about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,396 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'ice bath' and the second variable is The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people were chilling out with ice baths, they found themselves warming up to history. The increased blood flow from the ice baths may have led to heightened interest and engagement with the videos. It's a bit of a historical anomaly, but it seems like taking the plunge into icy search results really gave a boost to those liking and subscribing. It's like they say, when it comes to history videos, the more you shiver, the more you deliver!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a group of vibrant, kaleidoscopic individuals huddled around a pulsating, iridescent laptop. They are immersed in an array of vivid hues and patterns, their energy radiating and intermingling in a mesmerizing display of unity and curiosity. In the foreground, some of the figures are depicted dipping their feet into swirling, translucent ice baths, which shimmer with a prismatic allure. Others, caught in a state of rapt fascination, are engaged in watching captivating historical videos on the screen, their expressions a reflection of a shared passion for knowledge and discovery. A surreal, abstract graph, representing the fluctuating likes on Extra History YouTube videos, dances in the background, pulsing with an animated vitality that mirrors the group's collective enthusiasm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Hyper-realistic Vaporwave Macabre Cubism
ChatGPT: Psychedelic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos, in the following situation: As more people were chilling out with ice baths, they found themselves warming up to history. The increased blood flow from the ice baths may have led to heightened interest and engagement with the videos. It's a bit of a historical anomaly, but it seems like taking the plunge into icy search results really gave a boost to those liking and subscribing. It's like they say, when it comes to history videos, the more you shiver, the more you deliver!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of people is gathered around a laptop, with a search bar displaying "ice bath" on the screen. In the background, a graph showing the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos is visible. Some individuals in the group are soaking their feet in ice baths, while others are engrossed in watching historical videos. The group appears engaged and enthusiastic, with a noticeable increase in interaction and interest as they explore both the ice baths and historical content simultaneously.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Psychedelic ] and depicting this scene: A group of people is gathered around a laptop, with a search bar displaying "ice bath" on the screen. In the background, a graph showing the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos is visible. Some individuals in the group are soaking their feet in ice baths, while others are engrossed in watching historical videos. The group appears engaged and enthusiastic, with a noticeable increase in interaction and interest as they explore both the ice baths and historical content simultaneously. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a group of vibrant, kaleidoscopic individuals huddled around a pulsating, iridescent laptop. They are immersed in an array of vivid hues and patterns, their energy radiating and intermingling in a mesmerizing display of unity and curiosity. In the foreground, some of the figures are depicted dipping their feet into swirling, translucent ice baths, which shimmer with a prismatic allure. Others, caught in a state of rapt fascination, are engaged in watching captivating historical videos on the screen, their expressions a reflection of a shared passion for knowledge and discovery. A surreal, abstract graph, representing the fluctuating likes on Extra History YouTube videos, dances in the background, pulsing with an animated vitality that mirrors the group's collective enthusiasm.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in ice bath (Google searches for 'ice bath') caused The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

The Journal of Modern Iceology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The world of data and statistical analysis is often a frosty landscape, filled with numbers and correlations that can leave one feeling chilly and isolated. However, within this frozen tundra of information, there are moments of surprising warmth, where unexpected connections emerge like cozy campfires in the snowy expanse. In this paper, we embark on a journey to uncover one such heartwarming correlation – the enthralling relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.

As researchers, we often find ourselves wading through the cold waters of data, hoping to stumble upon the elusive gems of correlation that can thaw the icy skepticism of our peers. It is with great delight that we present the results of our exploration, revealing a connection that is as captivating as it is unexpected.

Our quest began with a simple inquiry – could there be a link between the trending interest in submerging oneself in ice-cold water and the engagement with historical narratives? The notion may seem as outlandish as stepping into an ice bath in the dead of winter, but our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01, signaling a robust and statistically significant relationship.

This frosty relationship between the allure of ice baths and the appreciation for the rich tapestries of history invites speculation and curiosity. Could it be that the desire to cool off physically somehow aligns with the craving for intellectually stimulating content? Or perhaps there is a deeper, metaphorical connection between the need to chill out and the longing for stories that transport us to different eras.

