about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,520 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2009, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As American cheese consumption increased, it led to an uptick in people's flatulence. This boost in gas production somehow created a unique, cheese-induced air purification system for Columbus, Mississippi, leading to the unexpected improvement in air quality. Who knew that cheese could provide such gouda protection for the atmosphere in a seemingly unrelated location like Columbus!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image depicting a vibrant city street in Columbus, Mississippi, where a delightful cheese festival is taking place. Show people enjoying various cheese-related activities, such as sampling artisanal cheeses, savoring cheesy dishes, and browsing cheese-themed stalls. And amidst the festivities, illustrate a whimsical scene of the city's air being purified by the combined effect of cheese-induced gas, creating a clean and fresh atmosphere. The visual should capture the joyous fusion of cheese indulgence and the unexpected benefit of improved air quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Cyberpunk Psychedelic A Discovery magazine cover image A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi, in the following situation: As American cheese consumption increased, it led to an uptick in people's flatulence. This boost in gas production somehow created a unique, cheese-induced air purification system for Columbus, Mississippi, leading to the unexpected improvement in air quality. Who knew that cheese could provide such gouda protection for the atmosphere in a seemingly unrelated location like Columbus!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Columbus, Mississippi, a cheese-lover's dream unfolded as American cheese consumption surged. Alongside this, an unexpected phenomenon occurred. As people indulged in more cheese, there was a noticeable increase in flatulence. Yet, this unexpected outcome had an unforeseen benefit. The combined effect of all this cheese-induced gas created a unique air purification system, leading to a surprising improvement in air quality. The aroma of melting cheese mixed with the clean, fresh air filled the streets of Columbus, curiously combining the pleasure of cheese with the unexpected boon of improved air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Columbus, Mississippi, a cheese-lover's dream unfolded as American cheese consumption surged. Alongside this, an unexpected phenomenon occurred. As people indulged in more cheese, there was a noticeable increase in flatulence. Yet, this unexpected outcome had an unforeseen benefit. The combined effect of all this cheese-induced gas created a unique air purification system, leading to a surprising improvement in air quality. The aroma of melting cheese mixed with the clean, fresh air filled the streets of Columbus, curiously combining the pleasure of cheese with the unexpected boon of improved air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image depicting a vibrant city street in Columbus, Mississippi, where a delightful cheese festival is taking place. Show people enjoying various cheese-related activities, such as sampling artisanal cheeses, savoring cheesy dishes, and browsing cheese-themed stalls. And amidst the festivities, illustrate a whimsical scene of the city's air being purified by the combined effect of cheese-induced gas, creating a clean and fresh atmosphere. The visual should capture the joyous fusion of cheese indulgence and the unexpected benefit of improved air quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in American cheese consumption caused Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi

The Journal of Cheesemongering and Environmental Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2009.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The age-old adage "You are what you eat" has never rung truer than in the context of our latest research endeavor. The undeniable love affair Americans have with cheese, particularly the ubiquitous American variety, has long been associated with comfort, deliciousness, and the perplexing ability to transform an otherwise mundane meal into a culinary masterpiece. However, what if we told you that this beloved dairy delight may have implications beyond its tantalizing taste and gooey texture?

In the realm of scientific exploration, we often find ourselves confronted with unexpected connections, and our current investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi, is no exception. At first glance, one might ponder: what on earth do curds and whey have to do with the quality of the very air we breathe? Yet, armed with an arsenal of statistical analyses and a healthy serving of curiosity, our research team unveiled a connection that may make you say "Cheese Louise!"

Historically, the study of air quality has often revolved around emissions from industrial sources, vehicular traffic, and other more traditional suspects. However, as scholars and researchers, it is our solemn duty to pursue even the cheesiest of hypotheses, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Thus, the tantalizing and enigmatic bond between the consumption of American cheese and the purity of the air in Columbus, Mississippi has taken center stage, prompting us to delve into the statistical quagmire with fervor and a passion for dairy science that would make even the most ardent lactose aficionado proud.

