Report an error
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme | r=0.98 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'fbi agent' meme | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'its wednesday my dudes' meme | r=0.89 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme | r=0.89 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'change my mind' meme | r=0.89 | 16yrs | No |
Air pollution in Central City, Kentucky | r=0.87 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chad also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)