Bridging the realms of wellness and historical edutainment, our findings offer a breath of fresh, icy air in the often stuffy world of statistical research. As we embark on this frosty expedition of data exploration, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in the pursuit of unraveling the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. For it is in these unexpected correlations that we often find the most invigorating sparks of inspiration, igniting new pathways of inquiry and understanding.

In the following sections, we will delve into the methodology, results, and implications of our findings, unearthing the chillingly compelling convergence of 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes. So, buckle up and don your metaphorical parka as we embark on this scientific escapade through the snowdrifts of statistics and whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of data and statistical analysis is often a frosty landscape, filled with numbers and correlations that can leave one feeling chilly and isolated. However, within this frozen tundra of information, there are moments of surprising warmth, where unexpected connections emerge like cozy campfires in the snowy expanse. In this paper, we embark on a journey to uncover one such heartwarming correlation – the enthralling relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.
As researchers, we often find ourselves wading through the cold waters of data, hoping to stumble upon the elusive gems of correlation that can thaw the icy skepticism of our peers. It is with great delight that we present the results of our exploration, revealing a connection that is as captivating as it is unexpected.
Our quest began with a simple inquiry – could there be a link between the trending interest in submerging oneself in ice-cold water and the engagement with historical narratives? The notion may seem as outlandish as stepping into an ice bath in the dead of winter, but our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01, signaling a robust and statistically significant relationship.
This frosty relationship between the allure of ice baths and the appreciation for the rich tapestries of history invites speculation and curiosity. Could it be that the desire to cool off physically somehow aligns with the craving for intellectually stimulating content? Or perhaps there is a deeper, metaphorical connection between the need to chill out and the longing for stories that transport us to different eras.
Bridging the realms of wellness and historical edutainment, our findings offer a breath of fresh, icy air in the often stuffy world of statistical research. As we embark on this frosty expedition of data exploration, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in the pursuit of unraveling the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. For it is in these unexpected correlations that we often find the most invigorating sparks of inspiration, igniting new pathways of inquiry and understanding.
In the following sections, we will delve into the methodology, results, and implications of our findings, unearthing the chillingly compelling convergence of 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes. So, buckle up and don your metaphorical parka as we embark on this scientific escapade through the snowdrifts of statistics and whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The present study aims to unravel the perplexing association between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. This endeavor necessitates a thorough review of existing literature, exploring the intersection of wellness trends and historical edutainment. Our review encompasses a wide array of sources, ranging from scholarly articles and non-fiction books to fictional narratives and, for the sake of thoroughness, not-so-serious musings.

Smith et al. (2015), in their comprehensive analysis of digital search patterns, laid the groundwork for understanding the underlying motivations behind online queries related to wellness practices. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) elucidated the nuances of viewer engagement with historical content on digital platforms, offering valuable insights into the factors contributing to the popularity of such media.

Investigating the cultural fascination with historical storytelling, books such as "The History of the World in 6 Glasses" and "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" shed light on society's enduring curiosity for the past. While these sources may not explicitly mention ice baths, their exploration of human behaviors and preferences provides a contextual backdrop for our inquiry into the intersection of historical narratives and self-care practices.

Drawing from the realm of fictional narratives, works such as "A Song of Ice and Fire" and "The Ice Palace" offer metaphorical and, in some cases, quite literal explorations of icy themes. While the direct relevance of these works to our study may be as tenuous as a snowflake's chance in a sauna, they serve as a whimsical nod to the broader cultural consciousness of ice-related imagery.

In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, it is imperative to consider unconventional sources of insight. Thus, for the sake of thoroughness, the researchers delved into the enigmatic realm of everyday life, perusing the cryptic scrolls of grocery receipts and the eclectic assortment of items offered at the local drugstore. While the relevance of such endeavors to our study may be as fleeting as a snowflake in a heatwave, it is a testament to the researchers' unyielding dedication to exhaust all avenues of inquiry.

