Download png, svg
AI explanation
As Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos went down, so did the level of cosmic knowledge among viewers. This led to a cosmic imbalance, disrupting the celestial harmony that Samoa's wind turbines were tapping into. Simply put, as people watched less about space, the winds in Samoa couldn't keep up with the universal funk. It's like the cosmic domino effect, but with less physics and more flapping of imaginary space wings. And that, my friend, is how a drop in YouTube views could literally deflate wind power in Samoa.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene island landscape, characterized by lush greenery and crystal-clear waters. In the foreground, wind turbines gracefully spin, harnessing the power of the breeze. Above the island, a cosmic disturbance occurs as stars and planets appear to waver and lose their luster, depicting a cosmic upheaval. Adjacent to this, a YouTube play button gradually dims, symbolizing a decrease in total views on PBS Space Time videos, which leads to the disruption of cosmic knowledge. This subtle interplay between the celestial realm and earthly energy sources highlights the tangible impact of cosmic awareness on the natural world. Ensure the image captures the remarkable juxtaposition between the tranquility of the island and the cosmic turmoil above, in a way that visually communicates the delicate relationship between the two realms. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Futuristic Surrealism Macabre Magic realism
ChatGPT: Futuristic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa, in the following situation: As Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos went down, so did the level of cosmic knowledge among viewers. This led to a cosmic imbalance, disrupting the celestial harmony that Samoa's wind turbines were tapping into. Simply put, as people watched less about space, the winds in Samoa couldn't keep up with the universal funk. It's like the cosmic domino effect, but with less physics and more flapping of imaginary space wings. And that, my friend, is how a drop in YouTube views could literally deflate wind power in Samoa.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a serene island landscape with lush greenery and crystal-clear waters. In the foreground, there are wind turbines gracefully spinning, harnessing the power of the breeze. However, above the island, there is a cosmic disturbance as stars and planets seem to waver and lose their luster. On the side, a YouTube play button gradually dims, indicating a decrease in total views on PBS Space Time videos, leading to the disruption of cosmic knowledge. The scene captures the subtle interplay between the celestial realm and earthly energy sources, illustrating the tangible impact of cosmic awareness on the natural world.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a serene island landscape with lush greenery and crystal-clear waters. In the foreground, there are wind turbines gracefully spinning, harnessing the power of the breeze. However, above the island, there is a cosmic disturbance as stars and planets seem to waver and lose their luster. On the side, a YouTube play button gradually dims, indicating a decrease in total views on PBS Space Time videos, leading to the disruption of cosmic knowledge. The scene captures the subtle interplay between the celestial realm and earthly energy sources, illustrating the tangible impact of cosmic awareness on the natural world. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene island landscape, characterized by lush greenery and crystal-clear waters. In the foreground, wind turbines gracefully spin, harnessing the power of the breeze. Above the island, a cosmic disturbance occurs as stars and planets appear to waver and lose their luster, depicting a cosmic upheaval. Adjacent to this, a YouTube play button gradually dims, symbolizing a decrease in total views on PBS Space Time videos, which leads to the disruption of cosmic knowledge. This subtle interplay between the celestial realm and earthly energy sources highlights the tangible impact of cosmic awareness on the natural world. Ensure the image captures the remarkable juxtaposition between the tranquility of the island and the cosmic turmoil above, in a way that visually communicates the delicate relationship between the two realms.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos caused Wind power generated in Samoa to decrease.
AI academic paper
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration Journal of Quirky Energy Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from YouTube and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and in the world of scientific research, the intersection of seemingly disparate phenomena can yield surprising insights. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. Our inquiry is motivated by the peculiar juxtaposition of public fascination with spacetime complexities and the practical generation of renewable energy on a tropical island.
As our team delved into this curious venture, we were met with the intriguing challenge of navigating the complexities of both statistical analysis and intergalactic wormholes - albeit, the former proving to be more within our grasp than the latter. Leveraging data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to statistically elucidate the potential link between the vibrant viewership of PBS Space Time and the gusty generation of wind power in Samoa.
