about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,525 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lexus and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People subconsciously associate the name Lexus with luxury and wealth. As the name fell out of favor, there was a parallel decline in aspirational feelings. This led to a state of 'political apathy', ultimately affecting the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. After all, a name can apparently drive more than just cars!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a realistic scene depicting a small Oklahoma town, with a sleek, shiny Lexus parked in front of an elegant mansion. The name "Lexus" is engraved on the license plate, conveying luxury and wealth. On the front lawn, a group of people gathers, all wearing expressions of disinterest and indifference. In the distance, a voting booth stands alone, with very few people in line. The ballots for the Democratic presidential candidate remain largely untouched. The decline in the popularity of the name "Lexus" seems to have created a domino effect, causing a noticeable decrease in interest in the political process. The sunset casts a warm glow over the scene, adding to the ambience of indifference and decline. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Cutsy graphics Realistic Cybernetic art Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma, in the following situation: People subconsciously associate the name Lexus with luxury and wealth. As the name fell out of favor, there was a parallel decline in aspirational feelings. This led to a state of 'political apathy', ultimately affecting the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. After all, a name can apparently drive more than just cars!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small Oklahoma town, a sleek, shiny Lexus sits parked in front of a stately, elegant mansion. The name "Lexus" is engraved on the license plate, evoking a sense of luxury and wealth. On the front lawn, a group of people gathers, all wearing expressions of disinterest and indifference. In the distance, a voting booth stands alone, with very few people in line. The ballots for the Democratic presidential candidate remain largely untouched. The decline in the popularity of the name "Lexus" seems to have created a domino effect, causing a noticeable decrease in interest in the political process.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a small Oklahoma town, a sleek, shiny Lexus sits parked in front of a stately, elegant mansion. The name "Lexus" is engraved on the license plate, evoking a sense of luxury and wealth. On the front lawn, a group of people gathers, all wearing expressions of disinterest and indifference. In the distance, a voting booth stands alone, with very few people in line. The ballots for the Democratic presidential candidate remain largely untouched. The decline in the popularity of the name "Lexus" seems to have created a domino effect, causing a noticeable decrease in interest in the political process. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a realistic scene depicting a small Oklahoma town, with a sleek, shiny Lexus parked in front of an elegant mansion. The name "Lexus" is engraved on the license plate, conveying luxury and wealth. On the front lawn, a group of people gathers, all wearing expressions of disinterest and indifference. In the distance, a voting booth stands alone, with very few people in line. The ballots for the Democratic presidential candidate remain largely untouched. The decline in the popularity of the name "Lexus" seems to have created a domino effect, causing a noticeable decrease in interest in the political process. The sunset casts a warm glow over the scene, adding to the ambience of indifference and decline.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Lexus caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma

Journal of Sociopolitical Name Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The age-old debate of nature versus nurture has a new, unexpected contender: nomenclature. As researchers grapple with the multifaceted factors that shape political preferences, the influence of something as seemingly whimsical as a first name has piqued the curiosity of many. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey through the peculiar realm where name popularity and political proclivities collide.

Amidst the sea of names that adorn birth certificates, one moniker shines as bright as a polished luxury sedan - Lexus. With an air of sophistication and a hint of opulence, the name Lexus carries with it a certain je ne sais quoi that sets it apart from the Hondas and Toyotas of the world. But could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Could the popularity of Lexus be intertwined with political preferences in ways that transcend mere serendipity?

Intrigued by the possibility, we set out to unravel this enthralling enigma within the context of the politically diverse state of Oklahoma. Known for its sweeping plains, rich Native American heritage, and a penchant for choosing steak over soybeans, Oklahoma presents an intriguing backdrop for our exploration into the interplay of nomenclature and political affiliations.

Armed with a surplus of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, our intrepid team of researchers embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden connections between the popularity of the name Lexus and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. With statistical rigor as our compass and a penchant for the pun-tastic, we navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of voter preferences and name trends.

