about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,087 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Hallie and the second variable is The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Hallie watched, they couldn't help but like the video, and it created a chain reaction of Hallie happiness that boosted those like numbers. It's like they had a secret power to summon the almighty likes for MrBeast! Keep watching, Hallies of the world, and spread that YouTube joy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute 2D animation ] Create a heartwarming scene where a colorful and vibrant cartoon version of MrBeast's YouTube video is playing on a screen. The video portrays MrBeast's character surrounded by various delightful elements such as smiling animals, rainbow-colored effects, and heart emojis floating around. The like button at the bottom is magnified, beaming with a radiant glow as it receives numerous joyful clicks. The name "Hallie" is prominently displayed among the list of people who have liked the video, and as the video progresses, a wave of adorable and cheerful Hallie characters begins to emerge from the like button. Each Hallie is filled with pure happiness and excitement, and as they multiply rapidly, the wave of Hallies results in a surge of colorful energy that spreads across the video, symbolizing the magical influence of Hallies in elevating the joy and popularity of MrBeast's content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Cute 2D animation Concept art a Polaroid photo A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos, in the following situation: Every time someone named Hallie watched, they couldn't help but like the video, and it created a chain reaction of Hallie happiness that boosted those like numbers. It's like they had a secret power to summon the almighty likes for MrBeast! Keep watching, Hallies of the world, and spread that YouTube joy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture the YouTube video featuring MrBeast, with the like button on the bottom and the name "Hallie" listed as having liked the video. As more Hallies watch the video, the like count increases rapidly, creating a wave of Hallie happiness that elevates the average number of likes on MrBeast's videos, symbolizing the special power of Hallies to spread joy and increase popularity through their likes.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: Picture the YouTube video featuring MrBeast, with the like button on the bottom and the name "Hallie" listed as having liked the video. As more Hallies watch the video, the like count increases rapidly, creating a wave of Hallie happiness that elevates the average number of likes on MrBeast's videos, symbolizing the special power of Hallies to spread joy and increase popularity through their likes. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute 2D animation ] Create a heartwarming scene where a colorful and vibrant cartoon version of MrBeast's YouTube video is playing on a screen. The video portrays MrBeast's character surrounded by various delightful elements such as smiling animals, rainbow-colored effects, and heart emojis floating around. The like button at the bottom is magnified, beaming with a radiant glow as it receives numerous joyful clicks. The name "Hallie" is prominently displayed among the list of people who have liked the video, and as the video progresses, a wave of adorable and cheerful Hallie characters begins to emerge from the like button. Each Hallie is filled with pure happiness and excitement, and as they multiply rapidly, the wave of Hallies results in a surge of colorful energy that spreads across the video, symbolizing the magical influence of Hallies in elevating the joy and popularity of MrBeast's content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Hallie caused The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence

The Journal of Social Nameology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9888617 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The influence of personal names on individual experiences and interactions has long been the subject of scholarly inquiry. From potential biases in employment to social perceptions, nomenclature holds a peculiar sway over human affairs. As we delve into the curious realm of digital engagement, the impact of names on online behaviors becomes an increasingly tantalizing area of study. Amidst the sea of usernames, hashtags, and influencer monikers, a peculiar pattern has emerged - the "Hallie" effect.

In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on the YouTube videos of the philanthropic sensation, MrBeast. While the correlation may at first glance seem frivolous or even arbitrary, our investigation aims to unravel the layers of this enigmatic relationship and tease out its intriguing implications.

The inspiration for this study stemmed from an amalgamation of happenstance and curiosity. The inquisitive minds of our research team could not help but notice the recurring appearance of the name "Hallie" in our daily musings on digital phenomena. As our fascination grew, it became clear that a systematic investigation was warranted to discern whether this was a mere coincidence or a genuine phenomenon. Thus, armed with statistical rigor and an appreciable dose of whimsy, we set out on the empirical odyssey that forms the crux of this research endeavor.

The unparalleled ascent of MrBeast as a formidable force in the digital realm makes his YouTube channel an apt testing ground for our inquiries. The sheer breadth of his audience and the viral nature of his content create an intriguing backdrop against which to explore the potential impact of the "Hallie" effect. Our findings, though unexpected, were nothing short of remarkable, reflecting a correlation coefficient that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.

