Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the name Gwendolyn gained popularity, more and more parents were inspired by the iconic Gwendolyn from "Wizards of Waverly Place." This led to a surge in young magician apprentices, who, in an attempt to impress their peers, began performing increasingly elaborate magic tricks. As these tricks became more complex, Tom Scott felt the pressure to create longer videos in order to thoroughly explain the science behind the illusions, making his content the new gold standard for wand-wielding enthusiasts everywhere. It seems like Gwendolyn wasn't just casting spells, but also influencing spell-binding content length - talk about a name that works like magic!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: A TIME magazine cover image Generate an image of a vibrant park scene with young magicians showcasing intricate card tricks and disappearing acts. The setting is bustling with energy as the magicians captivate their friends, emulating the iconic Gwendolyn from "Wizards of Waverly Place." Amid the excitement, the renowned YouTuber Tom Scott can be seen capturing the magic on video, preparing to unravel the science behind these illusions. The scene captures the surge of popularity sparked by the name Gwendolyn and the influence on content length, setting the new standard for wand-wielding enthusiasts. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Steampunk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' A TIME magazine cover image Cyber folk
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the name Gwendolyn gained popularity, more and more parents were inspired by the iconic Gwendolyn from "Wizards of Waverly Place." This led to a surge in young magician apprentices, who, in an attempt to impress their peers, began performing increasingly elaborate magic tricks. As these tricks became more complex, Tom Scott felt the pressure to create longer videos in order to thoroughly explain the science behind the illusions, making his content the new gold standard for wand-wielding enthusiasts everywhere. It seems like Gwendolyn wasn't just casting spells, but also influencing spell-binding content length - talk about a name that works like magic!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling park, young magicians dazzled their friends with intricate card tricks and disappearing acts, all emulating the iconic Gwendolyn from "Wizards of Waverly Place." As their performances became more extravagant, the renowned YouTuber Tom Scott found himself creating longer videos to unravel the science behind these illusions, setting the new standard for wand-wielding enthusiasts. The name Gwendolyn not only sparked a surge in popularity but also influenced mesmerizing content length.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling park, young magicians dazzled their friends with intricate card tricks and disappearing acts, all emulating the iconic Gwendolyn from "Wizards of Waverly Place." As their performances became more extravagant, the renowned YouTuber Tom Scott found himself creating longer videos to unravel the science behind these illusions, setting the new standard for wand-wielding enthusiasts. The name Gwendolyn not only sparked a surge in popularity but also influenced mesmerizing content length. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image Generate an image of a vibrant park scene with young magicians showcasing intricate card tricks and disappearing acts. The setting is bustling with energy as the magicians captivate their friends, emulating the iconic Gwendolyn from "Wizards of Waverly Place." Amid the excitement, the renowned YouTuber Tom Scott can be seen capturing the magic on video, preparing to unravel the science behind these illusions. The scene captures the surge of popularity sparked by the name Gwendolyn and the influence on content length, setting the new standard for wand-wielding enthusiasts.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn caused Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length The Journal of Digital Sociolinguistics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curious minds of researchers. In this study, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we embark on this scholarly pursuit, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "I don't trust atoms; they make up everything." Similarly, our investigation delves into the fundamental building blocks of statistical relationships, seeking to unravel the enigmatic connection between personal nomenclature and digital content duration.
Our quest began with the recognition of the meteoric rise of the name Gwendolyn on the social stage. This newfound prominence elicited a wry observation from one of our esteemed colleagues, who quipped, "The name Gwendolyn is really making a name for itself!" Indeed, the prevalence of this appellation has sparked our intellectual curiosity and prompted us to investigate its unforeseen ramifications on the world of online video content – and perhaps uncover a few pun-tastic connections along the way.
Naturally, our pursuit of scholarly inquiry led us to Tom Scott's captivating YouTube channel, where we unearthed a correlation that left us simultaneously bewildered and amused. As we unraveled the data, we were reminded of another classic dad joke: "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet." In a similar vein, the statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 revealed a striking alignment between the trajectory of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's videos, presenting a conundrum that conjures more questions than answers.