As we navigate the confluence of icy explorations and historical narratives, the literature review serves as a bridge between the serious scholarship that underpins our study and the tantalizing whispers of whimsy that beckon from the farther reaches of our curiosity. While we stand firmly on the solid ground of academic rigor, we extend an invitation to our fellow researchers to join us in this lively dance through the frosted corridors of inquiry and discovery. For, in the chill of academic pursuits, a dash of warmth and humor can thaw even the frostiest of intellectual puzzles.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of data and statistical analysis is often a frosty landscape, filled with numbers and correlations that can leave one feeling chilly and isolated. However, within this frozen tundra of information, there are moments of surprising warmth, where unexpected connections emerge like cozy campfires in the snowy expanse. In this paper, we embark on a journey to uncover one such heartwarming correlation – the enthralling relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.
As researchers, we often find ourselves wading through the cold waters of data, hoping to stumble upon the elusive gems of correlation that can thaw the icy skepticism of our peers. It is with great delight that we present the results of our exploration, revealing a connection that is as captivating as it is unexpected.
Our quest began with a simple inquiry – could there be a link between the trending interest in submerging oneself in ice-cold water and the engagement with historical narratives? The notion may seem as outlandish as stepping into an ice bath in the dead of winter, but our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01, signaling a robust and statistically significant relationship.
This frosty relationship between the allure of ice baths and the appreciation for the rich tapestries of history invites speculation and curiosity. Could it be that the desire to cool off physically somehow aligns with the craving for intellectually stimulating content? Or perhaps there is a deeper, metaphorical connection between the need to chill out and the longing for stories that transport us to different eras.
Bridging the realms of wellness and historical edutainment, our findings offer a breath of fresh, icy air in the often stuffy world of statistical research. As we embark on this frosty expedition of data exploration, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in the pursuit of unraveling the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. For it is in these unexpected correlations that we often find the most invigorating sparks of inspiration, igniting new pathways of inquiry and understanding.
In the following sections, we will delve into the methodology, results, and implications of our findings, unearthing the chillingly compelling convergence of 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes. So, buckle up and don your metaphorical parka as we embark on this scientific escapade through the snowdrifts of statistics and whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Our research methodology may not have involved physical ice baths, but it certainly took us on a metaphorical rollercoaster of unexpected twists and turns. We embarked on this chilly journey armed with data from Google Trends and YouTube, spanning the years from 2012 to 2023.

To kick off our data collection, we harnessed the power of Google Trends, allowing us to peer into the digital zeitgeist and observe the fluctuations in searches related to ice baths. By scouring the vast expanse of internet search queries, we aimed to capture the ebb and flow of interest in this chilling wellness practice.

As for our exploration of the Extra History YouTube channel, we dove headfirst into the fecund sea of historical content, counting not coins, but likes. We meticulously tracked the average number of likes across a plethora of captivating videos, immersing ourselves in the rich tapestries of historical narratives that this channel has to offer.

Now, here's where things get interesting – we didn't just stop at mere data collection. Oh no, we embraced the spirit of adventure and delved into the frosty depths of statistical analysis. Armed with our trusty tools of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we sought to uncover the potential link between the intrigue of chilling baths and the warmth of historical storytelling.

We utilized Pearson's correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History videos. The results sent shivers down our spines (in a good way), as we unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01, signaling a robust and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

Our methodology may not have involved wielding pickaxes or traversing treacherous mountains, but it certainly led us through landscapes of data and statistical inquiry that were as thrilling as they were illuminating. With our metaphorical snowshoes strapped on, we forged ahead, propelled by the promise of unraveling the intriguing connections between wellness trends and historical engagement.