As we cautiously unravel the intricacies of this peculiar correlation, we dare not dismiss the possibility of delightful serendipity amidst the labyrinth of data. This study, while anchored in empirical rigor, is not devoid of the whimsy and wonder that pervade the spaces where human behavior intersects with digital domains. Let us embark on this academic odyssey, where the "Hallie" effect serves as a whimsical guide through the labyrinth of digital nomenclature and its implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The influence of personal names on individual experiences and interactions has long been the subject of scholarly inquiry. From potential biases in employment to social perceptions, nomenclature holds a peculiar sway over human affairs. As we delve into the curious realm of digital engagement, the impact of names on online behaviors becomes an increasingly tantalizing area of study. Amidst the sea of usernames, hashtags, and influencer monikers, a peculiar pattern has emerged - the "Hallie" effect.
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on the YouTube videos of the philanthropic sensation, MrBeast. While the correlation may at first glance seem frivolous or even arbitrary, our investigation aims to unravel the layers of this enigmatic relationship and tease out its intriguing implications.
The inspiration for this study stemmed from an amalgamation of happenstance and curiosity. The inquisitive minds of our research team could not help but notice the recurring appearance of the name "Hallie" in our daily musings on digital phenomena. As our fascination grew, it became clear that a systematic investigation was warranted to discern whether this was a mere coincidence or a genuine phenomenon. Thus, armed with statistical rigor and an appreciable dose of whimsy, we set out on the empirical odyssey that forms the crux of this research endeavor.
The unparalleled ascent of MrBeast as a formidable force in the digital realm makes his YouTube channel an apt testing ground for our inquiries. The sheer breadth of his audience and the viral nature of his content create an intriguing backdrop against which to explore the potential impact of the "Hallie" effect. Our findings, though unexpected, were nothing short of remarkable, reflecting a correlation coefficient that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
As we cautiously unravel the intricacies of this peculiar correlation, we dare not dismiss the possibility of delightful serendipity amidst the labyrinth of data. This study, while anchored in empirical rigor, is not devoid of the whimsy and wonder that pervade the spaces where human behavior intersects with digital domains. Let us embark on this academic odyssey, where the "Hallie" effect serves as a whimsical guide through the labyrinth of digital nomenclature and its implications.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between nomenclature trends and digital engagement is a subject that has intrigued scholars across various disciplines. Previous research by Smith (2015) delves into the influence of personal names on online interactions, shedding light on the subtle ways in which nomenclature impacts digital behaviors. Furthermore, Doe (2018) expands upon this line of inquiry, examining the psychological implications of individuals' reactions to names in the online sphere. These studies serve as the foundation for our investigation, providing valuable insights into the nuanced dynamics of names and digital engagement.

In "The Name Effect: A Comprehensive Analysis," Jones (2017) addresses the broader societal implications of name popularity and its effects on individual experiences. The author's comprehensive examination of naming patterns in different contexts sets the stage for our exploration of the "Hallie" effect in the digital realm. Building upon these scholarly works, our study takes a unique and lighthearted approach to unraveling the intricate relationship between the first name "Hallie" and online phenomena.

Drawing from non-fiction sources, relevant works such as "Naming and Nucleons: The Intersection of Physics and Phonetics" (Johnson & Smith, 2020) provide theoretical frameworks for understanding the underlying mechanisms that may contribute to the "Hallie" effect. Additionally, "The Social Significance of Names" (Brown, 2019) offers a sociocultural perspective on the impact of names in contemporary society, laying the groundwork for our examination of how name popularity intersects with the digital landscape.

On a more whimsical note, fictional works such as "The Name Game Chronicles" by A. Novel (2018) present imaginative narratives that explore the fantastical dimensions of nomenclature. While purely fictional in nature, these stories offer playful interpretations of the potential influence of names on human experiences, serving as a lighthearted backdrop to our empirical inquiry.

The intersection of popular culture and digital phenomena cannot be overlooked in our study of the "Hallie" effect. Memes such as "Keep Calm and Like Hallie's Video" and "MrBeast Approves This Name" have permeated online spaces, hinting at the intriguing interplay between a specific name and digital engagement. While these cultural artifacts may seem inconsequential at first glance, they contribute to the broader context of our investigation into the subtle yet significant impact of nomenclature trends on online interactions.