And so, with great zeal and perhaps a faint scent of cheddar in the air, we present our findings that not only affirm the existence of a statistically robust link between American cheese consumption and air quality, but also showcase a correlation coefficient so strong, it might just make you "brie-ze" through your next statistical analysis with renewed enthusiasm! Join us as we embark on a journey filled with unexpected twists, cheesy observations, and a dash of pungent puns, all in the name of advancing our understanding of the entwined narratives of dairy preferences and the atmosphere that envelops us. Sit back, relax, and let's "whey-st" our time no more in unraveling the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The age-old adage "You are what you eat" has never rung truer than in the context of our latest research endeavor. The undeniable love affair Americans have with cheese, particularly the ubiquitous American variety, has long been associated with comfort, deliciousness, and the perplexing ability to transform an otherwise mundane meal into a culinary masterpiece. However, what if we told you that this beloved dairy delight may have implications beyond its tantalizing taste and gooey texture?
In the realm of scientific exploration, we often find ourselves confronted with unexpected connections, and our current investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi, is no exception. At first glance, one might ponder: what on earth do curds and whey have to do with the quality of the very air we breathe? Yet, armed with an arsenal of statistical analyses and a healthy serving of curiosity, our research team unveiled a connection that may make you say "Cheese Louise!"
Historically, the study of air quality has often revolved around emissions from industrial sources, vehicular traffic, and other more traditional suspects. However, as scholars and researchers, it is our solemn duty to pursue even the cheesiest of hypotheses, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Thus, the tantalizing and enigmatic bond between the consumption of American cheese and the purity of the air in Columbus, Mississippi has taken center stage, prompting us to delve into the statistical quagmire with fervor and a passion for dairy science that would make even the most ardent lactose aficionado proud.
And so, with great zeal and perhaps a faint scent of cheddar in the air, we present our findings that not only affirm the existence of a statistically robust link between American cheese consumption and air quality, but also showcase a correlation coefficient so strong, it might just make you "brie-ze" through your next statistical analysis with renewed enthusiasm! Join us as we embark on a journey filled with unexpected twists, cheesy observations, and a dash of pungent puns, all in the name of advancing our understanding of the entwined narratives of dairy preferences and the atmosphere that envelops us. Sit back, relax, and let's "whey-st" our time no more in unraveling the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their comprehensive study, Smith and Doe (2005) dive into the intricate world of cheese consumption and its potential impact on environmental variables, albeit in a broader context. Their findings suggest a potential association between dairy consumption and certain emissions, a correlation that may have profound implications for air quality. Moreover, Jones et al. (2010) explore the nuances of air quality control in urban settings, providing a solid framework for understanding the complexities of atmospheric composition and the various influencing factors.

Delving deeper into the cheesy realm of literature, "The Big Cheese: A Comprehensive Guide to American Cheese Consumption" by Dairy Enthusiast (2018) offers a whimsical yet data-driven exploration of the cultural and gastronomic significance of American cheese. The book provides a compelling narrative, sprinkled with curiously delightful anecdotes about cheese-based traditions and trends.

Similarly, "Fromage Fables: A Tale of Cheese and Environmental Harmony" by Casein Curator (2016) presents a series of allegorical stories that weave together the virtues of cheese consumption and its potential impact on environmental equilibrium. While the book's anthropomorphic renditions of various cheese varieties may border on the fanciful, the underlying message of environmental interdependence shines through.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Gouda Paradox" by Cheddar Chaser (2003) takes a delightfully absurd approach to exploring the unexplored consequences of cheese consumption on air quality. Through a series of outlandish scenarios involving sentient cheese wheels and atmospheric anomalies, the book humorously prods at the enigmatic links between dairy preferences and the unseen forces that shape our surroundings.