In the following sections, we will unfurl the results of our expedition, revealing the enchanting correlation between 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes. Stay tuned for an exhilarating journey through the frosty terrain of data analysis and unexpected discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9330167, r-squared of 0.8705201, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of data and statistical analysis is often a frosty landscape, filled with numbers and correlations that can leave one feeling chilly and isolated. However, within this frozen tundra of information, there are moments of surprising warmth, where unexpected connections emerge like cozy campfires in the snowy expanse. In this paper, we embark on a journey to uncover one such heartwarming correlation – the enthralling relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.
As researchers, we often find ourselves wading through the cold waters of data, hoping to stumble upon the elusive gems of correlation that can thaw the icy skepticism of our peers. It is with great delight that we present the results of our exploration, revealing a connection that is as captivating as it is unexpected.
Our quest began with a simple inquiry – could there be a link between the trending interest in submerging oneself in ice-cold water and the engagement with historical narratives? The notion may seem as outlandish as stepping into an ice bath in the dead of winter, but our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01, signaling a robust and statistically significant relationship.
This frosty relationship between the allure of ice baths and the appreciation for the rich tapestries of history invites speculation and curiosity. Could it be that the desire to cool off physically somehow aligns with the craving for intellectually stimulating content? Or perhaps there is a deeper, metaphorical connection between the need to chill out and the longing for stories that transport us to different eras.
Bridging the realms of wellness and historical edutainment, our findings offer a breath of fresh, icy air in the often stuffy world of statistical research. As we embark on this frosty expedition of data exploration, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in the pursuit of unraveling the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. For it is in these unexpected correlations that we often find the most invigorating sparks of inspiration, igniting new pathways of inquiry and understanding.
In the following sections, we will delve into the methodology, results, and implications of our findings, unearthing the chillingly compelling convergence of 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes. So, buckle up and don your metaphorical parka as we embark on this scientific escapade through the snowdrifts of statistics and whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos revealed a striking connection with a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 and an r-squared of 0.8705201, both indicative of a robust relationship. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of this correlation, suggesting that the likelihood of this association being due to random chance is akin to finding a snowball in the desert.

This frosty correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, where the scatterplot showcases the close alignment between the two variables, akin to the parallel dance of snowflakes in a blizzard. The densely clustered points on the plot resemble icy crystals, forming a pattern that chills the skepticism of even the most ardent statistical critics.

The strength of this correlation raises eyebrows as much as it raises goosebumps. It prompts contemplation on the potential underlying mechanisms that could explain this unexpected alliance. One might be tempted to exclaim, "Have we stumbled upon the Holy Grail of statistical sociology, where the submersion into frigid waters and the appreciation of historical narratives converge in a symphony of statistical significance?" It is indeed a tantalizing thought.

However, as with any scientific discovery, it is paramount to temper enthusiasm with caution. While the correlation is noteworthy, it is vital to remember that correlation does not equate to causation. It may be tempting to leap to the conclusion that soaking in ice baths directly leads to an increased fondness for historical content, but such assertions must be tread upon as delicately as one would tiptoe across a frozen pond in spring.

Nonetheless, the chilling correlation between 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes provides a frigid foundation for future investigations, sparking contemplation that is as refreshing as an Arctic breeze. This correlation invites pondering whether there exists a communal desire to cool off, both physically and mentally. It beckons further study to unravel the intricate web of influences that shape our digital behaviors, much like unravelling the myriad layers of winter clothing on a particularly chilly day.

