Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the gap widened, Mainers felt a gravitational pull towards democratic ideals, believing that the party could truly reach for the stars when it came to governance. They couldn't help but planet their support for the candidate, seeing them as the brightest in the political galaxy. The celestial shift left them feeling out of this world about the democratic platform, as if a cosmic force was urging them to make their voices heard at the polls. It was a campaign that resonated with them on a universal level, proving that even in the vast expanse of space, every vote really does count.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Generate an image showing Uranus and Saturn drifting further apart in the vast expanse of space, with the starry backdrop creating a mesmerizing sight. On Earth, in Maine, a group of enthusiastic voters gather under the night sky, casting their ballots in support of the Democratic candidate. The scene portrays the celestial alignment of the planets reflecting the democratic ideals, with the voters drawn towards the candidate like planets orbiting a bright political star. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Oragami Oragami 3D Pixar Style Glitch art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine, in the following situation: As the gap widened, Mainers felt a gravitational pull towards democratic ideals, believing that the party could truly reach for the stars when it came to governance. They couldn't help but planet their support for the candidate, seeing them as the brightest in the political galaxy. The celestial shift left them feeling out of this world about the democratic platform, as if a cosmic force was urging them to make their voices heard at the polls. It was a campaign that resonated with them on a universal level, proving that even in the vast expanse of space, every vote really does count.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the vast expanse of space, Uranus and Saturn drift further apart, their distant orbits creating a striking visual against the starry backdrop. Meanwhile, in Maine, a group of enthusiastic voters gather under the night sky, their ballots representing a strong collective pull towards the Democratic candidate. The celestial alignment seems to reflect the democratic ideals, as the voters are drawn towards the candidate like planets orbiting a bright political star.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In the vast expanse of space, Uranus and Saturn drift further apart, their distant orbits creating a striking visual against the starry backdrop. Meanwhile, in Maine, a group of enthusiastic voters gather under the night sky, their ballots representing a strong collective pull towards the Democratic candidate. The celestial alignment seems to reflect the democratic ideals, as the voters are drawn towards the candidate like planets orbiting a bright political star. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Generate an image showing Uranus and Saturn drifting further apart in the vast expanse of space, with the starry backdrop creating a mesmerizing sight. On Earth, in Maine, a group of enthusiastic voters gather under the night sky, casting their ballots in support of the Democratic candidate. The scene portrays the celestial alignment of the planets reflecting the democratic ideals, with the voters drawn towards the candidate like planets orbiting a bright political star.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The distance between Uranus and Saturn positively influenced Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis The Journal of Astro-Political Science Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Caclculated using Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous astronomer Galileo Galilei once said, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Indeed, applying our intellect to understanding the celestial dance of the planets may lead to some surprising insights, as well as a healthy helping of dad jokes along the way.
Before we embark on our cosmic journey, let's set the stage with a space-themed quip: Why did the astronaut break up with her boyfriend? Because she needed space! Now, onto the matter at hand: the curious connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Maine.
While it may seem like a reach to link celestial mechanics with electoral behavior, our investigation aims to prove that even a vast expanse of space can have an impact on down-to-earth political choices. Speaking of vast expanse, did you hear about the restaurant on the moon? Great food, no atmosphere!
In this paper, we bring together data from the realms of astronomy and political science to undertake a spatiotemporal analysis that reaches for the stars, both figuratively and literally. Our research leverages cutting-edge data sources such as Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to unveil the cosmic fingerprints on political preferences in the state of Maine.
Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of our findings, let's pause for another cosmic-themed jest: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Now, let's launch into our astronomical adventure, where we uncover correlations that are truly out of this world.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous astronomer Galileo Galilei once said, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Indeed, applying our intellect to understanding the celestial dance of the planets may lead to some surprising insights, as well as a healthy helping of dad jokes along the way.
Before we embark on our cosmic journey, let's set the stage with a space-themed quip: Why did the astronaut break up with her boyfriend? Because she needed space! Now, onto the matter at hand: the curious connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Maine.
