Download png, svg
AI explanation
As people watched fewer minutephysics videos, they became less interested in quantum cleaning, leading to a reduced demand for bleach. Remember, when it comes to cleaning solutions, even Schrödinger couldn't make up his mind!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of two line graphs representing the decreasing views on minutephysics YouTube videos and the declining Google searches for "where to buy bleach." The graphs should be connected, visually demonstrating the cause-and-effect relationship of reduced demand for bleach as interest in the minutephysics videos declines. In the background, depict a playful image of Schrödinger with two bottles of cleaner, unable to decide which one to use. Let the style be high-tech, with a futuristic and sleek aesthetic. Ensure the visual depiction is simple and does not include any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Cyber folk Hyper-realistic Surrealism Concept art
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach', in the following situation: As people watched fewer minutephysics videos, they became less interested in quantum cleaning, leading to a reduced demand for bleach. Remember, when it comes to cleaning solutions, even Schrödinger couldn't make up his mind!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, the number of views on minutephysics YouTube videos decreases, depicted by a decreasing line graph. As this happens, a corresponding line graph shows a decrease in Google searches for "where to buy bleach." The two graphs are connected, visually showing the cause-and-effect relationship, reflecting a reduced demand for bleach as interest in minutephysics videos declines. In the background, there's a playful image of Schrödinger with two bottles of cleaner, unable to decide which one to use.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, the number of views on minutephysics YouTube videos decreases, depicted by a decreasing line graph. As this happens, a corresponding line graph shows a decrease in Google searches for "where to buy bleach." The two graphs are connected, visually showing the cause-and-effect relationship, reflecting a reduced demand for bleach as interest in minutephysics videos declines. In the background, there's a playful image of Schrödinger with two bottles of cleaner, unable to decide which one to use. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of two line graphs representing the decreasing views on minutephysics YouTube videos and the declining Google searches for "where to buy bleach." The graphs should be connected, visually demonstrating the cause-and-effect relationship of reduced demand for bleach as interest in the minutephysics videos declines. In the background, depict a playful image of Schrödinger with two bottles of cleaner, unable to decide which one to use. Let the style be high-tech, with a futuristic and sleek aesthetic. Ensure the visual depiction is simple and does not include any words or speech bubbles.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos caused where to buy bleach (Google searches for 'where to buy bleach') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach The Journal of Digital Eccentricities Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from YouTube and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of technology and household products has long been a topic of interest, prompting numerous scholarly inquiries into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres of human activity. In this vein, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and the frequency of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. The juxtaposition of these two domains is as unexpected as finding dark matter in the laundry room – a puzzling yet captivating phenomenon that demands further exploration.
As we wade into these uncharted waters, often with the faint scent of bleach wafting through the digital ether, we cannot help but reflect on the sheer delight of stumbling upon such a peculiar pairing of variables. It’s almost as if the universe is holding up a sign that says, "Watch physics videos, and thou shall seeketh bleach," beckoning researchers into a delightful pun-filled rabbit hole of statistical analysis.
The infusion of humor notwithstanding, our quest is anything but trivial. Our study is motivated by a genuine curiosity to decipher the underlying motives and impulses that lead individuals to seek out household cleaning products following a virtual journey through the cosmos and the annals of scientific knowledge. This endeavor speaks to the inquisitive nature of humanity, which, much like the elusive gravitational waves, pulls us towards unearthing the unconventional, the unexpected, and, of course, the punchlines.
The statistical analysis reveals a robust correlation between the two variables, with a coefficient that is as striking as the realization that one has run out of both baking soda and patience during a messy experiment. The implications of this discovery are as profound as the depths of space, sparking reflections on the intricate interplay between intellectual engagement and practical utility – a phenomenon we have playfully termed the 'bromine-tinged enlightenment'. Indeed, the findings beckon further examination, for the intersection of knowledge and commodity offers a veritable Goldilocks conundrum: not too esoteric, not too mundane, but just the right blend of intellect and convenience.
Our investigation serves as a beacon, illuminating the oft-overlooked avenues of inquiry that meander through the digital landscape. It demonstrates that even in the realm of scientific ponderings, the pull of domestic duties and the lure of quips and jests may prove to be inextricably intertwined. As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this intellectual escapade, armed with statistical tools and, if need be, protective gear against accidental bleach spills.