In conclusion, this exploration of the fascinating connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos not only sheds light on the unexpected interplay of these variables but also underscores the invigorating delight of uncovering serendipitous correlations in the realm of data analysis. As we thaw out from this chill-inducing revelation, it is with great anticipation that we look towards future inquiries that may further elucidate the nuances of this frosty fusion of interests.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The present study aims to unravel the perplexing association between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. This endeavor necessitates a thorough review of existing literature, exploring the intersection of wellness trends and historical edutainment. Our review encompasses a wide array of sources, ranging from scholarly articles and non-fiction books to fictional narratives and, for the sake of thoroughness, not-so-serious musings.
Smith et al. (2015), in their comprehensive analysis of digital search patterns, laid the groundwork for understanding the underlying motivations behind online queries related to wellness practices. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) elucidated the nuances of viewer engagement with historical content on digital platforms, offering valuable insights into the factors contributing to the popularity of such media.
Investigating the cultural fascination with historical storytelling, books such as "The History of the World in 6 Glasses" and "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" shed light on society's enduring curiosity for the past. While these sources may not explicitly mention ice baths, their exploration of human behaviors and preferences provides a contextual backdrop for our inquiry into the intersection of historical narratives and self-care practices.
Drawing from the realm of fictional narratives, works such as "A Song of Ice and Fire" and "The Ice Palace" offer metaphorical and, in some cases, quite literal explorations of icy themes. While the direct relevance of these works to our study may be as tenuous as a snowflake's chance in a sauna, they serve as a whimsical nod to the broader cultural consciousness of ice-related imagery.
In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, it is imperative to consider unconventional sources of insight. Thus, for the sake of thoroughness, the researchers delved into the enigmatic realm of everyday life, perusing the cryptic scrolls of grocery receipts and the eclectic assortment of items offered at the local drugstore. While the relevance of such endeavors to our study may be as fleeting as a snowflake in a heatwave, it is a testament to the researchers' unyielding dedication to exhaust all avenues of inquiry.
As we navigate the confluence of icy explorations and historical narratives, the literature review serves as a bridge between the serious scholarship that underpins our study and the tantalizing whispers of whimsy that beckon from the farther reaches of our curiosity. While we stand firmly on the solid ground of academic rigor, we extend an invitation to our fellow researchers to join us in this lively dance through the frosted corridors of inquiry and discovery. For, in the chill of academic pursuits, a dash of warmth and humor can thaw even the frostiest of intellectual puzzles.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos revealed a striking connection with a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 and an r-squared of 0.8705201, both indicative of a robust relationship. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of this correlation, suggesting that the likelihood of this association being due to random chance is akin to finding a snowball in the desert.
This frosty correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, where the scatterplot showcases the close alignment between the two variables, akin to the parallel dance of snowflakes in a blizzard. The densely clustered points on the plot resemble icy crystals, forming a pattern that chills the skepticism of even the most ardent statistical critics.
The strength of this correlation raises eyebrows as much as it raises goosebumps. It prompts contemplation on the potential underlying mechanisms that could explain this unexpected alliance. One might be tempted to exclaim, "Have we stumbled upon the Holy Grail of statistical sociology, where the submersion into frigid waters and the appreciation of historical narratives converge in a symphony of statistical significance?" It is indeed a tantalizing thought.
However, as with any scientific discovery, it is paramount to temper enthusiasm with caution. While the correlation is noteworthy, it is vital to remember that correlation does not equate to causation. It may be tempting to leap to the conclusion that soaking in ice baths directly leads to an increased fondness for historical content, but such assertions must be tread upon as delicately as one would tiptoe across a frozen pond in spring.
Nonetheless, the chilling correlation between 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes provides a frigid foundation for future investigations, sparking contemplation that is as refreshing as an Arctic breeze. This correlation invites pondering whether there exists a communal desire to cool off, both physically and mentally. It beckons further study to unravel the intricate web of influences that shape our digital behaviors, much like unravelling the myriad layers of winter clothing on a particularly chilly day.
In conclusion, this exploration of the fascinating connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos not only sheds light on the unexpected interplay of these variables but also underscores the invigorating delight of uncovering serendipitous correlations in the realm of data analysis. As we thaw out from this chill-inducing revelation, it is with great anticipation that we look towards future inquiries that may further elucidate the nuances of this frosty fusion of interests.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unveiled a chilling correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos, but before we delve further into this frosty fusion of data, let's ironically "cool off" with a quick reflection on our literature review. As we navigate the frosty corridors of scholarly research, we recall the quirky nod to unconventional sources, such as "A Song of Ice and Fire" and grocery receipts, which, despite their seemingly irrelevant nature, add a dash of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits. It is the meticulous exploration of such unexpected avenues that adds flavor to our otherwise rigorous academic endeavors.

