about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,268 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the second variable is Solar power generated in Estonia.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The photons of knowledge emitted by his science videos were inadvertently boosting the efficiency of solar panels in Estonia. It's like the sunlight was getting a pep talk on how to be more electrifying!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyber folk scene featuring science communicator Steve Mould. Show him standing in a field of glowing solar panels in the Estonian countryside, smiling as he holds a clipboard labeled "Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos." The bright orange sun in the sky looks energized, and small speech bubbles with science symbols are floating from the videos to the panels, infusing them with extra brightness. The sunlight itself looks charged up and illuminated, as if it had just received a boost of knowledge and inspiration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Cute 2D animation Celtic art Symbolism Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia, in the following situation: The photons of knowledge emitted by his science videos were inadvertently boosting the efficiency of solar panels in Estonia. It's like the sunlight was getting a pep talk on how to be more electrifying!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see Steve Mould standing in front of a bright orange sun, holding a clipboard labeled "Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos" with a big smile on his face. Around him, solar panels in the Estonian countryside are glowing with extra brightness, and small speech bubbles with science symbols are floating from the videos to the panels. The sunlight looks energized and charged up, as if it had just received a boost of knowledge and inspiration.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see Steve Mould standing in front of a bright orange sun, holding a clipboard labeled "Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos" with a big smile on his face. Around him, solar panels in the Estonian countryside are glowing with extra brightness, and small speech bubbles with science symbols are floating from the videos to the panels. The sunlight looks energized and charged up, as if it had just received a boost of knowledge and inspiration. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyber folk scene featuring science communicator Steve Mould. Show him standing in a field of glowing solar panels in the Estonian countryside, smiling as he holds a clipboard labeled "Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos." The bright orange sun in the sky looks energized, and small speech bubbles with science symbols are floating from the videos to the panels, infusing them with extra brightness. The sunlight itself looks charged up and illuminated, as if it had just received a boost of knowledge and inspiration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos caused Solar power generated in Estonia to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power

Journal of Rhyming Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, as researchers seek to uncover hidden connections and shed light on unexpected relationships. In this study, we embark on a whimsical quest to investigate the peculiar correlation between the average views of Steve Mould's fascinating YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the enchanting land of Estonia.

As we unravel the data, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It appears that Steve's videos are not only generating views but also sparking a solar surprise in Estonia. Looks like he's a 'sunsational' hit in more ways than one!"

The framework of this study rests upon the premise that serendipitous discoveries often arise from the most unlikely pairings. Our investigation delves into the realms of popular science communication and renewable energy production, seeking to uncover any discernible pattern between the two disparate domains.

Amidst the scientific mirth, we introduce the key statistical measures that underpin our analysis. Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01, affirming a robust and statistically significant relationship between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam. This finding prompts us to wonder whether there is a direct causative link or if both phenomena are merely basking in the glow of statistical coincidence.

In the pursuit of scientific truth, we certainly encountered a few comedic detours, but our commitment to uncovering empirical evidence remained steadfast. As we unveil the surprising connection between Steve's online presence and Estonia's solar prowess, we invite fellow researchers to share in the delight of uncovering unexpected scientific relationships and to appreciate the humorous interplay between data-driven inquiry and genuine curiosity.

And remember, when it comes to surprising scientific connections, don't be afraid to let your inner dad joke shine – after all, it may just be the key to unlocking the next breakthrough.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, as researchers seek to uncover hidden connections and shed light on unexpected relationships. In this study, we embark on a whimsical quest to investigate the peculiar correlation between the average views of Steve Mould's fascinating YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the enchanting land of Estonia.
As we unravel the data, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It appears that Steve's videos are not only generating views but also sparking a solar surprise in Estonia. Looks like he's a 'sunsational' hit in more ways than one!"
The framework of this study rests upon the premise that serendipitous discoveries often arise from the most unlikely pairings. Our investigation delves into the realms of popular science communication and renewable energy production, seeking to uncover any discernible pattern between the two disparate domains.
Amidst the scientific mirth, we introduce the key statistical measures that underpin our analysis. Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01, affirming a robust and statistically significant relationship between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam. This finding prompts us to wonder whether there is a direct causative link or if both phenomena are merely basking in the glow of statistical coincidence.
In the pursuit of scientific truth, we certainly encountered a few comedic detours, but our commitment to uncovering empirical evidence remained steadfast. As we unveil the surprising connection between Steve's online presence and Estonia's solar prowess, we invite fellow researchers to share in the delight of uncovering unexpected scientific relationships and to appreciate the humorous interplay between data-driven inquiry and genuine curiosity.
And remember, when it comes to surprising scientific connections, don't be afraid to let your inner dad joke shine – after all, it may just be the key to unlocking the next breakthrough.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis on the role of YouTube in science communication, highlighting the increasing influence of online platforms in engaging and educating audiences. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the potential for renewable energy development in the Baltic region, focusing on Estonia as a case study for solar power generation.

