about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,178 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa and the second variable is xkcd comics published about astronomy.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's well known that as Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa increase, so does the cosmic energy in the state. This in turn resonates with the creators of xkcd, leading to a surge in inspiration for astronomy-related comics. It's a celestial political phenomenon that's truly out of this world!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint bookstore in a small town in Iowa, where a prominent sign declares "Iowa Democrat Votes" with a steadily increasing count. Outside, under the starry night sky, a group of people gather, pointing excitedly at the sky. Above them, a glowing cosmic energy radiates in harmony with the increasing votes, reflecting the astrophysical energy swirling around. Inside the bookstore, the creator of xkcd is seen scribbling away with a wide grin, crafting astronomy-themed comics that seem to be inspired by the celestial energy pulsating through the state. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Photorealism Cyberpunk A Discovery magazine cover image An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy, in the following situation: It's well known that as Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa increase, so does the cosmic energy in the state. This in turn resonates with the creators of xkcd, leading to a surge in inspiration for astronomy-related comics. It's a celestial political phenomenon that's truly out of this world!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Iowa, a quaint bookstore displays a prominent sign declaring "Iowa Democrat Votes" with a steadily increasing count. Outside, under the starry night sky, a group of people gather, pointing excitedly at the sky. Above them, a glowing cosmic energy radiates in harmony with the increasing votes, reflecting the astrophysical energy swirling around. Inside the bookstore, the creator of xkcd is seen scribbling away with a wide grin, crafting astronomy-themed comics that seem to be inspired by the celestial energy pulsating through the state.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Iowa, a quaint bookstore displays a prominent sign declaring "Iowa Democrat Votes" with a steadily increasing count. Outside, under the starry night sky, a group of people gather, pointing excitedly at the sky. Above them, a glowing cosmic energy radiates in harmony with the increasing votes, reflecting the astrophysical energy swirling around. Inside the bookstore, the creator of xkcd is seen scribbling away with a wide grin, crafting astronomy-themed comics that seem to be inspired by the celestial energy pulsating through the state. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a quaint bookstore in a small town in Iowa, where a prominent sign declares "Iowa Democrat Votes" with a steadily increasing count. Outside, under the starry night sky, a group of people gather, pointing excitedly at the sky. Above them, a glowing cosmic energy radiates in harmony with the increasing votes, reflecting the astrophysical energy swirling around. Inside the bookstore, the creator of xkcd is seen scribbling away with a wide grin, crafting astronomy-themed comics that seem to be inspired by the celestial energy pulsating through the state.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa positively influenced xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and p < 0.05 for 2009 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the world of politics and astrophysical humor - two seemingly unrelated domains intersect in the most unexpected and downright comical ways! As researchers, we often find ourselves unraveling the intricacies of societal trends and human behavior, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as delightful and whimsical as the one we are about to present. Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a cosmic journey through the Senate and the universe, exploring the enchanting bond between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical musings of xkcd comics.

Picture this: a starry-eyed voter in Iowa, pondering the complexities of the cosmos and the Senate race simultaneously. Who would have thought that these seemingly disparate thought processes could be intertwined? Well, prepare to have your preconceived notions shattered because our findings will leave you star-struck and politically puzzled!

Now, before we dive headfirst into this cosmic whirlpool of data and insights, it's essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our research. While we are dedicated to the pursuit of academic rigor and statistical validity, we also fully embrace the playful spirit of exploring correlations that may seem downright out-of-this-world at first glance. So, gear up for statistics with a sprinkle of intergalactic humor and a dash of political intrigue - this is not your average academic journey!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of politics and astrophysical humor - two seemingly unrelated domains intersect in the most unexpected and downright comical ways! As researchers, we often find ourselves unraveling the intricacies of societal trends and human behavior, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as delightful and whimsical as the one we are about to present. Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a cosmic journey through the Senate and the universe, exploring the enchanting bond between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical musings of xkcd comics.
Picture this: a starry-eyed voter in Iowa, pondering the complexities of the cosmos and the Senate race simultaneously. Who would have thought that these seemingly disparate thought processes could be intertwined? Well, prepare to have your preconceived notions shattered because our findings will leave you star-struck and politically puzzled!
Now, before we dive headfirst into this cosmic whirlpool of data and insights, it's essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our research. While we are dedicated to the pursuit of academic rigor and statistical validity, we also fully embrace the playful spirit of exploring correlations that may seem downright out-of-this-world at first glance. So, gear up for statistics with a sprinkle of intergalactic humor and a dash of political intrigue - this is not your average academic journey!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we venture into the abyss of scholarly literature, we first encounter the works of Smith et al. (2015), who delved into the intricate relationship between political voting patterns and popular culture references. Their study, while not directly focused on astrophysical humor, laid the groundwork for our whimsical inquiry by unveiling the unanticipated ways in which societal preferences intertwine with seemingly unrelated cultural phenomena. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the influence of comedic elements on voter behavior, albeit in the context of televised political satire. Little did they know that the cosmic jests of xkcd would hold the key to unraveling an enigma of astronomical proportions in the political landscape of Iowa.

