about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,091 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people question the status of Pluto, the gravitational pull of uncertainty causes Numberphile to orbit the topic, creating a celestial alignment of trendy videos. As the debate heats up, Numberphile simply can't resist the gravitational charm, leading to an out-of-this-world surge in 'hip and with it' video titles. It's like Pluto is the cool kid at the planetary party, and Numberphile just can't help but be drawn to its dwarf star power. So, the more the internet wonders about Pluto, the more Numberphile's content gets an astronomical boost, rocketing them to new levels of cosmic coolness. Watch out, because this trend is truly universal!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a YouTube thumbnail with a trendy cosmic backdrop, featuring a bold Numberphile video title "Is Pluto a Planet?" in vibrant, eye-catching font. The backdrop shows a cosmic scene filled with stars, planets, and galaxies in a captivating, modern style. Surrounding the video title, there's a cool, cosmic aura that emphasizes Pluto's enigmatic status and cosmic allure. The screen is also filled with Google search results for "Is Pluto a Planet?" to highlight the widespread curiosity surrounding this topic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Surrealism a funny image you would see on reddit a funny image you would see on reddit Low poly
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet', in the following situation: As more people question the status of Pluto, the gravitational pull of uncertainty causes Numberphile to orbit the topic, creating a celestial alignment of trendy videos. As the debate heats up, Numberphile simply can't resist the gravitational charm, leading to an out-of-this-world surge in 'hip and with it' video titles. It's like Pluto is the cool kid at the planetary party, and Numberphile just can't help but be drawn to its dwarf star power. So, the more the internet wonders about Pluto, the more Numberphile's content gets an astronomical boost, rocketing them to new levels of cosmic coolness. Watch out, because this trend is truly universal!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the YouTube thumbnail, a cosmic backdrop filled with stars, planets, and galaxies frames a bold and trendy Numberphile video title in funky, colorful font, drawing attention to the captivating topic of "Is Pluto a Planet?" The video title is surrounded by an aura of coolness, as if Pluto's enigmatic status has imbued it with cosmic allure. Meanwhile, the screen is filled with Google search results for the same question, highlighting the widespread curiosity surrounding Pluto's planetary identity. Overall, the scene captures the celestial pull of Pluto sparking an out-of-this-world surge in 'hip and with it' content from Numberphile.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In the YouTube thumbnail, a cosmic backdrop filled with stars, planets, and galaxies frames a bold and trendy Numberphile video title in funky, colorful font, drawing attention to the captivating topic of "Is Pluto a Planet?" The video title is surrounded by an aura of coolness, as if Pluto's enigmatic status has imbued it with cosmic allure. Meanwhile, the screen is filled with Google search results for the same question, highlighting the widespread curiosity surrounding Pluto's planetary identity. Overall, the scene captures the celestial pull of Pluto sparking an out-of-this-world surge in 'hip and with it' content from Numberphile. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a YouTube thumbnail with a trendy cosmic backdrop, featuring a bold Numberphile video title "Is Pluto a Planet?" in vibrant, eye-catching font. The backdrop shows a cosmic scene filled with stars, planets, and galaxies in a captivating, modern style. Surrounding the video title, there's a cool, cosmic aura that emphasizes Pluto's enigmatic status and cosmic allure. The screen is also filled with Google search results for "Is Pluto a Planet?" to highlight the widespread curiosity surrounding this topic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are caused is pluto a planet (Google searches for 'is pluto a planet') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

The International Journal of Interstellar Logic and Quirky Mathematics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Amidst the vast and mysterious expanse of our cosmic conversations, the quaint and yet captivating case of Pluto beckons to us with its enigmatic charm. From being dismissed as the ninth planet in our solar system to the controversial demotion to a mere "dwarf planet," the plight of Pluto has ignited a fervent celestial debate. Furthermore, as we glide through the celestial seas of the internet, the alluring allure of Numberphile's lexicologically lavish YouTube video titles captures our attention, enticing us to explore the "hip and with it" world of numbers and notions. In this whimsical waltz of planetary ponderings and digital diversions, could there be a clandestine connection between the trendy titles of Numberphile's videos and the inquisitive inquiries about Pluto's planetary status?

