about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,058 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'is this a butterfly' meme gained traction, people worldwide couldn't help but ponder the true nature of these delicate creatures. This led to a surge in butterfly-themed merchandise, including butterfly-shaped gas containers. Suriname, caught up in the global butterfly fervor, saw a sharp rise in the demand for these unique liquefied petroleum gas containers, creating a market flutter that nobody had anticipated. So, in a bizarre twist of fate, the meme that started as a lighthearted joke ended up sparking a profitable fascination with butterfly-shaped LPG containers in Suriname.

Create a meme inspired by the is this a butterfly meme that in some way references Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

The Journal of Memeology and Energy Consumption

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining of humor and energy consumption trends may not seem like an obvious avenue for scholarly exploration, but as the old adage goes, "there's no smoke without fire." In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between the ubiquity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the unique context of Suriname. Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these phenomena, our investigation reveals a surprising and compelling relationship that demands attention and further investigation.

When it comes to internet memes, one might be forgiven for assuming that their influence is confined to virtual spaces and lighthearted exchanges. However, the impact of these seemingly frivolous creations can often manifest in unexpected ways, infiltrating the fabric of society in a manner reminiscent of a stealthy butterfly fluttering its wings across the globe. Similarly, while the demand for LPG might appear to be a straightforward outcome of economic and environmental factors, our findings suggest that there may be more to this fuel's popularity than meets the eye.

As we embark on this academic journey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy of our subject matter and the potential for skepticism. Indeed, the notion of drawing a parallel between a viral internet meme and a utilitarian energy source may initially evoke a raised eyebrow or a stifled chuckle. Nevertheless, the evidence we present in this paper, supported by robust statistical analysis and rigorous methodology, invites readers to ponder the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.

Furthermore, this investigation serves as an exemplar of the potential for interdisciplinary research to uncover uncharted territory and reveal the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of society. By marrying the concepts of internet culture and energy utilization, we not only shed light on an intriguing correlation but also open the door to a broader dialogue about the intricate ways in which human behavior and societal trends can intertwine, much like the delicate and choreographed flight of a butterfly.

In the ensuing sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence that underpins our findings, drawing on data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration to construct a compelling case for the parallel rise of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of LPG in Suriname. Through our meticulous examination, we hope to provide insights that transcend the immediate levity of internet humor and uncover the unforeseen impact it may exert on real-world phenomena, igniting curiosity about the profound and often unexpected interplay between contemporary culture and practical necessities.

Thus, as we voyage through this labyrinth of correlation, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare themselves for a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining. With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge at heart, let us embark on this unorthodox exploration of the enigmatic relationship between meme popularity and LPG consumption, mindful of the wisdom that sometimes, the most captivating discoveries hide behind the most unlikely facades.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of humor and energy consumption trends may not seem like an obvious avenue for scholarly exploration, but as the old adage goes, "there's no smoke without fire." In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between the ubiquity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the unique context of Suriname. Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these phenomena, our investigation reveals a surprising and compelling relationship that demands attention and further investigation.
When it comes to internet memes, one might be forgiven for assuming that their influence is confined to virtual spaces and lighthearted exchanges. However, the impact of these seemingly frivolous creations can often manifest in unexpected ways, infiltrating the fabric of society in a manner reminiscent of a stealthy butterfly fluttering its wings across the globe. Similarly, while the demand for LPG might appear to be a straightforward outcome of economic and environmental factors, our findings suggest that there may be more to this fuel's popularity than meets the eye.
As we embark on this academic journey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy of our subject matter and the potential for skepticism. Indeed, the notion of drawing a parallel between a viral internet meme and a utilitarian energy source may initially evoke a raised eyebrow or a stifled chuckle. Nevertheless, the evidence we present in this paper, supported by robust statistical analysis and rigorous methodology, invites readers to ponder the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
Furthermore, this investigation serves as an exemplar of the potential for interdisciplinary research to uncover uncharted territory and reveal the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of society. By marrying the concepts of internet culture and energy utilization, we not only shed light on an intriguing correlation but also open the door to a broader dialogue about the intricate ways in which human behavior and societal trends can intertwine, much like the delicate and choreographed flight of a butterfly.
In the ensuing sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence that underpins our findings, drawing on data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration to construct a compelling case for the parallel rise of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of LPG in Suriname. Through our meticulous examination, we hope to provide insights that transcend the immediate levity of internet humor and uncover the unforeseen impact it may exert on real-world phenomena, igniting curiosity about the profound and often unexpected interplay between contemporary culture and practical necessities.
Thus, as we voyage through this labyrinth of correlation, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare themselves for a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining. With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge at heart, let us embark on this unorthodox exploration of the enigmatic relationship between meme popularity and LPG consumption, mindful of the wisdom that sometimes, the most captivating discoveries hide behind the most unlikely facades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the pursuit of understanding the unlikely correlation between the proliferation of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname, we first turn to the scholarly works that lay the foundation for our exploration of this intriguing relationship.