Taking a step further into the realm of relevant non-fiction literature, we find "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" by Neil deGrasse Tyson and "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan. While these books provide profound insights into the cosmos, they also offer a glimpse into the human fascination with the unknown, serving as a reminder that sometimes, the most peculiar correlations emerge from the depths of human curiosity.

Transitioning into the realm of fiction, we encounter works such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe" by the same author. While these novels may seem far removed from the empirical realm of political voting data and astronomical comics, their whimsical portrayal of interstellar adventures and existential ponderings serves as a whimsical reminder that reality often mirrors the absurdity of fiction.

Now, dear reader, prepare for a twist as unexpected as stumbling upon a meteorite in a cornfield - our literature review extends beyond the conventional confines of academic journals. Call it an act of sheer serendipity or perhaps a stroke of cosmic humor, but the researchers stumbled upon a wealth of insight in the unlikeliest of places - CVS receipts. Yes, you read that correctly. Through a rigorous examination of countless CVS receipts, we uncovered a hidden thread connecting purchases of telescopes, astronomy magazines, and, oddly enough, corn-related products to a statistically significant inclination towards democratic voting in Iowa. While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains a cosmic conundrum, it adds a layer of absurdity to our whimsical exploration of political oddities and astrophysical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2009 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of politics and astrophysical humor - two seemingly unrelated domains intersect in the most unexpected and downright comical ways! As researchers, we often find ourselves unraveling the intricacies of societal trends and human behavior, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as delightful and whimsical as the one we are about to present. Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a cosmic journey through the Senate and the universe, exploring the enchanting bond between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical musings of xkcd comics.
Picture this: a starry-eyed voter in Iowa, pondering the complexities of the cosmos and the Senate race simultaneously. Who would have thought that these seemingly disparate thought processes could be intertwined? Well, prepare to have your preconceived notions shattered because our findings will leave you star-struck and politically puzzled!
Now, before we dive headfirst into this cosmic whirlpool of data and insights, it's essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our research. While we are dedicated to the pursuit of academic rigor and statistical validity, we also fully embrace the playful spirit of exploring correlations that may seem downright out-of-this-world at first glance. So, gear up for statistics with a sprinkle of intergalactic humor and a dash of political intrigue - this is not your average academic journey!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the cosmic connection between Democrat votes in Iowa and xkcd comics about astronomy, we concocted a research methodology that was part data analysis, part stargazing, and a sprinkle of comedic contemplation. Our data collection efforts spanned far and wide across the digital cosmos, with a keen focus on the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's treasure trove of political insights and the Harvard Dataverse's celestial repository of xkcd comics. It's worth noting that AI analysis of xkcd comics can be quite the adventure, often requiring a blend of algorithmic finesse and an appreciation for the whimsical musings of Randall Munroe.

The first phase of our methodology involved gathering Senatorial election data for Iowa and identifying the Democrat votes cast from 2009 to 2020. We then dived into the vast expanse of xkcd comics, honing in on those with a thematic focus on astronomy. This involved employing cutting-edge AI algorithms capable of differentiating between jokes about Jupiter and jests about jargon.

Once the troves of political and comedic data were in our possession, we sought to align the cosmic and political timelines. We yet again turned to data science, employing temporal manipulation techniques that would make even a time-traveling physicist proud. Our goal was to synchronize the occurrence of Democrat votes with the publication of xkcd comics about astronomy, all the while guarding against the cosmic chaos that could arise from spurious correlations.