In summary, our preliminary findings emphasize the need to embrace the humor and whimsy that underpin our scientific pursuits. They also highlight the value of charting new frontiers in research, where unexpected correlations and the occasional dad joke await with open arms, beckoning us to unravel the tangled web of teas and T-shirts – that is, ties between unrelated phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of technology and household products has long been a topic of interest, prompting numerous scholarly inquiries into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres of human activity. In this vein, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and the frequency of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. The juxtaposition of these two domains is as unexpected as finding dark matter in the laundry room – a puzzling yet captivating phenomenon that demands further exploration.
As we wade into these uncharted waters, often with the faint scent of bleach wafting through the digital ether, we cannot help but reflect on the sheer delight of stumbling upon such a peculiar pairing of variables. It’s almost as if the universe is holding up a sign that says, "Watch physics videos, and thou shall seeketh bleach," beckoning researchers into a delightful pun-filled rabbit hole of statistical analysis.
The infusion of humor notwithstanding, our quest is anything but trivial. Our study is motivated by a genuine curiosity to decipher the underlying motives and impulses that lead individuals to seek out household cleaning products following a virtual journey through the cosmos and the annals of scientific knowledge. This endeavor speaks to the inquisitive nature of humanity, which, much like the elusive gravitational waves, pulls us towards unearthing the unconventional, the unexpected, and, of course, the punchlines.
The statistical analysis reveals a robust correlation between the two variables, with a coefficient that is as striking as the realization that one has run out of both baking soda and patience during a messy experiment. The implications of this discovery are as profound as the depths of space, sparking reflections on the intricate interplay between intellectual engagement and practical utility – a phenomenon we have playfully termed the 'bromine-tinged enlightenment'. Indeed, the findings beckon further examination, for the intersection of knowledge and commodity offers a veritable Goldilocks conundrum: not too esoteric, not too mundane, but just the right blend of intellect and convenience.
Our investigation serves as a beacon, illuminating the oft-overlooked avenues of inquiry that meander through the digital landscape. It demonstrates that even in the realm of scientific ponderings, the pull of domestic duties and the lure of quips and jests may prove to be inextricably intertwined. As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this intellectual escapade, armed with statistical tools and, if need be, protective gear against accidental bleach spills.
In summary, our preliminary findings emphasize the need to embrace the humor and whimsy that underpin our scientific pursuits. They also highlight the value of charting new frontiers in research, where unexpected correlations and the occasional dad joke await with open arms, beckoning us to unravel the tangled web of teas and T-shirts – that is, ties between unrelated phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) delve into the world of online tutorials and consumer behavior, exploring the fascinating dynamics that underpin seemingly incongruous relationships. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the cognitive and emotional responses of individuals engaging with educational content on digital platforms. These serious studies lay the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'.
In "Book," the authors find a plethora of intriguing examples of unexpected connections in consumer behavior, shedding light on the subconscious influences that guide purchasing decisions. Meanwhile, "Another Book" offers a comprehensive analysis of the psychological and sociological factors that shape online engagement with scientific content, providing valuable insights that inform our inquiry into the intersection of educational videos and household product searches.
However, as we traverse the scholarly landscape, it becomes increasingly clear that the ties that bind minutephysics and the quest for quarts of bleach are as perplexing as deciphering the gravitational anomalies of a cosmic lighthearted dad joke. The tangential relevance of real-world phenomena to these seemingly unrelated domains is akin to stumbling upon a punchline midway through an academic lecture – unexpected, yet oddly delightful.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Fabric of the Cosmos" and "Physics of the Impossible" offer thought-provoking perspectives that hint at the whimsical connections we aim to elucidate in our study. These works prompt readers to ponder the tantalizing nuances of scientific exploration and perhaps even consider the practical implications of quantum mechanics on everyday household chores.
On the fictional front, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Good Omens" present whimsical narratives that, while seemingly unrelated to our research, resonate with the spirit of unexpected discoveries and lighthearted musings. These literary forays into the realm of peculiar connections inspire us to approach our investigation with a dash of humor and a penchant for uncovering the offbeat correlations that lie beneath the surface of ordinary phenomena.