While the initial reaction to this research topic may elicit a chuckle or two, our findings have unearthed a correlation that is far from a mere cosmic coincidence. It appears that the intricate dance of spacetime exploration and the harnessing of wind energy are not as far removed from each other as one might expect. Indeed, the statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2015 to 2021. The seemingly whimsical relationship between these variables has led us to challenge the traditional separation of public interest in scientific complexities and sustainability efforts, or as we like to think of it, breaking the "space-time continuum" between science communication and energy solutions.
Our investigation not only defies the laws of conventional scientific thought but also offers tantalizing implications for the realms of science communication, energy policy, and - based on our occasionally humorous findings - the occasional utilization of puns in academic discourse. In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this playful yet enlightening journey through the data, where the winds of knowledge and the mysteries of spacetime converge in unexpected ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and in the world of scientific research, the intersection of seemingly disparate phenomena can yield surprising insights. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. Our inquiry is motivated by the peculiar juxtaposition of public fascination with spacetime complexities and the practical generation of renewable energy on a tropical island.
As our team delved into this curious venture, we were met with the intriguing challenge of navigating the complexities of both statistical analysis and intergalactic wormholes - albeit, the former proving to be more within our grasp than the latter. Leveraging data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to statistically elucidate the potential link between the vibrant viewership of PBS Space Time and the gusty generation of wind power in Samoa.
While the initial reaction to this research topic may elicit a chuckle or two, our findings have unearthed a correlation that is far from a mere cosmic coincidence. It appears that the intricate dance of spacetime exploration and the harnessing of wind energy are not as far removed from each other as one might expect. Indeed, the statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2015 to 2021. The seemingly whimsical relationship between these variables has led us to challenge the traditional separation of public interest in scientific complexities and sustainability efforts, or as we like to think of it, breaking the "space-time continuum" between science communication and energy solutions.
Our investigation not only defies the laws of conventional scientific thought but also offers tantalizing implications for the realms of science communication, energy policy, and - based on our occasionally humorous findings - the occasional utilization of puns in academic discourse. In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this playful yet enlightening journey through the data, where the winds of knowledge and the mysteries of spacetime converge in unexpected ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the purported correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is, understandably, limited. Smith, Doe, and Jones have yet to delve into this unique intersection of untamed curiosity about the cosmos and the harnessing of renewable energy. However, a multitude of theoretical frameworks and empirical studies stand ready to inform our whimsical exploration.
In "Renewable Energy: Power for a Sustainable Future," Boyle et al. shed light on the various sources of renewable energy and the mechanisms through which these sources can be harnessed for the betterment of humanity. While their work primarily focuses on the technical and environmental aspects of renewable energy, one cannot help but ponder the potential for a sustainable future where the awe-inspiring complexities of spacetime intertwine with renewable energy generation.
Turning to the domain of theoretical physics, Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" offers an enthralling glimpse into the enigmatic realms of spacetime and the fundamental laws that govern our universe. Although not directly related to wind power generation in Samoa, Hawking's magnum opus provides a cosmic backdrop against which the playful dance of PBS Space Time viewership and wind power may unfold.
Moving from non-fiction to the realm of fiction, Verne's "From the Earth to the Moon" and Jules' "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" beckon with tales of exploration, discovery, and the boundless wonders of the natural world. While these literary works may not offer empirical evidence of a correlation between YouTube views and wind power, they certainly provide a literary backdrop against which to appreciate the uncharted territories of our research endeavor.
In the spirit of embracing unconventional sources of inspiration, the research team also found it pertinent to seek insights from sources beyond traditional academia. The animated series "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" were selected for their captivating portrayal of scientific phenomena and principles. While geared toward a younger audience, these educational programs offer invaluable insights into the art of science communication and may illuminate our understanding of how public interest in scientific complexities shapes the narrative around renewable energy.
As we navigate through the waters of existing literature, it becomes clear that our pursuit of understanding the connection between PBS Space Time YouTube views and wind power in Samoa requires a melding of quantitative analysis, scientific imagination, and a touch of whimsy. In the pages that follow, we endeavor to marry these elements in our own quirky exploration, with the occasional pun serving as a buoy to guide us through the sea of empirical data and scientific inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2015 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and in the world of scientific research, the intersection of seemingly disparate phenomena can yield surprising insights. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. Our inquiry is motivated by the peculiar juxtaposition of public fascination with spacetime complexities and the practical generation of renewable energy on a tropical island.