In this study, we embark on a curious quest to probe the peculiar paradox of popular science communication, statistical correlations, and the perennially perplexing question, "Is Pluto a planet?" Leveraging the power of AI data mining techniques, we sift through the digital ether in search of subtle celestial signals lurking within the numerical nuances of Numberphile's titillating titles. Will our findings unveil an unexpected gravitational pull, an astrophysical attraction, or a statistical serendipity that links these disparate domains?

As we venture forth into this charmingly eccentric endeavor, let us not forget the whimsical wisdom of the cosmos, where numbers and notions dance in the celestial ballet of scientific discourse. For, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, a dash of delight and a sprinkling of levity may yet illumine the cosmic conundrums that captivate our curious minds. Join us as we unravel the mysteries that lie at the heart of the perplexing Pluto predicament, treading the fine line between rigorous research and the subtle siren call of scientific whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Amidst the vast and mysterious expanse of our cosmic conversations, the quaint and yet captivating case of Pluto beckons to us with its enigmatic charm. From being dismissed as the ninth planet in our solar system to the controversial demotion to a mere "dwarf planet," the plight of Pluto has ignited a fervent celestial debate. Furthermore, as we glide through the celestial seas of the internet, the alluring allure of Numberphile's lexicologically lavish YouTube video titles captures our attention, enticing us to explore the "hip and with it" world of numbers and notions. In this whimsical waltz of planetary ponderings and digital diversions, could there be a clandestine connection between the trendy titles of Numberphile's videos and the inquisitive inquiries about Pluto's planetary status?
In this study, we embark on a curious quest to probe the peculiar paradox of popular science communication, statistical correlations, and the perennially perplexing question, "Is Pluto a planet?" Leveraging the power of AI data mining techniques, we sift through the digital ether in search of subtle celestial signals lurking within the numerical nuances of Numberphile's titillating titles. Will our findings unveil an unexpected gravitational pull, an astrophysical attraction, or a statistical serendipity that links these disparate domains?
As we venture forth into this charmingly eccentric endeavor, let us not forget the whimsical wisdom of the cosmos, where numbers and notions dance in the celestial ballet of scientific discourse. For, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, a dash of delight and a sprinkling of levity may yet illumine the cosmic conundrums that captivate our curious minds. Join us as we unravel the mysteries that lie at the heart of the perplexing Pluto predicament, treading the fine line between rigorous research and the subtle siren call of scientific whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors delve into the whimsical world of popular science communication and its potential impact on public perception of celestial quandaries. While the inquiry may seem lighthearted at first glance, it delves into a critical intersection of scientific discourse and public curiosity surrounding the enigmatic status of Pluto. The unexpected gravitational pull of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles lies at the heart of this investigation, prompting a thorough exploration of the relationship between linguistic allure and the cosmic conundrum of planetary classification.

Smith et al. (2017) note the subtle yet influential role of popular science communication in shaping public awareness of astronomical phenomena, emphasizing the need for engaging and accessible content to stimulate scientific curiosity. Meanwhile, Doe (2019) expands on the impact of digital media on scientific discourse, underlining the potential for unconventional communication strategies to spark interest in complex scientific topics.

In "Book," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) explore the nuances of public engagement with astrophysical debates, shedding light on the multifaceted factors that contribute to the public's fascination with celestial objects. Their work underscores the intricate interplay between digital media and public perception, setting the stage for our investigation into the peculiar paradox of Numberphile's captivating video titles and public interest in Pluto's planetary status.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Pluto Files: The Rise and Fall of America's Favorite Planet" by Neil deGrasse Tyson (2009) offers a comprehensive examination of the controversies surrounding Pluto's reclassification as a dwarf planet. While not directly related to the influence of YouTube video titles on public perception, the book provides valuable insights into the broader cultural and scientific significance of Pluto's shifting status in the public consciousness.

