Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ezequiel correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.99 | 15yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington | r=0.99 | 12yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Nepal | r=0.98 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s stock price (JPM) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Arizona | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Delaware | r=0.84 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Number of times 16 was a winning Mega Millions number | r=0.57 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ezequiel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)