about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,403 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and the second variable is Air pollution in Portland, Maine.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Fire control and safety graduates dwindled, there was a subsequent lack of enthusiasm for putting out fires. This led to a rise in uncontrolled fires, creating a smokescreen of pollution. However, in a plot twist, as the air quality went up in smoke, the citizens of Portland realized they needed to take a breath and extinguish the problem. This sparked a renewed interest in fire safety, ultimately clearing the air and proving that when it comes to reducing air pollution, the real degree of success is in fire control and safety!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a brutalist building in Portland, Maine, surrounded by thick smokescreen and flames emerging from smaller buildings while a group of graduates stand proudly with their Associates degrees in Fire Control and Safety. The oppressive smokescreen should dominate the scene, but the graduates should be clearly visible and determined amidst the chaos, symbolizing their commitment to reignite the city's passion for fire safety. The overall tone of the image should convey a sense of resilience against the looming threat of pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Brutalism Celtic art Futuristic Low poly
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine, in the following situation: As the number of Fire control and safety graduates dwindled, there was a subsequent lack of enthusiasm for putting out fires. This led to a rise in uncontrolled fires, creating a smokescreen of pollution. However, in a plot twist, as the air quality went up in smoke, the citizens of Portland realized they needed to take a breath and extinguish the problem. This sparked a renewed interest in fire safety, ultimately clearing the air and proving that when it comes to reducing air pollution, the real degree of success is in fire control and safety!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Portland, Maine, a few graduates proudly hold their Associates degrees in Fire control and safety. As they open their textbooks, a thick smokescreen of pollution looms over the city, a result of uncontrolled fires due to the lack of enthusiasm for fire control. Yet, amidst the haze, the citizens take a stand, reigniting their passion for fire safety. As they work together to douse the flames, the air begins to clear, proving that the real degree of success in reducing air pollution lies in fire control and safety.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In Portland, Maine, a few graduates proudly hold their Associates degrees in Fire control and safety. As they open their textbooks, a thick smokescreen of pollution looms over the city, a result of uncontrolled fires due to the lack of enthusiasm for fire control. Yet, amidst the haze, the citizens take a stand, reigniting their passion for fire safety. As they work together to douse the flames, the air begins to clear, proving that the real degree of success in reducing air pollution lies in fire control and safety. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a brutalist building in Portland, Maine, surrounded by thick smokescreen and flames emerging from smaller buildings while a group of graduates stand proudly with their Associates degrees in Fire Control and Safety. The oppressive smokescreen should dominate the scene, but the graduates should be clearly visible and determined amidst the chaos, symbolizing their commitment to reignite the city's passion for fire safety. The overall tone of the image should convey a sense of resilience against the looming threat of pollution.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety caused Air pollution in Portland, Maine to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

The Journal of Environmental Epidemiology and Fire Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Fire has long been a symbol of both destruction and renewal. For centuries, humans have harnessed the power of fire in various forms - from taming its wild nature for warmth to controlling its unruly tendencies in the face of danger. In a similar vein, our research explores the duality of fire through the lens of academic pursuits and environmental impact. As we navigate the smoky corridors of academia, we seek to illuminate the connection between the awarding of associate degrees in fire control and safety and the quality of the air we breathe.

As we delved into our investigation, we couldn't help but imagine being the "hottest topic" at academic gatherings. After all, what could be more stimulating than exploring the potential impact of educational endeavors on a burning environmental issue? This burning curiosity led us to examine a decade's worth of data, igniting a discussion that proved to be as thought-provoking as it was smoke-filled.

The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like an uncontrolled wildfire that meanders through the forest. As we ventured into the statistical terrain, we were met with a conundrum fit for a father's pun: "Is there smoke without fire?" Our quest for answers in the misty realm of correlation coefficients and p-values ultimately uncovered a surprising correlation between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and the presence of air pollution in Portland, Maine.

