's a fun name to say. We embark on this journey armed with a boatload of data and a pun-tastic spirit, ready to uncover the surprising relationship between a moniker and electoral inclinations. So buckle up, fellow researchers, as we navigate the seas of statistics and jokes, because the correlation coefficient may be high, but the laughter is even higher.
But before we plunge headfirst into our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer pun-omenal nature of our research topic. They say that laughter is the best medicine, but I think we can all agree that a good pun comes in at a close second. With that in mind, we invite you to join us on this whimsical yet enlightening journey into the world of Ezequiel and the ballot box – where statistical significance meets the punchline. And remember, if all else fails, just blame it on the Ezequiel effect!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Researchers have long been intrigued by the subtle yet profound influences of names on various aspects of human life. Smith and Doe (2005) identified the impact of nomenclature on social interactions, while Jones (2010) delved into the implications of names in professional settings. However, our research breaks new ground by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.

Ezequiel, a name as distinctive as it is delightful, has been a subject of both curiosity and intrigue. Its rise and fall in popularity over the decades have sparked discussions about its potential impact on societal phenomena. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, we aim to unravel the enigma of Ezequiel's electoral influence with a statistical rigor that is as relentless as Ezequiel's pun-ishing punchlines.

In "The Name Effect: Unraveling the Influence of Monikers on Socio-Political Dynamics" by Smith and Doe, the authors explore the subtle yet significant sway that names can hold over societal behaviors. As we examine the correlation between the prevalence of the name Ezequiel and Democratic votes in Washington, we are reminded of the profound impact that names can have – and, of course, the importance of a well-crafted pun. After all, who can resist a good Ezequiel-themed quip when discussing statistical significance and dad jokes in the same breath?

Despite the serious implications of our research, we cannot deny the allure of lightheartedness that permeates our investigation. Much like the juxtaposition of a carefully constructed pun in a scholarly discourse, our study navigates the realms of Ezequiel's popularity and its unanticipated connection to political preferences with an unfaltering commitment to academic rigor and intellectual playfulness. After all, as Ezequiel would say, "Why did the statistician bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to get a higher turnout!"

Turning our attention to works outside the realm of academic discourse, real-life accounts and narratives in "Presidential Names and Their QuiRkY Impacts" by Lorem Ipsum (2015) and "Election Jokes for the Win" by Ipsum Lorem (2017) provide a refreshing departure from conventional research literature. While fiction may not always align with statistical analyses, the creative explorations of name-related eccentricities and electoral outcomes offer a unique perspective on the whimsical undercurrents of our study.

Delving further into unconventional sources of inspiration, the whimsical world of children's cartoons and educational programs has also offered valuable insight. Through careful observation of characters in shows such as "Arthur," "Sesame Street," and "WordGirl," we have gained a fresh standpoint on the interplay between names, popular culture, and electoral behavior. As we navigate the often comical landscapes of fictional narratives, we are reminded of the profound yet playful nature of our quest to understand the Ezequiel effect.

As our research uncovers the intertwining strands of nomenclature and political preferences, we are reminded of the timeless allure of a well-crafted pun. In the spirit of Ezequiel's whimsical influence, we invite readers to embrace the joyous absurdity of our findings and perhaps crack a dad joke or two along the way. After all, as we unravel the captivating correlation between a name and voting patterns, we are reminded that statistics and jests make for an unexpected yet harmonious duo – much like the name Ezequiel and its electoral impact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricacies of human behavior and decision-making have long fascinated researchers across various disciplines. One particularly intriguing area of study lies at the intersection of names and political preferences. Names can carry connotations and associations that extend well beyond their literal meaning, and our research seeks to untangle the web of connections between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting patterns for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Now, don't let the seriousness of the subject fool you – we're about to dive into a sea of data with the buoyancy of a buoy named Ezequiel. This research aims to bring levity to the often-solemn world of statistical analysis and draw attention to the delightful quirks that make our findings more than just numbers on a page. After all, as any good dad joke enthusiast knows, a little humor can go a long way, much like the impact of a name on electoral outcomes.
Step aside, political pundits, because Ezequiel is about to become the star of the show – and not just because it's a fun name to say. We embark on this journey armed with a boatload of data and a pun-tastic spirit, ready to uncover the surprising relationship between a moniker and electoral inclinations. So buckle up, fellow researchers, as we navigate the seas of statistics and jokes, because the correlation coefficient may be high, but the laughter is even higher.
But before we plunge headfirst into our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer pun-omenal nature of our research topic. They say that laughter is the best medicine, but I think we can all agree that a good pun comes in at a close second. With that in mind, we invite you to join us on this whimsical yet enlightening journey into the world of Ezequiel and the ballot box – where statistical significance meets the punchline. And remember, if all else fails, just blame it on the Ezequiel effect!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious correlation between the ubiquity of the name Ezequiel and the Democratic votes for the Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, we employed a methodological approach that was as methodical as it was comical – much like a well-crafted dad joke. Our research journey began with the collection of data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, where we wrangled copious amounts of information dating from 1976 to 2020.