In our pursuit of understanding the enigmatic bond between minutephysics and bleach, we must not overlook the insights offered by the real-world vignettes provided by TV shows such as "The Big Bang Theory" and "MythBusters". These programs, with their blend of scientific intrigue and offbeat humor, mirror the essence of our own investigation, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may share a thread of commonality waiting to be unraveled.
As we plunge into the enthralling tapestry of minutephysics viewers and bleach seekers, we hope to infuse our inquiry with a healthy dose of levity – for what is the quest for knowledge if not an opportunity to sprinkle some lightheartedness into the serious business of research?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Google Trends . You used data from 2011 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of technology and household products has long been a topic of interest, prompting numerous scholarly inquiries into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres of human activity. In this vein, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and the frequency of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. The juxtaposition of these two domains is as unexpected as finding dark matter in the laundry room – a puzzling yet captivating phenomenon that demands further exploration.
As we wade into these uncharted waters, often with the faint scent of bleach wafting through the digital ether, we cannot help but reflect on the sheer delight of stumbling upon such a peculiar pairing of variables. It’s almost as if the universe is holding up a sign that says, "Watch physics videos, and thou shall seeketh bleach," beckoning researchers into a delightful pun-filled rabbit hole of statistical analysis.
The infusion of humor notwithstanding, our quest is anything but trivial. Our study is motivated by a genuine curiosity to decipher the underlying motives and impulses that lead individuals to seek out household cleaning products following a virtual journey through the cosmos and the annals of scientific knowledge. This endeavor speaks to the inquisitive nature of humanity, which, much like the elusive gravitational waves, pulls us towards unearthing the unconventional, the unexpected, and, of course, the punchlines.
The statistical analysis reveals a robust correlation between the two variables, with a coefficient that is as striking as the realization that one has run out of both baking soda and patience during a messy experiment. The implications of this discovery are as profound as the depths of space, sparking reflections on the intricate interplay between intellectual engagement and practical utility – a phenomenon we have playfully termed the 'bromine-tinged enlightenment'. Indeed, the findings beckon further examination, for the intersection of knowledge and commodity offers a veritable Goldilocks conundrum: not too esoteric, not too mundane, but just the right blend of intellect and convenience.
Our investigation serves as a beacon, illuminating the oft-overlooked avenues of inquiry that meander through the digital landscape. It demonstrates that even in the realm of scientific ponderings, the pull of domestic duties and the lure of quips and jests may prove to be inextricably intertwined. As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this intellectual escapade, armed with statistical tools and, if need be, protective gear against accidental bleach spills.
In summary, our preliminary findings emphasize the need to embrace the humor and whimsy that underpin our scientific pursuits. They also highlight the value of charting new frontiers in research, where unexpected correlations and the occasional dad joke await with open arms, beckoning us to unravel the tangled web of teas and T-shirts – that is, ties between unrelated phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
**[[METHODOLOGY]]**
In our relentless pursuit of unraveling the peculiar connection between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and the frequency of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach', we followed a meticulously crafted research methodology. Our data collection and analysis strategy can be compared to the precision of a particle accelerator – albeit with a touch of whimsy and a sprinkle of jest.
To begin our quest, we ventured into the digital realms of YouTube and Google Trends, armed with an insatiable curiosity and an inexhaustible supply of quirky remarks. We sought to gather data from the year 2011 to 2023, spanning a period marked by both planetary transits and trending cleaning supplies. Our fervent foray into digital archives was not unlike embarking on a grand adventure – albeit one that may appear unassuming to the untrained eye, much like finding the punchline to a well-crafted dad joke.
The data sourcing process involved meticulous scrutiny of minutephysics videos, dissecting the viewership trends and teasing out patterns and peculiarities – akin to navigating a maze of quantum entanglement, albeit with the occasional detour into household chores. Simultaneously, we combed through Google Trends, tracking the ebb and flow of searches for 'where to buy bleach' with the determined zeal of a detective unraveling a perplexing riddle. It was during these voyages into the digital expanse that the interwoven nature of intellectual thirst and domestic necessities dawned upon us, much like the sudden realization of the perfect punchline.