Our findings kindled a fervent desire to further unravel the intricate relationship between academic achievements and environmental consequences, sparking a blaze of contemplation and instigating a "sizzling" debate within our research team. The significance of this revelation not only astonished us but also charred our preconceived notions about the distinct realms of academia and environmental science.

In the midst of the fervor and excitement of our investigation, we were reminded of the words of wisdom from our favorite proverbial firefighter: "Where there's smoke, there's fire!" However, the flames of this connection between fire control and safety education and air pollution have yet to be fully extinguished. As we present our findings, we hope to stoke the flames of curiosity in others and inspire a conflagration of further exploration into the unexpected intersections of academia and environmental impact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Fire has long been a symbol of both destruction and renewal. For centuries, humans have harnessed the power of fire in various forms - from taming its wild nature for warmth to controlling its unruly tendencies in the face of danger. In a similar vein, our research explores the duality of fire through the lens of academic pursuits and environmental impact. As we navigate the smoky corridors of academia, we seek to illuminate the connection between the awarding of associate degrees in fire control and safety and the quality of the air we breathe.
As we delved into our investigation, we couldn't help but imagine being the "hottest topic" at academic gatherings. After all, what could be more stimulating than exploring the potential impact of educational endeavors on a burning environmental issue? This burning curiosity led us to examine a decade's worth of data, igniting a discussion that proved to be as thought-provoking as it was smoke-filled.
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like an uncontrolled wildfire that meanders through the forest. As we ventured into the statistical terrain, we were met with a conundrum fit for a father's pun: "Is there smoke without fire?" Our quest for answers in the misty realm of correlation coefficients and p-values ultimately uncovered a surprising correlation between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and the presence of air pollution in Portland, Maine.
Our findings kindled a fervent desire to further unravel the intricate relationship between academic achievements and environmental consequences, sparking a blaze of contemplation and instigating a "sizzling" debate within our research team. The significance of this revelation not only astonished us but also charred our preconceived notions about the distinct realms of academia and environmental science.
In the midst of the fervor and excitement of our investigation, we were reminded of the words of wisdom from our favorite proverbial firefighter: "Where there's smoke, there's fire!" However, the flames of this connection between fire control and safety education and air pollution have yet to be fully extinguished. As we present our findings, we hope to stoke the flames of curiosity in others and inspire a conflagration of further exploration into the unexpected intersections of academia and environmental impact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The seminal work of Smith and Doe in "The Impact of Vocational Education on Environmental Factors" shed light on the potential influence of academic pursuits in vocational fields on environmental phenomena. Their study delved into the intricate relationship between educational programs in fire control and safety and the broader environmental landscape. The authors find that individuals pursuing associate degrees in fire control and safety demonstrate a strong understanding of environmental hazards and the potential to mitigate them, illustrating a promising link between educational pursuits and environmental awareness.

Speaking of fire, did you hear about the firefighter who was a great gardener? He could really make the hose bloom.

Jones, in "Emissions and Education: A Statistical Analysis," analyzed data from various urban centers to investigate the impact of educational programs on air pollution levels. The study posited a correlation between the number of degrees awarded in fire control and safety and the reduction of air pollutant emissions. Moreover, the researchers highlighted the potential for graduates to enter the workforce with a keen eye for environmental preservation, thereby contributing to a cleaner atmosphere.

What do you call a firefighter's trusty companion? Their "hose buddy."

Moving beyond academic studies, the book "Fire Safety and Environmental Responsibility" by Green provides insight into the practical applications of fire safety education in addressing environmental concerns. The publication emphasizes the role of educational programs in fostering a culture of environmental responsibility, leading to a ripple effect of positive changes within communities.

On a lighter note, I stumbled upon "The Dragon and the Dustbunny" by Sparkle, a children's book that whimsically weaves together the adventures of a firefighter dragon and the need to keep the air clean from dust and pollutants. Although a work of fiction, the underlying message of environmental stewardship resonates with the interplay between fire control education and air quality.

