Report an error
Wind power generated in Canada correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin | r=1 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Nora | r=0.99 | 30yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Raphael | r=0.97 | 30yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.96 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 30yrs | No |
Patents granted to Apple | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.92 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Joy | r=0.9 | 30yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Canada also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)