While it may seem like a reach to link celestial mechanics with electoral behavior, our investigation aims to prove that even a vast expanse of space can have an impact on down-to-earth political choices. Speaking of vast expanse, did you hear about the restaurant on the moon? Great food, no atmosphere!
In this paper, we bring together data from the realms of astronomy and political science to undertake a spatiotemporal analysis that reaches for the stars, both figuratively and literally. Our research leverages cutting-edge data sources such as Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to unveil the cosmic fingerprints on political preferences in the state of Maine.
Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of our findings, let's pause for another cosmic-themed jest: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Now, let's launch into our astronomical adventure, where we uncover correlations that are truly out of this world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "Celestial Mechanics and Political Trends" (Smith, 2005), the authors find a surprising link between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. This study sparked a wave of interest in the intersection of astrophysics and political science, paving the way for further exploration into the cosmic factors shaping electoral behavior. The findings illuminate a distinct correlation, prompting researchers to look to the stars for insights into terrestrial matters.
Next, "Planetary Activities and Political Affiliation" (Doe, 2010) presents a comprehensive analysis of astrological events and their potential impact on voting patterns. The study offers compelling evidence of a connection between planetary alignments and political preferences, suggesting that cosmic phenomena may exert a subtle yet significant influence on electoral outcomes. This research marks a significant leap in understanding the celestial dimensions of human decision-making, inviting scholars to explore the cosmic dance of the planets in relation to democratic choices.
Building on this foundation, "The Cosmic Voter: Galactic Forces and Electoral Tendencies" (Jones, 2015) dives deeper into the celestial factors shaping political allegiances. With meticulous attention to spatiotemporal dynamics, the study uncovers a compelling correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and voter trends in Maine. The authors unveil a cosmic choreography that appears to sway the political landscape, shedding light on the intricate interplay between planetary positions and democratic inclinations. These findings beckon researchers to gaze beyond earthly horizons and contemplate the cosmic ballet of influence on electoral dynamics.
Transitioning to related literature, "The Universe and You: A Guide to Celestial Influence" (Stargazer, 2018) offers a layperson's insight into the celestial forces that may shape human experiences, including political behavior. While not a scholarly work, this text provides a thought-provoking exploration of the potential links between astronomical phenomena and terrestrial affairs, prompting readers to ponder the cosmic threads woven into the fabric of everyday life.
On a more imaginative note, the fictional works of "Cosmic Conspiracies" (Nebula, 2012) and "Stellar Sentiments: A Tale of Planetary Influence" (Galactic, 2016) present captivating narratives that intertwine celestial events with political intrigue. While these books are undoubtedly products of creative imagination, they serve as a testament to the enduring fascination with the interplay of cosmic forces and human endeavors. Their whimsical tales hint at the enduring allure of celestial connections and their potential impact on earthly narratives.
Finally, the researchers conducted an unconventional yet enlightening review of seemingly unrelated materials, including ancient astrological texts, astrological cookbooks, and even deciphering celestial messages from CVS receipts. While these unconventional sources yielded no direct insights, they did foster a newfound appreciation for the boundless creativity of cosmic connections and the allure of exploring uncharted intellectual galaxies.
In summary, the literature presents a compelling narrative of the evolving understanding of the connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. From scholarly inquiries to imaginative musings, the research landscape is replete with diverse perspectives that invite us to contemplate the cosmic dance underlying political preferences. As we navigate this cosmic odyssey, it becomes clear that the stars may hold more profound secrets than we ever imagined.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous astronomer Galileo Galilei once said, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Indeed, applying our intellect to understanding the celestial dance of the planets may lead to some surprising insights, as well as a healthy helping of dad jokes along the way.
Before we embark on our cosmic journey, let's set the stage with a space-themed quip: Why did the astronaut break up with her boyfriend? Because she needed space! Now, onto the matter at hand: the curious connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Maine.
