about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,166 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad.  The chart goes from 1987 to 2002, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air in Central City cleared up, it also cleared the way for a decrease in demand for Liquefied Petroleum Gas, or LPG. This unexpected correlation can be attributed to the fact that as the pollution reduced, the citizens were no longer 'gasping' for clean air, leading to a 'propane' reduction in their reliance on LPG in their daily lives. It seems like the city's cleaner air not only did wonders for the environment but also had a 'knock-on effect', quite literally, on Chad's LPG usage!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a stark, geometric cityscape with towering concrete structures against a backdrop of a clear, radiant sky. Below, a bustling city center filled with people joyfully breathing in the fresh air. In the distance, a subtle indication of households in Chad transitioning away from LPG for cooking, perhaps represented by a change in the appearance of their homes. The scene evokes a sense of hope and progress as the city's air quality improves and positively impacts the lives of its inhabitants. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Futuristic Brutalism Pop art Scalar art
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad, in the following situation: As the air in Central City cleared up, it also cleared the way for a decrease in demand for Liquefied Petroleum Gas, or LPG. This unexpected correlation can be attributed to the fact that as the pollution reduced, the citizens were no longer 'gasping' for clean air, leading to a 'propane' reduction in their reliance on LPG in their daily lives. It seems like the city's cleaner air not only did wonders for the environment but also had a 'knock-on effect', quite literally, on Chad's LPG usage!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Central City, the sky clears as air pollution decreases. People happily breathe in the fresh air, while in Chad, fewer households are using LPG for cooking, as if the city's clearer air had a direct effect on it.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In Central City, the sky clears as air pollution decreases. People happily breathe in the fresh air, while in Chad, fewer households are using LPG for cooking, as if the city's clearer air had a direct effect on it. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a stark, geometric cityscape with towering concrete structures against a backdrop of a clear, radiant sky. Below, a bustling city center filled with people joyfully breathing in the fresh air. In the distance, a subtle indication of households in Chad transitioning away from LPG for cooking, perhaps represented by a change in the appearance of their homes. The scene evokes a sense of hope and progress as the city's air quality improves and positively impacts the lives of its inhabitants.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

The International Journal of Ecological Puzzles

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for 1987 to 2002.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Picture this: a cloud of air pollution in Kentucky making its way across the Atlantic and rendezvousing with Chad where people are firing up their LPG stoves. A bizarre and unlikely pair indeed, akin to a mismatched couple on a blind date set up by overzealous friends. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to uncover the peculiar connection between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in Chad. It's like trying to connect the dots between a fried chicken festival and a vegan expo – unexpected, yet strangely captivating.

When it comes to environmental factors, Central City, Kentucky, is infamous for its struggles with air pollution, while Chad, on the other side of the world, relies heavily on LPG for its cooking and heating needs. It’s like the odd couple of the Earth’s atmospheric theatre – the mismatched pair that nobody saw coming. As researchers, we couldn't resist the urge to delve into this enigmatic tango between pollutants and propane.

In a world of environmental studies filled with predictable relationships and expected correlations, this odd pairing stands out like a neon-pink flamingo in a sea of gray pigeons. It's a little like discovering that your grumpy neighbor and the local yoga instructor are secretly best pals. But instead of neighborhood gossip, we are dealing with environmental data that seems to be in cahoots with one another – and we aim to decipher this bizarre alliance.

By merging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover the hidden threads linking the air quality in Central City, Kentucky, and the usage of LPG in Chad. The results of our analysis left us incredulous, astonished, and slightly amused, much like stumbling upon a pair of mismatched socks in a perfectly coordinated wardrobe.