Smith, in "The Interplay of Internet Culture and Energy Consumption," embarks on a meticulous analysis of the interconnectedness of virtual phenomena and real-world resource utilization. With a keen eye for uncovering unexpected correlations, Smith's work provides valuable insights into the potential influence of online humor on everyday practices, offering a thoughtful backdrop for our investigation.

The groundbreaking study by Doe and Jones, "Laughing Gas: Unveiling the Unconventional Links Between Memes and Energy Sources," further delves into the enigmatic intersection of humor and fuel preferences. Their comprehensive examination of internet memes and energy demand sets the stage for our present undertaking, igniting curiosity about the unexplored territories where virtual virality meets tangible necessities.

Expanding our scope beyond the traditional confines of scholarly literature, we also peruse the intriguing findings put forth in non-fiction works such as "The Butterfly Effect: Unraveling the Chaos of Internet Culture" by Chaos and "LPG Chronicles: Tales of a Gas-Infused World" by Talesman. These texts, while not directly addressing the specific correlation under scrutiny, offer thought-provoking perspectives on the intricate dynamics of societal phenomena, prompting us to consider the potential reverberations of online trends on material consumption patterns.

In the realm of fiction, we encounter narratives that, while not explicitly focused on our subject matter, bear curious resemblances in their themes. For instance, "The Meme Manifesto" by Memester plunges into the surreal world of internet subculture, compelling readers to contemplate the ripple effects of digital content on tangible realities. Similarly, "Gasping for Air: A Tale of Mirth and Methane" by Airey spins a whimsical yarn that inadvertently evokes contemplation of the interplay between humor and fuel choices.

Venturing further into unorthodox sources, we take into account the unconventional wisdom inscribed on the back of shampoo bottles, which, despite their seemingly unrelated content, offer a contemplative respite between showers and an unexpected source of musings on the interconnectedness of everyday experiences. While their insights may not be empirically validated, they serve as a lighthearted reminder of the ubiquitous influence of seemingly trivial elements on our collective consciousness.

With a nod to the academic rigour that characterizes this investigation, we approach these diverse sources with the understanding that inspiration and insight can stem from the unlikeliest of origins. In doing so, we embrace the unexpected and honor the spirit of intellectual curiosity that propels us forward in our pursuit of understanding the whimsical and thought-provoking relationship between a popular internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname.

In the following sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence and statistical analyses that underpin our exploration, tethering our findings to the broader scholarly discourse while remaining ever attuned to the offbeat and intricate tapestry of correlations that defines our investigation.

Let the journey through this labyrinth of scholarly and unconventional literature guide us toward an enlightened understanding of the captivating and convoluted marriage between internet frivolity and material necessities, where memes meet methane in a dance of unexpected correlation and delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2006 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of humor and energy consumption trends may not seem like an obvious avenue for scholarly exploration, but as the old adage goes, "there's no smoke without fire." In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between the ubiquity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the unique context of Suriname. Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these phenomena, our investigation reveals a surprising and compelling relationship that demands attention and further investigation.
When it comes to internet memes, one might be forgiven for assuming that their influence is confined to virtual spaces and lighthearted exchanges. However, the impact of these seemingly frivolous creations can often manifest in unexpected ways, infiltrating the fabric of society in a manner reminiscent of a stealthy butterfly fluttering its wings across the globe. Similarly, while the demand for LPG might appear to be a straightforward outcome of economic and environmental factors, our findings suggest that there may be more to this fuel's popularity than meets the eye.
As we embark on this academic journey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy of our subject matter and the potential for skepticism. Indeed, the notion of drawing a parallel between a viral internet meme and a utilitarian energy source may initially evoke a raised eyebrow or a stifled chuckle. Nevertheless, the evidence we present in this paper, supported by robust statistical analysis and rigorous methodology, invites readers to ponder the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
Furthermore, this investigation serves as an exemplar of the potential for interdisciplinary research to uncover uncharted territory and reveal the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of society. By marrying the concepts of internet culture and energy utilization, we not only shed light on an intriguing correlation but also open the door to a broader dialogue about the intricate ways in which human behavior and societal trends can intertwine, much like the delicate and choreographed flight of a butterfly.
In the ensuing sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence that underpins our findings, drawing on data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration to construct a compelling case for the parallel rise of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of LPG in Suriname. Through our meticulous examination, we hope to provide insights that transcend the immediate levity of internet humor and uncover the unforeseen impact it may exert on real-world phenomena, igniting curiosity about the profound and often unexpected interplay between contemporary culture and practical necessities.
Thus, as we voyage through this labyrinth of correlation, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare themselves for a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining. With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge at heart, let us embark on this unorthodox exploration of the enigmatic relationship between meme popularity and LPG consumption, mindful of the wisdom that sometimes, the most captivating discoveries hide behind the most unlikely facades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the entwined dynamics between the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname, the research team embarked on an expedition that was as imaginative as it was rigorous. The methodological odyssey encompassed the careful curation and analysis of data sourced primarily from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration.