As I delved deeper into the literature, my pursuit of knowledge led me to an unexpected source of insight - the back of shampoo bottles. Surprisingly, the chemical composition and environmental impact information provided on these bottles echoed the themes of fire control and environmental awareness, albeit in a lighthearted, sudsy manner. Who knew that hair care products could offer such colorful commentary on our research?

In conclusion, the literature surrounding the relationship between fire control and safety associate degrees and air pollution in Portland, Maine is as diverse as it is enlightening. From serious academic works to whimsical tales, the exploration of this connection adds layers of depth and humor to our understanding of the intersection between education and the environment. This journey not only ignites our scholarly curiosity but also fans the flames of lighthearted inquiry in unexpected places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Fire has long been a symbol of both destruction and renewal. For centuries, humans have harnessed the power of fire in various forms - from taming its wild nature for warmth to controlling its unruly tendencies in the face of danger. In a similar vein, our research explores the duality of fire through the lens of academic pursuits and environmental impact. As we navigate the smoky corridors of academia, we seek to illuminate the connection between the awarding of associate degrees in fire control and safety and the quality of the air we breathe.
As we delved into our investigation, we couldn't help but imagine being the "hottest topic" at academic gatherings. After all, what could be more stimulating than exploring the potential impact of educational endeavors on a burning environmental issue? This burning curiosity led us to examine a decade's worth of data, igniting a discussion that proved to be as thought-provoking as it was smoke-filled.
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like an uncontrolled wildfire that meanders through the forest. As we ventured into the statistical terrain, we were met with a conundrum fit for a father's pun: "Is there smoke without fire?" Our quest for answers in the misty realm of correlation coefficients and p-values ultimately uncovered a surprising correlation between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and the presence of air pollution in Portland, Maine.
Our findings kindled a fervent desire to further unravel the intricate relationship between academic achievements and environmental consequences, sparking a blaze of contemplation and instigating a "sizzling" debate within our research team. The significance of this revelation not only astonished us but also charred our preconceived notions about the distinct realms of academia and environmental science.
In the midst of the fervor and excitement of our investigation, we were reminded of the words of wisdom from our favorite proverbial firefighter: "Where there's smoke, there's fire!" However, the flames of this connection between fire control and safety education and air pollution have yet to be fully extinguished. As we present our findings, we hope to stoke the flames of curiosity in others and inspire a conflagration of further exploration into the unexpected intersections of academia and environmental impact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the potential link between the awarding of associate degrees in fire control and safety and levels of air pollution in Portland, Maine, our research team embarked on a comprehensive data collection and analysis endeavor. Our pursuit began with the meticulous extraction of information from the databases of the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency. We sought to gather data encompassing the period from 2011 to 2021, capturing a decade's worth of educational achievements and environmental indicators. Our data-gathering process was akin to carefully tending to a bonfire, ensuring that each data point added to the fuel of our investigation.

With these data sources as our guiding beacons, we harnessed the power of statistical analyses to unravel the smoky enigma at hand. We crunched numbers, wrangled regression models, and let the flow of data guide us like wisps of smoke in the wind. Our statistical models were akin to fire control measures, aiming to contain the spread of uncertainty and illuminate the potential associations between fire control and safety education and air pollution levels. As we delved into the statistical inferno, our team couldn't resist a good dad joke: "Our p-values were so low, they reminded us of limbo contests – how low can you go?"

The quantitative examination of the data involved the calculation of correlation coefficients, significance tests, and regression analyses. We examined the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded over the years and correlated this with measurements of air pollutants in Portland, Maine. Our statistical inferno aimed to not only reveal potential connections but also to stir the embers of curiosity within the academic community.