Like a dedicated pun enthusiast seeking out the perfect joke, we meticulously filtered and curated the data to ensure its accuracy and relevance. We then employed a series of statistical analyses that would make even the most seasoned data scientist crack a smile – or at least raise an eyebrow in amusement. Our primary method of analysis involved conducting a time series regression model to explore the dynamic relationship between the prevalence of the name Ezequiel and the proportion of Democratic votes in each Presidential election year.

The rationale behind this approach was to capture the temporal nuances of Ezequiel's influence on electoral behavior, akin to carefully timing the delivery of a well-timed punchline. Additionally, we employed a multivariate regression analysis to control for potential confounding variables such as demographic shifts, regional trends, and the prevalence of other names with comparable comedic potential. These rigorous methods allowed us to discern whether the association between Ezequiel's popularity and Democratic votes remained robust in the face of alternative explanations – much like a punchline that stands the test of scrutiny.

Furthermore, in a lighthearted yet insightful twist, we implemented sentiment analysis on social media mentions of the name Ezequiel in the context of political discourse. This unconventional approach sought to capture the public perception and sentiment surrounding the name Ezequiel and its potential impact on electoral preferences. As it turns out, our analysis revealed that Ezequiel's influence extends beyond the realm of ballots and into the boundless expanse of digital banter, eliciting reactions that ranged from amused chuckles to earnest contemplation – proving once again that a name can spark more than just a ballot box interest.

In summary, our methodology marries the rigors of empirical analysis with the levity of pun-infused exploration, embodying the spirit of statistical inquiry and mirthful curiosity. It's as if statistical analyses and dad jokes decided to team up for a research adventure – and the results are as illuminating as they are entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9867903, r-squared of 0.9737552, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intricacies of human behavior and decision-making have long fascinated researchers across various disciplines. One particularly intriguing area of study lies at the intersection of names and political preferences. Names can carry connotations and associations that extend well beyond their literal meaning, and our research seeks to untangle the web of connections between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting patterns for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Now, don't let the seriousness of the subject fool you – we're about to dive into a sea of data with the buoyancy of a buoy named Ezequiel. This research aims to bring levity to the often-solemn world of statistical analysis and draw attention to the delightful quirks that make our findings more than just numbers on a page. After all, as any good dad joke enthusiast knows, a little humor can go a long way, much like the impact of a name on electoral outcomes.
Step aside, political pundits, because Ezequiel is about to become the star of the show – and not just because it's a fun name to say. We embark on this journey armed with a boatload of data and a pun-tastic spirit, ready to uncover the surprising relationship between a moniker and electoral inclinations. So buckle up, fellow researchers, as we navigate the seas of statistics and jokes, because the correlation coefficient may be high, but the laughter is even higher.
But before we plunge headfirst into our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer pun-omenal nature of our research topic. They say that laughter is the best medicine, but I think we can all agree that a good pun comes in at a close second. With that in mind, we invite you to join us on this whimsical yet enlightening journey into the world of Ezequiel and the ballot box – where statistical significance meets the punchline. And remember, if all else fails, just blame it on the Ezequiel effect!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. Our findings showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903, indicating a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between these two variables. It seems that Ezequiel carries more weight in the voting booth than in just its nine letters! Speaking of weight, did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average!

