Download png, svg

AI explanation

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an eerie image showing the juxtaposition of a stark futuristic concept and ancient tribal elements. In the foreground, a simmering biomass power plant looms ominously, its metallic structures casting long, creeping shadows over the desert landscape of Arizona. At the same time, nestled within the twisted metal framework, a forbidding figure stands, draped in traditional tribal attire. The scene is infused with an unsettling sense of contrast, as the figure's face is obscured in shadow, hinting at a deep, unknowable power emanating from the connection between ancient and modern energy influences. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

---

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Biomass power generated in Uganda. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Symbolism Macabre Celtic art Macabre
ChatGPT: Macabre

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Biomass power generated in Uganda, in the following situation: As more people in Arizona voted for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, it created a ripple effect of embracing non-traditional options. This led to a surge in support for alternative energy sources. In an unexpected turn of events, this newfound interest in liberty and independence resonated all the way to Uganda, inspiring greater investment in biomass power generation. It's like the butterfly effect, but with a political twist and a biomass bonanza. Who knew that the road to energy abundance could be intertwined with the political landscape of Arizona!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Arizona, an increasing number of citizens proudly cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, embracing a shift towards non-traditional options. This momentum sparked a surge in support for alternative energy sources, leading to a vibrant wave of interest in biomass power generation. Meanwhile, across the globe in Uganda, this newfound sense of liberty echoed, inspiring greater investment in the development of biomass power, creating a web of interconnected energy abundance and political influence.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Macabre ] and depicting this scene: In Arizona, an increasing number of citizens proudly cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, embracing a shift towards non-traditional options. This momentum sparked a surge in support for alternative energy sources, leading to a vibrant wave of interest in biomass power generation. Meanwhile, across the globe in Uganda, this newfound sense of liberty echoed, inspiring greater investment in the development of biomass power, creating a web of interconnected energy abundance and political influence. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an eerie image showing the juxtaposition of a stark futuristic concept and ancient tribal elements. In the foreground, a simmering biomass power plant looms ominously, its metallic structures casting long, creeping shadows over the desert landscape of Arizona. At the same time, nestled within the twisted metal framework, a forbidding figure stands, draped in traditional tribal attire. The scene is infused with an unsettling sense of contrast, as the figure's face is obscured in shadow, hinting at a deep, unknowable power emanating from the connection between ancient and modern energy influences.

---

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

AI academic paper

From Libertarian Votes in Arizona to Biomass Might in Uganda: A Correlation That Leaves Us in Stitches The International Journal of Whimsical Correlations Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

Problem variable:	Which variable has a problem? Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona Biomass power generated in Uganda Neither / both
Issue:	What is the issue? The data is incorrect The chart isn't displaying properly There is a typo The source link is incorrect A calculation is wrong Something else
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human:

Data details

Why this works

1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
   no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
   p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.

Try it yourself

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.376954,0.589093,0.547423,1.39611,4.13215,1.51934,])
array_2 = np.array([0.03,0.047,0.11,0.16,0.363,0.188,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Uganda"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

• High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
  
  If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
  
  Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
  
• High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
• Alternative high resolution line chart
• Scatterplot
• Portable line chart (png)
• Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
• Line chart for only Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona
• Line chart for only Biomass power generated in Uganda
• AI-generated correlation image
• The spurious research paper: From Libertarian Votes in Arizona to Biomass Might in Uganda: A Correlation That Leaves Us in Stitches