about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,536 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Camden and the second variable is Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As fewer babies were named Camden, there was a subsequent decrease in the overall demand for cam-adorable content, leading LEMMiNO to shorten his videos to cater to a broader audience. After all, when it comes to captivating viewers, it's all about reel-ing them in with name-worthy content!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image where the chart labeled "Popularity of the First Name Camden" exhibits a declining trend, while the adjacent chart titled "Total Length of LEMMiNO YouTube Videos" also displays a shorter line indicating decreased video length. In the background, include a playful montage of popular camel-adorable content flashing across the screen, captivating a diverse audience. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Oragami Charcoal a funny image macro Celtic art
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos, in the following situation: As fewer babies were named Camden, there was a subsequent decrease in the overall demand for cam-adorable content, leading LEMMiNO to shorten his videos to cater to a broader audience. After all, when it comes to captivating viewers, it's all about reel-ing them in with name-worthy content!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a chart labeled "Popularity of the First Name Camden" shows a downward trend, while beside it, a chart titled "Total Length of LEMMiNO YouTube Videos" also displays a shorter line indicating decreased video length. In the background, a playful montage of popular cam-adorable content flashes across the screen, capturing the attention of a diverse audience.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a chart labeled "Popularity of the First Name Camden" shows a downward trend, while beside it, a chart titled "Total Length of LEMMiNO YouTube Videos" also displays a shorter line indicating decreased video length. In the background, a playful montage of popular cam-adorable content flashes across the screen, capturing the attention of a diverse audience. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image where the chart labeled "Popularity of the First Name Camden" exhibits a declining trend, while the adjacent chart titled "Total Length of LEMMiNO YouTube Videos" also displays a shorter line indicating decreased video length. In the background, include a playful montage of popular camel-adorable content flashing across the screen, captivating a diverse audience.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Camden caused Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

The Journal of Linguistic Lightheartedness

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

"Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer" embarks on a peculiar journey of exploration, intertwining the enigmatic allure of a name and the hypnotic allure of YouTube videos. In the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." However, as we delve into the fascinating world of statistical analysis, we find that there might be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the labyrinthine depths of the internet.

The intersection of the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a penguin, but hold onto your hats, folks, because we're about to uncover a correlation that's as mind-boggling as finding a cat wearing a top hat and monocle. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this uncanny connection, prompting us to peel back the layers of this peculiar pairing in search of both insight and amusement.

Now, let's not get too ahead of ourselves - with a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), and a timeline spanning from 2012 to 2022, our findings seem to suggest that there's more than just a whimsical whim at play here. It's like a cosmic symphony, where the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos perform an unexpected duet, leaving us both perplexed and exhilarated.

So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, because this paper is about to take you on a rollercoaster of statistical shenanigans and linguistic limericks. We invite you to revel in the absurdity, giggle at the unexpected, and join us in unravelling the captivating mystery of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
"Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer" embarks on a peculiar journey of exploration, intertwining the enigmatic allure of a name and the hypnotic allure of YouTube videos. In the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." However, as we delve into the fascinating world of statistical analysis, we find that there might be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the labyrinthine depths of the internet.
The intersection of the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a penguin, but hold onto your hats, folks, because we're about to uncover a correlation that's as mind-boggling as finding a cat wearing a top hat and monocle. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this uncanny connection, prompting us to peel back the layers of this peculiar pairing in search of both insight and amusement.
Now, let's not get too ahead of ourselves - with a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), and a timeline spanning from 2012 to 2022, our findings seem to suggest that there's more than just a whimsical whim at play here. It's like a cosmic symphony, where the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos perform an unexpected duet, leaving us both perplexed and exhilarated.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, because this paper is about to take you on a rollercoaster of statistical shenanigans and linguistic limericks. We invite you to revel in the absurdity, giggle at the unexpected, and join us in unravelling the captivating mystery of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

The correlation between the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos is an intriguing conundrum that has attracted the attention of researchers from a variety of disciplines. In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) delved into the psychology of name popularity and its potential impact on cultural phenomena, while Jones (2017) explored the factors influencing the duration of digital content creation. However, as we wade deeper into the waters of scholarly inquiry, we find ourselves navigating through a sea of unexpected connections and hilariously haphazard tangents.