But hold on to your lab coats, because our literature review is about to take a turn for the unexpected. Let's not forget about the enlightening insights from "The Solar Cell Handbook" and "YouTube for Dummies" that delve into solar power technology and digital content creation, respectively. These authoritative tomes might not seem like an obvious pair, but stay with us – we're about to blur the lines between scholarly pursuits and popular culture.

In a fictional world not so far away, "Solar Energy Secrets" and "The Science of Viral Videos" offer an intriguing blend of fact and fiction, weaving tales of renewable energy breakthroughs and YouTube superstardom. Who says academic literature can't have a bit of whimsy?

As we venture into the realm of social media, a tweet from @SolarScienceEstonia catches our eye: "Did anyone else notice a spike in solar power output whenever Steve Mould releases a new video? Talk about a shockingly bright correlation!" The plot thickens, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted waters of scientific inquiry and internet stardom.

In a series of Instagram posts by @SteveMouldScience, we stumble upon a caption that reads, "Soaking up the sun in Estonia! Coincidence, or cosmic connection?" Ah, the puns are strong with this one. It seems that even social media is abuzz with the unexpected synergy between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam.

Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming of dry academic prose. But first, a dad joke: "It looks like Steve's videos are not just illuminating minds, but also energizing solar panels. Who knew he had the 'power' to brighten up renewable energy trends? Stay tuned for more shocking revelations, folks!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, as researchers seek to uncover hidden connections and shed light on unexpected relationships. In this study, we embark on a whimsical quest to investigate the peculiar correlation between the average views of Steve Mould's fascinating YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the enchanting land of Estonia.
As we unravel the data, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It appears that Steve's videos are not only generating views but also sparking a solar surprise in Estonia. Looks like he's a 'sunsational' hit in more ways than one!"
The framework of this study rests upon the premise that serendipitous discoveries often arise from the most unlikely pairings. Our investigation delves into the realms of popular science communication and renewable energy production, seeking to uncover any discernible pattern between the two disparate domains.
Amidst the scientific mirth, we introduce the key statistical measures that underpin our analysis. Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01, affirming a robust and statistically significant relationship between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam. This finding prompts us to wonder whether there is a direct causative link or if both phenomena are merely basking in the glow of statistical coincidence.
In the pursuit of scientific truth, we certainly encountered a few comedic detours, but our commitment to uncovering empirical evidence remained steadfast. As we unveil the surprising connection between Steve's online presence and Estonia's solar prowess, we invite fellow researchers to share in the delight of uncovering unexpected scientific relationships and to appreciate the humorous interplay between data-driven inquiry and genuine curiosity.
And remember, when it comes to surprising scientific connections, don't be afraid to let your inner dad joke shine – after all, it may just be the key to unlocking the next breakthrough.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To illuminate the whimsical connection between the average views of Steve Mould's delightful YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the picturesque land of Estonia, our research team embarked on an unconventional yet amusingly rigorous methodological journey. As we delved into the depths of data collection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "We approached this study with a sunny disposition, ready to bask in the statistical glow of YouTube views and solar rays."

First and foremost, our data collection efforts revolved around harnessing the vast expanse of information available on the internet. We diligently scoured YouTube analytics to gather comprehensive data on the average views of Steve Mould's science demonstrations, eager to uncover any unforeseen parallels between online viewership and solar energy generation. Additionally, we ventured into the domains of renewable resource databases, drawing upon the Energy Information Administration's wealth of knowledge to capture the ebbs and flows of solar power production in Estonia.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry seasoned with a dash of levity, our research methods meandered through the digital wilderness in pursuit of the elusive yet enchanting link between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam. We employed a blend of quantitative analyses and qualitative musings, embracing a multidisciplinary approach reminiscent of a scientific variety show. Each dataset was pored over with a mix of precision and playfulness, ensuring that our investigation reflected both scholarly rigor and the spirit of scientific adventure.