Get ready to be surprised, bemused, and perhaps even entertained as we traverse the realm of environmental connections that defy conventions. Join us as we unravel the peculiar correlation between air pollution in the heart of America and the usage of LPG in the heart of Africa. Strap in, folks – we’re about to embark on a rollercoaster ride of environmental randomness!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution in Kentucky making its way across the Atlantic and rendezvousing with Chad where people are firing up their LPG stoves. A bizarre and unlikely pair indeed, akin to a mismatched couple on a blind date set up by overzealous friends. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to uncover the peculiar connection between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in Chad. It's like trying to connect the dots between a fried chicken festival and a vegan expo – unexpected, yet strangely captivating.
When it comes to environmental factors, Central City, Kentucky, is infamous for its struggles with air pollution, while Chad, on the other side of the world, relies heavily on LPG for its cooking and heating needs. It’s like the odd couple of the Earth’s atmospheric theatre – the mismatched pair that nobody saw coming. As researchers, we couldn't resist the urge to delve into this enigmatic tango between pollutants and propane.
In a world of environmental studies filled with predictable relationships and expected correlations, this odd pairing stands out like a neon-pink flamingo in a sea of gray pigeons. It's a little like discovering that your grumpy neighbor and the local yoga instructor are secretly best pals. But instead of neighborhood gossip, we are dealing with environmental data that seems to be in cahoots with one another – and we aim to decipher this bizarre alliance.
By merging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover the hidden threads linking the air quality in Central City, Kentucky, and the usage of LPG in Chad. The results of our analysis left us incredulous, astonished, and slightly amused, much like stumbling upon a pair of mismatched socks in a perfectly coordinated wardrobe.
Get ready to be surprised, bemused, and perhaps even entertained as we traverse the realm of environmental connections that defy conventions. Join us as we unravel the peculiar correlation between air pollution in the heart of America and the usage of LPG in the heart of Africa. Strap in, folks – we’re about to embark on a rollercoaster ride of environmental randomness!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors' findings unveil an unexpected relationship, reminiscent of a plot twist in a mystery novel, between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Chad. While this connection may seem as far-fetched as finding a unicorn in a petting zoo, it has invoked both curiosity and bewilderment within the academic community.

In "Air Quality in Urban Environments," Smith et al. delve into the intricacies of air pollution in various urban settings, but little did they know that the fumes from Central City would embark on a much grander adventure. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive study on "Global Energy Consumption" barely scratches the surface of the enigmatic dance between LPG usage and distant air quality.

Venturing beyond the bounds of conventional scholarly works, we take inspiration from non-fiction titles such as "The Air We Breathe: A Climate Change Perspective" and "Gas Guzzlers and Green Guardians: A Story of Environmental Conflict." As for fiction, perhaps the whimsical connection between our focal points can be likened to the unlikely pairings found in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams or "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell.

Drawing further inspiration from unrelated sources, the perplexing correlation between air pollution in Central City and LPG consumption in Chad evokes the same disbelief as finding a "Colonel Mustard in the Conservatory with a Lead Pipe" scenario in the board game Clue or uncovering a "Candlestick in the Library" mystery in a game of Monopoly.

As we wade through the sea of seemingly unrelated literature and cultural references, the lightheartedness of this whimsical pairing leaves us pondering: if Central City and Chad were characters in a wacky sitcom, what delightful antics and mishaps would unfold? Whichever way we look at it, the correlation between these two seemingly incongruous factors ignites a sense of wonder that perhaps even the most eccentric of sitcoms would envy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1987 to 2002

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution in Kentucky making its way across the Atlantic and rendezvousing with Chad where people are firing up their LPG stoves. A bizarre and unlikely pair indeed, akin to a mismatched couple on a blind date set up by overzealous friends. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to uncover the peculiar connection between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in Chad. It's like trying to connect the dots between a fried chicken festival and a vegan expo – unexpected, yet strangely captivating.
When it comes to environmental factors, Central City, Kentucky, is infamous for its struggles with air pollution, while Chad, on the other side of the world, relies heavily on LPG for its cooking and heating needs. It’s like the odd couple of the Earth’s atmospheric theatre – the mismatched pair that nobody saw coming. As researchers, we couldn't resist the urge to delve into this enigmatic tango between pollutants and propane.
In a world of environmental studies filled with predictable relationships and expected correlations, this odd pairing stands out like a neon-pink flamingo in a sea of gray pigeons. It's a little like discovering that your grumpy neighbor and the local yoga instructor are secretly best pals. But instead of neighborhood gossip, we are dealing with environmental data that seems to be in cahoots with one another – and we aim to decipher this bizarre alliance.
By merging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover the hidden threads linking the air quality in Central City, Kentucky, and the usage of LPG in Chad. The results of our analysis left us incredulous, astonished, and slightly amused, much like stumbling upon a pair of mismatched socks in a perfectly coordinated wardrobe.
Get ready to be surprised, bemused, and perhaps even entertained as we traverse the realm of environmental connections that defy conventions. Join us as we unravel the peculiar correlation between air pollution in the heart of America and the usage of LPG in the heart of Africa. Strap in, folks – we’re about to embark on a rollercoaster ride of environmental randomness!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Here’s where the fun and games take a slightly more serious turn. Think of it like transitioning from a whimsical tea party to a slightly subdued board meeting – although we can’t promise that the absurdity levels won’t still spike from time to time.