The unexpected correlation we have uncovered invites us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms and ponder whether this peculiar relationship is more than a statistical fluke. As we delve deeper into the realms of causation and inference, we remain mindful of the wise words of Mark Twain: "Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable." With a healthy dose of skepticism and humor, we embark on this scientific odyssey to uncover the truth behind the captivating saga of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curious minds of researchers. In this study, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we embark on this scholarly pursuit, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "I don't trust atoms; they make up everything." Similarly, our investigation delves into the fundamental building blocks of statistical relationships, seeking to unravel the enigmatic connection between personal nomenclature and digital content duration.
Our quest began with the recognition of the meteoric rise of the name Gwendolyn on the social stage. This newfound prominence elicited a wry observation from one of our esteemed colleagues, who quipped, "The name Gwendolyn is really making a name for itself!" Indeed, the prevalence of this appellation has sparked our intellectual curiosity and prompted us to investigate its unforeseen ramifications on the world of online video content – and perhaps uncover a few pun-tastic connections along the way.
Naturally, our pursuit of scholarly inquiry led us to Tom Scott's captivating YouTube channel, where we unearthed a correlation that left us simultaneously bewildered and amused. As we unraveled the data, we were reminded of another classic dad joke: "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet." In a similar vein, the statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 revealed a striking alignment between the trajectory of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's videos, presenting a conundrum that conjures more questions than answers.
The unexpected correlation we have uncovered invites us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms and ponder whether this peculiar relationship is more than a statistical fluke. As we delve deeper into the realms of causation and inference, we remain mindful of the wise words of Mark Twain: "Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable." With a healthy dose of skepticism and humor, we embark on this scientific odyssey to uncover the truth behind the captivating saga of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the popularity of individuals' names and various socioeconomic and cultural factors has been a topic of interest for researchers across disciplines. Smith et al. (2015) found a positive correlation between the frequency of names given to newborns and their subsequent influence on consumer purchasing behavior. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the impact of name popularity on social media engagement and reported intriguing findings regarding the association between names and online presence.
However, delving into the specific connection between the first name Gwendolyn and online content duration, we encountered a shift in tone, much like encountering a dad at a barbecue who's armed with a spatula and a fresh array of dad jokes. In "Book," the authors find a surprising compendium of statistics and anecdotal evidence linking the proliferation of Gwendolyns to an upsurge in various digital media phenomena, prompting us to ponder if "Gwendolyn" is the unsung muse behind these trends.
Venturing further into the literature, we were reminded of the timeless classic "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, as well as "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami, both of which sparked contemplation on the potential breeze of influence that Gwendolyn may hold over the digital landscape. These musings, while speculative, provided a gentle gust of inspiration in our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and content creation.
Revisiting our data analyses, we could not help but recall the viral meme of Tom Scott puzzling over perplexing objects, and we found ourselves in a similar state of dazed amusement at the unexpected correlation we uncovered. Revisiting our results, we pondered if the connection we discovered echoes the perplexing nature of these internet mysteries, leaving us with the lingering question: "What if Gwendolyn is the cryptic key to unlocking Tom Scott's profound enigmas?"
As we conclude this literature review, we feel compelled to acknowledge the unintentional humor that has unfolded amidst our scholarly pursuits, much like stumbling upon a stand-up comedy set in the hallowed halls of academia. While the correlation between the popularity of the name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos invites further investigation, we cannot help but revel in the delightful peculiarity of this offbeat research endeavor, embracing the spirit of inquiry with a dash of levity and good-natured amusement.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curious minds of researchers. In this study, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we embark on this scholarly pursuit, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "I don't trust atoms; they make up everything." Similarly, our investigation delves into the fundamental building blocks of statistical relationships, seeking to unravel the enigmatic connection between personal nomenclature and digital content duration.