As we immerse ourselves in the existing literature and cultural references related to our research topic, we embark on a journey that is as scholarly as it is whimsical, embracing the delightful convergence of academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity in our pursuit of understanding the "Hallie" effect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The influence of personal names on individual experiences and interactions has long been the subject of scholarly inquiry. From potential biases in employment to social perceptions, nomenclature holds a peculiar sway over human affairs. As we delve into the curious realm of digital engagement, the impact of names on online behaviors becomes an increasingly tantalizing area of study. Amidst the sea of usernames, hashtags, and influencer monikers, a peculiar pattern has emerged - the "Hallie" effect.
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on the YouTube videos of the philanthropic sensation, MrBeast. While the correlation may at first glance seem frivolous or even arbitrary, our investigation aims to unravel the layers of this enigmatic relationship and tease out its intriguing implications.
The inspiration for this study stemmed from an amalgamation of happenstance and curiosity. The inquisitive minds of our research team could not help but notice the recurring appearance of the name "Hallie" in our daily musings on digital phenomena. As our fascination grew, it became clear that a systematic investigation was warranted to discern whether this was a mere coincidence or a genuine phenomenon. Thus, armed with statistical rigor and an appreciable dose of whimsy, we set out on the empirical odyssey that forms the crux of this research endeavor.
The unparalleled ascent of MrBeast as a formidable force in the digital realm makes his YouTube channel an apt testing ground for our inquiries. The sheer breadth of his audience and the viral nature of his content create an intriguing backdrop against which to explore the potential impact of the "Hallie" effect. Our findings, though unexpected, were nothing short of remarkable, reflecting a correlation coefficient that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
As we cautiously unravel the intricacies of this peculiar correlation, we dare not dismiss the possibility of delightful serendipity amidst the labyrinth of data. This study, while anchored in empirical rigor, is not devoid of the whimsy and wonder that pervade the spaces where human behavior intersects with digital domains. Let us embark on this academic odyssey, where the "Hallie" effect serves as a whimsical guide through the labyrinth of digital nomenclature and its implications.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Anchored in empirical rigor and an ample dose of whimsy, the methodology employed in this study was designed to capture the elusive "Hallie" effect and its improbable correlation with the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging an eclectic assortment of data sources, our research team embarked on a helter-skelter journey through the annals of nomenclature and digital engagement. Below, we traverse the labyrinthine path of our research methods, outlining the various techniques and procedures that culminated in the unearthing of this inimitable correlation.

Data Collection and Compilation

Our intrepid odyssey commenced with the retrieval of data from the US Social Security Administration, where records of first names and their respective popularity rankings were obtained. The trove of historical data spanning the period from 2012 to 2022 provided a rich tapestry of nomenclature trends, allowing us to discern the trajectory of the first name "Hallie" and its vicissitudes across the years. Combining meticulous record-keeping with a dash of audacious curiosity, our data collection process sought to capture the nuances and idiosyncrasies of name popularity with an ardent fervor.

Simultaneously, in our pursuit of unraveling the cryptic ties linking nomenclature and digital acclaim, we delved into the enigmatic realm of YouTube analytics. Mining the troves of data from MrBeast's YouTube channel, we meticulously documented the average number of likes garnered by his distinctive brand of content. Seizing upon this digital bounty, we navigated the swells of online engagement with an eye for uncovering the unforeseen synergy between the "Hallie" effect and the hallowed realm of likes.

Data Analysis and Correlation Unveiling

As purveyors of statistical inquiry, we harnessed the raw data gleaned from the aforementioned sources with a methodical finesse. Employing classical correlation analysis techniques, we sought to elucidate the hitherto unseen rapport between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the applause garnered by MrBeast's digital exploits. The deployment of robust statistical software, along with an incantation or two to appease the elusive gods of correlation, facilitated our foray into the realm of quantitative exploration.

The unearthing of a correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a head-turning statistical significance of p < 0.01, bore fruit to our unorthodox pursuit, leaving us in a state of bemused incredulity and awe. The significance of this unearthed correlation was tantamount to discovering a hidden treasure trove amidst the data deluge, with potential ramifications that extend far beyond the contours of online engagement.

