Report an error
Popularity of the first name Camden correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total length of LEMMiNO YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.97 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Massachusetts | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Maryland | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Georgia | r=0.95 | 47yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Rhode Island | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Tennessee | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Pennsylvania | r=0.94 | 47yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Mississippi | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'dumb ways to die' meme | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Ohio | r=0.91 | 47yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Oklahoma | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sleepwalking' | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Alabama | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Camden also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)