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9737552 indicates that a whopping 97.38% of the variation in the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington can be explained by the popularity of the name Ezequiel. It's as if every mention of the name Ezequiel in the state had Washingtonians saying, "Yes, we feel you!" This high r-squared value proves that when it comes to names influencing electoral preferences, Ezequiel is a prime example.

Not only did the statistical analysis reveal a compelling relationship, but the p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the popularity of the name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. It seems that Ezequiel's impact on voting behavior is no laughing matter – or is it? Remember, statistics is like a bikini. What it reveals is suggestive, but what it conceals is vital.

As mentioned, the results are encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. The figure provides a visual representation of the strong association unearthed by our analysis, offering a glimpse into the influence of a name on political leanings.

In conclusion, our research uncovers a captivating link between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, establishing Ezequiel's influential presence in the political landscape. This goes to show that when it comes to electoral outcomes, there's no debating the Ezequiel effect!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Researchers have long been intrigued by the subtle yet profound influences of names on various aspects of human life. Smith and Doe (2005) identified the impact of nomenclature on social interactions, while Jones (2010) delved into the implications of names in professional settings. However, our research breaks new ground by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Ezequiel, a name as distinctive as it is delightful, has been a subject of both curiosity and intrigue. Its rise and fall in popularity over the decades have sparked discussions about its potential impact on societal phenomena. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, we aim to unravel the enigma of Ezequiel's electoral influence with a statistical rigor that is as relentless as Ezequiel's pun-ishing punchlines.
In "The Name Effect: Unraveling the Influence of Monikers on Socio-Political Dynamics" by Smith and Doe, the authors explore the subtle yet significant sway that names can hold over societal behaviors. As we examine the correlation between the prevalence of the name Ezequiel and Democratic votes in Washington, we are reminded of the profound impact that names can have – and, of course, the importance of a well-crafted pun. After all, who can resist a good Ezequiel-themed quip when discussing statistical significance and dad jokes in the same breath?
Despite the serious implications of our research, we cannot deny the allure of lightheartedness that permeates our investigation. Much like the juxtaposition of a carefully constructed pun in a scholarly discourse, our study navigates the realms of Ezequiel's popularity and its unanticipated connection to political preferences with an unfaltering commitment to academic rigor and intellectual playfulness. After all, as Ezequiel would say, "Why did the statistician bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to get a higher turnout!"
Turning our attention to works outside the realm of academic discourse, real-life accounts and narratives in "Presidential Names and Their QuiRkY Impacts" by Lorem Ipsum (2015) and "Election Jokes for the Win" by Ipsum Lorem (2017) provide a refreshing departure from conventional research literature. While fiction may not always align with statistical analyses, the creative explorations of name-related eccentricities and electoral outcomes offer a unique perspective on the whimsical undercurrents of our study.
Delving further into unconventional sources of inspiration, the whimsical world of children's cartoons and educational programs has also offered valuable insight. Through careful observation of characters in shows such as "Arthur," "Sesame Street," and "WordGirl," we have gained a fresh standpoint on the interplay between names, popular culture, and electoral behavior. As we navigate the often comical landscapes of fictional narratives, we are reminded of the profound yet playful nature of our quest to understand the Ezequiel effect.
As our research uncovers the intertwining strands of nomenclature and political preferences, we are reminded of the timeless allure of a well-crafted pun. In the spirit of Ezequiel's whimsical influence, we invite readers to embrace the joyous absurdity of our findings and perhaps crack a dad joke or two along the way. After all, as we unravel the captivating correlation between a name and voting patterns, we are reminded that statistics and jests make for an unexpected yet harmonious duo – much like the name Ezequiel and its electoral impact.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. Our findings showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903, indicating a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between these two variables. It seems that Ezequiel carries more weight in the voting booth than in just its nine letters! Speaking of weight, did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9737552 indicates that a whopping 97.38% of the variation in the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington can be explained by the popularity of the name Ezequiel. It's as if every mention of the name Ezequiel in the state had Washingtonians saying, "Yes, we feel you!" This high r-squared value proves that when it comes to names influencing electoral preferences, Ezequiel is a prime example.
Not only did the statistical analysis reveal a compelling relationship, but the p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the popularity of the name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. It seems that Ezequiel's impact on voting behavior is no laughing matter – or is it? Remember, statistics is like a bikini. What it reveals is suggestive, but what it conceals is vital.
As mentioned, the results are encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. The figure provides a visual representation of the strong association unearthed by our analysis, offering a glimpse into the influence of a name on political leanings.
In conclusion, our research uncovers a captivating link between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, establishing Ezequiel's influential presence in the political landscape. This goes to show that when it comes to electoral outcomes, there's no debating the Ezequiel effect!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The undeniable correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington uncovers a facet of societal influence that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. Our findings not only confirm but significantly strengthen the existing body of literature that explores the impact of names on social and political dynamics. While our research may seem like a pun-tastic adventure, the statistically robust nature of our results cements the connection between Ezequiel's allure and electoral preferences.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 supports and amplifies previous research that has delved into the profound sway of names on societal behaviors. It appears that the name Ezequiel carries not only a distinct charm but also a remarkable ability to sway voting patterns in the state of Washington. One might say that Ezequiel's influence is as undeniable as a dad joke at a family gathering!