In tandem with our quantitative analyses, we engaged in a qualitative exploration of the broader contextual factors that could influence the relationship between fire control education and air quality. This approach was akin to fanning the flames of understanding and delving into the complexities surrounding the educational and environmental landscapes. Our research team couldn't help but ponder: "Are there nuances hidden within the smoke, much like the depths of humor within a well-timed dad joke?"

Furthermore, we conducted sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness of our findings. Our goal was to extinguish any lingering doubts about the validity and reliability of our results, providing a sturdy foundation for the discussions that were set ablaze by our revelations. As we sifted through the evidence, our team stayed vigilant, keeping an eye out for potential confounding variables that could cloud our interpretation. However, much like skilled firefighters, we remained undeterred in our pursuit of clarity amidst the haze.

In summary, our research methodology served as both a beacon of illumination and a roaring research fire, enabling us to uncover the intriguing connections between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution. Our statistical inferno blazed a trail for future investigations and kindled a pervasive sense of curiosity, leaving our team with a lingering question: "Is there such a thing as statistical smoke signals, or are we simply flaring up curiosity with our findings?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8262690, r-squared of 0.6827205, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Fire has long been a symbol of both destruction and renewal. For centuries, humans have harnessed the power of fire in various forms - from taming its wild nature for warmth to controlling its unruly tendencies in the face of danger. In a similar vein, our research explores the duality of fire through the lens of academic pursuits and environmental impact. As we navigate the smoky corridors of academia, we seek to illuminate the connection between the awarding of associate degrees in fire control and safety and the quality of the air we breathe.
As we delved into our investigation, we couldn't help but imagine being the "hottest topic" at academic gatherings. After all, what could be more stimulating than exploring the potential impact of educational endeavors on a burning environmental issue? This burning curiosity led us to examine a decade's worth of data, igniting a discussion that proved to be as thought-provoking as it was smoke-filled.
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like an uncontrolled wildfire that meanders through the forest. As we ventured into the statistical terrain, we were met with a conundrum fit for a father's pun: "Is there smoke without fire?" Our quest for answers in the misty realm of correlation coefficients and p-values ultimately uncovered a surprising correlation between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and the presence of air pollution in Portland, Maine.
Our findings kindled a fervent desire to further unravel the intricate relationship between academic achievements and environmental consequences, sparking a blaze of contemplation and instigating a "sizzling" debate within our research team. The significance of this revelation not only astonished us but also charred our preconceived notions about the distinct realms of academia and environmental science.
In the midst of the fervor and excitement of our investigation, we were reminded of the words of wisdom from our favorite proverbial firefighter: "Where there's smoke, there's fire!" However, the flames of this connection between fire control and safety education and air pollution have yet to be fully extinguished. As we present our findings, we hope to stoke the flames of curiosity in others and inspire a conflagration of further exploration into the unexpected intersections of academia and environmental impact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of a decade's worth of data from 2011 to 2021 has yielded a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8262690, with an r-squared value of 0.6827205 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and air pollution levels in Portland, Maine. This robust correlation ignited a flame of curiosity within our research team, prompting us to metaphorically fan the flames of inquiry in our quest to understand this unexpected connection.

As we examined the scatterplot representation of our findings (Fig. 1), we couldn't help but sense a smoky haze of evidence supporting the link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the data itself was sending smoke signals of the strong relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety education and the presence of air pollution. One might say our results were "smokin'!"

This revelation not only sparked an illuminating discussion within our team but also enkindled a passion for further exploration into the interplay of academic pursuits and environmental impact. We couldn't help but be reminded of the well-known saying: "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and indeed, our research has enkindled a fire of curiosity within the academic and environmental spheres.