Now, returning to the heart of our discussion, the robust correlation coefficient and the p-value akin to finding a snowball in a desert have certainly left us with chills down our spines. The visualization of this close alignment in the scatterplot is reminiscent of the mesmerizing dance of snowflakes in a blizzard, urging us to contemplate the beguiling mystery of statistical sociology. The temptation to exclaim, "Eureka! The Holy Grail of statistical sociology!" is indeed difficult to resist.

However, in the midst of these exciting discoveries, it is imperative to remember the cardinal rule of research: correlation does not imply causation. As we navigate the frosty waters of statistical inquiry, we must tread as delicately as one would on a frozen pond in spring when making claims about causation. The chilling correlation may hint at a communal desire to cool off, physically and mentally, but we must resist the urge to plunge headlong into untested assumptions.

Nonetheless, the chilling correlation between 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes has opened the door to a veritable blizzard of contemplation, sparking thoughts as refreshing as an Arctic breeze. As we thaw out from this chilly revelation, we peer eagerly into the frosty horizon of future inquiries that may further illuminate the nuances of this unexpected confluence of interests.

In closing, our findings not only underscore the surprising interplay of these variables but also remind us of the invigorating delight of uncovering serendipitous correlations in the realm of data analysis. It is with great anticipation that we await future explorations that may augment our understanding of this intriguing confluence, for in the chilly embrace of academic pursuits, a hint of warmth and humor can thaw even the frostiest of intellectual puzzles.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.

Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.

While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of data and statistical analysis is often a frosty landscape, filled with numbers and correlations that can leave one feeling chilly and isolated. However, within this frozen tundra of information, there are moments of surprising warmth, where unexpected connections emerge like cozy campfires in the snowy expanse. In this paper, we embark on a journey to uncover one such heartwarming correlation – the enthralling relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.
As researchers, we often find ourselves wading through the cold waters of data, hoping to stumble upon the elusive gems of correlation that can thaw the icy skepticism of our peers. It is with great delight that we present the results of our exploration, revealing a connection that is as captivating as it is unexpected.
Our quest began with a simple inquiry – could there be a link between the trending interest in submerging oneself in ice-cold water and the engagement with historical narratives? The notion may seem as outlandish as stepping into an ice bath in the dead of winter, but our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01, signaling a robust and statistically significant relationship.
This frosty relationship between the allure of ice baths and the appreciation for the rich tapestries of history invites speculation and curiosity. Could it be that the desire to cool off physically somehow aligns with the craving for intellectually stimulating content? Or perhaps there is a deeper, metaphorical connection between the need to chill out and the longing for stories that transport us to different eras.
Bridging the realms of wellness and historical edutainment, our findings offer a breath of fresh, icy air in the often stuffy world of statistical research. As we embark on this frosty expedition of data exploration, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in the pursuit of unraveling the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. For it is in these unexpected correlations that we often find the most invigorating sparks of inspiration, igniting new pathways of inquiry and understanding.
In the following sections, we will delve into the methodology, results, and implications of our findings, unearthing the chillingly compelling convergence of 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes. So, buckle up and don your metaphorical parka as we embark on this scientific escapade through the snowdrifts of statistics and whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos revealed a striking connection with a correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 and an r-squared of 0.8705201, both indicative of a robust relationship. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of this correlation, suggesting that the likelihood of this association being due to random chance is akin to finding a snowball in the desert.
This frosty correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, where the scatterplot showcases the close alignment between the two variables, akin to the parallel dance of snowflakes in a blizzard. The densely clustered points on the plot resemble icy crystals, forming a pattern that chills the skepticism of even the most ardent statistical critics.
The strength of this correlation raises eyebrows as much as it raises goosebumps. It prompts contemplation on the potential underlying mechanisms that could explain this unexpected alliance. One might be tempted to exclaim, "Have we stumbled upon the Holy Grail of statistical sociology, where the submersion into frigid waters and the appreciation of historical narratives converge in a symphony of statistical significance?" It is indeed a tantalizing thought.
However, as with any scientific discovery, it is paramount to temper enthusiasm with caution. While the correlation is noteworthy, it is vital to remember that correlation does not equate to causation. It may be tempting to leap to the conclusion that soaking in ice baths directly leads to an increased fondness for historical content, but such assertions must be tread upon as delicately as one would tiptoe across a frozen pond in spring.
Nonetheless, the chilling correlation between 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes provides a frigid foundation for future investigations, sparking contemplation that is as refreshing as an Arctic breeze. This correlation invites pondering whether there exists a communal desire to cool off, both physically and mentally. It beckons further study to unravel the intricate web of influences that shape our digital behaviors, much like unravelling the myriad layers of winter clothing on a particularly chilly day.
In conclusion, this exploration of the fascinating connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos not only sheds light on the unexpected interplay of these variables but also underscores the invigorating delight of uncovering serendipitous correlations in the realm of data analysis. As we thaw out from this chill-inducing revelation, it is with great anticipation that we look towards future inquiries that may further elucidate the nuances of this frosty fusion of interests.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our exploration of the captivating convergence of Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos has left us feeling as invigorated as a dip in a frigid arctic pool. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared values, akin to the steady grip of ice on the ground in winter, have provided compelling evidence of a frosty relationship that transcends the realms of wellness and historical edutainment. The p-value, much like a snowball in the desert, further solidifies the significance, leaving little room for skepticism as dense as a blizzard.

