Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of city bus drivers in Alaska | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'daylight savings time' | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Zambia | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E) | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
The number of chemists in Delaware | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
Air pollution in Portland, Maine | r=0.83 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)