Our quest began with the recognition of the meteoric rise of the name Gwendolyn on the social stage. This newfound prominence elicited a wry observation from one of our esteemed colleagues, who quipped, "The name Gwendolyn is really making a name for itself!" Indeed, the prevalence of this appellation has sparked our intellectual curiosity and prompted us to investigate its unforeseen ramifications on the world of online video content – and perhaps uncover a few pun-tastic connections along the way.
Naturally, our pursuit of scholarly inquiry led us to Tom Scott's captivating YouTube channel, where we unearthed a correlation that left us simultaneously bewildered and amused. As we unraveled the data, we were reminded of another classic dad joke: "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet." In a similar vein, the statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 revealed a striking alignment between the trajectory of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's videos, presenting a conundrum that conjures more questions than answers.
The unexpected correlation we have uncovered invites us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms and ponder whether this peculiar relationship is more than a statistical fluke. As we delve deeper into the realms of causation and inference, we remain mindful of the wise words of Mark Twain: "Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable." With a healthy dose of skepticism and humor, we embark on this scientific odyssey to uncover the truth behind the captivating saga of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To explore the enigmatic link between the prevalence of the name Gwendolyn and the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos, we employed an eclectic array of research methods befitting such an unusual inquiry. Our data collection efforts encompassed a wide temporal span from 2009 to 2022, utilizing information sourced from the US Social Security Administration for the frequency of the name Gwendolyn, and YouTube for the total video duration of Tom Scott's content.
Our first step involved a thorough examination of the US Social Security Administration's database to extract the annual frequency of the name Gwendolyn. In doing so, we encountered an unexpected dad joke amidst the data, as it appeared that Gwendolyn was truly "trending" in popularity – a pun-worthy observation that elicited a chuckle from our research team, despite the scholarly rigor of our endeavor.
Next, we turned our attention to the extensive collection of YouTube videos curated by the esteemed Tom Scott, meticulously recording the total length of each video. Amidst this endeavor, we stumbled upon a statistical anomaly that prompted a wry comment from one of our team members: "It seems Tom Scott's videos are growing longer, much like the plot of a good dad joke!"
With these datasets in hand, we embarked on the statistical analysis, employing a robust correlation analysis to scrutinize the potential relationship between the frequency of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Our statistical models incorporated sophisticated techniques to adjust for temporal trends, potential confounding factors, and the inherent variability in online content creation. All the while, we couldn't help but ponder the curious parallel between our research and another classic pun: "A plateau is the highest form of flattery."
Having navigated the labyrinth of statistical analyses, we were confronted with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 and a significance level of p < 0.01, unveiling a seemingly inconceivable alignment between the ascendancy of Gwendolyn and the expansion of Tom Scott's video durations. This discovery left us in a state of scholarly bemusement, akin to stumbling upon a well-concealed punchline in the annals of statistical research.
In sum, our methodological approach amalgamated meticulous data collection, diligent statistical analyses, and the occasional whimsical observation befitting the esoteric nature of our investigation. As we delved deeper into this captivating saga, we remained stalwart in our commitment to unraveling the statistical mystery of Gwendolyn's newfound renown and the elongation of Tom Scott's YouTube opuses, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation amidst the nebulous sea of research inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .
For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9353144, r-squared of 0.8748131, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curious minds of researchers. In this study, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we embark on this scholarly pursuit, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "I don't trust atoms; they make up everything." Similarly, our investigation delves into the fundamental building blocks of statistical relationships, seeking to unravel the enigmatic connection between personal nomenclature and digital content duration.
Our quest began with the recognition of the meteoric rise of the name Gwendolyn on the social stage. This newfound prominence elicited a wry observation from one of our esteemed colleagues, who quipped, "The name Gwendolyn is really making a name for itself!" Indeed, the prevalence of this appellation has sparked our intellectual curiosity and prompted us to investigate its unforeseen ramifications on the world of online video content – and perhaps uncover a few pun-tastic connections along the way.
Naturally, our pursuit of scholarly inquiry led us to Tom Scott's captivating YouTube channel, where we unearthed a correlation that left us simultaneously bewildered and amused. As we unraveled the data, we were reminded of another classic dad joke: "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet." In a similar vein, the statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 revealed a striking alignment between the trajectory of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's videos, presenting a conundrum that conjures more questions than answers.