Having amassed the relevant data with care and precision, we subjected it to rigorous statistical analysis, employing sophisticated methodologies that echoed the precision of crafting a well-timed punchline. The correlation between the average views of minutephysics videos and the volume of Google searches for bleach procurement was meticulously examined, granting us insights that sparkled with the same finesse as a clever quip.
To bolster the reliability of our findings, we performed additional analyses, charting the temporal evolution of the correlation across different sub-periods within our dataset. This rigorous scrutiny allowed us to discern the nuances in the relationship, akin to discerning the subtle nuances of wordplay in a Shakespearean comedy.
We then engaged in a series of sensitivity tests and robustness checks, akin to stress-testing the punchline of a lighthearted anecdote to ensure its resilience under scrutiny. These assessments validated the robustness of our findings, leaving us assured of the soundness of the connection we had unearthed – a discovery as delightful as the delivery of a well-timed jest.
In conclusion, our data collection, analysis, and validation proceedings were concocted with the precision of a mad scientist and the levity of a stand-up comedian, yielding a confluence of scientific rigor and mirth that encapsulates the essence of our boundless intellectual adventure.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Google Trends .
For the time period 2011 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8552044, r-squared of 0.7313745, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The confluence of technology and household products has long been a topic of interest, prompting numerous scholarly inquiries into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres of human activity. In this vein, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and the frequency of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. The juxtaposition of these two domains is as unexpected as finding dark matter in the laundry room – a puzzling yet captivating phenomenon that demands further exploration.
As we wade into these uncharted waters, often with the faint scent of bleach wafting through the digital ether, we cannot help but reflect on the sheer delight of stumbling upon such a peculiar pairing of variables. It’s almost as if the universe is holding up a sign that says, "Watch physics videos, and thou shall seeketh bleach," beckoning researchers into a delightful pun-filled rabbit hole of statistical analysis.
The infusion of humor notwithstanding, our quest is anything but trivial. Our study is motivated by a genuine curiosity to decipher the underlying motives and impulses that lead individuals to seek out household cleaning products following a virtual journey through the cosmos and the annals of scientific knowledge. This endeavor speaks to the inquisitive nature of humanity, which, much like the elusive gravitational waves, pulls us towards unearthing the unconventional, the unexpected, and, of course, the punchlines.
The statistical analysis reveals a robust correlation between the two variables, with a coefficient that is as striking as the realization that one has run out of both baking soda and patience during a messy experiment. The implications of this discovery are as profound as the depths of space, sparking reflections on the intricate interplay between intellectual engagement and practical utility – a phenomenon we have playfully termed the 'bromine-tinged enlightenment'. Indeed, the findings beckon further examination, for the intersection of knowledge and commodity offers a veritable Goldilocks conundrum: not too esoteric, not too mundane, but just the right blend of intellect and convenience.
Our investigation serves as a beacon, illuminating the oft-overlooked avenues of inquiry that meander through the digital landscape. It demonstrates that even in the realm of scientific ponderings, the pull of domestic duties and the lure of quips and jests may prove to be inextricably intertwined. As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this intellectual escapade, armed with statistical tools and, if need be, protective gear against accidental bleach spills.
In summary, our preliminary findings emphasize the need to embrace the humor and whimsy that underpin our scientific pursuits. They also highlight the value of charting new frontiers in research, where unexpected correlations and the occasional dad joke await with open arms, beckoning us to unravel the tangled web of teas and T-shirts – that is, ties between unrelated phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' yielded a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8552044 (r-squared = 0.7313745, p < 0.01). This robust correlation suggests a compelling relationship between the instructional allure of physics tutorials and the quest for household cleaning supplies.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It is as clear as a freshly cleaned glassware in a laboratory, highlighting the unmistakable association between intellectual engagement with scientific content and the subsequent desire to procure bleach – lest one leaves behind unsightly stains akin to the persistent mysteries of quantum mechanics.
The findings evoke a humorous yet thought-provoking analogy akin to the attraction between celestial bodies, reminiscent of Newton's law of universal gravitation but with a twist: "The larger the fascination with minutephysics, the greater the gravitational pull towards bleach — a correlation as inviolable as the laws of thermodynamics, yet yielding unexpected insights into human behavior and consumer tendencies."