The initial phase involved identifying and refining search terms related to the 'is this a butterfly' meme, harnessing the unparalleled power of internet humor to render it one of the most widely recognized and beloved online jests of recent times. The global ubiquity of this meme presented a captivating entry point for our investigation, reminiscent of the magnetic allure of a flickering flame amidst the shadows of cyberspace.

Simultaneously, data relating to LPG consumption in Suriname was meticulously gathered and mused over, drawing from the intensely detailed repository of the Energy Information Administration. The synthesis of these distinct datasets led to the inception of a juxtaposition so thought-provoking, it echoed the juxtaposition of a delicate butterfly fluttering in the vicinity of a utilitarian fuel source.

With the datasets in hand, the research team journeyed into the realm of statistical analysis. Leveraging the prodigious capabilities of advanced software such as R and Python, the team endeavored to coax meaning from the torrents of data, not unlike a gentle whisper steering the course of a wayward butterfly. In order to systematically examine the interplay between 'is this a butterfly' meme popularity and LPG consumption, a series of correlation analyses and time series modeling techniques were employed, employing the exploratory power of statistics to uncover hidden patterns and connections.

The discerning eye of the researcher was cast upon the resulting statistical measures, such as Pearson's correlation coefficient and the examination of time series relationships, to illuminate the nuanced dance between meme virality and LPG utilization. The quest to unravel this enigmatic relationship presented challenges akin to decoding the cryptic patterns on a butterfly's wing, necessitating meticulous attention to detail and an open mind to the serendipitous surprises that lay in wait within the data.

In essence, the methodology adopted for this study traversed the realms of internet culture and energy consumption with the grace of a butterfly and the tenacity of a diligent scholar, setting the stage for the revelatory findings elucidated in the subsequent sections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2006 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9407725, r-squared of 0.8850530, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining of humor and energy consumption trends may not seem like an obvious avenue for scholarly exploration, but as the old adage goes, "there's no smoke without fire." In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between the ubiquity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the unique context of Suriname. Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these phenomena, our investigation reveals a surprising and compelling relationship that demands attention and further investigation.
When it comes to internet memes, one might be forgiven for assuming that their influence is confined to virtual spaces and lighthearted exchanges. However, the impact of these seemingly frivolous creations can often manifest in unexpected ways, infiltrating the fabric of society in a manner reminiscent of a stealthy butterfly fluttering its wings across the globe. Similarly, while the demand for LPG might appear to be a straightforward outcome of economic and environmental factors, our findings suggest that there may be more to this fuel's popularity than meets the eye.
As we embark on this academic journey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy of our subject matter and the potential for skepticism. Indeed, the notion of drawing a parallel between a viral internet meme and a utilitarian energy source may initially evoke a raised eyebrow or a stifled chuckle. Nevertheless, the evidence we present in this paper, supported by robust statistical analysis and rigorous methodology, invites readers to ponder the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
Furthermore, this investigation serves as an exemplar of the potential for interdisciplinary research to uncover uncharted territory and reveal the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of society. By marrying the concepts of internet culture and energy utilization, we not only shed light on an intriguing correlation but also open the door to a broader dialogue about the intricate ways in which human behavior and societal trends can intertwine, much like the delicate and choreographed flight of a butterfly.
In the ensuing sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence that underpins our findings, drawing on data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration to construct a compelling case for the parallel rise of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of LPG in Suriname. Through our meticulous examination, we hope to provide insights that transcend the immediate levity of internet humor and uncover the unforeseen impact it may exert on real-world phenomena, igniting curiosity about the profound and often unexpected interplay between contemporary culture and practical necessities.
Thus, as we voyage through this labyrinth of correlation, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare themselves for a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining. With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge at heart, let us embark on this unorthodox exploration of the enigmatic relationship between meme popularity and LPG consumption, mindful of the wisdom that sometimes, the most captivating discoveries hide behind the most unlikely facades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis undertaken to unravel the mysterious connection between the incessantly quotable 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Suriname has yielded some truly captivating results. Our investigations, anchored in comprehensive data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, have led to the unearthing of a remarkable correlation. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 suggests an overwhelmingly positive association between the trajectory of the aforementioned meme's popularity and the demand for LPG in the peculiar context of Suriname.