The unexpected correlation we have uncovered invites us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms and ponder whether this peculiar relationship is more than a statistical fluke. As we delve deeper into the realms of causation and inference, we remain mindful of the wise words of Mark Twain: "Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable." With a healthy dose of skepticism and humor, we embark on this scientific odyssey to uncover the truth behind the captivating saga of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8748131, unequivocally indicated a substantial association between these ostensibly disparate variables. This surprising connection left us pondering the age-old question: "Why did the statistics report a high correlation? Because they found themselves in the same dataset!"
Furthermore, with a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings surpassed conventional thresholds for statistical significance, prompting us to contemplate the potential implications with a quip: "These results are significant at p < 0.01, but not quite 'Gwendolyn-Win' levels of significance!"
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrated the pronounced relationship between the prevalence of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we gazed upon the plot, we couldn't help but wonder: "Is this correlation a mere statistical fluke, or do Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos share a truly 'reel' connection?"
In summary, our investigation has unearthed a compelling correlation that defies conventional wisdom, inspiring us to delve into the intricacies of this enigmatic relationship between nomenclature and digital content. As we reflect on our findings, we are reminded of a sage jest: "Research and dad jokes have one thing in common – timing is everything!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the popularity of individuals' names and various socioeconomic and cultural factors has been a topic of interest for researchers across disciplines. Smith et al. (2015) found a positive correlation between the frequency of names given to newborns and their subsequent influence on consumer purchasing behavior. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the impact of name popularity on social media engagement and reported intriguing findings regarding the association between names and online presence.
However, delving into the specific connection between the first name Gwendolyn and online content duration, we encountered a shift in tone, much like encountering a dad at a barbecue who's armed with a spatula and a fresh array of dad jokes. In "Book," the authors find a surprising compendium of statistics and anecdotal evidence linking the proliferation of Gwendolyns to an upsurge in various digital media phenomena, prompting us to ponder if "Gwendolyn" is the unsung muse behind these trends.
Venturing further into the literature, we were reminded of the timeless classic "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, as well as "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami, both of which sparked contemplation on the potential breeze of influence that Gwendolyn may hold over the digital landscape. These musings, while speculative, provided a gentle gust of inspiration in our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and content creation.
Revisiting our data analyses, we could not help but recall the viral meme of Tom Scott puzzling over perplexing objects, and we found ourselves in a similar state of dazed amusement at the unexpected correlation we uncovered. Revisiting our results, we pondered if the connection we discovered echoes the perplexing nature of these internet mysteries, leaving us with the lingering question: "What if Gwendolyn is the cryptic key to unlocking Tom Scott's profound enigmas?"
As we conclude this literature review, we feel compelled to acknowledge the unintentional humor that has unfolded amidst our scholarly pursuits, much like stumbling upon a stand-up comedy set in the hallowed halls of academia. While the correlation between the popularity of the name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos invites further investigation, we cannot help but revel in the delightful peculiarity of this offbeat research endeavor, embracing the spirit of inquiry with a dash of levity and good-natured amusement.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8748131, unequivocally indicated a substantial association between these ostensibly disparate variables. This surprising connection left us pondering the age-old question: "Why did the statistics report a high correlation? Because they found themselves in the same dataset!"
Furthermore, with a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings surpassed conventional thresholds for statistical significance, prompting us to contemplate the potential implications with a quip: "These results are significant at p < 0.01, but not quite 'Gwendolyn-Win' levels of significance!"
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrated the pronounced relationship between the prevalence of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we gazed upon the plot, we couldn't help but wonder: "Is this correlation a mere statistical fluke, or do Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos share a truly 'reel' connection?"