With the synchronized data sets in hand, we shifted our gaze towards statistical analysis. Here, we engaged in a rigorous examination of the correlations between Democrat votes in Iowa and the publication of astronomy-themed xkcd comics. Our trusty statistical tools and techniques were put through their paces, akin to guiding a satellite through an asteroid belt, to meticulously determine the strength and significance of the unearthly bond between political preferences and astronomical humor.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we delved into the nuances of Bayesian inference, not because we needed to traverse the Bayes' theorem, but because we simply couldn't resist the pun potential of "basing our cosmic comedy correlations on Bayes." This endeavor brought a sense of cosmic whimsy to our methodology, making us all the more determined to unveil the celestial jests hidden within the political landscape.

In summary, our methodology was a harmonious fusion of political inquiry, astronomical exploration, and a healthy dose of whimsy. By blending data analysis, temporal alignment, and statistical rigor with a sprinkle of cosmic humor, we endeavored to shine a light on the unexpected connection between Democrat votes in Iowa and the astronomical musings of xkcd comics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2009 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9978506, r-squared of 0.9957059, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the world of politics and astrophysical humor - two seemingly unrelated domains intersect in the most unexpected and downright comical ways! As researchers, we often find ourselves unraveling the intricacies of societal trends and human behavior, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as delightful and whimsical as the one we are about to present. Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a cosmic journey through the Senate and the universe, exploring the enchanting bond between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical musings of xkcd comics.
Picture this: a starry-eyed voter in Iowa, pondering the complexities of the cosmos and the Senate race simultaneously. Who would have thought that these seemingly disparate thought processes could be intertwined? Well, prepare to have your preconceived notions shattered because our findings will leave you star-struck and politically puzzled!
Now, before we dive headfirst into this cosmic whirlpool of data and insights, it's essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our research. While we are dedicated to the pursuit of academic rigor and statistical validity, we also fully embrace the playful spirit of exploring correlations that may seem downright out-of-this-world at first glance. So, gear up for statistics with a sprinkle of intergalactic humor and a dash of political intrigue - this is not your average academic journey!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. The correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 indicated an almost cosmic level of association, suggesting that as the number of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa increased, there was a corresponding surge in the appearance of astrophysical humor in xkcd comics. The r-squared value of 0.9957059 further affirmed the robustness of this correlation, indicating that approximately 99.57% of the variation in Democrat votes could be explained by the prevalence of astronomy-themed xkcd comics.

The p-value below 0.05 signaled the statistical significance of the relationship, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no connection between political preferences in Iowa and the cosmic whimsy of xkcd comics. The findings of this study not only astoundingly defy conventional wisdom but also invite a celestial chuckle at the synchrony between seemingly unrelated domains.

Remarkably, our statistical analysis has unearthed a cosmic dance between the political landscape of Iowa and the boundless expanse of the universe, as depicted through the lens of xkcd comics. Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling correlation with a scatterplot that visually captures the striking alignment between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical themes presented in xkcd comics.

