about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,522 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and the second variable is Wind power generated in Canada.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2000, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog from Wisconsin Rapids wafted all the way to Canada, giving the wind turbines a much-needed boost in efficiency. You could say it was a breath of fresh smog for the wind power industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a surreal, psychedelic landscape with wisps of smog from Wisconsin Rapids carrying vibrant, swirling colors. The smog drifts across the border into Canada, where it interacts with a vast field of wind turbines. As the smog and wind intertwine, the turbines come to life, spinning faster and faster, surrounded by a mesmerizing aura of energy and motion. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Psychedelic a funny image you would see on reddit Surrealism Psychedelic
ChatGPT: Psychedelic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada, in the following situation: The smog from Wisconsin Rapids wafted all the way to Canada, giving the wind turbines a much-needed boost in efficiency. You could say it was a breath of fresh smog for the wind power industry!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, wisps of smog from Wisconsin Rapids drift across the border into Canada, reaching a vast field of wind turbines. As the smog mingles with the wind and turbines, the once-still turbines begin to spin more rapidly, generating an increased amount of clean energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Psychedelic ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, wisps of smog from Wisconsin Rapids drift across the border into Canada, reaching a vast field of wind turbines. As the smog mingles with the wind and turbines, the once-still turbines begin to spin more rapidly, generating an increased amount of clean energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a surreal, psychedelic landscape with wisps of smog from Wisconsin Rapids carrying vibrant, swirling colors. The smog drifts across the border into Canada, where it interacts with a vast field of wind turbines. As the smog and wind intertwine, the turbines come to life, spinning faster and faster, surrounded by a mesmerizing aura of energy and motion.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin caused Wind power generated in Canada to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

The Journal of Ecological Entanglements

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2000.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-changing landscape of environmental research, an undeniable breeze of curiosity has blown across the minds of researchers, propelling them to delve into the intricate relationship between air pollution and wind power. This study sets out to uncover the surprising link between the air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada, embarking on a quest that is as refreshing as a cool gust of wind on a hot summer day.

As we set out on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive knowledge of air pollution and wind power? A dino-"wind" researcher! Indeed, our fascination with this unexpected connection has led us to peel back the layers of environmental dynamics, blowing away preconceived notions with each surprising revelation.

The winds of change have, quite literally, nudged us to consider the impact of wind power generation on air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids. With an air of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, we embarked on this research endeavor, determined to unravel the mysteries carried on the wisps of the wind. The results, dare we say, left us breathless with excitement.

Speaking of winds, did you hear about the supporting actor in the movie about wind turbines? He really "blew" away the audience! Jokes aside, the correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01 in our statistical analysis left us with no choice but to acknowledge the profound connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer might just be blowin' in the wind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-changing landscape of environmental research, an undeniable breeze of curiosity has blown across the minds of researchers, propelling them to delve into the intricate relationship between air pollution and wind power. This study sets out to uncover the surprising link between the air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada, embarking on a quest that is as refreshing as a cool gust of wind on a hot summer day.
As we set out on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive knowledge of air pollution and wind power? A dino-"wind" researcher! Indeed, our fascination with this unexpected connection has led us to peel back the layers of environmental dynamics, blowing away preconceived notions with each surprising revelation.
The winds of change have, quite literally, nudged us to consider the impact of wind power generation on air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids. With an air of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, we embarked on this research endeavor, determined to unravel the mysteries carried on the wisps of the wind. The results, dare we say, left us breathless with excitement.
Speaking of winds, did you hear about the supporting actor in the movie about wind turbines? He really "blew" away the audience! Jokes aside, the correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01 in our statistical analysis left us with no choice but to acknowledge the profound connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer might just be blowin' in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we peer into the windy corridors of environmental science and energy dynamics, it is vital to ground our exploration in previous research that has blown through this field. Smith and Doe (2018) offered a comprehensive analysis of air pollution levels in the Midwest, pinpointing specific hotspots like Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, as areas of concern. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2019) shed light on the burgeoning wind power industry in Canada, unveiling the potential impact of renewable energy on the nation's energy landscape.

But let's not get too carried away with the serious stuff. After all, what do you call a big red dog who advocates for wind power? Clifford the Big Wind Dog. All jokes aside, it's time to turn to some non-fiction literature that touches upon the windswept realms of air pollution and wind power. "Wind Energy for Dummies" by Ian Woof and "The Power of Air: Exploring Pollution Dynamics" by E. Zephyr offer insights that, while informative, won't blow you away with their thrilling narratives.

In the realm of fiction, novels such as "Gone with the Wind Turbines" by Margaret Blowy and "The Airbender Chronicles" by A. Windavich may seem a bit far-fetched, but they still manage to capture the essence of the breezy connection we're exploring.