Our findings also reinforce the significance of the r-squared value, which indicates that a staggering 97.38% of the variation in the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington can be attributed to the popularity of the name Ezequiel. This echoes the whimsical yet potent influence of Ezequiel on the electoral landscape, resonating with the enduring impact of a well-crafted pun that lingers long after its delivery. One could argue that the name Ezequiel holds an ele-voting-c power!

The result of a p-value less than 0.01 further solidifies the veracity of our findings, offering strong evidence against the null hypothesis and adding weight to the recognition of Ezequiel's impact on voting behavior. It seems that when it comes to electoral preferences, the name Ezequiel is not one to be taken lightly – unless, of course, it's in the context of a lighthearted jest! After all, statistics without a hint of humor is like a fish without water – it just doesn't quite feel right.

In the grand tapestry of social phenomena, the connection between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington emerges as a fascinating thread that intertwines nomenclature and electoral inclinations. The whimsical yet undeniable association uncovered in our research beckons the academic community to consider the oft-overlooked impacts of names on social and political dynamics. As the adage goes, "Ezequiel may just be a name, but its influence on voting behavior is no laughing matter - or is it?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ezequiel and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.

Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.

The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.

In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intricacies of human behavior and decision-making have long fascinated researchers across various disciplines. One particularly intriguing area of study lies at the intersection of names and political preferences. Names can carry connotations and associations that extend well beyond their literal meaning, and our research seeks to untangle the web of connections between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting patterns for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Now, don't let the seriousness of the subject fool you – we're about to dive into a sea of data with the buoyancy of a buoy named Ezequiel. This research aims to bring levity to the often-solemn world of statistical analysis and draw attention to the delightful quirks that make our findings more than just numbers on a page. After all, as any good dad joke enthusiast knows, a little humor can go a long way, much like the impact of a name on electoral outcomes.
Step aside, political pundits, because Ezequiel is about to become the star of the show – and not just because it's a fun name to say. We embark on this journey armed with a boatload of data and a pun-tastic spirit, ready to uncover the surprising relationship between a moniker and electoral inclinations. So buckle up, fellow researchers, as we navigate the seas of statistics and jokes, because the correlation coefficient may be high, but the laughter is even higher.
But before we plunge headfirst into our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer pun-omenal nature of our research topic. They say that laughter is the best medicine, but I think we can all agree that a good pun comes in at a close second. With that in mind, we invite you to join us on this whimsical yet enlightening journey into the world of Ezequiel and the ballot box – where statistical significance meets the punchline. And remember, if all else fails, just blame it on the Ezequiel effect!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. Our findings showed a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903, indicating a remarkably strong positive linear relationship between these two variables. It seems that Ezequiel carries more weight in the voting booth than in just its nine letters! Speaking of weight, did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9737552 indicates that a whopping 97.38% of the variation in the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington can be explained by the popularity of the name Ezequiel. It's as if every mention of the name Ezequiel in the state had Washingtonians saying, "Yes, we feel you!" This high r-squared value proves that when it comes to names influencing electoral preferences, Ezequiel is a prime example.
Not only did the statistical analysis reveal a compelling relationship, but the p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the popularity of the name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. It seems that Ezequiel's impact on voting behavior is no laughing matter – or is it? Remember, statistics is like a bikini. What it reveals is suggestive, but what it conceals is vital.
As mentioned, the results are encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington. The figure provides a visual representation of the strong association unearthed by our analysis, offering a glimpse into the influence of a name on political leanings.
In conclusion, our research uncovers a captivating link between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and voting preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, establishing Ezequiel's influential presence in the political landscape. This goes to show that when it comes to electoral outcomes, there's no debating the Ezequiel effect!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, it's clear that Ezequiel's not just a snazzy name – it's also got some serious electoral sway in the state of Washington. This research has shown that the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate is no mere coincidence – it's a statistical phenomenon worthy of a standing ovation. I guess you could say that the impact of Ezequiel is as undeniable as a dad's affection for his grill – it's a real game-changer!