As we navigated the sometimes circuitous path of data analysis, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "We certainly faced some 'solar flares' of statistical complexity along the way, but our determination to uncover the secrets of this unlikely relationship remained steadfast."

The time frame for our analysis spanned from 2009 to 2021, encompassing a rich tapestry of Steve's engaging content and Estonia's solar energy triumphs. Through a blend of correlation analyses, regression modeling, and the occasional lighthearted quip, we sought to uncover the often-overlooked connections that enliven the field of scientific inquiry.

In the hallowed tradition of daring scientific endeavors, our methodology encapsulated not only the empirical rigor necessary for uncovering hidden relationships but also the irrepressible spirit of discovery that drives us to explore the world with unbounded curiosity. Indeed, no stone was left unturned, no data point unexamined, and no dad joke withheld in our quest to shed light on the unexpected partnership between Steve's online presence and Estonia's solar vitality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9750285, r-squared of 0.9506807, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, as researchers seek to uncover hidden connections and shed light on unexpected relationships. In this study, we embark on a whimsical quest to investigate the peculiar correlation between the average views of Steve Mould's fascinating YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the enchanting land of Estonia.
As we unravel the data, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It appears that Steve's videos are not only generating views but also sparking a solar surprise in Estonia. Looks like he's a 'sunsational' hit in more ways than one!"
The framework of this study rests upon the premise that serendipitous discoveries often arise from the most unlikely pairings. Our investigation delves into the realms of popular science communication and renewable energy production, seeking to uncover any discernible pattern between the two disparate domains.
Amidst the scientific mirth, we introduce the key statistical measures that underpin our analysis. Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01, affirming a robust and statistically significant relationship between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam. This finding prompts us to wonder whether there is a direct causative link or if both phenomena are merely basking in the glow of statistical coincidence.
In the pursuit of scientific truth, we certainly encountered a few comedic detours, but our commitment to uncovering empirical evidence remained steadfast. As we unveil the surprising connection between Steve's online presence and Estonia's solar prowess, we invite fellow researchers to share in the delight of uncovering unexpected scientific relationships and to appreciate the humorous interplay between data-driven inquiry and genuine curiosity.
And remember, when it comes to surprising scientific connections, don't be afraid to let your inner dad joke shine – after all, it may just be the key to unlocking the next breakthrough.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in Estonia. This correlation implies that there is a strong relationship between Steve's captivating science demonstrations and the renewable energy production in Estonia. One might say that it's a "sonny" relationship indeed!

A pun definitely couldn't hurt, so here's one: "Looks like Steve's videos aren't just capturing viewers' interest, but also harnessing the power of the sun – talk about a 'solar' success story!"

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9506807 indicates that approximately 95% of the variability in solar power generated in Estonia can be explained by the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos. It's as if Steve's online presence has become a solar-powered amplifier for renewable energy awareness.

As demonstrated in Fig. 1 (not included here, but trust us, it's a stellar scatterplot), the scatterplot visually affirms the strong positive relationship between the two variables. Each point in the scatterplot seems to exclaim, "Let's shed some light on this correlation!"

In essence, our findings suggest that there is an intriguing and statistically robust connection between online viewership of science content and solar power generation, opening up a sunny avenue for further exploration and future research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis on the role of YouTube in science communication, highlighting the increasing influence of online platforms in engaging and educating audiences. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the potential for renewable energy development in the Baltic region, focusing on Estonia as a case study for solar power generation.
But hold on to your lab coats, because our literature review is about to take a turn for the unexpected. Let's not forget about the enlightening insights from "The Solar Cell Handbook" and "YouTube for Dummies" that delve into solar power technology and digital content creation, respectively. These authoritative tomes might not seem like an obvious pair, but stay with us – we're about to blur the lines between scholarly pursuits and popular culture.
In a fictional world not so far away, "Solar Energy Secrets" and "The Science of Viral Videos" offer an intriguing blend of fact and fiction, weaving tales of renewable energy breakthroughs and YouTube superstardom. Who says academic literature can't have a bit of whimsy?
As we venture into the realm of social media, a tweet from @SolarScienceEstonia catches our eye: "Did anyone else notice a spike in solar power output whenever Steve Mould releases a new video? Talk about a shockingly bright correlation!" The plot thickens, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted waters of scientific inquiry and internet stardom.
In a series of Instagram posts by @SteveMouldScience, we stumble upon a caption that reads, "Soaking up the sun in Estonia! Coincidence, or cosmic connection?" Ah, the puns are strong with this one. It seems that even social media is abuzz with the unexpected synergy between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming of dry academic prose. But first, a dad joke: "It looks like Steve's videos are not just illuminating minds, but also energizing solar panels. Who knew he had the 'power' to brighten up renewable energy trends? Stay tuned for more shocking revelations, folks!"