On the fictional front, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams (1979) playfully explores the absurdity of interstellar exploration and the idiosyncrasies of planetary classifications, serving as a humorous counterpart to our scholarly endeavors. Additionally, "Good Night, Little Pluto" by Holly Hartman (2015) provides a delightful children's perspective on Pluto's status, reminding us of the diverse ways in which celestial objects capture the imagination of the young and the young at heart.

As the inquiry extends beyond traditional academic sources, the authors draw upon a diverse array of media for insights into the peculiar Pluto predicament. The whimsy of this investigation echoes the playful spirit of Numberphile's content, inviting readers to embrace a dash of scientific levity in the pursuit of cosmic understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends . You used data from 2011 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Amidst the vast and mysterious expanse of our cosmic conversations, the quaint and yet captivating case of Pluto beckons to us with its enigmatic charm. From being dismissed as the ninth planet in our solar system to the controversial demotion to a mere "dwarf planet," the plight of Pluto has ignited a fervent celestial debate. Furthermore, as we glide through the celestial seas of the internet, the alluring allure of Numberphile's lexicologically lavish YouTube video titles captures our attention, enticing us to explore the "hip and with it" world of numbers and notions. In this whimsical waltz of planetary ponderings and digital diversions, could there be a clandestine connection between the trendy titles of Numberphile's videos and the inquisitive inquiries about Pluto's planetary status?
In this study, we embark on a curious quest to probe the peculiar paradox of popular science communication, statistical correlations, and the perennially perplexing question, "Is Pluto a planet?" Leveraging the power of AI data mining techniques, we sift through the digital ether in search of subtle celestial signals lurking within the numerical nuances of Numberphile's titillating titles. Will our findings unveil an unexpected gravitational pull, an astrophysical attraction, or a statistical serendipity that links these disparate domains?
As we venture forth into this charmingly eccentric endeavor, let us not forget the whimsical wisdom of the cosmos, where numbers and notions dance in the celestial ballet of scientific discourse. For, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, a dash of delight and a sprinkling of levity may yet illumine the cosmic conundrums that captivate our curious minds. Join us as we unravel the mysteries that lie at the heart of the perplexing Pluto predicament, treading the fine line between rigorous research and the subtle siren call of scientific whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the confounding conundrum of the correlation between the linguistic lexicon of Numberphile's YouTube video titles and public ponderings about Pluto's planetary status, our research team employed a multifaceted and mirthful methodology. The data collection process unfolded over a period from 2011 to 2023, encompassing a comprehensive and convoluted approach to capturing the captivating nuances of this cosmic correlation.

Firstly, we utilized state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to diligently dissect and decipher the droll and dubious details within Numberphile's prodigious portfolio of video titles. Leveraging linguistic analysis tools, data mining techniques, and a generous sprinkle of statistical sorcery, we sought to quantify the quantum of quirkiness, the veracity of verbosity, and the profundity of puns present in these titles.

Subsequently, we engaged in an enchanting escapade through the ethereal expanse of Google Trends, where we sought to discern the celestial curiosities and capricious inquiries about Pluto's planetary standing. Through the tantalizing tool of trend analysis, we embarked on a labyrinthine journey to unearth the ebbs and flows of public interest in Pluto's planetary plight across the cyber constellations.

The marriage of these disparate data streams was accomplished through a merry medley of mathematical manipulations, statistical stratagems, and a dash of data sorcery. By applying robust and rigorous statistical techniques, including regression analysis, time series modeling, and a liberal dash of experimental exuberance, we endeavored to discern the subtleties and patterns that might underpin the purported correlation between the mischievous merriment of Numberphile's titles and the enigmatic enigma of Pluto's planetary quandary.

Moreover, in a whimsical nod to our pursuit of scientific mirth, we ventured into the uncharted terrain of linguistic legerdemain. Through a playful and pun-laden linguistic analysis of the video titles, we sought to unearth any hidden humor, cryptic clues, or droll double entendres that might unwittingly influence the inquisitive inclinations of the internet denizens in their quest for planetary enlightenment.