Moving beyond traditional literature, the authors have gathered valuable insights from a wide array of sources, ranging from cartoons to children's shows. An unexpected gem in the form of "Cheese Adventures: A Cartoon Quest for Dairy Dominance" provided a lighthearted depiction of the whimsical interactions between cheese-loving characters and the environmental consequences of their fervent fromage indulgence. Additionally, the children's show "Dairy Detectives" remarkably intertwined educational messages about dairy products with comical escapades, offering a unique lens through which to view the intersection of cheese consumption and environmental dynamics.

While the initial foray into the literature yielded a rich tapestry of perspectives and narratives, it became increasingly apparent that the academic exploration of the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi had hitherto been a subject of whimsy and wonder. As the authors delved deeper into the research, they found themselves navigating a landscape of scholarly inquiry that often veered into the delightfully quirky and the unexpectedly amusing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1990 to 2009

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The age-old adage "You are what you eat" has never rung truer than in the context of our latest research endeavor. The undeniable love affair Americans have with cheese, particularly the ubiquitous American variety, has long been associated with comfort, deliciousness, and the perplexing ability to transform an otherwise mundane meal into a culinary masterpiece. However, what if we told you that this beloved dairy delight may have implications beyond its tantalizing taste and gooey texture?
In the realm of scientific exploration, we often find ourselves confronted with unexpected connections, and our current investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi, is no exception. At first glance, one might ponder: what on earth do curds and whey have to do with the quality of the very air we breathe? Yet, armed with an arsenal of statistical analyses and a healthy serving of curiosity, our research team unveiled a connection that may make you say "Cheese Louise!"
Historically, the study of air quality has often revolved around emissions from industrial sources, vehicular traffic, and other more traditional suspects. However, as scholars and researchers, it is our solemn duty to pursue even the cheesiest of hypotheses, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Thus, the tantalizing and enigmatic bond between the consumption of American cheese and the purity of the air in Columbus, Mississippi has taken center stage, prompting us to delve into the statistical quagmire with fervor and a passion for dairy science that would make even the most ardent lactose aficionado proud.
And so, with great zeal and perhaps a faint scent of cheddar in the air, we present our findings that not only affirm the existence of a statistically robust link between American cheese consumption and air quality, but also showcase a correlation coefficient so strong, it might just make you "brie-ze" through your next statistical analysis with renewed enthusiasm! Join us as we embark on a journey filled with unexpected twists, cheesy observations, and a dash of pungent puns, all in the name of advancing our understanding of the entwined narratives of dairy preferences and the atmosphere that envelops us. Sit back, relax, and let's "whey-st" our time no more in unraveling the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this section, we will explore the convoluted yet flavorful path our research team traversed to uncover the "cheddary" connection between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Our approach involved a carefully crafted blend of statistical analyses, data wrangling, and a healthy dose of humor to keep the research process "gouda" from beginning to end.

### Data Collection

Our journey commenced with the diligent collection of data from various sources, most notably the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The cheese consumption data, aptly labeled the "cheese matrix" by our enthusiastic team, was obtained from the annals of the USDA, where it lay nestled among the plethora of agricultural statistics, waiting for its moment in the research limelight. As for the air quality data, we ventured into the EPA's treasure trove of environmental measurements, where the atmospheric composition of Columbus, Mississippi offered tantalizing insights into the city's atmospheric nuances from 1990 to 2009.

### Data Cleaning

With the raw ingredients in hand, our researchers embarked on a meticulous process of data cleaning. Much like the art of crafting a fine cheese, this stage required the careful removal of any impurities or anomalies that might have curdled our statistical analyses. Outliers, missing values, and peculiar deviations were scrutinized with the same fervor that a cheese connoisseur reserves for inspecting the carefully aged rind of a fine wheel of cheddar.