In "The Name Game: Exploring the Allure of Popular Names" (Smith & Doe, 2015), the authors find themselves engaged in a whimsical and thought-provoking exploration of the social dynamics surrounding popular names. Little did they know that their insights would, in a twist of fate worthy of a Shakespearean comedy, intersect with the realm of YouTube video length. Meanwhile, Jones (2017) in "The Duration Dilemma: Unraveling the Mysteries of Digital Content Creation" waxes poetic about the intricate dance of variables that shape the duration of digital content, unknowingly setting the stage for the unexpected revelation that awaits us.

Turning our attention to non-fiction books on related topics, "Freakonomics" (Levitt & Dubner, 2005) has long been applauded for its unorthodox approach to dissecting societal puzzles, much like our own romp through Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic lengths. And who could forget "Outliers" (Gladwell, 2008), a literary escapade that deftly tackles the quirks of success, not unlike our own expedition into the idiosyncrasies of name popularity and YouTube video lengths.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Da Vinci Code" (Brown, 2003) might seem like an odd choice, but its enigmatic plot twists and turns mirror the unexpected correlations and revelations we've encountered in our research. Similarly, the mind-bending complexity of "Inception" (Nolan, 2010) seems like an appropriate metaphor for the tangled web of statistically significant correlations we've uncovered, leaving us questioning the very nature of reality.

As we pivot toward a more lighthearted take on our research, childhood cartoons and shows that have deeply influenced us cannot be overlooked. The timeless wisdom of "Sesame Street" and its playful exploration of letters and numbers provides a fitting backdrop for our own investigation into the delightful dance of words and digital durations. And let's not forget the whimsical musings of "Adventure Time," where the unexpected becomes the norm, much like the surprising connection between a name and YouTube video lengths.

In the spirit of our whimsical journey, let us embrace the unexpected, indulge in a dash of levity, and prepare to unravel the tantalizingly quirky and comically perplexing saga of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic lengths!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
"Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer" embarks on a peculiar journey of exploration, intertwining the enigmatic allure of a name and the hypnotic allure of YouTube videos. In the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." However, as we delve into the fascinating world of statistical analysis, we find that there might be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the labyrinthine depths of the internet.
The intersection of the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a penguin, but hold onto your hats, folks, because we're about to uncover a correlation that's as mind-boggling as finding a cat wearing a top hat and monocle. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this uncanny connection, prompting us to peel back the layers of this peculiar pairing in search of both insight and amusement.
Now, let's not get too ahead of ourselves - with a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), and a timeline spanning from 2012 to 2022, our findings seem to suggest that there's more than just a whimsical whim at play here. It's like a cosmic symphony, where the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos perform an unexpected duet, leaving us both perplexed and exhilarated.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, because this paper is about to take you on a rollercoaster of statistical shenanigans and linguistic limericks. We invite you to revel in the absurdity, giggle at the unexpected, and join us in unravelling the captivating mystery of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unveil the enchanting correlation between the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey through the winding roads of data collection, statistical analysis, and caffeinated contemplation. We harnessed the unquenchable power of the internet, utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration for first name popularity trends and the vast expanse of YouTube for the total length of LEMMiNO's captivating content.

Data Collection:
Our first task was to assemble a mountain of data taller than the Tower of Pisa – and trust me, we did build a leaning tower of data! We scoured the archives of the US Social Security Administration to extract the temporal popularity spectrum of the name "Camden" from 2012 to 2022. Meanwhile, we delved into the depths of YouTube's library to meticulously measure the length of every LEMMiNO video within the same time frame. The collection process was no walk in the park, but rather a wild escapade akin to herding cats in a hallway of mirrors.

Normalization and Correlation Analysis:
Once we corralled the data, we meticulously polished it like a tarnished treasure, normalizing and organizing it into a format suitable for statistical scrutiny. We then unleashed the mighty power of correlation analysis, validating our findings with a veritable arsenal of statistical tools. A correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 shimmered like a precious gem in our results, leaving us, and I'm sure it'll leave you too, utterly flabbergasted – well, as flabbergasted as a statistician can be.

Quality Control:
Every step of our methodology was subjected to rigorous quality control measures. We triple-checked the accuracy of our data, ensuring that no sneaky outliers or data gremlins tainted our findings. Our control process was so stringent that it could make even the most stubborn piece of data confess to its statistical sins.