In summary, our study has illuminated an unexpected link between the awarding of Associates degrees in Fire control and safety and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. Our findings not only stoke the flames of debate but also serve as a beacon, guiding future research endeavors in unraveling the intricate relationship between education and environmental consequences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The seminal work of Smith and Doe in "The Impact of Vocational Education on Environmental Factors" shed light on the potential influence of academic pursuits in vocational fields on environmental phenomena. Their study delved into the intricate relationship between educational programs in fire control and safety and the broader environmental landscape. The authors find that individuals pursuing associate degrees in fire control and safety demonstrate a strong understanding of environmental hazards and the potential to mitigate them, illustrating a promising link between educational pursuits and environmental awareness.
Speaking of fire, did you hear about the firefighter who was a great gardener? He could really make the hose bloom.
Jones, in "Emissions and Education: A Statistical Analysis," analyzed data from various urban centers to investigate the impact of educational programs on air pollution levels. The study posited a correlation between the number of degrees awarded in fire control and safety and the reduction of air pollutant emissions. Moreover, the researchers highlighted the potential for graduates to enter the workforce with a keen eye for environmental preservation, thereby contributing to a cleaner atmosphere.
What do you call a firefighter's trusty companion? Their "hose buddy."
Moving beyond academic studies, the book "Fire Safety and Environmental Responsibility" by Green provides insight into the practical applications of fire safety education in addressing environmental concerns. The publication emphasizes the role of educational programs in fostering a culture of environmental responsibility, leading to a ripple effect of positive changes within communities.
On a lighter note, I stumbled upon "The Dragon and the Dustbunny" by Sparkle, a children's book that whimsically weaves together the adventures of a firefighter dragon and the need to keep the air clean from dust and pollutants. Although a work of fiction, the underlying message of environmental stewardship resonates with the interplay between fire control education and air quality.
As I delved deeper into the literature, my pursuit of knowledge led me to an unexpected source of insight - the back of shampoo bottles. Surprisingly, the chemical composition and environmental impact information provided on these bottles echoed the themes of fire control and environmental awareness, albeit in a lighthearted, sudsy manner. Who knew that hair care products could offer such colorful commentary on our research?
In conclusion, the literature surrounding the relationship between fire control and safety associate degrees and air pollution in Portland, Maine is as diverse as it is enlightening. From serious academic works to whimsical tales, the exploration of this connection adds layers of depth and humor to our understanding of the intersection between education and the environment. This journey not only ignites our scholarly curiosity but also fans the flames of lighthearted inquiry in unexpected places.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of a decade's worth of data from 2011 to 2021 has yielded a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8262690, with an r-squared value of 0.6827205 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and air pollution levels in Portland, Maine. This robust correlation ignited a flame of curiosity within our research team, prompting us to metaphorically fan the flames of inquiry in our quest to understand this unexpected connection.
As we examined the scatterplot representation of our findings (Fig. 1), we couldn't help but sense a smoky haze of evidence supporting the link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the data itself was sending smoke signals of the strong relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety education and the presence of air pollution. One might say our results were "smokin'!"
This revelation not only sparked an illuminating discussion within our team but also enkindled a passion for further exploration into the interplay of academic pursuits and environmental impact. We couldn't help but be reminded of the well-known saying: "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and indeed, our research has enkindled a fire of curiosity within the academic and environmental spheres.
In summary, our study has illuminated an unexpected link between the awarding of Associates degrees in Fire control and safety and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. Our findings not only stoke the flames of debate but also serve as a beacon, guiding future research endeavors in unraveling the intricate relationship between education and environmental consequences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The significant correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and air pollution levels in Portland, Maine, as revealed by our study, aligns with previous research conducted by Smith and Doe, and Jones. These studies, despite focusing on separate aspects of the connection between educational pursuits and environmental impact, offered insight into the potential influence of educational programs in vocational fields on environmental phenomena. Our findings provide empirical evidence to support the theoretical propositions put forth by these prior works, thereby adding layers of complexity and nuance to the understanding of this relationship.

The study by Smith and Doe, which highlighted the potential for individuals pursuing associate degrees in fire control and safety to mitigate environmental hazards, resonates with our findings. It seems that their work was not just playing with fire – it was illuminating a spark of truth. Similarly, Jones's investigation into the correlation between the number of degrees awarded in fire control and safety and the reduction of air pollutant emissions echoes our results, further reinforcing the notion that educational pursuits in fire control and safety can have a tangible impact on environmental factors.