### Statistical Analysis

Unbeknownst to the uninitiated, the correlation between American cheese consumption and air quality was not a straightforward concoction. Our team employed a range of statistical methods, including Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression, to untangle the web of relationships within our dataset. With a wink to statistical tradition and a sprinkle of academic rigor, we also conducted hypothesis testing to ensure that our findings were not merely a fortuitous fluke but rather a robust and meaningful discovery.

### Control Variables

To ensure that our findings didn't melt into a statistical fondue of spurious correlations, we meticulously accounted for potential confounding factors. Variables such as population density, industrial emissions, and even the presence of local dairy farms were carefully integrated into the analysis, preventing any cheesy confusions from clouding the validity of our results.

### Sensitivity Analyses

Just as every cheese aficionado knows the importance of savoring a variety of tastes and textures, our research embraced the need for sensitivity analyses. We probed the robustness of our findings through alternate model specifications and additional control variables, creating a rich and tantalizing palette of analyses to paint a comprehensive picture of the cheddary connection we sought to uncover.

And so, armed with a blend of statistical techniques, a keen eye for data purity, and a penchant for puns "grater" than the finest Parmigiano-Reggiano, our methodology stirred together a concoction of research practices that can truly be described as a "gouda" blend of scientific inquiry. Let us now turn our attention to the results of our investigation, where the cheesiest findings await.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1990 to 2009, you found a correlation 0.8110944, r-squared of 0.6578742, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The age-old adage "You are what you eat" has never rung truer than in the context of our latest research endeavor. The undeniable love affair Americans have with cheese, particularly the ubiquitous American variety, has long been associated with comfort, deliciousness, and the perplexing ability to transform an otherwise mundane meal into a culinary masterpiece. However, what if we told you that this beloved dairy delight may have implications beyond its tantalizing taste and gooey texture?
In the realm of scientific exploration, we often find ourselves confronted with unexpected connections, and our current investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi, is no exception. At first glance, one might ponder: what on earth do curds and whey have to do with the quality of the very air we breathe? Yet, armed with an arsenal of statistical analyses and a healthy serving of curiosity, our research team unveiled a connection that may make you say "Cheese Louise!"
Historically, the study of air quality has often revolved around emissions from industrial sources, vehicular traffic, and other more traditional suspects. However, as scholars and researchers, it is our solemn duty to pursue even the cheesiest of hypotheses, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Thus, the tantalizing and enigmatic bond between the consumption of American cheese and the purity of the air in Columbus, Mississippi has taken center stage, prompting us to delve into the statistical quagmire with fervor and a passion for dairy science that would make even the most ardent lactose aficionado proud.
And so, with great zeal and perhaps a faint scent of cheddar in the air, we present our findings that not only affirm the existence of a statistically robust link between American cheese consumption and air quality, but also showcase a correlation coefficient so strong, it might just make you "brie-ze" through your next statistical analysis with renewed enthusiasm! Join us as we embark on a journey filled with unexpected twists, cheesy observations, and a dash of pungent puns, all in the name of advancing our understanding of the entwined narratives of dairy preferences and the atmosphere that envelops us. Sit back, relax, and let's "whey-st" our time no more in unraveling the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi yielded some truly "grate" findings. Our research revealed a substantial positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and an r-squared value of 0.6578742 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2009.

These results suggest that as American cheese consumption increased, air quality in Columbus, Mississippi improved. Our statistical analysis produced a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the significance of this relationship. It seems that the air in Columbus was breathing in sync with the rhythms of cheese consumption, much like a well-choreographed cheese and crackers pairing.

To visualize this "cheddary" connection, we present a scatterplot in Figure 1, which underscores the robust and unmistakable relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality. Gazing upon this chart, one might even detect the faint aroma of a statistically significant cheese plate.

In essence, our findings highlight the unexpected harmony between dairy preferences and environmental conditions. This study not only adds a new dimension to the discourse on air quality but also nudges our collective understanding of the underexplored influences of cheese on our surroundings. These results tantalizingly invite further exploration and, perhaps, a few "gouda" jokes along the way.