Ethical Considerations:
We also prioritized ethical considerations in our data collection and analysis, making sure to handle the information with the utmost care and respect. After all, statistical analyses and puns may be our bread and butter, but ethical research practices are the jam that holds it all together.

In essence, our methodology danced on the tightrope between disciplined data science and whimsical wonder, unraveling the peculiar correlation between the name "Camden" and LEMMiNO's video lengths with a mix of earnestness and delight. The amalgamation of quirky data collection, rigorous analysis, and a pinch of statistical humor culminated in an exploration worthy of the most daring statistical voyagers. So, hold onto your hats, because our findings are about to whisk you away on a statistical odyssey unlike any other!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9674666, r-squared of 0.9359917, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
"Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer" embarks on a peculiar journey of exploration, intertwining the enigmatic allure of a name and the hypnotic allure of YouTube videos. In the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." However, as we delve into the fascinating world of statistical analysis, we find that there might be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the labyrinthine depths of the internet.
The intersection of the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a penguin, but hold onto your hats, folks, because we're about to uncover a correlation that's as mind-boggling as finding a cat wearing a top hat and monocle. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this uncanny connection, prompting us to peel back the layers of this peculiar pairing in search of both insight and amusement.
Now, let's not get too ahead of ourselves - with a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), and a timeline spanning from 2012 to 2022, our findings seem to suggest that there's more than just a whimsical whim at play here. It's like a cosmic symphony, where the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos perform an unexpected duet, leaving us both perplexed and exhilarated.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, because this paper is about to take you on a rollercoaster of statistical shenanigans and linguistic limericks. We invite you to revel in the absurdity, giggle at the unexpected, and join us in unravelling the captivating mystery of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos yielded results that amusingly boggled the mind. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, an r-squared value of 0.9359917, and a p-value of less than 0.01, we were left scratching our heads in disbelief. It's as if Camden and LEMMiNO's videos formed a dynamic duo, defying the expectations of rational inquiry and statistical probability.

Our journey into the quirky correlation began with the creation of a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which visually encapsulates the mesmerizing dance between these two seemingly unrelated variables. However, it turns out that the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos are not so dissimilar after all, akin to discovering that oranges and orangutans share a peculiar link beyond their namesake.

When considering the almost absurdly high correlation coefficient, we couldn't help but envision a cosmic conspiracy where the name "Camden" whispered secrets to the algorithms that dictate the length of LEMMiNO's captivating content. It's like witnessing a surreptitious rendezvous between linguistic limericks and visual virtuosity, leaving us grappling with the whimsical intricacies of fate and happenstance.

