Report an error
Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Eritrea | r=0.96 | 28yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 27yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Germany | r=0.95 | 31yrs | No |
Total length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 14yrs | Yes! |
The number of mechanical engineers in Texas | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'kermit' meme | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)