Considering the comprehensive literature review discussing the serious and often playful examination of the intersection between fire control and environmental awareness, it is evident that our research is not just a flash in the pan – it has added tangible evidence to the existing body of knowledge, fanning the flames of inquiry to illuminate an unexpected correlation. The quirky revelation of insights from unexpected sources, such as the back of shampoo bottles and children's books, demonstrates the multifaceted nature of this research, where academic rigor coexists with a sense of humor and lighthearted inquiry.

Moreover, the robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value derived from our analysis serve as a strong signal of the potential impact of educational programs in fire control and safety on air pollution levels. Just as a firefighter's hose skillfully directs water to douse flames, our study expertly channels data to highlight the relationship between educational pursuits and environmental outcomes. This tangible connection not only stokes the flames of curiosity but also kindles a fervent discussion within the scientific community and beyond.

In essence, our study has not only added fuel to the fire of scholarship but has also ignited a passion for further exploration into the intertwining realms of education and the environment. As we continue to unravel the intricate threads connecting fire control and safety education to air pollution in Portland, Maine, we hope our research serves as a guiding light for future inquiries in this dynamic field. After all, it seems that where there's smoke, there's not only fire but also a smoldering avenue for scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Air pollution in Portland, Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.

As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.

In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Fire has long been a symbol of both destruction and renewal. For centuries, humans have harnessed the power of fire in various forms - from taming its wild nature for warmth to controlling its unruly tendencies in the face of danger. In a similar vein, our research explores the duality of fire through the lens of academic pursuits and environmental impact. As we navigate the smoky corridors of academia, we seek to illuminate the connection between the awarding of associate degrees in fire control and safety and the quality of the air we breathe.
As we delved into our investigation, we couldn't help but imagine being the "hottest topic" at academic gatherings. After all, what could be more stimulating than exploring the potential impact of educational endeavors on a burning environmental issue? This burning curiosity led us to examine a decade's worth of data, igniting a discussion that proved to be as thought-provoking as it was smoke-filled.
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, much like an uncontrolled wildfire that meanders through the forest. As we ventured into the statistical terrain, we were met with a conundrum fit for a father's pun: "Is there smoke without fire?" Our quest for answers in the misty realm of correlation coefficients and p-values ultimately uncovered a surprising correlation between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and the presence of air pollution in Portland, Maine.
Our findings kindled a fervent desire to further unravel the intricate relationship between academic achievements and environmental consequences, sparking a blaze of contemplation and instigating a "sizzling" debate within our research team. The significance of this revelation not only astonished us but also charred our preconceived notions about the distinct realms of academia and environmental science.
In the midst of the fervor and excitement of our investigation, we were reminded of the words of wisdom from our favorite proverbial firefighter: "Where there's smoke, there's fire!" However, the flames of this connection between fire control and safety education and air pollution have yet to be fully extinguished. As we present our findings, we hope to stoke the flames of curiosity in others and inspire a conflagration of further exploration into the unexpected intersections of academia and environmental impact.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of a decade's worth of data from 2011 to 2021 has yielded a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8262690, with an r-squared value of 0.6827205 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and air pollution levels in Portland, Maine. This robust correlation ignited a flame of curiosity within our research team, prompting us to metaphorically fan the flames of inquiry in our quest to understand this unexpected connection.
As we examined the scatterplot representation of our findings (Fig. 1), we couldn't help but sense a smoky haze of evidence supporting the link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the data itself was sending smoke signals of the strong relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety education and the presence of air pollution. One might say our results were "smokin'!"
This revelation not only sparked an illuminating discussion within our team but also enkindled a passion for further exploration into the interplay of academic pursuits and environmental impact. We couldn't help but be reminded of the well-known saying: "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and indeed, our research has enkindled a fire of curiosity within the academic and environmental spheres.
In summary, our study has illuminated an unexpected link between the awarding of Associates degrees in Fire control and safety and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. Our findings not only stoke the flames of debate but also serve as a beacon, guiding future research endeavors in unraveling the intricate relationship between education and environmental consequences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. While our research may have started with a small spark of curiosity, it has certainly ignited a fiery discussion within academic and environmental circles alike. It seems our findings have fanned the flames of interest in establishing a deeper understanding of this unexpected nexus between academic pursuits and environmental impact.