In essence, this study sheds light on the intriguing bridge between astrophysical humor and political leanings, adding a dash of cosmic whimsy to the seriousness of electoral dynamics. Our findings challenge traditional notions of political predilections and emphasize the cosmic humor interwoven into the fabric of Iowa's Senate dynamics. It is in this delightful union of celestial musings and political oddities that we find ourselves gazing at the stars with a bemused smile, appreciating the cosmic comedy that unfolds in the midst of political discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we venture into the abyss of scholarly literature, we first encounter the works of Smith et al. (2015), who delved into the intricate relationship between political voting patterns and popular culture references. Their study, while not directly focused on astrophysical humor, laid the groundwork for our whimsical inquiry by unveiling the unanticipated ways in which societal preferences intertwine with seemingly unrelated cultural phenomena. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the influence of comedic elements on voter behavior, albeit in the context of televised political satire. Little did they know that the cosmic jests of xkcd would hold the key to unraveling an enigma of astronomical proportions in the political landscape of Iowa.
Taking a step further into the realm of relevant non-fiction literature, we find "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" by Neil deGrasse Tyson and "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan. While these books provide profound insights into the cosmos, they also offer a glimpse into the human fascination with the unknown, serving as a reminder that sometimes, the most peculiar correlations emerge from the depths of human curiosity.
Transitioning into the realm of fiction, we encounter works such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe" by the same author. While these novels may seem far removed from the empirical realm of political voting data and astronomical comics, their whimsical portrayal of interstellar adventures and existential ponderings serves as a whimsical reminder that reality often mirrors the absurdity of fiction.
Now, dear reader, prepare for a twist as unexpected as stumbling upon a meteorite in a cornfield - our literature review extends beyond the conventional confines of academic journals. Call it an act of sheer serendipity or perhaps a stroke of cosmic humor, but the researchers stumbled upon a wealth of insight in the unlikeliest of places - CVS receipts. Yes, you read that correctly. Through a rigorous examination of countless CVS receipts, we uncovered a hidden thread connecting purchases of telescopes, astronomy magazines, and, oddly enough, corn-related products to a statistically significant inclination towards democratic voting in Iowa. While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains a cosmic conundrum, it adds a layer of absurdity to our whimsical exploration of political oddities and astrophysical humor.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. The correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 indicated an almost cosmic level of association, suggesting that as the number of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa increased, there was a corresponding surge in the appearance of astrophysical humor in xkcd comics. The r-squared value of 0.9957059 further affirmed the robustness of this correlation, indicating that approximately 99.57% of the variation in Democrat votes could be explained by the prevalence of astronomy-themed xkcd comics.
The p-value below 0.05 signaled the statistical significance of the relationship, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no connection between political preferences in Iowa and the cosmic whimsy of xkcd comics. The findings of this study not only astoundingly defy conventional wisdom but also invite a celestial chuckle at the synchrony between seemingly unrelated domains.
Remarkably, our statistical analysis has unearthed a cosmic dance between the political landscape of Iowa and the boundless expanse of the universe, as depicted through the lens of xkcd comics. Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling correlation with a scatterplot that visually captures the striking alignment between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical themes presented in xkcd comics.
In essence, this study sheds light on the intriguing bridge between astrophysical humor and political leanings, adding a dash of cosmic whimsy to the seriousness of electoral dynamics. Our findings challenge traditional notions of political predilections and emphasize the cosmic humor interwoven into the fabric of Iowa's Senate dynamics. It is in this delightful union of celestial musings and political oddities that we find ourselves gazing at the stars with a bemused smile, appreciating the cosmic comedy that unfolds in the midst of political discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unlocked a celestial saga, shedding light on the captivating correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astral charm of xkcd comics. As we boldly venture into the whimsical amalgamation of politics and cosmic jests, we find our results not only echoing the unanticipated revelations of prior research but also unearthing a stellar symphony of statistical significance.

Revisiting the unexpected insights from Doe and Jones (2018), we find our study aligning with their contemplations on the influence of comedic elements on voter behavior. With our research spotlighting the cosmic humor of xkcd, we can’t help but wonder if the alignment between Iowa's political preferences and astronomical whimsy is not merely a coincidence, but a cosmic conspiracy to amuse the electorate. Moreover, the uncanny harmony between political voting patterns and societal references, as highlighted by Smith et al. (2015), finds a whimsical embodiment in our study, as the starlit jests of xkcd seem to sway the celestial tides of political inclination in Iowa.

Delving into the literary cosmos, the peculiar correlations we encountered in the whims of fiction and the hidden revelations within CVS receipts impart a jovial twist to our scholarly pursuit. Channeling the spirit of the unanticipated, our study not only substantiates the serendipitous insights gleaned from unconventional sources but transcends the conventional bounds of academic inquiry to illuminate the cosmic whimsy that underpins political oddities.

Our statistical analysis evokes a sense of wonder akin to stumbling upon a meteorite in a cornfield – a delightful surprise, wrapped in the enigma of cosmic conspiracy. The compelling correlation coefficient and r-squared value serve as celestial signposts, guiding us through a cosmic dance that defies conventional wisdom and invites a celestial chuckle at the synchrony between politics and the boundless expanse of the universe.