While it may seem like a reach to link celestial mechanics with electoral behavior, our investigation aims to prove that even a vast expanse of space can have an impact on down-to-earth political choices. Speaking of vast expanse, did you hear about the restaurant on the moon? Great food, no atmosphere!
In this paper, we bring together data from the realms of astronomy and political science to undertake a spatiotemporal analysis that reaches for the stars, both figuratively and literally. Our research leverages cutting-edge data sources such as Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to unveil the cosmic fingerprints on political preferences in the state of Maine.
Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of our findings, let's pause for another cosmic-themed jest: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Now, let's launch into our astronomical adventure, where we uncover correlations that are truly out of this world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To investigate the relationship between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine, we employed a multi-faceted research methodology that was as diverse as the planetary orbits we were studying. Our data collection process was as meticulous as mapping out the constellations in the night sky – a task that was made much easier, thanks to the wonders of modern technology and some much-needed caffeine.
We initially gathered historical data on the distance between Uranus and Saturn from 1976 to 2020 using the Astropy library, which provided us with precise astronomical measurements. The data on votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine during the same period were sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse. Our team of researchers scoured the internet, navigating through the endless expanse of online repositories like intrepid astronauts venturing into the cosmos, in search of the elusive treasure trove of electoral data.
Speaking of treasure troves, did you hear about the astronomer who won the lottery? He was over the moon! In a similar vein, our quest for data was akin to striking astronomical gold, as the datasets we acquired provided us with a rich tapestry of information to unravel the cosmic enigma of electoral behavior.
With the celestial and electoral data in hand, we then set out to conduct a spatiotemporal analysis that was as complex as plotting the trajectory of a comet hurtling through space. We applied advanced statistical techniques, including multivariate regression and spatiotemporal modeling, to tease out potential correlations between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. These analyses were carried out with the precision and rigor befitting a mission to explore the far reaches of our solar system – because when it comes to investigating cosmic connections, there's no room for errors!
Now, as we delve into the intricate details of our methodological approach, here's a stellar joke to brighten up the scientific discourse: Why did the sun go to school? To get a little brighter! Just like the sun, we aimed to shed light on the mysteries of celestial influence on earthly political preferences. So buckle up, fellow astronomers and political enthusiasts, as we journey through the galaxies of statistical analysis and empirical inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .
For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8303008, r-squared of 0.6893993, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the famous astronomer Galileo Galilei once said, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Indeed, applying our intellect to understanding the celestial dance of the planets may lead to some surprising insights, as well as a healthy helping of dad jokes along the way.
Before we embark on our cosmic journey, let's set the stage with a space-themed quip: Why did the astronaut break up with her boyfriend? Because she needed space! Now, onto the matter at hand: the curious connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Maine.
While it may seem like a reach to link celestial mechanics with electoral behavior, our investigation aims to prove that even a vast expanse of space can have an impact on down-to-earth political choices. Speaking of vast expanse, did you hear about the restaurant on the moon? Great food, no atmosphere!
In this paper, we bring together data from the realms of astronomy and political science to undertake a spatiotemporal analysis that reaches for the stars, both figuratively and literally. Our research leverages cutting-edge data sources such as Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to unveil the cosmic fingerprints on political preferences in the state of Maine.
Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of our findings, let's pause for another cosmic-themed jest: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Now, let's launch into our astronomical adventure, where we uncover correlations that are truly out of this world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine during the years 1976 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6893993, signifying that approximately 68.9% of the variability in the votes for the Democrat candidate can be explained by the distance between these two celestial bodies. It seems even the gravitational pull of Uranus and Saturn can sway the political tides on Earth.
Revealing this correlation was like finding a shooting star – surprising and awe-inspiring. It has certainly caused our research team to feel like astronauts, as we find ourselves over the moon with these unexpected results. Now, for a celestial joke that's truly out of this world: Why did the sun go to school? To get a little brighter!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no association between Uranus-Saturn distance and Democrat votes in Maine. It seems that when these two planets are far apart, the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate tend to align, creating a cosmic dance of political preferences.