Interdisciplinary Interpretation and Implications

Armed with an array of interdisciplinary perspectives and a penchant for whimsy, our research endeavor did not conclude with the mere unearthing of statistical correlations. Akin to intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories, we dared to delve into the implications of our findings, prodding at the underbelly of digital phenomena to discern the potential ramifications of the "Hallie" effect.

Eager to inject a touch of levity amidst the scholarly pursuit, we charted a course through the whimsical interplay of personal monikers and online realms, paying homage to the delightful serendipity that often punctuates the scholarly pursuit. The implications unearthed by our investigations, while veiled in subtlety, served as testaments to the idiosyncrasies that govern the digital landscape, offering a glimpse into the peculiar ways in which nomenclature intertwines with online phenomena.

In sum, our methodology, while grounded in empirical rigor, was laced with a spirit of whimsy and wonder, underpinning our quest to capture the elusive "Hallie" effect and its improbable correlation with the digital escapades of MrBeast. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic links between personal names and online influence, we remain steadfast in our commitment to infusing the scholarly pursuit with a hint of audacious curiosity and a playful nod to the capricious nature of human interactions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9888617, r-squared of 0.9778475, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The influence of personal names on individual experiences and interactions has long been the subject of scholarly inquiry. From potential biases in employment to social perceptions, nomenclature holds a peculiar sway over human affairs. As we delve into the curious realm of digital engagement, the impact of names on online behaviors becomes an increasingly tantalizing area of study. Amidst the sea of usernames, hashtags, and influencer monikers, a peculiar pattern has emerged - the "Hallie" effect.
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on the YouTube videos of the philanthropic sensation, MrBeast. While the correlation may at first glance seem frivolous or even arbitrary, our investigation aims to unravel the layers of this enigmatic relationship and tease out its intriguing implications.
The inspiration for this study stemmed from an amalgamation of happenstance and curiosity. The inquisitive minds of our research team could not help but notice the recurring appearance of the name "Hallie" in our daily musings on digital phenomena. As our fascination grew, it became clear that a systematic investigation was warranted to discern whether this was a mere coincidence or a genuine phenomenon. Thus, armed with statistical rigor and an appreciable dose of whimsy, we set out on the empirical odyssey that forms the crux of this research endeavor.
The unparalleled ascent of MrBeast as a formidable force in the digital realm makes his YouTube channel an apt testing ground for our inquiries. The sheer breadth of his audience and the viral nature of his content create an intriguing backdrop against which to explore the potential impact of the "Hallie" effect. Our findings, though unexpected, were nothing short of remarkable, reflecting a correlation coefficient that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
As we cautiously unravel the intricacies of this peculiar correlation, we dare not dismiss the possibility of delightful serendipity amidst the labyrinth of data. This study, while anchored in empirical rigor, is not devoid of the whimsy and wonder that pervade the spaces where human behavior intersects with digital domains. Let us embark on this academic odyssey, where the "Hallie" effect serves as a whimsical guide through the labyrinth of digital nomenclature and its implications.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube videos yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. From 2012 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9888617 was observed, with an r-squared value of 0.9778475 and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical measures underscore the strength and significance of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, signaling a compelling association that defies conventional expectations.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the formidable correlation between the two variables. The data points coalesce into a discernible trend, reflecting the synchronized rise and fall of "Hallie" popularity alongside the ebbs and flows of YouTube likes. Observing this juxtaposition, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of nomenclature and digital interactions, as if the very essence of "Hallie" exerts a spellbinding influence on the digital realm, not unlike a captivating melody that draws in admirers.

These results unveil the inherent intrigue and complexity of the "Hallie" effect, prompting contemplation on the intertwined nature of personal names and online phenomena. The implications of this connection extend far beyond statistical measures, inviting us to ponder the quirky interplay between nomenclature trends and digital engagement. It becomes evident that there may be an elusive, yet undeniable allure to the name "Hallie," a charm that seems to echo across the digital landscape, eliciting responses that transcend mere chance or happenstance.

In uncovering this compelling correlation, we are reminded of the whimsy and wonder that infuse the pursuit of knowledge, where the most unexpected connections await discovery. The serendipitous nature of this finding serves as a testament to the playful intricacies of human behavior and digital dynamics. As we delve deeper into the "Hallie" effect, we are prompted to contemplate the delightful quirkiness that underpins our digital interactions, where the resonance of a name can wield an influence more potent than mere coincidence.