Lastly, to anchor our analysis in robust methodological moorings, we conducted a diligent and dexterous review of relevant literature, drawing upon the cosmic compendium of scientific studies, linguistic analyses, and statistical synopses to contextualize our findings within the broader landscape of whimsical science communication and the quixotic quest for planetary knowledge.

The amalgamation of these mirthful methodologies enabled us to embark on a merry and insightful investigation into the interstellar intricacies of public perception, popular science communication, and the peculiar dynamics at play in the Pluto predicament. The boon of our buoyant research approach was not just the acquisition of empirical evidence but also the cultivation of a scientific spirit suffused with a delightful, albeit droll, disposition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends .

For the time period 2011 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8084946, r-squared of 0.6536635, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Amidst the vast and mysterious expanse of our cosmic conversations, the quaint and yet captivating case of Pluto beckons to us with its enigmatic charm. From being dismissed as the ninth planet in our solar system to the controversial demotion to a mere "dwarf planet," the plight of Pluto has ignited a fervent celestial debate. Furthermore, as we glide through the celestial seas of the internet, the alluring allure of Numberphile's lexicologically lavish YouTube video titles captures our attention, enticing us to explore the "hip and with it" world of numbers and notions. In this whimsical waltz of planetary ponderings and digital diversions, could there be a clandestine connection between the trendy titles of Numberphile's videos and the inquisitive inquiries about Pluto's planetary status?
In this study, we embark on a curious quest to probe the peculiar paradox of popular science communication, statistical correlations, and the perennially perplexing question, "Is Pluto a planet?" Leveraging the power of AI data mining techniques, we sift through the digital ether in search of subtle celestial signals lurking within the numerical nuances of Numberphile's titillating titles. Will our findings unveil an unexpected gravitational pull, an astrophysical attraction, or a statistical serendipity that links these disparate domains?
As we venture forth into this charmingly eccentric endeavor, let us not forget the whimsical wisdom of the cosmos, where numbers and notions dance in the celestial ballet of scientific discourse. For, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, a dash of delight and a sprinkling of levity may yet illumine the cosmic conundrums that captivate our curious minds. Join us as we unravel the mysteries that lie at the heart of the perplexing Pluto predicament, treading the fine line between rigorous research and the subtle siren call of scientific whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the "hip and with it" Numberphile YouTube video titles and public interest in the planetary status of Pluto. Over the period from 2011 to 2023, our team found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946, with an r-squared value of 0.6536635, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship.

The correlation plot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the compelling connection between the variables, portraying a clear pattern that aligns with our statistical findings. The tantalizingly tight clustering of data points traverses a trajectory that mirrors the enigmatic orbital path of a celestial body, albeit manifested in the digital domain.

In scrutinizing the whimsically unexpected findings, one cannot help but admire the elusively enthralling nature of this celestial symbiosis. While the interplay of plucky Pluto-themed titles and public interest might seem as surreal as cosmic debris in space, our results underscore the notion that the engaging allure of Numberphile's numerical narratives may indeed ripple through the collective consciousness, nudging the masses to ponder Pluto's planetary predicament.

The unexpected robustness of the correlation invokes a planetary paradox, akin to Pluto's own ambiguous identity, teasing the boundaries of statistical serendipity and scientific whimsy. This alignment of popular science communication and public fascination underscores the pivotal role of engaging content creators in igniting cosmic curiosities and reshaping conversations about the cosmos.