Data Collection:

To uncover the elusive relationship between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and LPG consumption in Chad, we relied on a mishmash of data collection methods. This included consulting the almighty oracle (also known as the internet), with a particular focus on scrounging up information from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. It was like piecing together a jigsaw puzzle, but instead of an idyllic landscape, we were uncovering the wacky connections between air quality and propane usage. And, of course, we mostly found ourselves furiously clicking through tables and figures from the years 1987 to 2002 – a digital treasure hunt through the labyrinth of data.

Statistical Analysis:

Like detectives hunting for clues in a mystery novel, we employed rigorous statistical analyses to tease out the interconnectedness of these seemingly incongruous variables. Our arsenal of statistical tools resembled a Swiss Army knife, with correlation coefficients, regression models, and goodness-of-fit tests serving as our trusty companions in this offbeat expedition. And just like a magician revealing their secret tricks, we slapped a p < 0.01 on our findings, providing a dramatic flourish of evidence for the compelling link between air pollution in Central City and LPG consumption in Chad.

Cross-Referencing and Validation:

Much like fact-checking a juicy piece of gossip, we diligently cross-referenced our findings with additional resources to ensure the robustness and reliability of our results. It was a bit like double, triple, and quadruple checking that your parachute is securely fastened before leaping out of a plane – an essential step in our endeavor to unravel this eccentric ecological riddle.

Discussion:

In what can only be described as a scholarly whirlwind, we dissected and analyzed our findings, sounding the horn for a grand, if not slightly quirky, symphony of ecological revelations. Like skillful puppeteers manipulating marionettes, we teased apart the intricate dance between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of LPG in Chad, marveling at the unexpected choreography that unfolded before our eyes.

In essence, we combined the rigor of empirical analysis with the whimsy of unraveling a magical secret, blending the serious with the absurd to reveal the surprising connection between air quality in the heart of America and the usage of LPG in the heart of Africa.

And with that, dear readers, our methodology becomes a quirky symphony of data collection, statistical manipulation, and scholarly exploration. It's an eclectic mix worthy of a spot in the quirkiest research methods hall of fame, albeit with a touch of rigorous scientific novelty.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1987 to 2002, you found a correlation 0.8655982, r-squared of 0.7492602, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution in Kentucky making its way across the Atlantic and rendezvousing with Chad where people are firing up their LPG stoves. A bizarre and unlikely pair indeed, akin to a mismatched couple on a blind date set up by overzealous friends. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to uncover the peculiar connection between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in Chad. It's like trying to connect the dots between a fried chicken festival and a vegan expo – unexpected, yet strangely captivating.
When it comes to environmental factors, Central City, Kentucky, is infamous for its struggles with air pollution, while Chad, on the other side of the world, relies heavily on LPG for its cooking and heating needs. It’s like the odd couple of the Earth’s atmospheric theatre – the mismatched pair that nobody saw coming. As researchers, we couldn't resist the urge to delve into this enigmatic tango between pollutants and propane.
In a world of environmental studies filled with predictable relationships and expected correlations, this odd pairing stands out like a neon-pink flamingo in a sea of gray pigeons. It's a little like discovering that your grumpy neighbor and the local yoga instructor are secretly best pals. But instead of neighborhood gossip, we are dealing with environmental data that seems to be in cahoots with one another – and we aim to decipher this bizarre alliance.
By merging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover the hidden threads linking the air quality in Central City, Kentucky, and the usage of LPG in Chad. The results of our analysis left us incredulous, astonished, and slightly amused, much like stumbling upon a pair of mismatched socks in a perfectly coordinated wardrobe.
Get ready to be surprised, bemused, and perhaps even entertained as we traverse the realm of environmental connections that defy conventions. Join us as we unravel the peculiar correlation between air pollution in the heart of America and the usage of LPG in the heart of Africa. Strap in, folks – we’re about to embark on a rollercoaster ride of environmental randomness!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad during the period from 1987 to 2002. Like two unlikely dance partners, these seemingly disparate variables proved to be intertwined in a manner that both surprised and amused our research team.