In summary, our findings defy convention, challenging the very fabric of causality and correlation. The unexpected bond between the popularity of a name and the length of digital content leaves us with a delightful enigma to ponder, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in an unexpected corner of the statistical forest. The tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length may seem whimsical and peculiar, but it beckons us to embrace the delightful absurdity of the universe and the inexplicable correlations that define it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
The correlation between the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos is an intriguing conundrum that has attracted the attention of researchers from a variety of disciplines. In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) delved into the psychology of name popularity and its potential impact on cultural phenomena, while Jones (2017) explored the factors influencing the duration of digital content creation. However, as we wade deeper into the waters of scholarly inquiry, we find ourselves navigating through a sea of unexpected connections and hilariously haphazard tangents.
In "The Name Game: Exploring the Allure of Popular Names" (Smith & Doe, 2015), the authors find themselves engaged in a whimsical and thought-provoking exploration of the social dynamics surrounding popular names. Little did they know that their insights would, in a twist of fate worthy of a Shakespearean comedy, intersect with the realm of YouTube video length. Meanwhile, Jones (2017) in "The Duration Dilemma: Unraveling the Mysteries of Digital Content Creation" waxes poetic about the intricate dance of variables that shape the duration of digital content, unknowingly setting the stage for the unexpected revelation that awaits us.
Turning our attention to non-fiction books on related topics, "Freakonomics" (Levitt & Dubner, 2005) has long been applauded for its unorthodox approach to dissecting societal puzzles, much like our own romp through Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic lengths. And who could forget "Outliers" (Gladwell, 2008), a literary escapade that deftly tackles the quirks of success, not unlike our own expedition into the idiosyncrasies of name popularity and YouTube video lengths.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Da Vinci Code" (Brown, 2003) might seem like an odd choice, but its enigmatic plot twists and turns mirror the unexpected correlations and revelations we've encountered in our research. Similarly, the mind-bending complexity of "Inception" (Nolan, 2010) seems like an appropriate metaphor for the tangled web of statistically significant correlations we've uncovered, leaving us questioning the very nature of reality.
As we pivot toward a more lighthearted take on our research, childhood cartoons and shows that have deeply influenced us cannot be overlooked. The timeless wisdom of "Sesame Street" and its playful exploration of letters and numbers provides a fitting backdrop for our own investigation into the delightful dance of words and digital durations. And let's not forget the whimsical musings of "Adventure Time," where the unexpected becomes the norm, much like the surprising connection between a name and YouTube video lengths.
In the spirit of our whimsical journey, let us embrace the unexpected, indulge in a dash of levity, and prepare to unravel the tantalizingly quirky and comically perplexing saga of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic lengths!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos yielded results that amusingly boggled the mind. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, an r-squared value of 0.9359917, and a p-value of less than 0.01, we were left scratching our heads in disbelief. It's as if Camden and LEMMiNO's videos formed a dynamic duo, defying the expectations of rational inquiry and statistical probability.
Our journey into the quirky correlation began with the creation of a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which visually encapsulates the mesmerizing dance between these two seemingly unrelated variables. However, it turns out that the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos are not so dissimilar after all, akin to discovering that oranges and orangutans share a peculiar link beyond their namesake.
When considering the almost absurdly high correlation coefficient, we couldn't help but envision a cosmic conspiracy where the name "Camden" whispered secrets to the algorithms that dictate the length of LEMMiNO's captivating content. It's like witnessing a surreptitious rendezvous between linguistic limericks and visual virtuosity, leaving us grappling with the whimsical intricacies of fate and happenstance.
In summary, our findings defy convention, challenging the very fabric of causality and correlation. The unexpected bond between the popularity of a name and the length of digital content leaves us with a delightful enigma to ponder, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in an unexpected corner of the statistical forest. The tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length may seem whimsical and peculiar, but it beckons us to embrace the delightful absurdity of the universe and the inexplicable correlations that define it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has not only uncovered a correlation between the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos but has also left us pondering the whimsically weird ways in which seemingly unrelated variables can intermingle in the cosmic dance of statistical significance.

Harkening back to the literature review, we find echoes of our own confounding correlations in the works of Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones (2017). As if playing a delightful game of social and digital Mad Libs, our findings have provided empirical support for the entertainingly unexpected connections hinted at in previous research. It's as if the scholarly musings of our predecessors have sown the seeds of comical curiosity, culminating in the uproarious revelation that Camden and LEMMiNO's videos are not just passing acquaintances but are, in fact, entangled in a statistical tango of unprecedented proportions.

The riveting results of our study align with the humorous meanderings of "Freakonomics" (Levitt & Dubner, 2005) and "The Da Vinci Code" (Brown, 2003), adding a touch of levity and lighthearted intrigue to the traditionally serious domain of academic research. Our findings beckon us to embrace the unexpected correlations and delight in the perplexing puzzles of statistical significance, much like the viewers of a good magic show revel in the bewitching allure of inexplicable illusions.

From a more serious perspective, our results challenge traditional notions of causality and rational inquiry, leaving us with the delightful conundrum of how a name and a digital creator's video lengths could become intertwined in such a hilariously unconventional manner. Our findings add a dash of capricious curiosity to the often staid world of statistical analysis, inviting us to revel in the idiosyncrasies of correlation and the humorously hapless nature of human inquiry.