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01, it's safe to say that Ezequiel's influence on Washington's voting patterns is as clear as day – much like a dad's love for sharing "dad jokes." Our results have unequivocally demonstrated that Ezequiel is more than just a name; it's a force to be reckoned with in the political arena. You might even say that it's the "namesake" of electoral sway!

Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the Ezequiel in the poll? Our data shows that a whopping 97.38% of the variation in the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington can be attributed to the popularity of the name Ezequiel. It's almost as if every utterance of the name caused voters to exclaim, "Eureka – it's Ezequiel!" I guess you could say that Ezequiel's impact on voting behavior is a real "slamdunk," much like a dad's signature move on the basketball court.

In light of these robust findings, it's safe to say that further research in this area is about as necessary as a fish needs a bicycle – in other words, not at all! The evidence has spoken, and it's clear that when it comes to the relationship between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, the verdict is in: Ezequiel definitely has a knack for influencing electoral outcomes. So, in the immortal words of dads everywhere, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way!"

It's time for us to hang up our statistical hats and bask in the glory of this research. After all, you know what they say: "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts." And with that, we bid adieu to the Ezequiel electoral effect – until the next uproarious discovery beckons!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Punditry and Pun-alysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Punderful Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Ezequiel's Electoral Effect: A Presidential Popularity Pun-demic with an abstract of Ezequiel, a name with a swagger as smooth as a buttery pun, finds itself at the intersection of political preference and nomenclature significance. This paper delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name Ezequiel and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Washington, unleashing a whirlwind of statistical analyses and dad jokes that will make even the most serious researcher crack a smile.
Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our findings reveal a relationship so strong, it's almost as if Ezequiel himself cast a spell on the ballots. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9867903 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1976 to 2020, the evidence suggests that there's more to Ezequiel than meets the eye – or the voting booth.
The association between the rise and fall of the name Ezequiel and the ebb and flow of Democratic votes in the state of Washington presents a riveting narrative, akin to a dad joke that never fails to elicit a chuckle. Our research extends beyond the realm of numbers and charts to explore the quirky world of name-based trends in electoral behavior, where Ezequiel emerges as the unsung hero of political preferences, perhaps proving that sometimes the name truly does carry weight – or at least votes.
In conclusion, this research sheds light on a connection that transforms the mundane into the extraordinary, leaving both statisticians and jest enthusiasts alike to ponder the profound impact of Ezequiel's presence in the political landscape. As the saying goes, "Ezequiel by any other name would still vote the same – but it's a lot funnier this way.

ChatGPT:

"Ezequiel electoral influence, Democrat Presidential candidate, Washington state votes, correlation between name and political preference, US Social Security Administration data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab findings, Harvard Dataverse statistics, name-based trends in electoral behavior, Ezequiel's impact on political landscape"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Ezequiel
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Ezequiel
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Ezequiel

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington

Correlation r = 0.9867903 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9737552 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Ezequiel) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.1E-9. 0.0000000030983002566858640000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 3.1E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 322,757,615 random variables You don't actually need 322 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Ezequiel (Babies born)769981119179329331403520510567861
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington (Total votes)7173236501937983529335169930371123320124765015102001750850175540017427202369610




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([76,99,81,119,179,329,331,403,520,510,567,861,])
array_2 = np.array([717323,650193,798352,933516,993037,1123320,1247650,1510200,1750850,1755400,1742720,2369610,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Ezequiel"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5601 · Black Variable ID: 3192 · Red Variable ID: 26042
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0