The strength of this correlation is further underscored by an r-squared value of 0.8850530, indicating that a substantial 88.5% of the variability in LPG usage can be explained by the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme. This robust association, observed over the period spanning from 2006 to 2021, defies conventional expectations and thrusts into the limelight an unexpected relationship between a whimsical internet meme and a practical energy source.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling correlation between the burgeoning fame of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption patterns of LPG in the unique milieu of Suriname. The figure not only serves as a testament to the statistical coherence of our findings but also offers a striking visual representation of the entwined pathways of internet culture and energy utilization.

Although one might initially question the plausibility of a link between online humor and tangible energy demand, our results beckon us to consider the possibility that the flight of a butterfly’s wings in the virtual realm may indeed set off a chain reaction that resonates in the domain of energy consumption. The implications of this unexpected association extend beyond the confines of dank memes and LPG canisters, permeating the very fabric of societal dynamics and behavioral influences.

However, it is imperative to approach these findings with a hint of cautious skepticism, cognizant of the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter. While the allure of uncovering the clandestine ties between internet frivolity and practical energy choices is undeniably tantalizing, the robustness of our statistical analysis lends credence to the legitimacy of this correlation, offering a compelling prompt for further exploration.

In conclusion, the data-driven revelation of a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the propagation of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of LPG in Suriname serves as a clarion call for continued investigation into the unforeseen interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. This unorthodox nexus between internet culture and energy utilization beckons forth an engaging dialogue that transcends the perfunctory, inviting us to contemplate the profound influences of seemingly whimsical phenomena on the tangible realities of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of understanding the unlikely correlation between the proliferation of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname, we first turn to the scholarly works that lay the foundation for our exploration of this intriguing relationship.
Smith, in "The Interplay of Internet Culture and Energy Consumption," embarks on a meticulous analysis of the interconnectedness of virtual phenomena and real-world resource utilization. With a keen eye for uncovering unexpected correlations, Smith's work provides valuable insights into the potential influence of online humor on everyday practices, offering a thoughtful backdrop for our investigation.
The groundbreaking study by Doe and Jones, "Laughing Gas: Unveiling the Unconventional Links Between Memes and Energy Sources," further delves into the enigmatic intersection of humor and fuel preferences. Their comprehensive examination of internet memes and energy demand sets the stage for our present undertaking, igniting curiosity about the unexplored territories where virtual virality meets tangible necessities.
Expanding our scope beyond the traditional confines of scholarly literature, we also peruse the intriguing findings put forth in non-fiction works such as "The Butterfly Effect: Unraveling the Chaos of Internet Culture" by Chaos and "LPG Chronicles: Tales of a Gas-Infused World" by Talesman. These texts, while not directly addressing the specific correlation under scrutiny, offer thought-provoking perspectives on the intricate dynamics of societal phenomena, prompting us to consider the potential reverberations of online trends on material consumption patterns.
In the realm of fiction, we encounter narratives that, while not explicitly focused on our subject matter, bear curious resemblances in their themes. For instance, "The Meme Manifesto" by Memester plunges into the surreal world of internet subculture, compelling readers to contemplate the ripple effects of digital content on tangible realities. Similarly, "Gasping for Air: A Tale of Mirth and Methane" by Airey spins a whimsical yarn that inadvertently evokes contemplation of the interplay between humor and fuel choices.
Venturing further into unorthodox sources, we take into account the unconventional wisdom inscribed on the back of shampoo bottles, which, despite their seemingly unrelated content, offer a contemplative respite between showers and an unexpected source of musings on the interconnectedness of everyday experiences. While their insights may not be empirically validated, they serve as a lighthearted reminder of the ubiquitous influence of seemingly trivial elements on our collective consciousness.
With a nod to the academic rigour that characterizes this investigation, we approach these diverse sources with the understanding that inspiration and insight can stem from the unlikeliest of origins. In doing so, we embrace the unexpected and honor the spirit of intellectual curiosity that propels us forward in our pursuit of understanding the whimsical and thought-provoking relationship between a popular internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname.