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in Estonia. This correlation implies that there is a strong relationship between Steve's captivating science demonstrations and the renewable energy production in Estonia. One might say that it's a "sonny" relationship indeed!
A pun definitely couldn't hurt, so here's one: "Looks like Steve's videos aren't just capturing viewers' interest, but also harnessing the power of the sun – talk about a 'solar' success story!"
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9506807 indicates that approximately 95% of the variability in solar power generated in Estonia can be explained by the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos. It's as if Steve's online presence has become a solar-powered amplifier for renewable energy awareness.
As demonstrated in Fig. 1 (not included here, but trust us, it's a stellar scatterplot), the scatterplot visually affirms the strong positive relationship between the two variables. Each point in the scatterplot seems to exclaim, "Let's shed some light on this correlation!"
In essence, our findings suggest that there is an intriguing and statistically robust connection between online viewership of science content and solar power generation, opening up a sunny avenue for further exploration and future research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in Estonia confirms the unexpected yet robust relationship we uncovered. It seems that Steve's science demonstrations are not just enlightening minds but also brightening up Estonia's solar power production. One might say that he's creating a real "solar flare" in the renewable energy arena.

Our findings not only corroborate the work of Smith (2015) in emphasizing the influential role of online platforms in science communication but also align with the insights of Doe and Jones (2018) regarding the potential for renewable energy development in Estonia. Who would have thought that Estonia's solar power generation could be so deeply intertwined with a YouTube science communicator's screen time? It's a case of "sunsational synchronicity," indeed!

The r-squared value of 0.9506807 further supports the robustness of the relationship, indicating that approximately 95% of the variability in solar power generation in Estonia can be attributed to the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos. This suggests that Steve's online presence is not just a flash in the pan – it's a veritable "solar-powered success story!"

Our findings open up a Pandora's box of possibilities for interdisciplinary research, bridging the worlds of digital content creation, science communication, and renewable energy development. It seems that the "son'spectacular energy relationship" we uncovered is not just a statistical curiosity but a powerful example of the unforeseen connections that can arise in the world of data analysis. Who knew that statistical analysis could lead to such "sonny" discoveries?

In conclusion, our research unveils a bright and unexpected relationship between online viewership of science content and solar power generation. As we bask in the glow of these findings, we are left to ponder the broader implications of this connection and the potential for future research to further illuminate this "sonny" relationship. It's clear that the sun hasn't set on the unexpected connections we can uncover through data analysis – in fact, it's just the beginning of a "sonny" new dawn in interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos and Solar power generated in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.

Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.

As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"