As we reflect on our findings, we cannot help but recall the words of a seasoned firefighter, "I can handle the heat, but this correlation is smokin'!" The statistical evidence, represented in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), leaves little doubt that there is indeed a noteworthy connection between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and the observed levels of air pollution. It seems that where there are fire control and safety degrees, there is also a smoky situation.

Our research has not only illuminated an unconventional correlation but has also sparked a spirited debate within our team. This unexpected link between educational achievements and environmental consequences has left us both astonished and full of burning questions. It's as though our data is sending smoke signals, urging for further investigation into the complexity of this relationship.

As we present our findings, we are also reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the firefighter wear red suspenders? To keep his pants up!" However, there will be no need for suspenders to hold up the validity of our research – the data speaks for itself.

In this light, we firmly assert that further research in this smoky area is not needed. Our study has stoked the fires of curiosity and uncovered a connection that is undoubtedly worth considering in future academic and environmental inquiries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Epidemiology and Fire Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Urban Environmental Research and Safety Evaluation (IUERSE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Smoke Degrees: Exploring the Link Between Fire Control and Safety Associate Degrees and Air Pollution in Portland, Maine with an abstract of In the pursuit of uncovering the burning questions surrounding the relationship between academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena, our research team delved into the world of associate degrees in fire control and safety and their potential impact on air pollution in Portland, Maine. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, we analyzed a decade of information spanning from 2011 to 2021 to illuminate the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8262690 and p-value less than 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the number of fire control and safety associate degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This data sparked a fiery discussion within our team, but it also left us feeling quite smoky in our quest for knowledge.
As we sifted through the statistical smoke, we couldn't help but ponder: "Did our research set the air on fire, or were we just fanning the flames of curiosity?" Our investigation, while rooted in the serious realm of academia, led us to uncover a lighthearted truth - education and environmental impact are intertwined in unexpected ways. We hope our findings spark further examination and ignite a passion for uncovering uncharted connections in the academic and environmental domains.
In conclusion, our study shed light on the incendiary relationship between the pursuit of fire control and safety associate degrees and the prevalence of air pollution in Portland, Maine. This research not only fuels the conversation within academic circles but also kindles a flame of curiosity for future inquiries.

ChatGPT:

Smoke Degrees, Fire control and safety, Associate degrees, Air pollution, Portland Maine, National Center for Education Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, Correlation coefficient, P-value, Statistical analysis, Educational impact on air pollution, Academic pursuits and atmospheric phenomena.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Fire control and safety
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety

Air pollution in Portland, Maine
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Portland-South Portland, ME
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Portland, Maine

Correlation r = 0.8262690 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6827205 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Portland, Maine) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0017. 0.0017186327550979580000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.17% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 582 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety (Degrees awarded)46034779491046494525424141914284430540313985
Air pollution in Portland, Maine (Bad air quality days)19.72616.120223.287716.986321.917810.655712.876714.794515.616412.84159.31507




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4603,4779,4910,4649,4525,4241,4191,4284,4305,4031,3985,])
array_2 = np.array([19.726,16.1202,23.2877,16.9863,21.9178,10.6557,12.8767,14.7945,15.6164,12.8415,9.31507,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Portland, Maine"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5403 · Black Variable ID: 1238 · Red Variable ID: 21080
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0