As our team delved into this curious venture, we were met with the intriguing challenge of navigating the complexities of both statistical analysis and intergalactic wormholes - albeit, the former proving to be more within our grasp than the latter. Leveraging data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to statistically elucidate the potential link between the vibrant viewership of PBS Space Time and the gusty generation of wind power in Samoa.
While the initial reaction to this research topic may elicit a chuckle or two, our findings have unearthed a correlation that is far from a mere cosmic coincidence. It appears that the intricate dance of spacetime exploration and the harnessing of wind energy are not as far removed from each other as one might expect. Indeed, the statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2015 to 2021. The seemingly whimsical relationship between these variables has led us to challenge the traditional separation of public interest in scientific complexities and sustainability efforts, or as we like to think of it, breaking the "space-time continuum" between science communication and energy solutions.
Our investigation not only defies the laws of conventional scientific thought but also offers tantalizing implications for the realms of science communication, energy policy, and - based on our occasionally humorous findings - the occasional utilization of puns in academic discourse. In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this playful yet enlightening journey through the data, where the winds of knowledge and the mysteries of spacetime converge in unexpected ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on our whimsical exploration, we assembled a motley crew of methods and statistical tools, akin to a scientific pirate ship charting the uncharted waters of data analysis. With fervor rivaling that of a mad scientist, we collected data from various sources, including PBS Space Time YouTube channel analytics and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) databases. Our journey began by navigating the treacherous seas of internet data repositories, with YouTube serving as our primary port of call for the wondrous world of public interest in spacetime phenomena.
Our quest for data spanned the years from 2015 to 2021, a period during which the cosmic ballet of PBS Space Time videos and the gusty symphony of wind power generation in Samoa unfolded. Armed with an array of statistical instruments, we set sail on this curious adventure, poised to uncover the hidden connections between these seemingly unrelated realms.
To quantify the magnitude of public fascination with spacetime intricacies, we diligently compiled data on the total views of PBS Space Time videos over the designated time frame. Meanwhile, in the realm of sustainable energy, the EIA's repository provided us with the bountiful harvest of wind power generation figures in Samoa, allowing us to measure the surges and ebbs of renewable energy production with precision.
Applying statistical sorcery, we cast an ensemble of analytical spells, drawing upon correlation analysis to unveil the potential interplay between YouTube viewership and wind power generation. With the resilience of intrepid explorers, we delved into the labyrinth of statistical software to compute the correlation coefficient, like intrepid cartographers charting the terra incognita of data relationships.
Our enchanting journey also entailed the scrutiny of p-values, those mystical indicators of statistical significance. Through the manipulation of mathematical incantations, we sought to discern whether the observed connection between PBS Space Time viewership and wind power generation transcended mere happenstance and ventured into the realm of statistical certainty.
While our methods may have at times appeared as convoluted as an Escher puzzle, our approach was underpinned by a commitment to rigor and a steadfast determination to unravel the enigmatic relationship between these extraordinary variables. With the flickering illumination of statistical significance guiding our way, we navigated the turbulent seas of data analysis, ultimately unveiling a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01. These figures, like celestial constellations in the night sky, beckoned us to embrace the unexpected correlation between the esoteric allure of spacetime exploration and the renewable winds of change in Samoa.
In the pursuit of scientific discovery, we humbly acknowledge the potential limitations of our methods, recognizing that the caprices of data and the intricacies of statistical analysis may conceal subtler patterns beneath our gaze. Yet, with our findings poised to challenge the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry and delightful puns waiting to be cracked, we eagerly invite fellow researchers and intrepid explorers to join us in this whimsical odyssey through the eccentric terrain of data, where the arcane winds of statistics dance cheek to cheek with the charming mysteries of spacetime fascination.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2015 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9852804, r-squared of 0.9707775, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and in the world of scientific research, the intersection of seemingly disparate phenomena can yield surprising insights. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. Our inquiry is motivated by the peculiar juxtaposition of public fascination with spacetime complexities and the practical generation of renewable energy on a tropical island.