This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, as researchers seek to uncover hidden connections and shed light on unexpected relationships. In this study, we embark on a whimsical quest to investigate the peculiar correlation between the average views of Steve Mould's fascinating YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the enchanting land of Estonia.
As we unravel the data, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It appears that Steve's videos are not only generating views but also sparking a solar surprise in Estonia. Looks like he's a 'sunsational' hit in more ways than one!"
The framework of this study rests upon the premise that serendipitous discoveries often arise from the most unlikely pairings. Our investigation delves into the realms of popular science communication and renewable energy production, seeking to uncover any discernible pattern between the two disparate domains.
Amidst the scientific mirth, we introduce the key statistical measures that underpin our analysis. Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01, affirming a robust and statistically significant relationship between Steve's screen time and Estonia's sunbeam. This finding prompts us to wonder whether there is a direct causative link or if both phenomena are merely basking in the glow of statistical coincidence.
In the pursuit of scientific truth, we certainly encountered a few comedic detours, but our commitment to uncovering empirical evidence remained steadfast. As we unveil the surprising connection between Steve's online presence and Estonia's solar prowess, we invite fellow researchers to share in the delight of uncovering unexpected scientific relationships and to appreciate the humorous interplay between data-driven inquiry and genuine curiosity.
And remember, when it comes to surprising scientific connections, don't be afraid to let your inner dad joke shine – after all, it may just be the key to unlocking the next breakthrough.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in Estonia. This correlation implies that there is a strong relationship between Steve's captivating science demonstrations and the renewable energy production in Estonia. One might say that it's a "sonny" relationship indeed!
A pun definitely couldn't hurt, so here's one: "Looks like Steve's videos aren't just capturing viewers' interest, but also harnessing the power of the sun – talk about a 'solar' success story!"
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9506807 indicates that approximately 95% of the variability in solar power generated in Estonia can be explained by the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos. It's as if Steve's online presence has become a solar-powered amplifier for renewable energy awareness.
As demonstrated in Fig. 1 (not included here, but trust us, it's a stellar scatterplot), the scatterplot visually affirms the strong positive relationship between the two variables. Each point in the scatterplot seems to exclaim, "Let's shed some light on this correlation!"
In essence, our findings suggest that there is an intriguing and statistically robust connection between online viewership of science content and solar power generation, opening up a sunny avenue for further exploration and future research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research illuminates a sunny side to the world of science communication and renewable energy production. The striking correlation we uncovered between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in Estonia suggests a compelling link between online engagement with popular science and the advancement of sustainable energy sources. It's like Steve's videos are acting as a solar-powered beacon, guiding Estonia's energy future!

While we're basking in the glow of these findings, let's not forget to don our shades and reflect on the implications. This delightful connection between online viewership and solar power generation could pave the way for innovative strategies to promote renewable energy awareness. Perhaps it's time for other science YouTubers to join the solar "panel" and harness the power of engaging content to brighten our planet's renewable energy outlook.

As we stand under the sun's rays of discovery, we find ourselves compelled to share one last dad joke: "It appears that Steve's videos have truly sparked a 'solar revolution' in Estonia—talk about a 'sunsational' impact!"

In light of our research, it's crystal clear that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to turn off the solar-powered statistical calculators and shine a light on new scientific frontiers!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Rhyming Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Silly Science Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Steve's Screen Time and Estonia's Sunbeam: A Rhyme Time Connection Between YouTube Views and Solar Power with an abstract of In this study, we humorously delve into the relationship between the average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the solar power generated in the charming country of Estonia. Utilizing data from sources as disparate as YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to explore the unlikely link between online viewership and renewable energy production.
Our research team unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9750285 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning from 2009 to 2021. This indicates a strikingly strong connection between the two variables, leaving us to ponder whether Steve's captivating science demonstrations hold the key to unlocking solar energy potential or if Estonians have simply taken to watching his videos under the sun.
As we reveal our findings, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "It seems Steve's enlightening content is truly shedding light on Estonia's solar power generation. Perhaps we should dub this the 'son'spectacular energy relationship'!"
This study not only sheds light on a hitherto overlooked phenomenon but also demonstrates the potential for unconventional data sources to illuminate unexpected connections in the world around us.

ChatGPT:

Steve Mould, YouTube views, solar power, Estonia, renewable energy, correlation coefficient, data analysis, unconventional data sources, science demonstrations, Energy Information Administration, solar energy potential, humor in research, unexpected connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of Steve Mould YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos

Solar power generated in Estonia
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Estonia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Estonia

Correlation r = 0.9750285 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9506807 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Estonia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-8. 0.0000000155684377838961500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 64,232,521 random variables You don't actually need 64 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos (Average views)27994.552208.2262030562564291833199308526052656656496168189922015303204664220
Solar power generated in Estonia (Billion kWh)0.00010.00010.00020.00030.0010.0030.0060.0096770.0144910.0308020.07350.1230.305




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27994.5,52208.2,26203,0,562564,291833,199308,526052,656656,496168,1899220,1530320,4664220,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0001,0.0001,0.0002,0.0003,0.001,0.003,0.006,0.009677,0.014491,0.030802,0.0735,0.123,0.305,])
array_1_name = "Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Estonia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5268 · Black Variable ID: 25528 · Red Variable ID: 23656
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0