In the following sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence and statistical analyses that underpin our exploration, tethering our findings to the broader scholarly discourse while remaining ever attuned to the offbeat and intricate tapestry of correlations that defines our investigation.
Let the journey through this labyrinth of scholarly and unconventional literature guide us toward an enlightened understanding of the captivating and convoluted marriage between internet frivolity and material necessities, where memes meet methane in a dance of unexpected correlation and delight.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis undertaken to unravel the mysterious connection between the incessantly quotable 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Suriname has yielded some truly captivating results. Our investigations, anchored in comprehensive data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, have led to the unearthing of a remarkable correlation. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 suggests an overwhelmingly positive association between the trajectory of the aforementioned meme's popularity and the demand for LPG in the peculiar context of Suriname.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by an r-squared value of 0.8850530, indicating that a substantial 88.5% of the variability in LPG usage can be explained by the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme. This robust association, observed over the period spanning from 2006 to 2021, defies conventional expectations and thrusts into the limelight an unexpected relationship between a whimsical internet meme and a practical energy source.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling correlation between the burgeoning fame of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption patterns of LPG in the unique milieu of Suriname. The figure not only serves as a testament to the statistical coherence of our findings but also offers a striking visual representation of the entwined pathways of internet culture and energy utilization.
Although one might initially question the plausibility of a link between online humor and tangible energy demand, our results beckon us to consider the possibility that the flight of a butterfly’s wings in the virtual realm may indeed set off a chain reaction that resonates in the domain of energy consumption. The implications of this unexpected association extend beyond the confines of dank memes and LPG canisters, permeating the very fabric of societal dynamics and behavioral influences.
However, it is imperative to approach these findings with a hint of cautious skepticism, cognizant of the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter. While the allure of uncovering the clandestine ties between internet frivolity and practical energy choices is undeniably tantalizing, the robustness of our statistical analysis lends credence to the legitimacy of this correlation, offering a compelling prompt for further exploration.
In conclusion, the data-driven revelation of a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the propagation of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of LPG in Suriname serves as a clarion call for continued investigation into the unforeseen interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. This unorthodox nexus between internet culture and energy utilization beckons forth an engaging dialogue that transcends the perfunctory, inviting us to contemplate the profound influences of seemingly whimsical phenomena on the tangible realities of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the pursuit of unraveling the whimsical and thought-provoking relationship between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in Suriname, our robust statistical analysis has unearthed a compelling correlation that defies conventional expectations. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and a p-value less than 0.01 witnessed from 2006 to 2021 solidifies the unexpected and intriguing connection between internet humor and material necessities.

Smith’s analysis of the interconnectedness of virtual phenomena and real-world resource utilization serves as a foundation for our results, as it laid the groundwork for understanding the potential influence of online humor on everyday practices. Similarly, Doe and Jones' study on the unconventional links between memes and energy sources has been vindicated by our findings, shedding light on the unexplored territories where virtual virality meets tangible necessities. The lighthearted narratives of "The Meme Manifesto" and "Gasping for Air: A Tale of Mirth and Methane" now appear to have unwittingly foreshadowed our surprising discovery, underscoring the potential reverberations of internet trends on material consumption patterns in a manner that could only be considered gasp-worthy.

Our results not only provide empirical support for the existing literature but also prompt a re-evaluation of the unexpected marriage between internet frivolity and practical energy choices. The r-squared value of 0.8850530 elucidates the substantial variability in LPG usage explained by the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme, thereby cementing the significant association between these seemingly disparate domains. This correlation, while seemingly improbable, emerges as a persuasive call for further exploration into the clandestine ties between internet culture and energy utilization.