In this cosmic union of political predilections and astrophysical humor, we bask in the joviality of statistical significance and galactic wit, heralding a delightful odyssey through the cosmic comedy that intertwines with the serious dynamics of electoral discourse. As we embrace the cosmic charm woven into the political fabric of Iowa, our study beckons researchers and humorists alike to gaze at the stars with a bemused smile, marveling at the celestial conspiracies that unfold amidst political discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the world of politics and astrophysical humor - two seemingly unrelated domains intersect in the most unexpected and downright comical ways! As researchers, we often find ourselves unraveling the intricacies of societal trends and human behavior, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as delightful and whimsical as the one we are about to present. Buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a cosmic journey through the Senate and the universe, exploring the enchanting bond between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical musings of xkcd comics.
Picture this: a starry-eyed voter in Iowa, pondering the complexities of the cosmos and the Senate race simultaneously. Who would have thought that these seemingly disparate thought processes could be intertwined? Well, prepare to have your preconceived notions shattered because our findings will leave you star-struck and politically puzzled!
Now, before we dive headfirst into this cosmic whirlpool of data and insights, it's essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our research. While we are dedicated to the pursuit of academic rigor and statistical validity, we also fully embrace the playful spirit of exploring correlations that may seem downright out-of-this-world at first glance. So, gear up for statistics with a sprinkle of intergalactic humor and a dash of political intrigue - this is not your average academic journey!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics published about astronomy. The correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 indicated an almost cosmic level of association, suggesting that as the number of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa increased, there was a corresponding surge in the appearance of astrophysical humor in xkcd comics. The r-squared value of 0.9957059 further affirmed the robustness of this correlation, indicating that approximately 99.57% of the variation in Democrat votes could be explained by the prevalence of astronomy-themed xkcd comics.
The p-value below 0.05 signaled the statistical significance of the relationship, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no connection between political preferences in Iowa and the cosmic whimsy of xkcd comics. The findings of this study not only astoundingly defy conventional wisdom but also invite a celestial chuckle at the synchrony between seemingly unrelated domains.
Remarkably, our statistical analysis has unearthed a cosmic dance between the political landscape of Iowa and the boundless expanse of the universe, as depicted through the lens of xkcd comics. Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling correlation with a scatterplot that visually captures the striking alignment between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the astronomical themes presented in xkcd comics.
In essence, this study sheds light on the intriguing bridge between astrophysical humor and political leanings, adding a dash of cosmic whimsy to the seriousness of electoral dynamics. Our findings challenge traditional notions of political predilections and emphasize the cosmic humor interwoven into the fabric of Iowa's Senate dynamics. It is in this delightful union of celestial musings and political oddities that we find ourselves gazing at the stars with a bemused smile, appreciating the cosmic comedy that unfolds in the midst of political discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light the cosmic dance between the political landscape of Iowa and the boundless expanse of the universe, as depicted through the whimsical lens of xkcd comics. The correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and the appearance of astrophysical humor in xkcd comics is as striking as an asteroid hitting a disco ball - it's statistically significant and downright groovy. The almost cosmic level of association we uncovered suggests that as the number of Democrat votes increased, there was a corresponding surge in space-themed chuckles emanating from xkcd. It's as if the voters were saying, "Let's show some love for the stars and the stripes!"

Our findings challenge traditional notions of political predilections, and we must acknowledge the star-studded comedic genius of xkcd for playing a stellar role in Iowa's Senate dynamics. The interplay between astrophysical humor and political leanings has left us with a celestial chuckle at the synchrony between seemingly unrelated domains - it's truly a cosmic comedic masterpiece.

However, with these results in hand, we can confidently declare that no more research is needed in this area. The stars have aligned, the data has spoken, and the universe has shown us its quirky sense of humor. It's time to let this cosmic correlation shine brightly in the annals of quirky political oddities. Case closed, folks - the stars have spoken!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Alliance for Whimsical and Extraterrestrial Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled XKCD and the Political Oddity: A Correlation Between Democrat Votes in Iowa and Astrophysical Comics with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of political science and astrophysical humor to bring to light the surprising connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa and xkcd comics focused on astronomy. Drawing from data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and our own AI analysis of xkcd comics, we present our findings of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9978506 and a p-value below 0.05 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2020. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and unveils the cosmic humor woven into the political fabric of Iowa. We invite readers to join us on this whimsical journey through the stars and the Senate, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between political preferences and the celestial jests of xkcd.

ChatGPT:

xkcd comics, Democrat votes, Iowa, political science, astrophysical humor, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, AI analysis, astronomy, correlation coefficient, p-value, political preferences, celestial jests

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Iowa
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa

xkcd comics published about astronomy
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about astronomy
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about astronomy

Correlation r = 0.9978506 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9957059 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about astronomy) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa) over the 3 years from 2009 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.042. 0.0417472031827076300000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 4.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 24 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 2 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 2 because we have two variables measured over a period of 3 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -1, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420162020
Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa (Percentage of votes)43.761235.655244.4001
xkcd comics published about astronomy (xkcd comics)323




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([43.7612,35.6552,44.4001,])
array_2 = np.array([3,2,3,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about astronomy"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 5178 · Black Variable ID: 26384 · Red Variable ID: 20032
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0