In summary, our investigation has unearthed a compelling correlation that defies conventional wisdom, inspiring us to delve into the intricacies of this enigmatic relationship between nomenclature and digital content. As we reflect on our findings, we are reminded of a sage jest: "Research and dad jokes have one thing in common – timing is everything!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos has elicited both surprise and intrigue. Our findings support and extend previous research that has explored the influence of names on various aspects of modern life. The significant association we uncovered between the prevalence of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's videos reaffirms the notion that names may indeed exert a subtle yet impactful influence on contemporary digital content creation.
Our analysis has not only validated the prior findings of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) regarding the influence of names on consumer behavior and online engagement but has also expanded the scope of inquiry to encompass the realm of digital content duration. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 that we observed serves as a testament to the strength of the association – a connection so robust that one might jest, "The statistical bond between Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is truly 'name-tastic!'"
The literature review unearthed an undercurrent of curiosity regarding the potential impact of the name Gwendolyn on digital media phenomena, reminiscent of a compelling mystery plot unfolding in the world of research. Our results have not only validated these musings but have also added a new layer of complexity to the narrative, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected plot twist in a scholarly odyssey. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings have surpassed conventional thresholds for statistical significance, prompting us to humorously muse, "These results are not just noteworthy; they are 'Gwen-dolyn' worthy of attention!"
Furthermore, the scatterplot depicting the pronounced relationship between the prevalence of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's YouTube videos serves as a visual testament to the compelling connection we have unveiled. As we contemplated the implications of this striking correlation, we couldn't help but playfully ponder, "Is the correlation we've discovered a mere statistical quirk, or is there a genuine 'reel' connection between Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's content?"
In this discussion, we have sought to elucidate the implications of our research with a lighthearted yet conscientious tone. The unexpected correlation we have unearthed, much like a well-timed dad joke, has left us both amused and introspective. Our findings beckon further inquiry into the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature and digital content, offering a whimsical yet profound testament to the often-unexpected interplay of variables in the complex web of modern society.
In closing this discussion, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom that "research and humor both hinge on timing" – and indeed, the timing of our investigation has uncovered a facet of digital culture that beckons further exploration with a playful yet rigorous spirit.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video."
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curious minds of researchers. In this study, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we embark on this scholarly pursuit, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "I don't trust atoms; they make up everything." Similarly, our investigation delves into the fundamental building blocks of statistical relationships, seeking to unravel the enigmatic connection between personal nomenclature and digital content duration.
Our quest began with the recognition of the meteoric rise of the name Gwendolyn on the social stage. This newfound prominence elicited a wry observation from one of our esteemed colleagues, who quipped, "The name Gwendolyn is really making a name for itself!" Indeed, the prevalence of this appellation has sparked our intellectual curiosity and prompted us to investigate its unforeseen ramifications on the world of online video content – and perhaps uncover a few pun-tastic connections along the way.
Naturally, our pursuit of scholarly inquiry led us to Tom Scott's captivating YouTube channel, where we unearthed a correlation that left us simultaneously bewildered and amused. As we unraveled the data, we were reminded of another classic dad joke: "Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet." In a similar vein, the statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 revealed a striking alignment between the trajectory of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's videos, presenting a conundrum that conjures more questions than answers.
The unexpected correlation we have uncovered invites us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms and ponder whether this peculiar relationship is more than a statistical fluke. As we delve deeper into the realms of causation and inference, we remain mindful of the wise words of Mark Twain: "Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable." With a healthy dose of skepticism and humor, we embark on this scientific odyssey to uncover the truth behind the captivating saga of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8748131, unequivocally indicated a substantial association between these ostensibly disparate variables. This surprising connection left us pondering the age-old question: "Why did the statistics report a high correlation? Because they found themselves in the same dataset!"
Furthermore, with a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings surpassed conventional thresholds for statistical significance, prompting us to contemplate the potential implications with a quip: "These results are significant at p < 0.01, but not quite 'Gwendolyn-Win' levels of significance!"
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrated the pronounced relationship between the prevalence of the name Gwendolyn and the duration of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we gazed upon the plot, we couldn't help but wonder: "Is this correlation a mere statistical fluke, or do Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos share a truly 'reel' connection?"