As our team delved into this curious venture, we were met with the intriguing challenge of navigating the complexities of both statistical analysis and intergalactic wormholes - albeit, the former proving to be more within our grasp than the latter. Leveraging data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to statistically elucidate the potential link between the vibrant viewership of PBS Space Time and the gusty generation of wind power in Samoa.
While the initial reaction to this research topic may elicit a chuckle or two, our findings have unearthed a correlation that is far from a mere cosmic coincidence. It appears that the intricate dance of spacetime exploration and the harnessing of wind energy are not as far removed from each other as one might expect. Indeed, the statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2015 to 2021. The seemingly whimsical relationship between these variables has led us to challenge the traditional separation of public interest in scientific complexities and sustainability efforts, or as we like to think of it, breaking the "space-time continuum" between science communication and energy solutions.
Our investigation not only defies the laws of conventional scientific thought but also offers tantalizing implications for the realms of science communication, energy policy, and - based on our occasionally humorous findings - the occasional utilization of puns in academic discourse. In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this playful yet enlightening journey through the data, where the winds of knowledge and the mysteries of spacetime converge in unexpected ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa yielded intriguing findings. For the period from 2015 to 2021, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9707775, suggesting that approximately 97% of the variability in wind power generated in Samoa could be explained by the total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the robustness of this relationship, indicating a high level of statistical significance.
The results of our analysis are succinctly encapsulated in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is showcased. The figure not only visually reinforces the substantial link between these variables but also serves as a visual representation of the whimsical intertwining of science communication and renewable energy.
It is important to note that while the correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is undeniably strong, our findings do not imply causation. Nevertheless, the unexpected convergence of public interest in spacetime complexities and the generation of wind power in Samoa invites a lighthearted reflection on the interconnectedness of scientific inquiry and sustainability efforts.
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a significant statistical relationship between these disparate phenomena, challenging conventions and offering a delightful avenue for further exploration at the intersection of pop culture curiosity and environmental sustainability. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of our universe and the complexities of renewable energy, we find ourselves delightfully entangled in the playful dance of data analysis and the occasional science-infused pun.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the purported correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is, understandably, limited. Smith, Doe, and Jones have yet to delve into this unique intersection of untamed curiosity about the cosmos and the harnessing of renewable energy. However, a multitude of theoretical frameworks and empirical studies stand ready to inform our whimsical exploration.
In "Renewable Energy: Power for a Sustainable Future," Boyle et al. shed light on the various sources of renewable energy and the mechanisms through which these sources can be harnessed for the betterment of humanity. While their work primarily focuses on the technical and environmental aspects of renewable energy, one cannot help but ponder the potential for a sustainable future where the awe-inspiring complexities of spacetime intertwine with renewable energy generation.
Turning to the domain of theoretical physics, Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" offers an enthralling glimpse into the enigmatic realms of spacetime and the fundamental laws that govern our universe. Although not directly related to wind power generation in Samoa, Hawking's magnum opus provides a cosmic backdrop against which the playful dance of PBS Space Time viewership and wind power may unfold.
Moving from non-fiction to the realm of fiction, Verne's "From the Earth to the Moon" and Jules' "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" beckon with tales of exploration, discovery, and the boundless wonders of the natural world. While these literary works may not offer empirical evidence of a correlation between YouTube views and wind power, they certainly provide a literary backdrop against which to appreciate the uncharted territories of our research endeavor.
In the spirit of embracing unconventional sources of inspiration, the research team also found it pertinent to seek insights from sources beyond traditional academia. The animated series "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" were selected for their captivating portrayal of scientific phenomena and principles. While geared toward a younger audience, these educational programs offer invaluable insights into the art of science communication and may illuminate our understanding of how public interest in scientific complexities shapes the narrative around renewable energy.
As we navigate through the waters of existing literature, it becomes clear that our pursuit of understanding the connection between PBS Space Time YouTube views and wind power in Samoa requires a melding of quantitative analysis, scientific imagination, and a touch of whimsy. In the pages that follow, we endeavor to marry these elements in our own quirky exploration, with the occasional pun serving as a buoy to guide us through the sea of empirical data and scientific inquiry.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa yielded intriguing findings. For the period from 2015 to 2021, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9707775, suggesting that approximately 97% of the variability in wind power generated in Samoa could be explained by the total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the robustness of this relationship, indicating a high level of statistical significance.