The Pearson correlation coefficient between the air pollution levels in Central City and the consumption of LPG in Chad was calculated to be 0.8655982, indicating a highly significant positive relationship. This finding suggests that as air pollution levels in Central City increased, so did the consumption of LPG in Chad, akin to an intricate dance routine where one partner's movements mirror the other's.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.7492602, indicating that approximately 74.92% of the variation in LPG consumption in Chad can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels in Central City. It's like trying to explain 75% of a magic trick, only to realize that the rabbit isn't in the hat but has hopped across the ocean to join a cooking show in Chad.

The p-value associated with the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating that the observed relationship between air pollution in Central City and LPG consumption in Chad is statistically significant. This result left our team both awe-struck and tickled, much like discovering a secret handshake between two completely unrelated social groups.

In Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution levels in Central City and the consumption of LPG in Chad. This graphical representation serves as a visual testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these two environmental factors, leaving us to ponder the whimsical dance of global atmospheric dynamics.

In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence for the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of LPG in Chad. This unexpected coupling challenges conventional wisdom and opens up new avenues for further exploration in the realm of environmental interconnectivity. Join us in embracing the delightful absurdity of these findings, as we continue to unravel the mysteries of our planet's seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors' findings unveil an unexpected relationship, reminiscent of a plot twist in a mystery novel, between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Chad. While this connection may seem as far-fetched as finding a unicorn in a petting zoo, it has invoked both curiosity and bewilderment within the academic community.
In "Air Quality in Urban Environments," Smith et al. delve into the intricacies of air pollution in various urban settings, but little did they know that the fumes from Central City would embark on a much grander adventure. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive study on "Global Energy Consumption" barely scratches the surface of the enigmatic dance between LPG usage and distant air quality.
Venturing beyond the bounds of conventional scholarly works, we take inspiration from non-fiction titles such as "The Air We Breathe: A Climate Change Perspective" and "Gas Guzzlers and Green Guardians: A Story of Environmental Conflict." As for fiction, perhaps the whimsical connection between our focal points can be likened to the unlikely pairings found in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams or "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell.
Drawing further inspiration from unrelated sources, the perplexing correlation between air pollution in Central City and LPG consumption in Chad evokes the same disbelief as finding a "Colonel Mustard in the Conservatory with a Lead Pipe" scenario in the board game Clue or uncovering a "Candlestick in the Library" mystery in a game of Monopoly.
As we wade through the sea of seemingly unrelated literature and cultural references, the lightheartedness of this whimsical pairing leaves us pondering: if Central City and Chad were characters in a wacky sitcom, what delightful antics and mishaps would unfold? Whichever way we look at it, the correlation between these two seemingly incongruous factors ignites a sense of wonder that perhaps even the most eccentric of sitcoms would envy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad during the period from 1987 to 2002. Like two unlikely dance partners, these seemingly disparate variables proved to be intertwined in a manner that both surprised and amused our research team.
The Pearson correlation coefficient between the air pollution levels in Central City and the consumption of LPG in Chad was calculated to be 0.8655982, indicating a highly significant positive relationship. This finding suggests that as air pollution levels in Central City increased, so did the consumption of LPG in Chad, akin to an intricate dance routine where one partner's movements mirror the other's.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.7492602, indicating that approximately 74.92% of the variation in LPG consumption in Chad can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels in Central City. It's like trying to explain 75% of a magic trick, only to realize that the rabbit isn't in the hat but has hopped across the ocean to join a cooking show in Chad.
The p-value associated with the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating that the observed relationship between air pollution in Central City and LPG consumption in Chad is statistically significant. This result left our team both awe-struck and tickled, much like discovering a secret handshake between two completely unrelated social groups.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution levels in Central City and the consumption of LPG in Chad. This graphical representation serves as a visual testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these two environmental factors, leaving us to ponder the whimsical dance of global atmospheric dynamics.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence for the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of LPG in Chad. This unexpected coupling challenges conventional wisdom and opens up new avenues for further exploration in the realm of environmental interconnectivity. Join us in embracing the delightful absurdity of these findings, as we continue to unravel the mysteries of our planet's seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, the wondrous interplay of air pollution and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) usage has left us pondering the cosmic dance of global environmental dynamics. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, increased, so did the consumption of LPG in Chad – a waltz of emissions and energy sources across continents. It's as if Mother Nature decided to pair two seemingly incongruous partners at a whimsical ball, leading to an unexpected and remarkably strong correlation.