This revelation leaves us contemplating the curious mystery that shrouds the influence of nomenclature on our digital experiences, reminding us that in the labyrinth of data, unexpected delights and captivating oddities await the intrepid explorer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between nomenclature trends and digital engagement is a subject that has intrigued scholars across various disciplines. Previous research by Smith (2015) delves into the influence of personal names on online interactions, shedding light on the subtle ways in which nomenclature impacts digital behaviors. Furthermore, Doe (2018) expands upon this line of inquiry, examining the psychological implications of individuals' reactions to names in the online sphere. These studies serve as the foundation for our investigation, providing valuable insights into the nuanced dynamics of names and digital engagement.
In "The Name Effect: A Comprehensive Analysis," Jones (2017) addresses the broader societal implications of name popularity and its effects on individual experiences. The author's comprehensive examination of naming patterns in different contexts sets the stage for our exploration of the "Hallie" effect in the digital realm. Building upon these scholarly works, our study takes a unique and lighthearted approach to unraveling the intricate relationship between the first name "Hallie" and online phenomena.
Drawing from non-fiction sources, relevant works such as "Naming and Nucleons: The Intersection of Physics and Phonetics" (Johnson & Smith, 2020) provide theoretical frameworks for understanding the underlying mechanisms that may contribute to the "Hallie" effect. Additionally, "The Social Significance of Names" (Brown, 2019) offers a sociocultural perspective on the impact of names in contemporary society, laying the groundwork for our examination of how name popularity intersects with the digital landscape.
On a more whimsical note, fictional works such as "The Name Game Chronicles" by A. Novel (2018) present imaginative narratives that explore the fantastical dimensions of nomenclature. While purely fictional in nature, these stories offer playful interpretations of the potential influence of names on human experiences, serving as a lighthearted backdrop to our empirical inquiry.
The intersection of popular culture and digital phenomena cannot be overlooked in our study of the "Hallie" effect. Memes such as "Keep Calm and Like Hallie's Video" and "MrBeast Approves This Name" have permeated online spaces, hinting at the intriguing interplay between a specific name and digital engagement. While these cultural artifacts may seem inconsequential at first glance, they contribute to the broader context of our investigation into the subtle yet significant impact of nomenclature trends on online interactions.
As we immerse ourselves in the existing literature and cultural references related to our research topic, we embark on a journey that is as scholarly as it is whimsical, embracing the delightful convergence of academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity in our pursuit of understanding the "Hallie" effect.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube videos yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. From 2012 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9888617 was observed, with an r-squared value of 0.9778475 and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical measures underscore the strength and significance of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, signaling a compelling association that defies conventional expectations.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the formidable correlation between the two variables. The data points coalesce into a discernible trend, reflecting the synchronized rise and fall of "Hallie" popularity alongside the ebbs and flows of YouTube likes. Observing this juxtaposition, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of nomenclature and digital interactions, as if the very essence of "Hallie" exerts a spellbinding influence on the digital realm, not unlike a captivating melody that draws in admirers.
These results unveil the inherent intrigue and complexity of the "Hallie" effect, prompting contemplation on the intertwined nature of personal names and online phenomena. The implications of this connection extend far beyond statistical measures, inviting us to ponder the quirky interplay between nomenclature trends and digital engagement. It becomes evident that there may be an elusive, yet undeniable allure to the name "Hallie," a charm that seems to echo across the digital landscape, eliciting responses that transcend mere chance or happenstance.
In uncovering this compelling correlation, we are reminded of the whimsy and wonder that infuse the pursuit of knowledge, where the most unexpected connections await discovery. The serendipitous nature of this finding serves as a testament to the playful intricacies of human behavior and digital dynamics. As we delve deeper into the "Hallie" effect, we are prompted to contemplate the delightful quirkiness that underpins our digital interactions, where the resonance of a name can wield an influence more potent than mere coincidence.
This revelation leaves us contemplating the curious mystery that shrouds the influence of nomenclature on our digital experiences, reminding us that in the labyrinth of data, unexpected delights and captivating oddities await the intrepid explorer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study reveal a compelling and statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Delving into the existing literature, we find support for our findings, echoing the whimsical musings and lighthearted representations that have permeated scholarly and cultural discussions on name influence.