The results of our analysis are succinctly encapsulated in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is showcased. The figure not only visually reinforces the substantial link between these variables but also serves as a visual representation of the whimsical intertwining of science communication and renewable energy.
It is important to note that while the correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is undeniably strong, our findings do not imply causation. Nevertheless, the unexpected convergence of public interest in spacetime complexities and the generation of wind power in Samoa invites a lighthearted reflection on the interconnectedness of scientific inquiry and sustainability efforts.
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a significant statistical relationship between these disparate phenomena, challenging conventions and offering a delightful avenue for further exploration at the intersection of pop culture curiosity and environmental sustainability. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of our universe and the complexities of renewable energy, we find ourselves delightfully entangled in the playful dance of data analysis and the occasional science-infused pun.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings unexpectedly supported the whimsical and seemingly offbeat theoretical underpinnings outlined in the literature review. To our amusement, the statistically significant correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa validated the uncharted potential of this quirky connection. Such an unanticipated alignment of YouTube viewership of cosmological conundrums and the generation of renewable energy in Samoa adds a touch of levity to the empirical landscape of scientific exploration.
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9707775, mirrored the remarkable intertwining of public interest in the enigmatic realms of space-time and the sustainable generation of wind power. While we approached this research with a lighthearted curiosity, we were pleasantly surprised to uncover a strong statistical relationship that defied conventional scientific boundaries.
Our results not only substantiated the unconventional theoretical undercurrents, reminiscent of Jules Verne's literary musings and Bill Nye's captivating science narratives, but also propelled these imaginative threads into the realm of empirical reality. As we navigated the sea of empirical data, the buoyant spirit of witticism and whimsy served as our guiding light, leading us to a statistically significant correlation that evoked both scholarly rigor and playful contemplation.
Moreover, the high level of statistical significance, indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01, further underscored the substantive nature of this correlation. While our findings do not imply a causal relationship, they certainly invite a spirited reflection on the unexpected convergence of science communication and sustainability efforts. As we continue this delightful dance between seemingly disparate phenomena, we are reminded of the enchanting interconnectedness of scientific inquiry and the whimsical allure of vibrant data analysis.
Our research beckons the scientific community to embrace unanticipated correlations with open-minded levity and to recognize the delightful potential for connecting complex scientific concepts and public intrigue. As we tread this unexplored territory, the occasional pun and playful observation offer a whimsical flair to the empirical landscape, keeping the spirit of scientific inquiry buoyant and imaginative.
In the pages that follow, we invite fellow researchers to join us in an exploration that intertwines the profound and the playful, the statistical and the spirited, and the empirical and the enchanting. Together, let us embark on a journey that melds whimsical science communication with the earnest pursuit of sustainable energy solutions, guided by the occasional lighthearted pun and an unwavering commitment to scholarly exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and Wind power generated in Samoa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and in the world of scientific research, the intersection of seemingly disparate phenomena can yield surprising insights. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. Our inquiry is motivated by the peculiar juxtaposition of public fascination with spacetime complexities and the practical generation of renewable energy on a tropical island.
As our team delved into this curious venture, we were met with the intriguing challenge of navigating the complexities of both statistical analysis and intergalactic wormholes - albeit, the former proving to be more within our grasp than the latter. Leveraging data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to statistically elucidate the potential link between the vibrant viewership of PBS Space Time and the gusty generation of wind power in Samoa.
While the initial reaction to this research topic may elicit a chuckle or two, our findings have unearthed a correlation that is far from a mere cosmic coincidence. It appears that the intricate dance of spacetime exploration and the harnessing of wind energy are not as far removed from each other as one might expect. Indeed, the statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2015 to 2021. The seemingly whimsical relationship between these variables has led us to challenge the traditional separation of public interest in scientific complexities and sustainability efforts, or as we like to think of it, breaking the "space-time continuum" between science communication and energy solutions.