Our robust Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 reflects a significant positive relationship between these variables, akin to an enthralling tango where one partner's movements mirror the other's. The coefficient of determination of 0.7492602 further suggests that around 74.92% of the variation in LPG consumption in Chad can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels in Central City – a bit like trying to explain 75% of a magician's trick, only to find the rabbit has hopped across the ocean.

As we hark back to our whimsical literature review, who knew that the fumes from Central City would embark on such a grand adventure, akin to a plot twist in a mystery novel? Just like the lightheartedness of an unlikely pairing in a board game, our alleged "Colonel Mustard in the Conservatory with a Lead Pipe" scenario has turned into an enigmatic dance between continents.

What delightful antics and mishaps would unfold if Central City and Chad were characters in a wacky sitcom? The mind boggles at the possibilities! It's as if the Earth has decided to write its own peculiar sitcom plot, drawing unlikely characters together in a whimsical tale of interconnected environmental phenomena.

Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also open new avenues for further exploration in the realm of environmental interconnectivity. This unexpected coupling has led us to embrace the delightful absurdity of these findings and continue unraveling the mysteries of our planet's seemingly unrelated phenomena. Join us in this fantastic voyage as we bring some unexpected humor and awe to the world of environmental research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Picture this: a cloud of air pollution in Kentucky making its way across the Atlantic and rendezvousing with Chad where people are firing up their LPG stoves. A bizarre and unlikely pair indeed, akin to a mismatched couple on a blind date set up by overzealous friends. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to uncover the peculiar connection between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in Chad. It's like trying to connect the dots between a fried chicken festival and a vegan expo – unexpected, yet strangely captivating.
When it comes to environmental factors, Central City, Kentucky, is infamous for its struggles with air pollution, while Chad, on the other side of the world, relies heavily on LPG for its cooking and heating needs. It’s like the odd couple of the Earth’s atmospheric theatre – the mismatched pair that nobody saw coming. As researchers, we couldn't resist the urge to delve into this enigmatic tango between pollutants and propane.
In a world of environmental studies filled with predictable relationships and expected correlations, this odd pairing stands out like a neon-pink flamingo in a sea of gray pigeons. It's a little like discovering that your grumpy neighbor and the local yoga instructor are secretly best pals. But instead of neighborhood gossip, we are dealing with environmental data that seems to be in cahoots with one another – and we aim to decipher this bizarre alliance.
By merging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover the hidden threads linking the air quality in Central City, Kentucky, and the usage of LPG in Chad. The results of our analysis left us incredulous, astonished, and slightly amused, much like stumbling upon a pair of mismatched socks in a perfectly coordinated wardrobe.
Get ready to be surprised, bemused, and perhaps even entertained as we traverse the realm of environmental connections that defy conventions. Join us as we unravel the peculiar correlation between air pollution in the heart of America and the usage of LPG in the heart of Africa. Strap in, folks – we’re about to embark on a rollercoaster ride of environmental randomness!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad during the period from 1987 to 2002. Like two unlikely dance partners, these seemingly disparate variables proved to be intertwined in a manner that both surprised and amused our research team.
The Pearson correlation coefficient between the air pollution levels in Central City and the consumption of LPG in Chad was calculated to be 0.8655982, indicating a highly significant positive relationship. This finding suggests that as air pollution levels in Central City increased, so did the consumption of LPG in Chad, akin to an intricate dance routine where one partner's movements mirror the other's.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.7492602, indicating that approximately 74.92% of the variation in LPG consumption in Chad can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels in Central City. It's like trying to explain 75% of a magic trick, only to realize that the rabbit isn't in the hat but has hopped across the ocean to join a cooking show in Chad.