In our quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe, we must not overlook the captivating synergy between lively language and planetary ponderings. As we navigate the cosmic conundrums that beguile us, let us revel in the quirks and quiddities that infuse our scientific pursuits, for it is the blend of rigour and revelry that propels us towards cosmic enlightenment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors delve into the whimsical world of popular science communication and its potential impact on public perception of celestial quandaries. While the inquiry may seem lighthearted at first glance, it delves into a critical intersection of scientific discourse and public curiosity surrounding the enigmatic status of Pluto. The unexpected gravitational pull of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles lies at the heart of this investigation, prompting a thorough exploration of the relationship between linguistic allure and the cosmic conundrum of planetary classification.
Smith et al. (2017) note the subtle yet influential role of popular science communication in shaping public awareness of astronomical phenomena, emphasizing the need for engaging and accessible content to stimulate scientific curiosity. Meanwhile, Doe (2019) expands on the impact of digital media on scientific discourse, underlining the potential for unconventional communication strategies to spark interest in complex scientific topics.
In "Book," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) explore the nuances of public engagement with astrophysical debates, shedding light on the multifaceted factors that contribute to the public's fascination with celestial objects. Their work underscores the intricate interplay between digital media and public perception, setting the stage for our investigation into the peculiar paradox of Numberphile's captivating video titles and public interest in Pluto's planetary status.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Pluto Files: The Rise and Fall of America's Favorite Planet" by Neil deGrasse Tyson (2009) offers a comprehensive examination of the controversies surrounding Pluto's reclassification as a dwarf planet. While not directly related to the influence of YouTube video titles on public perception, the book provides valuable insights into the broader cultural and scientific significance of Pluto's shifting status in the public consciousness.
On the fictional front, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams (1979) playfully explores the absurdity of interstellar exploration and the idiosyncrasies of planetary classifications, serving as a humorous counterpart to our scholarly endeavors. Additionally, "Good Night, Little Pluto" by Holly Hartman (2015) provides a delightful children's perspective on Pluto's status, reminding us of the diverse ways in which celestial objects capture the imagination of the young and the young at heart.
As the inquiry extends beyond traditional academic sources, the authors draw upon a diverse array of media for insights into the peculiar Pluto predicament. The whimsy of this investigation echoes the playful spirit of Numberphile's content, inviting readers to embrace a dash of scientific levity in the pursuit of cosmic understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the "hip and with it" Numberphile YouTube video titles and public interest in the planetary status of Pluto. Over the period from 2011 to 2023, our team found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946, with an r-squared value of 0.6536635, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship.
The correlation plot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the compelling connection between the variables, portraying a clear pattern that aligns with our statistical findings. The tantalizingly tight clustering of data points traverses a trajectory that mirrors the enigmatic orbital path of a celestial body, albeit manifested in the digital domain.
In scrutinizing the whimsically unexpected findings, one cannot help but admire the elusively enthralling nature of this celestial symbiosis. While the interplay of plucky Pluto-themed titles and public interest might seem as surreal as cosmic debris in space, our results underscore the notion that the engaging allure of Numberphile's numerical narratives may indeed ripple through the collective consciousness, nudging the masses to ponder Pluto's planetary predicament.
The unexpected robustness of the correlation invokes a planetary paradox, akin to Pluto's own ambiguous identity, teasing the boundaries of statistical serendipity and scientific whimsy. This alignment of popular science communication and public fascination underscores the pivotal role of engaging content creators in igniting cosmic curiosities and reshaping conversations about the cosmos.
In our quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe, we must not overlook the captivating synergy between lively language and planetary ponderings. As we navigate the cosmic conundrums that beguile us, let us revel in the quirks and quiddities that infuse our scientific pursuits, for it is the blend of rigour and revelry that propels us towards cosmic enlightenment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the lively cosmos of scientific inquiry, our investigation into the whimsical world of popular science communication has yielded remarkably robust and statistically significant findings. The correlation between Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and the public's interest in Pluto's planetary status may seem as enigmatic as the celestial body itself, yet our results align with prior research on the elusive impact of quirky content on scientific discourse.

The unexpected gravitational pull of Numberphile's linguistic allure is not to be underestimated, as it has manifested a correlation coefficient of 0.8084946, echoing the sentiments of Smith et al. (2017) regarding the subtly influential role of engaging science communication. The unconventional communication strategies espoused by Doe (2019) find a peculiar parallel in our findings, underscoring the potential for zany linguistic appeal to spark curiosity in complex scientific topics.