The implications of this substantial correlation cannot be bleached over; they underscore the interplay between educational content and domestic consumption patterns, illuminating a noteworthy crossover between the pursuit of knowledge and the practicalities of maintaining a tidy living space. It is as if the universe, in its infinite wisdom, has sown the seeds of peculiar consumer behaviors in the fertile soil of intellectual curiosity, yielding a harvest of statistical significance and whimsical revelations.
In the immortal words of Benjamin Franklin, "In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in physics there are bleach runs." Indeed, this discovery prompts a reimagining of the nexus between intellectual enlightenment and a desire for household sanitation, compelling further exploration into the unexpected yet undeniably present connections that underscore the rich tapestry of human behavior and interests.
Overall, these findings invite scholars and industry stakeholders alike to contemplate the unanticipated intersections between educational content and consumer behavior, reminding us that even when grappling with serious subjects, a sprinkle of humor and wit may yield insights as refreshing as a lemon-scented solution to life's mysteries.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) delve into the world of online tutorials and consumer behavior, exploring the fascinating dynamics that underpin seemingly incongruous relationships. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the cognitive and emotional responses of individuals engaging with educational content on digital platforms. These serious studies lay the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'.
In "Book," the authors find a plethora of intriguing examples of unexpected connections in consumer behavior, shedding light on the subconscious influences that guide purchasing decisions. Meanwhile, "Another Book" offers a comprehensive analysis of the psychological and sociological factors that shape online engagement with scientific content, providing valuable insights that inform our inquiry into the intersection of educational videos and household product searches.
However, as we traverse the scholarly landscape, it becomes increasingly clear that the ties that bind minutephysics and the quest for quarts of bleach are as perplexing as deciphering the gravitational anomalies of a cosmic lighthearted dad joke. The tangential relevance of real-world phenomena to these seemingly unrelated domains is akin to stumbling upon a punchline midway through an academic lecture – unexpected, yet oddly delightful.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Fabric of the Cosmos" and "Physics of the Impossible" offer thought-provoking perspectives that hint at the whimsical connections we aim to elucidate in our study. These works prompt readers to ponder the tantalizing nuances of scientific exploration and perhaps even consider the practical implications of quantum mechanics on everyday household chores.
On the fictional front, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Good Omens" present whimsical narratives that, while seemingly unrelated to our research, resonate with the spirit of unexpected discoveries and lighthearted musings. These literary forays into the realm of peculiar connections inspire us to approach our investigation with a dash of humor and a penchant for uncovering the offbeat correlations that lie beneath the surface of ordinary phenomena.
In our pursuit of understanding the enigmatic bond between minutephysics and bleach, we must not overlook the insights offered by the real-world vignettes provided by TV shows such as "The Big Bang Theory" and "MythBusters". These programs, with their blend of scientific intrigue and offbeat humor, mirror the essence of our own investigation, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may share a thread of commonality waiting to be unraveled.
As we plunge into the enthralling tapestry of minutephysics viewers and bleach seekers, we hope to infuse our inquiry with a healthy dose of levity – for what is the quest for knowledge if not an opportunity to sprinkle some lightheartedness into the serious business of research?
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' yielded a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8552044 (r-squared = 0.7313745, p < 0.01). This robust correlation suggests a compelling relationship between the instructional allure of physics tutorials and the quest for household cleaning supplies.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It is as clear as a freshly cleaned glassware in a laboratory, highlighting the unmistakable association between intellectual engagement with scientific content and the subsequent desire to procure bleach – lest one leaves behind unsightly stains akin to the persistent mysteries of quantum mechanics.
The findings evoke a humorous yet thought-provoking analogy akin to the attraction between celestial bodies, reminiscent of Newton's law of universal gravitation but with a twist: "The larger the fascination with minutephysics, the greater the gravitational pull towards bleach — a correlation as inviolable as the laws of thermodynamics, yet yielding unexpected insights into human behavior and consumer tendencies."
The implications of this substantial correlation cannot be bleached over; they underscore the interplay between educational content and domestic consumption patterns, illuminating a noteworthy crossover between the pursuit of knowledge and the practicalities of maintaining a tidy living space. It is as if the universe, in its infinite wisdom, has sown the seeds of peculiar consumer behaviors in the fertile soil of intellectual curiosity, yielding a harvest of statistical significance and whimsical revelations.
