Report an error
The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of receptionists in Texas | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Hallie | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Afghanistan | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'shrek' | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in Business | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Eli Lilly and Company's stock price (LLY) | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| Infosys' stock price (INFY) | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN) | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
| Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to annex texas' | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of dietitians and nutritionists in Florida | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Benito | r=0.85 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to treat a snake bite' | r=0.76 | 12yrs | No |
The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)