In conclusion, our research illuminates the intriguing link between what we savor on our sandwiches and the air we breathe, offering a cheesy yet compelling tale that invites further investigation into the vast, unexplored world of dairy-driven atmospheric dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their comprehensive study, Smith and Doe (2005) dive into the intricate world of cheese consumption and its potential impact on environmental variables, albeit in a broader context. Their findings suggest a potential association between dairy consumption and certain emissions, a correlation that may have profound implications for air quality. Moreover, Jones et al. (2010) explore the nuances of air quality control in urban settings, providing a solid framework for understanding the complexities of atmospheric composition and the various influencing factors.
Delving deeper into the cheesy realm of literature, "The Big Cheese: A Comprehensive Guide to American Cheese Consumption" by Dairy Enthusiast (2018) offers a whimsical yet data-driven exploration of the cultural and gastronomic significance of American cheese. The book provides a compelling narrative, sprinkled with curiously delightful anecdotes about cheese-based traditions and trends.
Similarly, "Fromage Fables: A Tale of Cheese and Environmental Harmony" by Casein Curator (2016) presents a series of allegorical stories that weave together the virtues of cheese consumption and its potential impact on environmental equilibrium. While the book's anthropomorphic renditions of various cheese varieties may border on the fanciful, the underlying message of environmental interdependence shines through.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Gouda Paradox" by Cheddar Chaser (2003) takes a delightfully absurd approach to exploring the unexplored consequences of cheese consumption on air quality. Through a series of outlandish scenarios involving sentient cheese wheels and atmospheric anomalies, the book humorously prods at the enigmatic links between dairy preferences and the unseen forces that shape our surroundings.
Moving beyond traditional literature, the authors have gathered valuable insights from a wide array of sources, ranging from cartoons to children's shows. An unexpected gem in the form of "Cheese Adventures: A Cartoon Quest for Dairy Dominance" provided a lighthearted depiction of the whimsical interactions between cheese-loving characters and the environmental consequences of their fervent fromage indulgence. Additionally, the children's show "Dairy Detectives" remarkably intertwined educational messages about dairy products with comical escapades, offering a unique lens through which to view the intersection of cheese consumption and environmental dynamics.
While the initial foray into the literature yielded a rich tapestry of perspectives and narratives, it became increasingly apparent that the academic exploration of the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi had hitherto been a subject of whimsy and wonder. As the authors delved deeper into the research, they found themselves navigating a landscape of scholarly inquiry that often veered into the delightfully quirky and the unexpectedly amusing.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi yielded some truly "grate" findings. Our research revealed a substantial positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and an r-squared value of 0.6578742 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2009.
These results suggest that as American cheese consumption increased, air quality in Columbus, Mississippi improved. Our statistical analysis produced a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the significance of this relationship. It seems that the air in Columbus was breathing in sync with the rhythms of cheese consumption, much like a well-choreographed cheese and crackers pairing.
To visualize this "cheddary" connection, we present a scatterplot in Figure 1, which underscores the robust and unmistakable relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality. Gazing upon this chart, one might even detect the faint aroma of a statistically significant cheese plate.
In essence, our findings highlight the unexpected harmony between dairy preferences and environmental conditions. This study not only adds a new dimension to the discourse on air quality but also nudges our collective understanding of the underexplored influences of cheese on our surroundings. These results tantalizingly invite further exploration and, perhaps, a few "gouda" jokes along the way.
In conclusion, our research illuminates the intriguing link between what we savor on our sandwiches and the air we breathe, offering a cheesy yet compelling tale that invites further investigation into the vast, unexplored world of dairy-driven atmospheric dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpectedly strong correlation between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi has truly "grilled" our expectations. Our findings align with the prior research, affirming the potential impact of dairy consumption on environmental variables. It seems that the cheese stands alone as a key player in the dairy-dense symphony of atmospheric delight.