As we delve into the fascinating findings of our study, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a jaunty jaunt through the often-uncharted territory where names and politics intertwine. Our quest may be one of whimsy and wonder, but our dedication to methodological precision remains steadfast. So, let us embolden our spirits and venture forth, ready to unravel the mystique of "Lexus and the Single Voter" in the heartland of Oklahoma.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The age-old debate of nature versus nurture has a new, unexpected contender: nomenclature. As researchers grapple with the multifaceted factors that shape political preferences, the influence of something as seemingly whimsical as a first name has piqued the curiosity of many. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey through the peculiar realm where name popularity and political proclivities collide.
Amidst the sea of names that adorn birth certificates, one moniker shines as bright as a polished luxury sedan - Lexus. With an air of sophistication and a hint of opulence, the name Lexus carries with it a certain je ne sais quoi that sets it apart from the Hondas and Toyotas of the world. But could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Could the popularity of Lexus be intertwined with political preferences in ways that transcend mere serendipity?
Intrigued by the possibility, we set out to unravel this enthralling enigma within the context of the politically diverse state of Oklahoma. Known for its sweeping plains, rich Native American heritage, and a penchant for choosing steak over soybeans, Oklahoma presents an intriguing backdrop for our exploration into the interplay of nomenclature and political affiliations.
Armed with a surplus of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, our intrepid team of researchers embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden connections between the popularity of the name Lexus and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. With statistical rigor as our compass and a penchant for the pun-tastic, we navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of voter preferences and name trends.
As we delve into the fascinating findings of our study, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a jaunty jaunt through the often-uncharted territory where names and politics intertwine. Our quest may be one of whimsy and wonder, but our dedication to methodological precision remains steadfast. So, let us embolden our spirits and venture forth, ready to unravel the mystique of "Lexus and the Single Voter" in the heartland of Oklahoma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

The influence of nomenclature on political leanings has been a subject of scholarly interest in recent years. Smith (2010) and Doe (2015) have highlighted the potential impact of first names on various aspects of individuals' lives, including academic achievements and career choices. Furthermore, Jones (2018) examined the societal perceptions associated with certain names and their implications for individuals' social and political identities. However, these studies have yet to explore the specific connection between the popularity of the name Lexus and political preferences, particularly in the context of a region known for its diverse landscape and political dynamics.

Moving on from the serious stuff, let's talk about some non-fiction books that might be related. "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner could shed light on the unexpected correlations between seemingly unrelated variables, much like the relationship between a high-end car name and the Democrat vote in Oklahoma. "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell might offer insights into the subconscious evaluations that individuals make based on names, perhaps subconsciously associating a name like Lexus with certain political viewpoints.

Now, how about some fiction books that sound like they could be related? Imagine "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald, but with a political twist - "The Great Lexus: Gatsby's Glamorous Get-Out-The-Vote Gala." Or consider "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, where instead of a mystery set in a medieval monastery, it's a modern-day political intrigue involving a character named Lexus and a trail of votes leading to Oklahoma.

Bringing in a lighthearted touch, let's not forget the animated wonders of our childhood days - cartoons and children's shows that inadvertently taught us the ABCs of life. From "Sesame Street" to "The Magic School Bus," these delightful programs may not have directly explored the correlation between names and politics, but they certainly laid the foundation for us to embark on this scholarly journey with a sense of adventure and curiosity.

In the next section, we'll dive into the realm of names and voting behaviors with all the enthusiasm of a puppy chasing its tail. So, grab your sense of humor, fasten your academic seatbelt, and prepare to witness the intersection of quantitative analysis and whimsical wonder in a way that only academia can provide. Let's roll! Or should I say, let's Lexus and the Single Voter!

Stay tuned for more unpredictable pairings than a blind date set up by a mischievous cupid!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The age-old debate of nature versus nurture has a new, unexpected contender: nomenclature. As researchers grapple with the multifaceted factors that shape political preferences, the influence of something as seemingly whimsical as a first name has piqued the curiosity of many. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey through the peculiar realm where name popularity and political proclivities collide.
Amidst the sea of names that adorn birth certificates, one moniker shines as bright as a polished luxury sedan - Lexus. With an air of sophistication and a hint of opulence, the name Lexus carries with it a certain je ne sais quoi that sets it apart from the Hondas and Toyotas of the world. But could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Could the popularity of Lexus be intertwined with political preferences in ways that transcend mere serendipity?
Intrigued by the possibility, we set out to unravel this enthralling enigma within the context of the politically diverse state of Oklahoma. Known for its sweeping plains, rich Native American heritage, and a penchant for choosing steak over soybeans, Oklahoma presents an intriguing backdrop for our exploration into the interplay of nomenclature and political affiliations.
Armed with a surplus of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, our intrepid team of researchers embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden connections between the popularity of the name Lexus and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. With statistical rigor as our compass and a penchant for the pun-tastic, we navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of voter preferences and name trends.
As we delve into the fascinating findings of our study, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a jaunty jaunt through the often-uncharted territory where names and politics intertwine. Our quest may be one of whimsy and wonder, but our dedication to methodological precision remains steadfast. So, let us embolden our spirits and venture forth, ready to unravel the mystique of "Lexus and the Single Voter" in the heartland of Oklahoma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unearth the potential connection between the popularity of the first name "Lexus" and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma, our research team embarked on a methodological odyssey that would make even the most intrepid explorers of statistical realms raise an eyebrow or two. Our approach was meticulously crafted to extract insightful nuggets of wisdom from the expansive data landscape and, hopefully, elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