Our results align with the insightful work of Smith (2015) and Doe (2018), further illuminating the nuanced dynamics of nomenclature and its impact on digital behaviors. The robust correlation coefficient mirrors the fascinating insights put forth by Jones (2017), underscoring the societal implications of name popularity and individual experiences. This finding serves as a lighthearted yet substantive contribution to the ongoing dialogue on the interplay between personal names and online phenomena.

Intriguingly, our results also resonate with the thematic undercurrents of "The Name Game Chronicles" by A. Novel (2018), offering a playful counterpart to our empirical inquiry. The whimsical narratives within this fictional work hold a mirror to the captivating allure and influence of the name "Hallie" on digital interactions, embodying the delightful convergence of academic rigor and lighthearted curiosity that characterizes our study.

Moreover, our findings lend credence to the playful interpretations presented in the fictional narratives, encapsulating the inherent allure and influence of the name "Hallie" in the digital sphere. This connection between nomenclature trends and online engagement intertwines with the broader social significance of names, echoing the whimsical intertwining of popular culture and digital phenomena, as hinted at by the "Keep Calm and Like Hallie's Video" meme.

The robust association between the popularity of the name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos evokes a sense of wonder and whimsy, inviting reflection on the playful intricacies of human behavior and digital dynamics. The elusive allure of the name "Hallie" seems to exert a spellbinding influence on the digital landscape, eliciting responses that transcend statistical measures and hint at a captivating, albeit lighthearted, mystery.

As we navigate the labyrinth of data and unexpected connections in our pursuit of understanding the "Hallie" effect, we find ourselves immersed in the delightful quirkiness that underpins our digital interactions. This revelation serves as a joyous testament to the serendipitous and playful nature of human behavior, where the resonance of a name can wield an influence more potent than mere coincidence. In uncovering this compelling correlation, we are reminded of the whimsy and wonder that infuse the pursuit of knowledge, leaving us contemplating the curious mystery that shrouds the influence of nomenclature on our digital experiences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Hallie and The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The influence of personal names on individual experiences and interactions has long been the subject of scholarly inquiry. From potential biases in employment to social perceptions, nomenclature holds a peculiar sway over human affairs. As we delve into the curious realm of digital engagement, the impact of names on online behaviors becomes an increasingly tantalizing area of study. Amidst the sea of usernames, hashtags, and influencer monikers, a peculiar pattern has emerged - the "Hallie" effect.
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on the YouTube videos of the philanthropic sensation, MrBeast. While the correlation may at first glance seem frivolous or even arbitrary, our investigation aims to unravel the layers of this enigmatic relationship and tease out its intriguing implications.
The inspiration for this study stemmed from an amalgamation of happenstance and curiosity. The inquisitive minds of our research team could not help but notice the recurring appearance of the name "Hallie" in our daily musings on digital phenomena. As our fascination grew, it became clear that a systematic investigation was warranted to discern whether this was a mere coincidence or a genuine phenomenon. Thus, armed with statistical rigor and an appreciable dose of whimsy, we set out on the empirical odyssey that forms the crux of this research endeavor.
The unparalleled ascent of MrBeast as a formidable force in the digital realm makes his YouTube channel an apt testing ground for our inquiries. The sheer breadth of his audience and the viral nature of his content create an intriguing backdrop against which to explore the potential impact of the "Hallie" effect. Our findings, though unexpected, were nothing short of remarkable, reflecting a correlation coefficient that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
As we cautiously unravel the intricacies of this peculiar correlation, we dare not dismiss the possibility of delightful serendipity amidst the labyrinth of data. This study, while anchored in empirical rigor, is not devoid of the whimsy and wonder that pervade the spaces where human behavior intersects with digital domains. Let us embark on this academic odyssey, where the "Hallie" effect serves as a whimsical guide through the labyrinth of digital nomenclature and its implications.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube videos yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. From 2012 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9888617 was observed, with an r-squared value of 0.9778475 and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical measures underscore the strength and significance of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, signaling a compelling association that defies conventional expectations.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the formidable correlation between the two variables. The data points coalesce into a discernible trend, reflecting the synchronized rise and fall of "Hallie" popularity alongside the ebbs and flows of YouTube likes. Observing this juxtaposition, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of nomenclature and digital interactions, as if the very essence of "Hallie" exerts a spellbinding influence on the digital realm, not unlike a captivating melody that draws in admirers.
These results unveil the inherent intrigue and complexity of the "Hallie" effect, prompting contemplation on the intertwined nature of personal names and online phenomena. The implications of this connection extend far beyond statistical measures, inviting us to ponder the quirky interplay between nomenclature trends and digital engagement. It becomes evident that there may be an elusive, yet undeniable allure to the name "Hallie," a charm that seems to echo across the digital landscape, eliciting responses that transcend mere chance or happenstance.
In uncovering this compelling correlation, we are reminded of the whimsy and wonder that infuse the pursuit of knowledge, where the most unexpected connections await discovery. The serendipitous nature of this finding serves as a testament to the playful intricacies of human behavior and digital dynamics. As we delve deeper into the "Hallie" effect, we are prompted to contemplate the delightful quirkiness that underpins our digital interactions, where the resonance of a name can wield an influence more potent than mere coincidence.
This revelation leaves us contemplating the curious mystery that shrouds the influence of nomenclature on our digital experiences, reminding us that in the labyrinth of data, unexpected delights and captivating oddities await the intrepid explorer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a peculiar yet robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. The statistical measures, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9888617 and a p-value less than 0.01, highlight the unexpected and compelling association between these seemingly disparate variables. The whimsical dance of "Hallie" popularity alongside the ebbs and flows of YouTube likes defies conventional expectations, prompting contemplation on the intertwined nature of personal names and online phenomena.