Smith and Doe (2005) set the stage for this revelation, laying the groundwork for our own cheesy odyssey. Their exploration of the broader impact of dairy consumption on environmental variables paved the whey for our deeper dive into the cheddar-choked conundrum. Similarly, dairy enthusiasts will surely revel in the insights from "The Big Cheese" by Dairy Enthusiast (2018), as our findings lend "cheddarific" support to the culturally significant role of American cheese consumption. As for "Fromage Fables" by Casein Curator (2016), the whimsical allegories ring with a newfound resonance, the harmony between cheese consumption and environmental equilibrium blooming like a brie in the sun.

Our unexpected ally, "The Gouda Paradox" by Cheddar Chaser (2003), may have seemed like a playful romp in a land of breathless cheese, but its exploratory spirit has proved a delectable guide to the intriguing dynamics at play. Despite the book's humorous overtones, its exploration of wacky hypotheticals has foreshadowed the very real correlation we've unearthed.

Now, let's dive into the "whey" we "curdle" the data. Our study corroborates the essence of these previous works, demonstrating a substantial positive correlation between American cheese consumption and air quality. The robustness of this connection, with its tantalizing correlation coefficient and p-value, is "grate" cause for scholarly excitement. As for the scatterplot, it's more than just a visual aid – it's a testament to the power of dairy to permeate even the most unsuspecting corners of our lives.

Our findings tickle the taste buds of curiosity, inviting further exploration into the enigmatic dance between artisanal aspirations and atmospheric acquiescence. It's a tale as old as time – the irresistible pull of cheese and its unlikely implications on the air we breathe. As we nibble away at this cheesy mystery, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the intersection of food and atmospheric dynamics is richer, cheesier, and perhaps sharper than we ever imagined. So, let's raise a glass of milk to further research and maybe even a "gouda" chuckle or two along the whey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The age-old adage "You are what you eat" has never rung truer than in the context of our latest research endeavor. The undeniable love affair Americans have with cheese, particularly the ubiquitous American variety, has long been associated with comfort, deliciousness, and the perplexing ability to transform an otherwise mundane meal into a culinary masterpiece. However, what if we told you that this beloved dairy delight may have implications beyond its tantalizing taste and gooey texture?
In the realm of scientific exploration, we often find ourselves confronted with unexpected connections, and our current investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi, is no exception. At first glance, one might ponder: what on earth do curds and whey have to do with the quality of the very air we breathe? Yet, armed with an arsenal of statistical analyses and a healthy serving of curiosity, our research team unveiled a connection that may make you say "Cheese Louise!"
Historically, the study of air quality has often revolved around emissions from industrial sources, vehicular traffic, and other more traditional suspects. However, as scholars and researchers, it is our solemn duty to pursue even the cheesiest of hypotheses, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Thus, the tantalizing and enigmatic bond between the consumption of American cheese and the purity of the air in Columbus, Mississippi has taken center stage, prompting us to delve into the statistical quagmire with fervor and a passion for dairy science that would make even the most ardent lactose aficionado proud.
And so, with great zeal and perhaps a faint scent of cheddar in the air, we present our findings that not only affirm the existence of a statistically robust link between American cheese consumption and air quality, but also showcase a correlation coefficient so strong, it might just make you "brie-ze" through your next statistical analysis with renewed enthusiasm! Join us as we embark on a journey filled with unexpected twists, cheesy observations, and a dash of pungent puns, all in the name of advancing our understanding of the entwined narratives of dairy preferences and the atmosphere that envelops us. Sit back, relax, and let's "whey-st" our time no more in unraveling the cheddary connection between American cheese consumption and air quality.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi yielded some truly "grate" findings. Our research revealed a substantial positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and an r-squared value of 0.6578742 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2009.
These results suggest that as American cheese consumption increased, air quality in Columbus, Mississippi improved. Our statistical analysis produced a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the significance of this relationship. It seems that the air in Columbus was breathing in sync with the rhythms of cheese consumption, much like a well-choreographed cheese and crackers pairing.
To visualize this "cheddary" connection, we present a scatterplot in Figure 1, which underscores the robust and unmistakable relationship between American cheese consumption and air quality. Gazing upon this chart, one might even detect the faint aroma of a statistically significant cheese plate.
In essence, our findings highlight the unexpected harmony between dairy preferences and environmental conditions. This study not only adds a new dimension to the discourse on air quality but also nudges our collective understanding of the underexplored influences of cheese on our surroundings. These results tantalizingly invite further exploration and, perhaps, a few "gouda" jokes along the way.
In conclusion, our research illuminates the intriguing link between what we savor on our sandwiches and the air we breathe, offering a cheesy yet compelling tale that invites further investigation into the vast, unexplored world of dairy-driven atmospheric dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our study has not only highlighted the unexpected correlation between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi but has also opened a proverbial "jarlsberg" of possibilities for future research. While the statistical connection between these variables may seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack of cheese curds, our findings undeniably point to a robust and "gouda" relationship.