Data Collection:
Our expedition into the realm of name popularity and political proclivities commenced with sourcing data from the US Social Security Administration, as well as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the prestigious Harvard Dataverse. We spared no effort in accessing a treasure trove of information spanning the years from 1990 to 2020, allowing us to capture the ebbs and flows of both name trends and electoral dynamics. Our dedication to data collection could rival that of a squirrel hoarding acorns for the winter, as we meticulously gathered and curated a wealth of empirical evidence to fuel our analytical escapade.

Name Popularity Assessment:
With a twinkle in our eyes and a spreadsheet in hand, we meticulously assessed the popularity of the first name "Lexus" over the years within the geographical boundaries of Oklahoma. Using advanced statistical techniques and a healthy dose of computer programming prowess, we crunched and wrangled the numbers to provide a comprehensive picture of Lexus domination (or lack thereof) in the state. Our approach could be compared to that of a name-obsessed detective on the hunt for clues, sifting through mounds of data to unveil the telltale signs of lexical prominence.

Voter Behavior Analysis:
To capture the essence of political preferences, we delved into the depths of electoral data to gauge the votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Our lenses were trained on the subtle nuances of voter behavior, aiming to uncover any potential correlations between the appeal of the name "Lexus" and political leanings. With rigorous attention to detail and a keen eye for patterns, we endeavored to weave a narrative that would shed light on the quirkier aspects of electoral dynamics.

Statistical Marvels:
Armed with a battalion of statistical techniques and a penchant for number-crunching antics, we unleashed the full force of mathematical sorcery upon the amassed data. From correlation coefficients to regression analyses, our statistical arsenal brimmed with wizardry that would make Merlin blush. We scrutinized the data with the precision of a watchmaker tinkering with the delicate gears of time, aiming to extract meaningful insights with a dash of statistical flair.

Ethical Considerations:
In our quest for intellectual treasure, we remained steadfast in adhering to ethical standards akin to those of noble knights on a chivalric quest. Our data handling and analysis were conducted with the utmost respect for privacy and integrity, ensuring that the rights of individuals were upheld with the fortitude of a gallant protector of data sovereignty.

In the end, our methodological expedition stands as a testament to the inherent blend of rigor and lightheartedness that permeates this research endeavor. With a wink and a nod to statistical conventions, we invite the reader to join us on this whimsical journey through the captivating crossroads of nomenclature and electoral intrigue. Buckle up, dear reader, for the ride promises to be as exhilarating as a high-speed spin in a pristine Lexus sedan – with just as many twists and turns along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9290904, r-squared of 0.8632090, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The age-old debate of nature versus nurture has a new, unexpected contender: nomenclature. As researchers grapple with the multifaceted factors that shape political preferences, the influence of something as seemingly whimsical as a first name has piqued the curiosity of many. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey through the peculiar realm where name popularity and political proclivities collide.
Amidst the sea of names that adorn birth certificates, one moniker shines as bright as a polished luxury sedan - Lexus. With an air of sophistication and a hint of opulence, the name Lexus carries with it a certain je ne sais quoi that sets it apart from the Hondas and Toyotas of the world. But could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Could the popularity of Lexus be intertwined with political preferences in ways that transcend mere serendipity?
Intrigued by the possibility, we set out to unravel this enthralling enigma within the context of the politically diverse state of Oklahoma. Known for its sweeping plains, rich Native American heritage, and a penchant for choosing steak over soybeans, Oklahoma presents an intriguing backdrop for our exploration into the interplay of nomenclature and political affiliations.
Armed with a surplus of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, our intrepid team of researchers embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden connections between the popularity of the name Lexus and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. With statistical rigor as our compass and a penchant for the pun-tastic, we navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of voter preferences and name trends.
As we delve into the fascinating findings of our study, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a jaunty jaunt through the often-uncharted territory where names and politics intertwine. Our quest may be one of whimsy and wonder, but our dedication to methodological precision remains steadfast. So, let us embolden our spirits and venture forth, ready to unravel the mystique of "Lexus and the Single Voter" in the heartland of Oklahoma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

**Correlation and Statistical Significance**

As we sought to unpack the potential link between the popularity of the first name "Lexus" and voting behavior in Oklahoma, our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9290904. This figure suggests a remarkably strong positive relationship between the prevalence of the name "Lexus" and support for the Democratic Presidential candidate over the period from 1990 to 2020. To paraphrase Shakespeare, "What's in a name? A strong correlation to political preferences, it seems!"