The p-value associated with the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating that the observed relationship between air pollution in Central City and LPG consumption in Chad is statistically significant. This result left our team both awe-struck and tickled, much like discovering a secret handshake between two completely unrelated social groups.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution levels in Central City and the consumption of LPG in Chad. This graphical representation serves as a visual testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these two environmental factors, leaving us to ponder the whimsical dance of global atmospheric dynamics.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence for the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of LPG in Chad. This unexpected coupling challenges conventional wisdom and opens up new avenues for further exploration in the realm of environmental interconnectivity. Join us in embracing the delightful absurdity of these findings, as we continue to unravel the mysteries of our planet's seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our comical quest to uncover the unexpected link between Central City's air pollution and Chad's LPG consumption, we find ourselves at a crossroads – or should we say, a cross-continental air current. The results of our study have left us more befuddled than a confused tourist trying to decipher the local cuisine in a foreign country. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and a p-value that's smaller than the chances of finding a needle in a haystack on a foggy day both point to a significant relationship between these unlikely bedfellows. It's as if Kentucky's air pollution and Chad's use of LPG are engaged in a whimsical dance, with one taking steps and the other following suit halfway across the globe.

Much like discovering a hidden talent in a coworker known for their serious demeanor, our findings have unveiled an unexpected synergy that defies conventional environmental logic. The sheer delight of unraveling this zany connection is akin to stumbling upon a unicorn at a bustling city intersection – utterly out of place yet irresistibly fascinating.

In light of these revelatory results, we assert with utmost certainty—much like a Great Dane staunchly guarding a squeaky toy—that no further research is needed in this hilariously unexpected correlation. Our minds may be blown, but the curtain has fallen on this preposterously wondrous show. It's time to bid adieu to this extraordinary journey and marvel at the whimsical oddities that characterize the complex web of our planet's environmental interplay.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Ecological Puzzles


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Global Air Quality and Energy Consumption


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clashing Conundrum: Correlating Air Pollution in Central City, Kentucky with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Chad with an abstract of This research paper presents an in-depth analysis of the surprising link between air pollution levels in Central City, Kentucky, and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Chad. Combining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to shed light on this unconventional pairing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8655982 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1987 to 2002, providing compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate factors. Join us in unraveling this whimsical mystery, as we explore the unexpected relationship between air quality in the heart of America and the use of LPG in the heart of Africa.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Central City Kentucky, liquefied petroleum gas consumption, Chad, correlation, statistical analysis, environmental protection agency, energy information administration, air quality, interconnectedness, America, Africa

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Central City, KY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Chad in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad

Correlation r = 0.8655982 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7492602 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky) over the 16 years from 1987 through 2002.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-5. 0.0000147799042396883180000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.0015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 67,659 random variables You don't actually need 67 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002
Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky (Bad air quality days)54000000000000043.673510
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad (Million Barrels/Day)0.10.001040.001050.004440000000000.0316940.03178080.0317808




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,43.6735,10,])
array_2 = np.array([0.1,0.00104,0.00105,0.00444,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.031694,0.0317808,0.0317808,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 5166 · Black Variable ID: 20425 · Red Variable ID: 24290
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0