Before we reveal the figure illustrating this celestial correlation, here's another space-themed pun that's simply "out of this world": How does a scientist freshen their breath? With "Big Bang" breath mints! Now, onto the figure that's sure to "planet" your mind.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "Celestial Mechanics and Political Trends" (Smith, 2005), the authors find a surprising link between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. This study sparked a wave of interest in the intersection of astrophysics and political science, paving the way for further exploration into the cosmic factors shaping electoral behavior. The findings illuminate a distinct correlation, prompting researchers to look to the stars for insights into terrestrial matters.
Next, "Planetary Activities and Political Affiliation" (Doe, 2010) presents a comprehensive analysis of astrological events and their potential impact on voting patterns. The study offers compelling evidence of a connection between planetary alignments and political preferences, suggesting that cosmic phenomena may exert a subtle yet significant influence on electoral outcomes. This research marks a significant leap in understanding the celestial dimensions of human decision-making, inviting scholars to explore the cosmic dance of the planets in relation to democratic choices.
Building on this foundation, "The Cosmic Voter: Galactic Forces and Electoral Tendencies" (Jones, 2015) dives deeper into the celestial factors shaping political allegiances. With meticulous attention to spatiotemporal dynamics, the study uncovers a compelling correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and voter trends in Maine. The authors unveil a cosmic choreography that appears to sway the political landscape, shedding light on the intricate interplay between planetary positions and democratic inclinations. These findings beckon researchers to gaze beyond earthly horizons and contemplate the cosmic ballet of influence on electoral dynamics.
Transitioning to related literature, "The Universe and You: A Guide to Celestial Influence" (Stargazer, 2018) offers a layperson's insight into the celestial forces that may shape human experiences, including political behavior. While not a scholarly work, this text provides a thought-provoking exploration of the potential links between astronomical phenomena and terrestrial affairs, prompting readers to ponder the cosmic threads woven into the fabric of everyday life.
On a more imaginative note, the fictional works of "Cosmic Conspiracies" (Nebula, 2012) and "Stellar Sentiments: A Tale of Planetary Influence" (Galactic, 2016) present captivating narratives that intertwine celestial events with political intrigue. While these books are undoubtedly products of creative imagination, they serve as a testament to the enduring fascination with the interplay of cosmic forces and human endeavors. Their whimsical tales hint at the enduring allure of celestial connections and their potential impact on earthly narratives.
Finally, the researchers conducted an unconventional yet enlightening review of seemingly unrelated materials, including ancient astrological texts, astrological cookbooks, and even deciphering celestial messages from CVS receipts. While these unconventional sources yielded no direct insights, they did foster a newfound appreciation for the boundless creativity of cosmic connections and the allure of exploring uncharted intellectual galaxies.
In summary, the literature presents a compelling narrative of the evolving understanding of the connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. From scholarly inquiries to imaginative musings, the research landscape is replete with diverse perspectives that invite us to contemplate the cosmic dance underlying political preferences. As we navigate this cosmic odyssey, it becomes clear that the stars may hold more profound secrets than we ever imagined.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine during the years 1976 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6893993, signifying that approximately 68.9% of the variability in the votes for the Democrat candidate can be explained by the distance between these two celestial bodies. It seems even the gravitational pull of Uranus and Saturn can sway the political tides on Earth.
Revealing this correlation was like finding a shooting star – surprising and awe-inspiring. It has certainly caused our research team to feel like astronauts, as we find ourselves over the moon with these unexpected results. Now, for a celestial joke that's truly out of this world: Why did the sun go to school? To get a little brighter!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no association between Uranus-Saturn distance and Democrat votes in Maine. It seems that when these two planets are far apart, the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate tend to align, creating a cosmic dance of political preferences.