Our investigation not only defies the laws of conventional scientific thought but also offers tantalizing implications for the realms of science communication, energy policy, and - based on our occasionally humorous findings - the occasional utilization of puns in academic discourse. In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this playful yet enlightening journey through the data, where the winds of knowledge and the mysteries of spacetime converge in unexpected ways.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa yielded intriguing findings. For the period from 2015 to 2021, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9707775, suggesting that approximately 97% of the variability in wind power generated in Samoa could be explained by the total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the robustness of this relationship, indicating a high level of statistical significance.
The results of our analysis are succinctly encapsulated in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is showcased. The figure not only visually reinforces the substantial link between these variables but also serves as a visual representation of the whimsical intertwining of science communication and renewable energy.
It is important to note that while the correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa is undeniably strong, our findings do not imply causation. Nevertheless, the unexpected convergence of public interest in spacetime complexities and the generation of wind power in Samoa invites a lighthearted reflection on the interconnectedness of scientific inquiry and sustainability efforts.
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a significant statistical relationship between these disparate phenomena, challenging conventions and offering a delightful avenue for further exploration at the intersection of pop culture curiosity and environmental sustainability. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of our universe and the complexities of renewable energy, we find ourselves delightfully entangled in the playful dance of data analysis and the occasional science-infused pun.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
The whimsical exploration into the correlation between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa has not only unveiled a statistically significant relationship but also sparked jovial contemplation on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9852804, coupled with the p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of the unexpected intertwining of public interest in spacetime complexities and the generation of wind power on a tropical island. Our findings, while certainly surprising, serve as a reminder of the delightful potential for unexpected connections in the realm of scientific inquiry. As we wrap up this delightful journey through data analysis, it becomes evident that the winds of knowledge and the enigmatic allure of spacetime complexities have converged in ways that defy conventional scientific boundaries – or, perhaps, we could say they've been caught in a cosmic vortex of statistical significance.
In light of these findings, it is with a touch of whimsy and a dash of statistical certainty that we assert: no further research is needed to attest to the fascinating link between the viewership of PBS Space Time YouTube videos and the generation of wind power in Samoa. This study stands as a testament to the harmonious interplay of scientific curiosity and renewable energy, leaving us with an appreciation for the unexpected connections that propel our research endeavors – and, of course, the occasional pun that might spark a scientific chuckle.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Quirky Energy Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Institute of Quirky Renewable Energy Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration with an abstract of This study undertakes a whimsical exploration into the connection between total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos and wind power generated in Samoa. By utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9852804 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021. Our analysis challenges the conventional thought that complex scientific concepts and renewable energy sources exist in separate realms by demonstrating a clear link between public interest in space-time complexities and the generation of wind power in a Pacific island nation. This study opens the door to further inquiries into the quirky intertwining of pop culture curiosity and green energy solutions, with potential implications for science communication, energy policy, and of course, the occasional pun.
ChatGPT:
YouTube analytics, PBS Space Time, wind power correlation, Samoa wind energy, renewable energy correlation, public interest in science, space-time complexities, green energy solutions, science communication, energy policy, unconventional correlations
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videosDetailed data title: Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
See what else correlates with Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos
Wind power generated in Samoa
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Samoa in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Samoa
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9707775 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Samoa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos) over the 7 years from 2015 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.0091E-5. 0.0000500907944841471300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.0050091% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 19,964 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.9, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos (Total views) | 72896200 | 69867200 | 51093600 | 44000900 | 47821400 | 40492500 | 42490400 |
Wind power generated in Samoa (Billion kWh) | 0.00023 | 0.00022 | 0.00015 | 0.00013 | 0.00013 | 0.00013 | 0.00013 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([72896200,69867200,51093600,44000900,47821400,40492500,42490400,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00023,0.00022,0.00015,0.00013,0.00013,0.00013,0.00013,])
array_1_name = "Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Samoa"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos
- Line chart for only Wind power generated in Samoa
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Wind Power and Witty PBS Space Time: A Whimsical Exploration
Thanks for being the explorer we needed!
Correlation ID: 5101 · Black Variable ID: 25657 · Red Variable ID: 23943