We must also acknowledge the films that have blown through our research team's movie nights, providing tangential insights that flicker like a gust of wind. "Blowin' in the Wind: A Tale of Environmental Redemption" and "Winds of Change: A Renewable Romance" may not be the most scientifically accurate portrayals, but they certainly add a touch of whimsy to our research pursuits.

Now, back to the serious business at hand. Our findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkable link between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer may indeed be blowin' in the wind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1992 to 2000

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-changing landscape of environmental research, an undeniable breeze of curiosity has blown across the minds of researchers, propelling them to delve into the intricate relationship between air pollution and wind power. This study sets out to uncover the surprising link between the air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada, embarking on a quest that is as refreshing as a cool gust of wind on a hot summer day.
As we set out on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive knowledge of air pollution and wind power? A dino-"wind" researcher! Indeed, our fascination with this unexpected connection has led us to peel back the layers of environmental dynamics, blowing away preconceived notions with each surprising revelation.
The winds of change have, quite literally, nudged us to consider the impact of wind power generation on air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids. With an air of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, we embarked on this research endeavor, determined to unravel the mysteries carried on the wisps of the wind. The results, dare we say, left us breathless with excitement.
Speaking of winds, did you hear about the supporting actor in the movie about wind turbines? He really "blew" away the audience! Jokes aside, the correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01 in our statistical analysis left us with no choice but to acknowledge the profound connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer might just be blowin' in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the air-ry connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and wind power generation in Canada, our research team embarked on a whirlwind journey of data collection and analysis. The data used in this study were primarily sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). We focused on data from the period of 1992 to 2000, capturing a snapshot of environmental and energy dynamics during that air-ra. Get it? Air-ry instead of eerie? No? Okay, I'll show myself out.

Now, onto the research methods. Determining the wind power generated in Canada involved a bit of a windy road, as we navigated through databases and reports to gather data on wind turbine installations, capacity, and production. We performed a thorough analysis of wind power generation across different provinces and territories, paying close attention to the meteorological conditions that could flutteringly impact the generation of wind power. In the spirit of full disclosure, we might have found ourselves humming tunes like "Blowin' in the Wind" while sifting through these vast datasets. A little music never hurt the scientific process, right?

As for assessing air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, we took a gusty approach, incorporating data on various air pollutants such as particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. We also factored in meteorological data, including wind speed and direction, to analyze how these elements intertwined with air pollution levels. Admittedly, it was a bit like untangling a kite string on a breezy day, but we persevered nonetheless.

After gathering the data, we unearthed our trusty statistical tools to analyze the relationship between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and wind power generation in Canada. We calculated correlation coefficients and conducted regression analyses, all while keeping our data goggles firmly in place. We also employed geographical mapping techniques to visually air out the spatial distribution of air pollution and wind power generation, creating a breeze of visualization that swept through the windswept landscapes of our findings.

Oh, and speaking of windswept landscapes, did you hear about the wind power company that went out of business? They just couldn't stay a-float! Puns aside, the research methods may have involved a bit of a windy path, but they ultimately guided us to unravel the intriguing connection between air pollution and wind power generation.

In summary, our methodology harnessed the power of data collection, statistical analysis, and a touch of whimsy to capture the essence of this air-ry research endeavor. And if there's one thing we've learned, it's that exploring the relationship between air pollution and wind power can truly take your breath away.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1992 to 2000, you found a correlation 0.9998067, r-squared of 0.9996134, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-changing landscape of environmental research, an undeniable breeze of curiosity has blown across the minds of researchers, propelling them to delve into the intricate relationship between air pollution and wind power. This study sets out to uncover the surprising link between the air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada, embarking on a quest that is as refreshing as a cool gust of wind on a hot summer day.
As we set out on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive knowledge of air pollution and wind power? A dino-"wind" researcher! Indeed, our fascination with this unexpected connection has led us to peel back the layers of environmental dynamics, blowing away preconceived notions with each surprising revelation.
The winds of change have, quite literally, nudged us to consider the impact of wind power generation on air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids. With an air of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, we embarked on this research endeavor, determined to unravel the mysteries carried on the wisps of the wind. The results, dare we say, left us breathless with excitement.
Speaking of winds, did you hear about the supporting actor in the movie about wind turbines? He really "blew" away the audience! Jokes aside, the correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01 in our statistical analysis left us with no choice but to acknowledge the profound connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer might just be blowin' in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis left us feeling as buoyant as a kite caught in a strong breeze. We found a remarkably strong correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. The correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and r-squared of 0.9996134 revealed a relationship so robust that it could rival the force of a powerful gust from a wind turbine.

Our statistical analysis blew us away - quite literally! The sheer strength of the correlation coefficient and the stringent p-value of less than 0.01 left us in awe of the unexpected interconnectedness between air pollution and wind power. One might even say we were blown away in more ways than one, both by the findings and the playful puns we couldn't resist inserting into our academic discussion.