Before we reveal the figure illustrating this celestial correlation, here's another space-themed pun that's simply "out of this world": How does a scientist freshen their breath? With "Big Bang" breath mints! Now, onto the figure that's sure to "planet" your mind.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study provide compelling support for the prior research that has hinted at a connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. Our findings affirm the striking correlation identified by Smith (2005), whose pioneering work initiated the exploration of celestial mechanics and political trends. Just as the gravitational pull of celestial bodies shapes the movements of celestial objects, it seems to exert a subtle yet significant influence on the terrestrial electoral landscape.
Doe's (2010) comprehensive analysis of astrological events and their potential impact on voting patterns is further substantiated by our research, as we reveal a notable correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and voter preferences in Maine. This cosmic connection, akin to an invisible thread weaving through the fabric of political choices, aligns with Doe's suggestion of subtle yet significant celestial influence on electoral outcomes. It appears that the celestial dance of planets is not merely a spectacle for the cosmos but holds sway over the democratic inclinations of earthly beings.
Additionally, our findings echo the insights put forth by Jones (2015), who meticulously studied the spatiotemporal dynamics of planetary positions and voter trends in Maine, ultimately unveiling a compelling correlation. The cosmic choreography revealed in our study substantiates Jones's suggestion of a nuanced influence of planetary positions on the political landscape, reinforcing the notion that the distance between Uranus and Saturn may indeed serve as a celestial conductor orchestrating voter preferences.
Transitioning to the celestial whimsy woven into the literature, Stargazer's (2018) contemplation of the potential links between astronomical phenomena and terrestrial affairs is poignantly affirmed by our findings. Just as Stargazer encouraged readers to ponder the cosmic threads woven into the fabric of everyday life, we present evidence of celestial forces impacting the democratic choices of Maine voters, as if the stars had aligned to influence political allegiances.
Moreover, the unconventional review of seemingly unrelated materials, including ancient astrological texts, astrological cookbooks, and deciphering celestial messages from CVS receipts, though light-hearted in nature, fostered a newfound appreciation for the boundless creativity of cosmic connections. In a surprising turn of events, our research unveiled a tangible and significant correlation, akin to a cosmic riddle unraveling to reveal an unexpected answer. It seems that the cosmic connections, even when approached with whimsy, may hold profound insights into the terrestrial narratives of political preferences.
The interconnectedness of astronomical phenomena and political behavior, as revealed in our study, invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to gaze beyond earthly horizons and contemplate the cosmic ballet of influence on electoral dynamics. As we traverse the cosmic odyssey upon which this research has embarked, the stars indeed appear to hold more profound secrets than we ever imagined. And now, for a cosmic joke as enigmatic as the distant dance between Uranus and Saturn: What do planets do when they get tired? They take a meteorite!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the famous astronomer Galileo Galilei once said, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Indeed, applying our intellect to understanding the celestial dance of the planets may lead to some surprising insights, as well as a healthy helping of dad jokes along the way.
Before we embark on our cosmic journey, let's set the stage with a space-themed quip: Why did the astronaut break up with her boyfriend? Because she needed space! Now, onto the matter at hand: the curious connection between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the great state of Maine.
While it may seem like a reach to link celestial mechanics with electoral behavior, our investigation aims to prove that even a vast expanse of space can have an impact on down-to-earth political choices. Speaking of vast expanse, did you hear about the restaurant on the moon? Great food, no atmosphere!
In this paper, we bring together data from the realms of astronomy and political science to undertake a spatiotemporal analysis that reaches for the stars, both figuratively and literally. Our research leverages cutting-edge data sources such as Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to unveil the cosmic fingerprints on political preferences in the state of Maine.
Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of our findings, let's pause for another cosmic-themed jest: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Now, let's launch into our astronomical adventure, where we uncover correlations that are truly out of this world.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine during the years 1976 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6893993, signifying that approximately 68.9% of the variability in the votes for the Democrat candidate can be explained by the distance between these two celestial bodies. It seems even the gravitational pull of Uranus and Saturn can sway the political tides on Earth.