In summary, our investigation has unearthed a compelling correlation that defies conventional wisdom, inspiring us to delve into the intricacies of this enigmatic relationship between nomenclature and digital content. As we reflect on our findings, we are reminded of a sage jest: "Research and dad jokes have one thing in common – timing is everything!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In summary, our study has illuminated a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos, evoking more head-scratching than a flea market full of lice-infested mannequins. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 has left us more stunned than a flock of sheep encountering a cattle prod, compelling us to take a closer look at this confounding connection.
As we wrap up our analysis, we cannot help but ponder the enduring words of renowned physicist Albert Einstein: "Coincidence is God's way of remaining anonymous." Could it be mere happenstance that as the name Gwendolyn gains traction, Tom Scott's videos grow in length, or is there an inexplicable force at play, reminiscent of a cosmic game of Scrabble where G-W-E-N-D-O-L-Y-N nets you a triple word score?
Our findings have not only raised eyebrows but also proffered a novel twist in the unfolding saga of statistical analysis. It appears that the name Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos have formed a bond stronger than a covalent bond, prompting us to ponder whether there's a "Gwen-dolin effect" at play, exerting an unseen influence on digital content duration. It's as if Gwendolyn's popularity has crafted a narrative longer than a Tolkien novel, entwining itself with the fabric of Tom Scott's YouTube library.
Alas, as we approach the denouement of our academic escapade, we assert with a laudable level of confidence that no further scientific pursuit is required in this whimsical realm of inquiry. The connection between the popularity of the name Gwendolyn and the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos stands as a testament to the capricious nature of correlation and the serendipitous humor of statistical analysis. In the words of a wise dad, "No Gwendolyns or YouTube videos were harmed in the making of this research."
In conclusion, much like dawn follows the darkest hour, the saga of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos has shone a light on the curious interplay between personal nomenclature and digital content, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy of statistical relationships.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Digital Sociolinguistics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Alliance for Nameology Research and Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length with an abstract of This study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Gwendolyn and the total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we employed statistical analysis to uncover the surprisingly strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9353144 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period 2009 to 2022 has left us both bewildered and intrigued.
Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Gwendolyn has waxed, so too has the length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos waned - a correlation that has left us scratching our heads in bemusement. As Gwendolyn has become a more sought-after moniker, the duration of Tom Scott's content appears to have expanded in tandem, prompting us to ponder: Is there a clandestine connection, or is this sheer coincidence? It certainly seems that the tale of Gwendolyn and Tom Scott's videos is not one of "much ado about nothing," but rather a captivating saga worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, while causation cannot be definitively established from our analysis, the correlation we have unveiled invites further exploration into the curious relationship between the popularity of a name and the length of online content. As the late great bard might have mused, "What's in a name? Perhaps, the length of a YouTube video.
ChatGPT:
Gwendolyn, YouTube, Tom Scott, name popularity, correlation, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration, YouTube video length, data analysis, YouTube content, Gwendolyn name popularity, Tom Scott video length, correlation coefficient, significance level, causation vs. correlation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name GwendolynDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Gwendolyn
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn
Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of Tom Scott YouTube videos.
Source: Tom Scott's YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8748131 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.2E-7. 0.0000009190969193146005000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 9.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,088,025 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.8, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn (Babies born) | 522 | 517 | 512 | 592 | 651 | 764 | 791 | 825 | 821 | 844 | 851 | 819 | 793 | 796 |
Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos (Total length in seconds) | 2798 | 257 | 142 | 1163 | 3774 | 28039 | 22541 | 30931 | 23986 | 30962 | 24139 | 31275 | 24629 | 17427 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([522,517,512,592,651,764,791,825,821,844,851,819,793,796,])
array_2 = np.array([2798,257,142,1163,3774,28039,22541,30931,23986,30962,24139,31275,24629,17427,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn"
array_2_name = "Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn
- Line chart for only Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Gwendolyn's Gone Viral: The Reel Connection Between Name Popularity and YouTube Length
Big thanks for reviewing!
Correlation ID: 5480 · Black Variable ID: 3327 · Red Variable ID: 25470