To visually encapsulate the wind-swept connection we uncovered, we present the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the tight relationship between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and wind power generation in Canada. This figure provides a clear snapshot of the breezy correlation we discovered, underscoring the importance of considering the multifaceted impacts of wind power generation on environmental dynamics.

In summary, our findings stand as a testament to the unpredictability and intricacy of environmental influences. As we continue to navigate the winds of change in the realm of environmental research, we must remain open to the idea that perhaps, just perhaps, the answer to some of our air-ry questions is indeed blowin' in the wind.

And with that, we conclude our results section, leaving you with this parting dad joke: What did the wind turbine say to the solar panel? I'm a big fan of your work!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we peer into the windy corridors of environmental science and energy dynamics, it is vital to ground our exploration in previous research that has blown through this field. Smith and Doe (2018) offered a comprehensive analysis of air pollution levels in the Midwest, pinpointing specific hotspots like Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, as areas of concern. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2019) shed light on the burgeoning wind power industry in Canada, unveiling the potential impact of renewable energy on the nation's energy landscape.
But let's not get too carried away with the serious stuff. After all, what do you call a big red dog who advocates for wind power? Clifford the Big Wind Dog. All jokes aside, it's time to turn to some non-fiction literature that touches upon the windswept realms of air pollution and wind power. "Wind Energy for Dummies" by Ian Woof and "The Power of Air: Exploring Pollution Dynamics" by E. Zephyr offer insights that, while informative, won't blow you away with their thrilling narratives.
In the realm of fiction, novels such as "Gone with the Wind Turbines" by Margaret Blowy and "The Airbender Chronicles" by A. Windavich may seem a bit far-fetched, but they still manage to capture the essence of the breezy connection we're exploring.
We must also acknowledge the films that have blown through our research team's movie nights, providing tangential insights that flicker like a gust of wind. "Blowin' in the Wind: A Tale of Environmental Redemption" and "Winds of Change: A Renewable Romance" may not be the most scientifically accurate portrayals, but they certainly add a touch of whimsy to our research pursuits.
Now, back to the serious business at hand. Our findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, suggesting a remarkable link between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer may indeed be blowin' in the wind.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis left us feeling as buoyant as a kite caught in a strong breeze. We found a remarkably strong correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. The correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and r-squared of 0.9996134 revealed a relationship so robust that it could rival the force of a powerful gust from a wind turbine.
Our statistical analysis blew us away - quite literally! The sheer strength of the correlation coefficient and the stringent p-value of less than 0.01 left us in awe of the unexpected interconnectedness between air pollution and wind power. One might even say we were blown away in more ways than one, both by the findings and the playful puns we couldn't resist inserting into our academic discussion.
To visually encapsulate the wind-swept connection we uncovered, we present the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the tight relationship between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and wind power generation in Canada. This figure provides a clear snapshot of the breezy correlation we discovered, underscoring the importance of considering the multifaceted impacts of wind power generation on environmental dynamics.
In summary, our findings stand as a testament to the unpredictability and intricacy of environmental influences. As we continue to navigate the winds of change in the realm of environmental research, we must remain open to the idea that perhaps, just perhaps, the answer to some of our air-ry questions is indeed blowin' in the wind.
And with that, we conclude our results section, leaving you with this parting dad joke: What did the wind turbine say to the solar panel? I'm a big fan of your work!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have sent us on a whirlwind of contemplation, blowing open the doors of possibility in the world of environmental research. The results of our analysis not only confirmed the strong correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada but also left us pondering the intricate intricacies of this airy relationship. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer may indeed be blowin' in the wind, just like the lyrics of a classic Bob Dylan song.

Our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, suggesting a connection so strong that even the most steadfast pessimist would have to admit that the wind of change is indeed untamable. The robustness of this relationship underscores the profound impact that environmental factors can have across geographical boundaries, crossing borders like a mischievous zephyr in search of mischief. Interestingly, this aligns with the whimsical notion of interconnectedness that we stumbled upon in our riveting review of literature and reinforces the breezy theories put forth by the esteemed scholars Smith, Doe, Jones, and the likes.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a visual testament to the wind-swept connection we uncovered, portraying a picture so compelling that it could whisk you away to a dreamscape of renewable romance and environmental redemption. We cannot emphasize enough the importance of considering the multifaceted impacts of wind power generation on environmental dynamics, showcasing the paramount role of renewable energy in steering the winds of change towards a cleaner, more sustainable future.

In essence, our research not only confirms the air-ry connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada but also beckons us to consider the nuanced and intricate relationships that intertwine with the winds of change. As we leave you to ponder our findings, let us leave you with this uplifting dad joke: "Why don't we ever say 'goodbye' to the wind? Because it's always 'see you later'!" Until then, may the winds of change carry you to new heights of environmental enlightenment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Wind power generated in Canada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.

Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.

But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-changing landscape of environmental research, an undeniable breeze of curiosity has blown across the minds of researchers, propelling them to delve into the intricate relationship between air pollution and wind power. This study sets out to uncover the surprising link between the air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada, embarking on a quest that is as refreshing as a cool gust of wind on a hot summer day.
As we set out on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: what do you call a dinosaur with an extensive knowledge of air pollution and wind power? A dino-"wind" researcher! Indeed, our fascination with this unexpected connection has led us to peel back the layers of environmental dynamics, blowing away preconceived notions with each surprising revelation.
The winds of change have, quite literally, nudged us to consider the impact of wind power generation on air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids. With an air of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, we embarked on this research endeavor, determined to unravel the mysteries carried on the wisps of the wind. The results, dare we say, left us breathless with excitement.
Speaking of winds, did you hear about the supporting actor in the movie about wind turbines? He really "blew" away the audience! Jokes aside, the correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01 in our statistical analysis left us with no choice but to acknowledge the profound connection between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. It seems that when it comes to environmental influences, the answer might just be blowin' in the wind.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis left us feeling as buoyant as a kite caught in a strong breeze. We found a remarkably strong correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. The correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and r-squared of 0.9996134 revealed a relationship so robust that it could rival the force of a powerful gust from a wind turbine.
Our statistical analysis blew us away - quite literally! The sheer strength of the correlation coefficient and the stringent p-value of less than 0.01 left us in awe of the unexpected interconnectedness between air pollution and wind power. One might even say we were blown away in more ways than one, both by the findings and the playful puns we couldn't resist inserting into our academic discussion.
To visually encapsulate the wind-swept connection we uncovered, we present the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the tight relationship between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids and wind power generation in Canada. This figure provides a clear snapshot of the breezy correlation we discovered, underscoring the importance of considering the multifaceted impacts of wind power generation on environmental dynamics.
In summary, our findings stand as a testament to the unpredictability and intricacy of environmental influences. As we continue to navigate the winds of change in the realm of environmental research, we must remain open to the idea that perhaps, just perhaps, the answer to some of our air-ry questions is indeed blowin' in the wind.
And with that, we conclude our results section, leaving you with this parting dad joke: What did the wind turbine say to the solar panel? I'm a big fan of your work!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has blown us away with the remarkably strong correlation we uncovered between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. These findings not only confirm the unexpected interconnectedness between seemingly disparate factors but also provide a refreshing breeze of insight into the complex dynamics of environmental influences.

As we wrap up this study, it's clear that the winds of change carry more than just a breath of fresh air; they also bring with them the potential to shape air quality and energy generation across geographical boundaries. Our research team feels as excited as a pun-loving dad with a well-timed dad joke in hand. It seems that when it comes to environmental research, the answers might just be blowin' in the wind after all.

At this juncture, we can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area, unless you're a researcher specializing in wind puns!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Entanglements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Environmental Airflow Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Winds of Change: Exploring the Air-ry Connection Between Air Pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and Wind Power in Canada with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the generation of wind power in Canada. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this intriguing relationship to determine if there is indeed a gusty connection between the two. To our surprise, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9998067 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids and the generation of wind power in Canada. The results not only blew us away but also left us pondering the air-ry mysteries of environmental dynamics.
Perhaps it's time we acknowledge that when it comes to air pollution, the answer may be blowin' in the wind. Our findings suggest that as the winds of change sweep across geographical boundaries, they carry with them the potential to influence air quality and generation of wind power in ways we had not previously considered. As for our research team, we certainly found ourselves blown away by the unexpected interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors.
But hey, don't let the serious tone fool you; we're just a bunch of data enthusiasts trying to breathe some fresh air into the world of environmental research. After all, who knew that probing the connection between air pollution and wind power would lead us to this breezy, yet thought-provoking journey?

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Wisconsin Rapids, wind power, Canada, environmental protection agency, Energy Information Administration, correlation, statistical analysis, geographical boundaries, air quality, interconnectedness, environmental research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Wisconsin Rapids-Marshfield, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin

Wind power generated in Canada
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Canada in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Canada

Correlation r = 0.9998067 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9996134 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 100% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Canada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin) over the 9 years from 1992 through 2000.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.31E-13. 0.0000000000003307073435699056
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 3.31E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,023,821,573,495 random variables You don't actually need 3 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 1, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199219931994199519961997199819992000
Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin (Bad air quality days)00000000.8771931.73913
Wind power generated in Canada (Billion kWh)0.0590.0590.0590.0590.0620.0620.0620.1640.264




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.877193,1.73913,])
array_2 = np.array([0.059,0.059,0.059,0.059,0.062,0.062,0.062,0.164,0.264,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Canada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 5522 · Black Variable ID: 21471 · Red Variable ID: 23577
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0