Revealing this correlation was like finding a shooting star – surprising and awe-inspiring. It has certainly caused our research team to feel like astronauts, as we find ourselves over the moon with these unexpected results. Now, for a celestial joke that's truly out of this world: Why did the sun go to school? To get a little brighter!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no association between Uranus-Saturn distance and Democrat votes in Maine. It seems that when these two planets are far apart, the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate tend to align, creating a cosmic dance of political preferences.
Before we reveal the figure illustrating this celestial correlation, here's another space-themed pun that's simply "out of this world": How does a scientist freshen their breath? With "Big Bang" breath mints! Now, onto the figure that's sure to "planet" your mind.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has unveiled a captivating correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) observed over the period from 1976 to 2020 has left our research team starry-eyed and Saturn-smitten. This remarkable finding is akin to stumbling upon a black hole in the midst of an electoral analysis – unexpected and confounding, yet undeniably captivating.
Now, for a celestial-inspired dad joke to lighten the cosmic mood: What do you call an astronaut's favorite part of a computer? The space bar! It seems fitting to "space out" for a moment before concluding our discussion.
The strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, points to a gravitational pull of cosmic proportions influencing the political leanings in the state of Maine. It's as if the planetary dance of Uranus and Saturn extends its reach to sway the voting behavior of earthly citizens, echoing across the vast expanse of our solar system.
Before we declare an end to this astral analysis, let's sprinkle in one last space pun: Why did the sci-fi film win an award? Because it had an "out of this world" plot! As we wrap up, it is our scholarly consensus that no further research is needed in this celestial domain. This research closes the book on the cosmic tie to political preferences, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the interstellar influences on terrestrial affairs.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Astro-Political Science
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Stellar Cartography and Electoral Dynamics Institute
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis with an abstract of This research delves into an out-of-this-world examination of the relationship between astronomical phenomena and political behavior. Leveraging data from Astropy and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we undertake a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis of the correlation between the distance between Uranus and Saturn and votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8303008 (p < 0.01) spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Just like a comet's tail, this research sheds light on the cosmic connections influencing earthly electoral outcomes.
ChatGPT:
"Mars-Jupiter Distance," "voter trends in Maine," "spatiotemporal analysis," "astronomical phenomena," "political behavior," "Astropy data," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "correlation between Uranus and Saturn distance and Democrat votes," "Maine presidential elections," "cosmic connections to electoral outcomes"
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The distance between Uranus and SaturnDetailed data title: The average distance between Uranus and Saturn as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.
See what else correlates with The distance between Uranus and Saturn
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Maine
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Maine
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Maine
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6893993 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Maine) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Uranus and Saturn) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00083. 0.0008273592495434817000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.083% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,209 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.49, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1976 | 1980 | 1984 | 1988 | 1992 | 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn (Planetary distance (AU)) | 20.7485 | 15.7689 | 11.2163 | 9.25106 | 11.721 | 16.8508 | 22.4424 | 26.942 | 29.2926 | 29.2849 | 27.2649 | 23.6217 |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Maine (Percentage of votes) | 48.0941 | 42.2504 | 38.781 | 43.8835 | 38.7668 | 51.624 | 49.086 | 53.5729 | 57.7057 | 55.371 | 46.3452 | 52.5256 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.7485,15.7689,11.2163,9.25106,11.721,16.8508,22.4424,26.942,29.2926,29.2849,27.2649,23.6217,])
array_2 = np.array([48.0941,42.2504,38.781,43.8835,38.7668,51.624,49.086,53.5729,57.7057,55.371,46.3452,52.5256,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Uranus and Saturn"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Maine"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The distance between Uranus and Saturn
- Line chart for only Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Maine
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Seeing the Stars: The Mars-Jupiter Distance and Voter Trends in Maine: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 5145 · Black Variable ID: 1966 · Red Variable ID: 26106