The r-squared value of 0.8632090 further accentuates the robustness of the relationship, indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in Democrat Presidential votes in Oklahoma can be explained by the popularity of the name "Lexus." With a p-value below 0.01, our findings also demonstrate a statistically significant association, providing a level of certainty that's as sturdy as a well-engineered luxury vehicle.

**Scatterplot Visualization (Fig. 1)**

The visual representation of our data in Fig. 1 paints a compelling picture, quite literally. The scatterplot showcases the tight clustering of data points, resembling the precision and alignment of a fleet of Lexus automobiles on a showroom floor. Each point serves as a miniature electoral anecdote, contributing to the overarching narrative of the intertwined fate of a name and a political preference. As the adage goes, "A picture is worth a thousand words," and this graph speaks volumes about the striking relationship we observed.

In summary, our results stand as a testament to the unexpected nature of the connection between name popularity and political proclivities. While the widespread appeal of the first name "Lexus" may evoke images of luxury and refinement, our findings suggest that it also resonates with a particular political inclination in the heartland of Oklahoma. This revelation underscores the whimsical yet impactful influences that shape our electoral landscape, adding a touch of eccentricity to the rigorous world of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
The influence of nomenclature on political leanings has been a subject of scholarly interest in recent years. Smith (2010) and Doe (2015) have highlighted the potential impact of first names on various aspects of individuals' lives, including academic achievements and career choices. Furthermore, Jones (2018) examined the societal perceptions associated with certain names and their implications for individuals' social and political identities. However, these studies have yet to explore the specific connection between the popularity of the name Lexus and political preferences, particularly in the context of a region known for its diverse landscape and political dynamics.
Moving on from the serious stuff, let's talk about some non-fiction books that might be related. "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner could shed light on the unexpected correlations between seemingly unrelated variables, much like the relationship between a high-end car name and the Democrat vote in Oklahoma. "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell might offer insights into the subconscious evaluations that individuals make based on names, perhaps subconsciously associating a name like Lexus with certain political viewpoints.
Now, how about some fiction books that sound like they could be related? Imagine "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald, but with a political twist - "The Great Lexus: Gatsby's Glamorous Get-Out-The-Vote Gala." Or consider "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, where instead of a mystery set in a medieval monastery, it's a modern-day political intrigue involving a character named Lexus and a trail of votes leading to Oklahoma.
Bringing in a lighthearted touch, let's not forget the animated wonders of our childhood days - cartoons and children's shows that inadvertently taught us the ABCs of life. From "Sesame Street" to "The Magic School Bus," these delightful programs may not have directly explored the correlation between names and politics, but they certainly laid the foundation for us to embark on this scholarly journey with a sense of adventure and curiosity.
In the next section, we'll dive into the realm of names and voting behaviors with all the enthusiasm of a puppy chasing its tail. So, grab your sense of humor, fasten your academic seatbelt, and prepare to witness the intersection of quantitative analysis and whimsical wonder in a way that only academia can provide. Let's roll! Or should I say, let's Lexus and the Single Voter!
Stay tuned for more unpredictable pairings than a blind date set up by a mischievous cupid!

[[RESULTS]]
As we sought to unpack the potential link between the popularity of the first name "Lexus" and voting behavior in Oklahoma, our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9290904. This figure suggests a remarkably strong positive relationship between the prevalence of the name "Lexus" and support for the Democratic Presidential candidate over the period from 1990 to 2020. To paraphrase Shakespeare, "What's in a name? A strong correlation to political preferences, it seems!"
The r-squared value of 0.8632090 further accentuates the robustness of the relationship, indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in Democrat Presidential votes in Oklahoma can be explained by the popularity of the name "Lexus." With a p-value below 0.01, our findings also demonstrate a statistically significant association, providing a level of certainty that's as sturdy as a well-engineered luxury vehicle.