As we reflect on the implications of our research, it's impossible to resist a few cheesy puns and amusing observations. After all, as scientists, we must always camembert the importance of maintaining a "feta" sense of humor in our explorations of the unknown. Our findings serve as a poignant reminder that, just like a fine cheddar, research can often age into something unexpectedly delightful and thought-provoking.

However, despite the temptation to continue "brie-ing" new life into this area of research, we must assert that no further studies are necessary. We believe our results have "matured" to perfection, and it's time to let them "havarti" moment in the spotlight. No need to "bleu" this out of proportion - sometimes, a slice of Swiss is just a slice of Swiss, and the air quality is just a breath of fresh air. Our results may be a "mozzarella" good time, but it's "nacho" responsibility to stretch this cheese metaphor any further. Thank you, and "grate" job to all involved!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cheesemongering and Environmental Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Delights and Atmospheric Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Say Cheese: The Cheddary Connection between American Cheese Consumption and Air Quality in Columbus, Mississippi with an abstract of This research paper investigates the surprising link between American cheese consumption and air quality in Columbus, Mississippi. Utilizing data from the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency, our team has examined the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results reveal a strong and statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8110944 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2009. Our study sheds light on this cheesily intriguing connection and raises questions about the potential ripple effects of our dairy preferences on the environment. We hope this paper will help inspire further research in the field of fromage and air quality, and perhaps lead to some "gouda" policy decisions.

ChatGPT:

American cheese consumption, air quality, Columbus Mississippi, USDA data, Environmental Protection Agency data, correlation between cheese consumption and air quality, dairy preferences and environment, fromage and air quality, cheese consumption impact on environment

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

American cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of American cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with American cheese consumption

Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Columbus, MS
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi

Correlation r = 0.8110944 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6578742 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., American cheese consumption) over the 20 years from 1990 through 2009.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-5. 0.0000143277214165727360000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.0014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 69,795 random variables You don't actually need 69 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009
American cheese consumption (Pounds per person)11.12711.033511.255911.31311.423711.687211.808711.814911.978412.698712.683912.813312.831412.561912.861212.64913.065612.792913.130613.3553
Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi (Good air quality)00000000000.9914530.9913790.98148110.99107100.9915250.98260911




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.127,11.0335,11.2559,11.313,11.4237,11.6872,11.8087,11.8149,11.9784,12.6987,12.6839,12.8133,12.8314,12.5619,12.8612,12.649,13.0656,12.7929,13.1306,13.3553,])
array_2 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.991453,0.991379,0.981481,1,0.991071,0,0.991525,0.982609,1,1,])
array_1_name = "American cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Air quality in Columbus, Mississippi"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5520 · Black Variable ID: 553 · Red Variable ID: 21918
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0