Report an error
Solar power generated in Estonia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=0.99 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Advanced Micro Devices' stock price (AMD) | r=0.99 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Average views of Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
The number of marketing managers in Wyoming | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
Air pollution in Duluth | r=0.89 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Estonia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)