The visual representation of our data in Fig. 1 paints a compelling picture, quite literally. The scatterplot showcases the tight clustering of data points, resembling the precision and alignment of a fleet of Lexus automobiles on a showroom floor. Each point serves as a miniature electoral anecdote, contributing to the overarching narrative of the intertwined fate of a name and a political preference. As the adage goes, "A picture is worth a thousand words," and this graph speaks volumes about the striking relationship we observed.
In summary, our results stand as a testament to the unexpected nature of the connection between name popularity and political proclivities. While the widespread appeal of the first name "Lexus" may evoke images of luxury and refinement, our findings suggest that it also resonates with a particular political inclination in the heartland of Oklahoma. This revelation underscores the whimsical yet impactful influences that shape our electoral landscape, adding a touch of eccentricity to the rigorous world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide compelling evidence of a strong and unanticipated relationship between the popularity of the first name "Lexus" and support for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the state of Oklahoma. While it may seem like a stretch to connect a luxury car brand with political leanings, the data leaves little room for doubt. This correlation coefficient is tighter than a valet parking a sleek Lexus in a tight spot!

Our results are consistent with previous research by Smith (2010) and Doe (2015), who highlighted the potential influence of first names on various aspects of individuals' lives. The unexpected correlation we observed aligns with the premise of "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, shedding light on the intriguing correlations between seemingly unrelated variables. It's like finding a hidden feature in a luxury car – surprising, but undeniably present!

Furthermore, the visual representation of our data in Fig. 1 reinforces the robustness of our findings, resembling the precision and alignment of a fleet of Lexus automobiles on a showroom floor. It's as if the principles of high-end automotive engineering have transcended their mechanical realm to leave a mark on the political landscape! This correlation isn't just statistically significant; it's practically revving its engine with electoral implications.

The connection between the name "Lexus" and support for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma isn't just a statistical quirk; it's a testament to the multifaceted influences that shape our political decisions. Our results warrant further exploration into the quirks and idiosyncrasies of political preferences, and the potential impact of seemingly innocuous factors on electoral outcomes. It's like embarking on a road trip and stumbling across a hidden gem – unexpected, exhilarating, and sure to make for a great story in academic circles.

As the dust settles on our analysis, we are left with a clear indication that a name isn't just a label; it can also carry intriguing implications for political tilt. With the academic equivalent of a V8 engine under the hood of our research, it's time to shift gears and explore the broader implications of our findings. The intersection of nomenclature and political propensities has proven to be an exhilarating ride, and we eagerly anticipate further scholarly pursuits in this enigmatic territory. It's like stepping into a luxury vehicle – once you've experienced it, you can never look at political preferences the same way again!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lexus and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The age-old debate of nature versus nurture has a new, unexpected contender: nomenclature. As researchers grapple with the multifaceted factors that shape political preferences, the influence of something as seemingly whimsical as a first name has piqued the curiosity of many. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey through the peculiar realm where name popularity and political proclivities collide.
Amidst the sea of names that adorn birth certificates, one moniker shines as bright as a polished luxury sedan - Lexus. With an air of sophistication and a hint of opulence, the name Lexus carries with it a certain je ne sais quoi that sets it apart from the Hondas and Toyotas of the world. But could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Could the popularity of Lexus be intertwined with political preferences in ways that transcend mere serendipity?
Intrigued by the possibility, we set out to unravel this enthralling enigma within the context of the politically diverse state of Oklahoma. Known for its sweeping plains, rich Native American heritage, and a penchant for choosing steak over soybeans, Oklahoma presents an intriguing backdrop for our exploration into the interplay of nomenclature and political affiliations.
Armed with a surplus of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, our intrepid team of researchers embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden connections between the popularity of the name Lexus and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate. With statistical rigor as our compass and a penchant for the pun-tastic, we navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of voter preferences and name trends.
As we delve into the fascinating findings of our study, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a jaunty jaunt through the often-uncharted territory where names and politics intertwine. Our quest may be one of whimsy and wonder, but our dedication to methodological precision remains steadfast. So, let us embolden our spirits and venture forth, ready to unravel the mystique of "Lexus and the Single Voter" in the heartland of Oklahoma.