The visually captivating scatterplot, depicted in Fig. 1, encapsulates the entwined pathways of internet culture and energy utilization, serving as a testament to the statistical coherence of our findings. While the widespread inclination may be to dismiss the potential link between online humor and tangible energy demand as mere whimsy, the substantial and statistically significant correlation uncovered by our analysis nudges us to entertain the possibility that the flutter of a butterfly’s wings in the virtual realm may indeed send ripples across the domain of energy consumption.

In the confluence of memes and methane, our findings beckon forth an engaging dialog that transcends the perfunctory, inviting us to contemplate the profound influences of seemingly whimsical phenomena on the tangible realities of our world. As we look ahead, the elucidation of this peculiar nexus between internet culture and energy demand stands as a beacon, guiding us toward an enlightened understanding of the captivating and convoluted marriage between memes and methane. Additionally, it inspires us to consider the myriad curious correlations that lay hidden within the realms of internet phenomena and practical resource consumption.

In conclusion, our study has not only illuminated the connection between the 'is this a butterfly' meme and LPG consumption in Suriname but has also kindled a flame of curiosity, drawing attention to the unexplored frontiers where internet frivolity and material necessities intersect. This finding calls for continued investigation into the unforeseen interplay between seemingly unrelated domains, urging researchers to embark on a journey through the labyrinth of scholarly and unconventional literature to decipher the intriguing interplay between internet humor and tangible energy choices. These unexpected associations prompt us to view the world through a lens that's not just butterfly-sight but one that sees gas-filled laughter, urging us to embrace the whimsical correlations that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly incongruent phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining of humor and energy consumption trends may not seem like an obvious avenue for scholarly exploration, but as the old adage goes, "there's no smoke without fire." In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between the ubiquity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the unique context of Suriname. Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these phenomena, our investigation reveals a surprising and compelling relationship that demands attention and further investigation.
When it comes to internet memes, one might be forgiven for assuming that their influence is confined to virtual spaces and lighthearted exchanges. However, the impact of these seemingly frivolous creations can often manifest in unexpected ways, infiltrating the fabric of society in a manner reminiscent of a stealthy butterfly fluttering its wings across the globe. Similarly, while the demand for LPG might appear to be a straightforward outcome of economic and environmental factors, our findings suggest that there may be more to this fuel's popularity than meets the eye.
As we embark on this academic journey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy of our subject matter and the potential for skepticism. Indeed, the notion of drawing a parallel between a viral internet meme and a utilitarian energy source may initially evoke a raised eyebrow or a stifled chuckle. Nevertheless, the evidence we present in this paper, supported by robust statistical analysis and rigorous methodology, invites readers to ponder the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
Furthermore, this investigation serves as an exemplar of the potential for interdisciplinary research to uncover uncharted territory and reveal the hidden threads that weave through the fabric of society. By marrying the concepts of internet culture and energy utilization, we not only shed light on an intriguing correlation but also open the door to a broader dialogue about the intricate ways in which human behavior and societal trends can intertwine, much like the delicate and choreographed flight of a butterfly.
In the ensuing sections, we will navigate through the empirical evidence that underpins our findings, drawing on data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration to construct a compelling case for the parallel rise of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the utilization of LPG in Suriname. Through our meticulous examination, we hope to provide insights that transcend the immediate levity of internet humor and uncover the unforeseen impact it may exert on real-world phenomena, igniting curiosity about the profound and often unexpected interplay between contemporary culture and practical necessities.
Thus, as we voyage through this labyrinth of correlation, we encourage readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare themselves for a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining. With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge at heart, let us embark on this unorthodox exploration of the enigmatic relationship between meme popularity and LPG consumption, mindful of the wisdom that sometimes, the most captivating discoveries hide behind the most unlikely facades.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis undertaken to unravel the mysterious connection between the incessantly quotable 'is this a butterfly' meme and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Suriname has yielded some truly captivating results. Our investigations, anchored in comprehensive data sourced from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, have led to the unearthing of a remarkable correlation. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 suggests an overwhelmingly positive association between the trajectory of the aforementioned meme's popularity and the demand for LPG in the peculiar context of Suriname.
The strength of this correlation is further underscored by an r-squared value of 0.8850530, indicating that a substantial 88.5% of the variability in LPG usage can be explained by the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme. This robust association, observed over the period spanning from 2006 to 2021, defies conventional expectations and thrusts into the limelight an unexpected relationship between a whimsical internet meme and a practical energy source.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling correlation between the burgeoning fame of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption patterns of LPG in the unique milieu of Suriname. The figure not only serves as a testament to the statistical coherence of our findings but also offers a striking visual representation of the entwined pathways of internet culture and energy utilization.
Although one might initially question the plausibility of a link between online humor and tangible energy demand, our results beckon us to consider the possibility that the flight of a butterfly’s wings in the virtual realm may indeed set off a chain reaction that resonates in the domain of energy consumption. The implications of this unexpected association extend beyond the confines of dank memes and LPG canisters, permeating the very fabric of societal dynamics and behavioral influences.
However, it is imperative to approach these findings with a hint of cautious skepticism, cognizant of the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter. While the allure of uncovering the clandestine ties between internet frivolity and practical energy choices is undeniably tantalizing, the robustness of our statistical analysis lends credence to the legitimacy of this correlation, offering a compelling prompt for further exploration.
In conclusion, the data-driven revelation of a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the propagation of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the consumption of LPG in Suriname serves as a clarion call for continued investigation into the unforeseen interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. This unorthodox nexus between internet culture and energy utilization beckons forth an engaging dialogue that transcends the perfunctory, inviting us to contemplate the profound influences of seemingly whimsical phenomena on the tangible realities of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of the compelling correlation between the 'is this a butterfly' meme's popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Suriname, it becomes evident that the fluttering of internet humor has implications far beyond the realm of virtual whimsy. Our findings, driven by robust statistical analysis and underpinned by a wealth of empirical data, emphasize the unforeseen interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal phenomena. The undeniable parallel between the proliferation of a viral meme and the demand for a fundamental energy source evokes a whimsical dance of influence, reminiscent of the intricate flight paths of the very butterflies that serve as the meme's namesake.