As we scrutinize the data, the tantalizing trajectory of the correlation plot beckons us to ponder the captivating symbiosis between playful language and cosmic curiosities. The unexpected robustness of the correlation evokes a planetary paradox, reminiscent of Pluto's enigmatic identity, teasing the boundaries of statistical serendipity and scientific whimsy. Our findings serve as a splendid testament to the profound influence of quirky content creators in reshaping public perceptions of astronomical mysteries, resonating with the multifaceted factors explored by Lorem and Ipsum (2020) in their examination of public engagement with astrophysical debates.

In navigating the boundless universe of popular science, we mustn't overlook the unassuming yet formidable influence of linguistic levity in shaping our cosmic conversations. Just as the celestial bodies whirl in their cosmic dance, so too does the euphoric blend of scientific rigour and revelry propel us towards cosmic enlightenment. As we navigate these cosmic quiddities, let us revel in the quirks that infuse our scientific pursuits and propel us toward a deeper understanding of the cosmos.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.

The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.

This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Amidst the vast and mysterious expanse of our cosmic conversations, the quaint and yet captivating case of Pluto beckons to us with its enigmatic charm. From being dismissed as the ninth planet in our solar system to the controversial demotion to a mere "dwarf planet," the plight of Pluto has ignited a fervent celestial debate. Furthermore, as we glide through the celestial seas of the internet, the alluring allure of Numberphile's lexicologically lavish YouTube video titles captures our attention, enticing us to explore the "hip and with it" world of numbers and notions. In this whimsical waltz of planetary ponderings and digital diversions, could there be a clandestine connection between the trendy titles of Numberphile's videos and the inquisitive inquiries about Pluto's planetary status?
In this study, we embark on a curious quest to probe the peculiar paradox of popular science communication, statistical correlations, and the perennially perplexing question, "Is Pluto a planet?" Leveraging the power of AI data mining techniques, we sift through the digital ether in search of subtle celestial signals lurking within the numerical nuances of Numberphile's titillating titles. Will our findings unveil an unexpected gravitational pull, an astrophysical attraction, or a statistical serendipity that links these disparate domains?
As we venture forth into this charmingly eccentric endeavor, let us not forget the whimsical wisdom of the cosmos, where numbers and notions dance in the celestial ballet of scientific discourse. For, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, a dash of delight and a sprinkling of levity may yet illumine the cosmic conundrums that captivate our curious minds. Join us as we unravel the mysteries that lie at the heart of the perplexing Pluto predicament, treading the fine line between rigorous research and the subtle siren call of scientific whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the "hip and with it" Numberphile YouTube video titles and public interest in the planetary status of Pluto. Over the period from 2011 to 2023, our team found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946, with an r-squared value of 0.6536635, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship.
The correlation plot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the compelling connection between the variables, portraying a clear pattern that aligns with our statistical findings. The tantalizingly tight clustering of data points traverses a trajectory that mirrors the enigmatic orbital path of a celestial body, albeit manifested in the digital domain.
In scrutinizing the whimsically unexpected findings, one cannot help but admire the elusively enthralling nature of this celestial symbiosis. While the interplay of plucky Pluto-themed titles and public interest might seem as surreal as cosmic debris in space, our results underscore the notion that the engaging allure of Numberphile's numerical narratives may indeed ripple through the collective consciousness, nudging the masses to ponder Pluto's planetary predicament.
The unexpected robustness of the correlation invokes a planetary paradox, akin to Pluto's own ambiguous identity, teasing the boundaries of statistical serendipity and scientific whimsy. This alignment of popular science communication and public fascination underscores the pivotal role of engaging content creators in igniting cosmic curiosities and reshaping conversations about the cosmos.
In our quest to unravel the mysteries of the universe, we must not overlook the captivating synergy between lively language and planetary ponderings. As we navigate the cosmic conundrums that beguile us, let us revel in the quirks and quiddities that infuse our scientific pursuits, for it is the blend of rigour and revelry that propels us towards cosmic enlightenment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we have delved into the captivating connection between the tantalizingly trendy titles of Numberphile's YouTube videos and the perennial pondering about Pluto's planetary status. Our findings, while gracefully cloaked in statistical significance, reveal a correlation coefficient that could rival the celestial dance of planetary bodies. The allure of playful titles and cosmic curiosities has intertwined in a cosmic waltz that has left us in the cosmic equivalent of a paradoxical predicament—a mirthful mystery that tickles the intellect.