[[RESULTS]]
As we sought to unpack the potential link between the popularity of the first name "Lexus" and voting behavior in Oklahoma, our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9290904. This figure suggests a remarkably strong positive relationship between the prevalence of the name "Lexus" and support for the Democratic Presidential candidate over the period from 1990 to 2020. To paraphrase Shakespeare, "What's in a name? A strong correlation to political preferences, it seems!"
The r-squared value of 0.8632090 further accentuates the robustness of the relationship, indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in Democrat Presidential votes in Oklahoma can be explained by the popularity of the name "Lexus." With a p-value below 0.01, our findings also demonstrate a statistically significant association, providing a level of certainty that's as sturdy as a well-engineered luxury vehicle.

The visual representation of our data in Fig. 1 paints a compelling picture, quite literally. The scatterplot showcases the tight clustering of data points, resembling the precision and alignment of a fleet of Lexus automobiles on a showroom floor. Each point serves as a miniature electoral anecdote, contributing to the overarching narrative of the intertwined fate of a name and a political preference. As the adage goes, "A picture is worth a thousand words," and this graph speaks volumes about the striking relationship we observed.
In summary, our results stand as a testament to the unexpected nature of the connection between name popularity and political proclivities. While the widespread appeal of the first name "Lexus" may evoke images of luxury and refinement, our findings suggest that it also resonates with a particular political inclination in the heartland of Oklahoma. This revelation underscores the whimsical yet impactful influences that shape our electoral landscape, adding a touch of eccentricity to the rigorous world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In the enchanting intersection of nomenclature and political sway, our study has traversed uncharted terrain, revealing a correlation worthy of the most extravagant luxury vehicle commercials. With a correlation coefficient that dazzles like the gleam of a well-polished Lexus, our findings underscore the unforeseen connection between the name "Lexus" and support for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma.

As we wrap up this rollicking romp through the data, we can't help but marvel at the serendipitous synergy between a name synonymous with elegance and a political leaning that's sleeker than a well-maintained campaign bus. While our results may appear as surprising as finding heated leather seats in a hybrid sedan, they robustly highlight the potential impact of nomenclature on the political tapestry of Oklahoma.

Our findings, akin to the frisson of setting the cruise control on Interstate 40, propel us forward in our understanding of the multifaceted fabric of voter preferences. As we bid adieu to this intriguing interplay of name popularity and political predilections, let us not forget the rambunctious spirit of exploration that led us on this scholarly joyride.

In light of our hair-raising revelation, it's evident that the allure of the name "Lexus" extends beyond the purr of a finely-tuned engine and into the realm of electoral inclinations. However, as much as we cherish unraveling the quirks of the voter zeitgeist, it's time for this particular journey to reach its destination. Our scholarly endeavors in this domain have revved their engines and cruised along the highway of discovery, leaving us with the resounding assertion that no further research is required in this territory.

So, buckle your seatbelts and prepare to pull into the academic pit stop, for the name "Lexus" and its dalliance with Oklahoma's political preferences has been thoroughly and exhaustively unboxed. Our scholarly tires have screeched on this captivating correlation, and it's time to drive off into the sunset of conclusiveness, leaving the perpetually curious to ponder the whimsical wonders of the "Lexus and the Single Voter" phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sociopolitical Name Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Political Nameology and Voter Behavior Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lexus and the Single Voter: An Exhaustive Examination of Name Popularity and Political Preferences in Oklahoma with an abstract of In this comprehensive study, we delve headfirst into the whimsical world of name popularity and its potential influence on political leanings. With a pun-tastic focus on the first name "Lexus," we examine its correlation with votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Oklahoma. Drawing upon a plethora of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team unveils some tire-screeching, eye-popping results. Our analysis reveals a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9290904 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2020. With a dash of statistical sass and a pinch of electoral excitement, this study takes a lighthearted yet rigorously analytical approach to understanding the quirky intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Buckle up and get ready for a wild ride through the ever-surprising landscape of name-based political propensities!

ChatGPT:

Lexus, Single voter, Name popularity, Political preferences, Oklahoma, Democrat, Presidential candidate, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Correlation coefficient, Electorate, Nomenclature, Political propensities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lexus
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lexus
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lexus

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Oklahoma
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma

Correlation r = 0.9290904 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8632090 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lexus) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00084. 0.0008446311857561035000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.084% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,184 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Lexus (Babies born)218582369257157793924
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma (Percentage of votes)34.024740.449138.426934.429634.354933.227728.931732.2862




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([218,582,369,257,157,79,39,24,])
array_2 = np.array([34.0247,40.4491,38.4269,34.4296,34.3549,33.2277,28.9317,32.2862,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lexus"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Oklahoma"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5525 · Black Variable ID: 2801 · Red Variable ID: 26153
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0