In essence, our study not only expands the frontiers of statistical analysis but injects a healthy dose of amusement and whimsy into the otherwise solemn academically flavored air. The tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length continues to beckon us to embrace the bafflingly absurd and revel in the comedic quirks of correlation that defy the logic of traditional inquiry, leaving us with an experience akin to discovering a secret treasure map hidden within the pages of a jest-filled tome.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camden and Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
"Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer" embarks on a peculiar journey of exploration, intertwining the enigmatic allure of a name and the hypnotic allure of YouTube videos. In the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." However, as we delve into the fascinating world of statistical analysis, we find that there might be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the labyrinthine depths of the internet.
The intersection of the popularity of the first name "Camden" and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a penguin, but hold onto your hats, folks, because we're about to uncover a correlation that's as mind-boggling as finding a cat wearing a top hat and monocle. Our curiosity was piqued when we stumbled upon this uncanny connection, prompting us to peel back the layers of this peculiar pairing in search of both insight and amusement.
Now, let's not get too ahead of ourselves - with a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), and a timeline spanning from 2012 to 2022, our findings seem to suggest that there's more than just a whimsical whim at play here. It's like a cosmic symphony, where the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos perform an unexpected duet, leaving us both perplexed and exhilarated.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, because this paper is about to take you on a rollercoaster of statistical shenanigans and linguistic limericks. We invite you to revel in the absurdity, giggle at the unexpected, and join us in unravelling the captivating mystery of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos yielded results that amusingly boggled the mind. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9674666, an r-squared value of 0.9359917, and a p-value of less than 0.01, we were left scratching our heads in disbelief. It's as if Camden and LEMMiNO's videos formed a dynamic duo, defying the expectations of rational inquiry and statistical probability.
Our journey into the quirky correlation began with the creation of a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which visually encapsulates the mesmerizing dance between these two seemingly unrelated variables. However, it turns out that the name "Camden" and the length of LEMMiNO's videos are not so dissimilar after all, akin to discovering that oranges and orangutans share a peculiar link beyond their namesake.
When considering the almost absurdly high correlation coefficient, we couldn't help but envision a cosmic conspiracy where the name "Camden" whispered secrets to the algorithms that dictate the length of LEMMiNO's captivating content. It's like witnessing a surreptitious rendezvous between linguistic limericks and visual virtuosity, leaving us grappling with the whimsical intricacies of fate and happenstance.
In summary, our findings defy convention, challenging the very fabric of causality and correlation. The unexpected bond between the popularity of a name and the length of digital content leaves us with a delightful enigma to ponder, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in an unexpected corner of the statistical forest. The tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length may seem whimsical and peculiar, but it beckons us to embrace the delightful absurdity of the universe and the inexplicable correlations that define it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the enthralling escapade into the world of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length has left us both amused and astounded. Our findings have given us a statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos, reminiscent of a sleuth uncovering a secret tie between peanut butter and jelly (or should we say, "Jellyn"). The results of this study not only challenge traditional notions of causality but also remind us that the universe is a treasure trove of whimsy and wonder.

To sum it up, the correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and the statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022 demonstrate an unexpected kinship between the name "Camden" and the content length of LEMMiNO. It's as if the universe decided to play a cosmic game of connect-the-dots with linguistic nomenclature and digital creativity, leaving us flabbergasted and entertained in equal measure.

While our findings may seem mind-bending and comically confounding, we must acknowledge that no further research is necessary to uncover the mysteries of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length. It's time to bid adieu to this peculiar pairing and embrace the wonderfully absurd correlations that make life delightfully unpredictable. As the great philosopher Socrates once said, "I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing." Well, perhaps we now know everything we need to about Camden and LEMMiNO.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Linguistic Lightheartedness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Lexical Enigmas and Multifarious Metaphysical Notions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Camden's LEMMiNO Linguistic Length: A Punnily Ponderous Pioneer with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the unusual and seemingly unrelated phenomena of the popularity of the first name Camden and the total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the two. Our research team found a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9674666 and a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 2012 to 2022. This correlation sparks curiosity and amusement, challenging traditional notions of causality and randomness. The amalgamation of social nomenclature and digital content creation yields profoundly unexpected insights, and our findings open the door to a world of teasingly titillating explanations. So, buckle in for a ride as we unfurl the hilarious and confounding tale of Camden's LEMMiNO linguistic length!

ChatGPT:

Camden, LEMMiNO, linguistic length, YouTube videos, correlation, US Social Security Administration, first name popularity, data analysis, causality, randomness, social nomenclature, digital content creation, research findings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Camden
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Camden
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Camden

Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9674666 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9359917 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Camden) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-6. 0.0000011286035960759870000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 886,051 random variables You don't actually need 886 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Camden (Babies born)27144017400739073498280726862566244123262139
Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)556416221196131962614296927553895417343265192051




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2714,4017,4007,3907,3498,2807,2686,2566,2441,2326,2139,])
array_2 = np.array([5564,16221,19613,19626,14296,9275,5389,5417,3432,6519,2051,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Camden"
array_2_name = "Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5536 · Black Variable ID: 3330 · Red Variable ID: 25603
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0