As much as the unexpected link between internet culture and energy consumption may elicit a wry smile, the statistical rigor and the striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 demand earnest consideration. This unorthodox connection prompts us to contemplate the subtle but impactful ways in which virtual culture can shape real-world behaviors, much like the subtle but impactful fragrance of a flower drawing in a butterfly.

The implications of our findings invite further exploration into the quirky juncture of meme virality and energy dynamics, akin to embarking on a quest to unearth the hidden treasures of an unlikely treasure map. The sheer unexpectedness of this correlation underscores the intricacies of human behavior and the myriad influences that permeate daily lives, often concealed beneath layers of surprising associations.

With a twinkle in our eye and a chuckle at the capricious nature of scholarly inquiry, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, but we certainly won't stop anyone from trying to unravel the mystery of how a meme and LPG consumption could be connected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Memeology and Energy Consumption


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Memetic Alchemy and Energy Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Fire: Exploring the Correlation Between the 'is this a butterfly' Meme Popularity and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Suriname with an abstract of This study investigates the correlation between the popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Suriname. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, a significant positive correlation was identified, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9407725 and p < 0.01 observed from 2006 to 2021. The findings suggest a potential link between the proliferation of this internet meme and the demand for LPG in Suriname, shedding light on the unexpected role of internet phenomena in influencing energy consumption patterns. The implications of this unusual relationship are discussed, along with suggestions for further research to decipher the quirky connection between online humor and real-world energy trends.

ChatGPT:

"is this a butterfly" meme, popularity, Liquefied Petroleum Gas consumption, Suriname, Google Trends, Energy Information Administration, correlation, internet meme, energy consumption, energy trends, online humor, data analysis, research implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'is this a butterfly meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Suriname in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname

Correlation r = 0.9407725 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8850530 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme) over the 16 years from 2006 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.9E-8. 0.0000000585681711509754100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 5.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,074,120 random variables You don't actually need 17 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme (Relative popularity)2.818182.444441.93.50.8751.714292.0833310.91.555561.750.8571432613.166712.259.25
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname (Million Barrels/Day)0.4800820.4952740.4856070.486830.492230.4987270.51210.5374270.4660210.466470.4767120.4271340.8263010.7309590.6991780.699178




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.81818,2.44444,1.9,3.5,0.875,1.71429,2.08333,1,0.9,1.55556,1.75,0.857143,26,13.1667,12.25,9.25,])
array_2 = np.array([0.480082,0.495274,0.485607,0.48683,0.49223,0.498727,0.5121,0.537427,0.466021,0.46647,0.476712,0.427134,0.826301,0.730959,0.699178,0.699178,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'is this a butterfly' meme"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Suriname"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5058 · Black Variable ID: 25140 · Red Variable ID: 24952
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0