Our findings, as refreshing as an Arctic breeze, prompt contemplation on the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices, much like marveling at the intricate patterns of frost on a windowpane. However, caution must be exercised in leaping to conclusions, as correlation does not imply causation - a lesson as essential as wearing a coat in sub-zero temperatures.

As we bask in the glow of this unexpected connection, it is with a twinkle in our eyes that we assert – no further research on this frosty fusion is needed. The data we have uncovered is as chilly and compelling as it can get. So, let us bid ado to this chilly escapade and turn our attention to newer, warmer realms of inquiry, leaving this peculiar correlation to linger like the echoes of a frosty, half-forgotten winter's tale.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Modern Iceology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Digital Diversions and Polar Plunges


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Chilled Correlations: Captivating Convergence of Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube Videos with an abstract of This paper presents the surprising correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos. Utilizing data from Google Trends and YouTube, we examined the period from 2012 to 2023, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9330167 with p < 0.01.
Our analysis unearthed a frosty relationship between the popularity of ice baths and the engagement with historical content, indicating a potential connection between the need to cool off and the appreciation for enriched storytelling. The findings delve into the intriguing dynamics of online trends, providing a refreshing insight into the seemingly disparate realms of wellness and historical edutainment.
While causation cannot be determined from a singular study, the chilling correlation prompts further investigation into the whimsical interplay of popular culture and wellness practices. As researchers, we remain buoyantly optimistic that this frosty fusion of data will invite new perspectives and perhaps even thaw future lines of inquiry within the academic community.

ChatGPT:

Google searches, 'ice bath', Extra History YouTube videos, correlation, engagement, historical content, data analysis, online trends, popular culture, wellness practices, academic research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'ice bath'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'ice bath' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'ice bath'

The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9330167 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8705201 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'ice bath') over the 12 years from 2012 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.5E-6. 0.0000094835784695855010000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.00095% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 105,445 random variables You don't actually need 105 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'ice bath' (Rel. search volume)17.166717.51919.916720.333320.916721.833323.523.7527.083338.333386.2
The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos (Average likes)1063813226.710936.416094.11948926674.919539.816313.213987.514691.622391.156916.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17.1667,17.5,19,19.9167,20.3333,20.9167,21.8333,23.5,23.75,27.0833,38.3333,86.2,])
array_2 = np.array([10638,13226.7,10936.4,16094.1,19489,26674.9,19539.8,16313.2,13987.5,14691.6,22391.1,56916.7,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'ice bath'"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 5396 · Black Variable ID: 1408 · Red Variable ID: 25776
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0