As we reflect on these findings, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical and enigmatic nature of this correlation. The allure of the name "Hallie" seems to echo across the digital landscape, eliciting responses that transcend mere chance or happenstance. Indeed, the serendipitous nature of this finding serves as a testament to the playful intricacies of human behavior and digital dynamics.

The implications of this study are far-reaching, inviting further reflection on the quirky interplay between nomenclature trends and digital engagement. The very essence of "Hallie" exerts a spellbinding influence on the digital realm, not unlike a captivating melody that draws in admirers. This revelation leaves us contemplating the curious mystery that shrouds the influence of nomenclature on our digital experiences, reminding us that in the labyrinth of data, unexpected delights and captivating oddities await the intrepid explorer.

In light of these findings, it is evident that the "Hallie" effect holds a place of significance in the annals of digital engagement. While our exploration has been whimsical and enlightening, it is with a hint of wordplay that we assert that no further "Hallie-lujah" research is needed in this area. The data speaks for itself, echoing the name "Hallie" as a whimsical guide through the labyrinth of digital nomenclature and its implications.

The 'Hallie' effect, with its delightful quirkiness and unexpected resonance, beckons us to embrace the whimsy and wonder that pervade our digital interactions, for in the unpredictable and peculiar, we often find the most enchanting insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Social Nameology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Societal Nameology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The 'Hallie' Effect: Exploring the Correlation between Name Popularity and Social Media Influence with an abstract of The present study investigates the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Hallie" and the average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unravel the enigmatic link between nomenclature trends and online engagement. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9888617, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, we delve into the implications of these results, shedding light on the subtle yet significant impact of first names on digital interactions. Our research not only provides empirical evidence of the "Hallie" effect but also underscores the intriguing interplay between personal monikers and online phenomena.

ChatGPT:

"Hallie" popularity, social media influence, YouTube likes, first name popularity, nomenclature trends, online engagement, name correlation, social media impact, MrBeast, data analysis, digital interactions, name significance, online phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Hallie
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Hallie
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Hallie

The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on MrBeast YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9888617 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9778475 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Hallie) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.4E-9. 0.0000000093573359353615380000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 9.4E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 106,868,024 random variables You don't actually need 106 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Hallie (Babies born)57857051054353659668077682710171316
The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos (Average likes)49661921357.925083.910845.189634575590105651029187403806510496372010436200




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([578,570,510,543,536,596,680,776,827,1017,1316,])
array_2 = np.array([496619,21357.9,25083.9,10845.1,89634,575590,1056510,2918740,3806510,4963720,10436200,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Hallie"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5087 · Black Variable ID: 2917 · Red Variable ID: 25738
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0