As we navigate the cosmic conundrums that captivate our collective consciousness, let us not neglect the tantalizing touch of whimsy and wonder. From the intriguing influence of celestial-themed alliterations to the quirky pull of Numberphile's numerically-nuanced narratives, the language of science weaves a delightful tapestry that sparks curiosity amidst the cosmic seas of the digital domain. But fear not, for our exploration of this celestial symbiosis has left us content that no further research is needed in this inherently quirky and delightful area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Interstellar Logic and Quirky Mathematics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Cosmic Curiosity Consortium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Perplexing Pluto Predicament: Probing the Peculiar Paradox of Numberphile's YouTube Titles and Public Perception with an abstract of This paper delves into the delightful but slightly absurd intersection of popular science communication and public interest in the ambiguous planetary status of Pluto. Leveraging the enchanting allure of alliterations and zany number games, we scrutinize the potential influence of Numberphile's "hip and with it" YouTube video titles on the perennially perplexing question "Is Pluto a planet?" Our research team conducted a rigorous analysis using AI data mining techniques to scrutinize the numeric nuances within the video titles, and then correlated these with Google search trends for the contentious celestial object over a span of 12 years.
The findings, while whimsically unexpected, exhibit a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8084946 (p < 0.01) between the trendiness of Numberphile's video titles and the frequency of Google searches about Pluto's planetary status. Thus, we posit that the quirky and captivating appeal of Numberphile's content may indeed have an understated impact on the ongoing dialogue and public curiosity pertaining to the cosmological conundrum of Pluto's planetary classification.
This research not only underscores the curious dynamics of science communication in the digital age but also sheds light on the profound influence of quirky content creators in shaping public perceptions of the astronomical mysteries that captivate us all. In conclusion, as we navigate the boundless universe of popular science, let us not overlook the unexpected gravitational pull of playful titles and their potential to ignite cosmic curiosities in the hearts and minds of the masses.

ChatGPT:

"Pluto planetary status," "Numberphile YouTube titles," "Public perception Pluto planet," "Science communication influence," "AI data mining techniques," "Google search trends Pluto," "Science communication quirky content creators," "Impact popular science communication," "Influence of YouTube video titles," "Cosmological conundrum Pluto," "Public curiosity astronomical mysteries," "Influence of playful titles," "Popular science communication," "Numberphile video titles correlation," "Pluto planetary classification."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of Numberphile YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are

Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'is pluto a planet' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'

Correlation r = 0.8084946 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6536635 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'is pluto a planet') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are) over the 13 years from 2011 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00082. 0.0008214380583955675000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.082% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,217 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.46, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are (Hip' score (out of 10))6.44446.73686.78217.01437.24666.85296.98286.74517.20837.1256.90247.31717.0882
Google searches for 'is pluto a planet' (Rel. search volume)20.833320.519.833329.33333825.416726.583328.41672930.66672531.416728.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.4444,6.7368,6.7821,7.0143,7.2466,6.8529,6.9828,6.7451,7.2083,7.125,6.9024,7.3171,7.0882,])
array_2 = np.array([20.8333,20.5,19.8333,29.3333,38,25.4167,26.5833,28.4167,29,30.6667,25,31.4167,28.6667,])
array_1_name = "How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'is pluto a planet'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5091 · Black Variable ID: 25476 · Red Variable ID: 1518
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0