In the immortal words of Benjamin Franklin, "In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in physics there are bleach runs." Indeed, this discovery prompts a reimagining of the nexus between intellectual enlightenment and a desire for household sanitation, compelling further exploration into the unexpected yet undeniably present connections that underscore the rich tapestry of human behavior and interests.
Overall, these findings invite scholars and industry stakeholders alike to contemplate the unanticipated intersections between educational content and consumer behavior, reminding us that even when grappling with serious subjects, a sprinkle of humor and wit may yield insights as refreshing as a lemon-scented solution to life's mysteries.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study provide compelling evidence to support the prior research that has delved into the unexpected intersections between educational content and consumer behavior. The significant correlation we identified between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' aligns with the findings of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018).
It seems that the allure of intriguing physics tutorials may indeed trigger a cognitive link to household cleaning supplies, prompting individuals to seek out products like bleach. This connection, while initially lighthearted, highlights the complex interplay between intellectual engagement and everyday consumer choices. In the immortal words of Sir Isaac Bleach-ton, "What goes up must come clean."
Utilizing our robust statistical findings, we have illuminated an unexpected correlation that mirrors the continual gravitational dance of celestial bodies – a connection as captivating as the elusive force of dark matter, yet with practical implications for daily living. Much like the unforeseen punchline of a physics joke, the correlation between educational videos and household product searches offers a moment of quirky insight into human behavior and decision-making processes.
Our study also heeds the subtle promptings of the literary and fictional works in our literature review, embracing the spirit of whimsical connections. Just as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" serves as a humorous guide to the perplexing intricacies of the universe, our research positions the correlation between minutephysics and bleach searches as a delightful enigma, inviting further exploration into the quirky associations that underpin our daily lives.
In "The Fabric of the Cosmos", Greene (2004) artfully navigates the labyrinth of theoretical physics, just as our study has navigated the curious path that leads from physics tutorials to domestic cleaning products. Much like solving a puzzling paradox in quantum mechanics, our findings offer a moment of unexpected clarity amidst the seemingly disparate domains of knowledge and consumer behavior.
As we delve deeper into the peculiar correlation between minute physics tutorials and searches for household cleaning products, we are reminded of the enduring blend of scientific intrigue and offbeat humor presented by TV shows such as "The Big Bang Theory" and "MythBusters". These programs encapsulate the spirit of our investigation, serving as a humorous reminder that unlikely connections may lead to profound discoveries, much like finding unexpected joy in the midst of the rigor of scientific inquiry.
Our study, much like the irrepressible pursuit of knowledge itself, encourages scholars and industry stakeholders to embrace the serendipitous coincidences that underpin human behavior and interests. Just as the quirkiness and wit of a well-placed dad joke can enliven a serious conversation, our findings shed light on the captivating intersections between educational content and consumer tendencies. Indeed, as we gaze upon the correlation between minutephysics and the quest for bleach, we may find not just scholarly intrigue, but also a refreshing reminder of the lighthearted moments that enhance our understanding of the world around us.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The confluence of technology and household products has long been a topic of interest, prompting numerous scholarly inquiries into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate spheres of human activity. In this vein, we present our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and the frequency of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. The juxtaposition of these two domains is as unexpected as finding dark matter in the laundry room – a puzzling yet captivating phenomenon that demands further exploration.
As we wade into these uncharted waters, often with the faint scent of bleach wafting through the digital ether, we cannot help but reflect on the sheer delight of stumbling upon such a peculiar pairing of variables. It’s almost as if the universe is holding up a sign that says, "Watch physics videos, and thou shall seeketh bleach," beckoning researchers into a delightful pun-filled rabbit hole of statistical analysis.
The infusion of humor notwithstanding, our quest is anything but trivial. Our study is motivated by a genuine curiosity to decipher the underlying motives and impulses that lead individuals to seek out household cleaning products following a virtual journey through the cosmos and the annals of scientific knowledge. This endeavor speaks to the inquisitive nature of humanity, which, much like the elusive gravitational waves, pulls us towards unearthing the unconventional, the unexpected, and, of course, the punchlines.
The statistical analysis reveals a robust correlation between the two variables, with a coefficient that is as striking as the realization that one has run out of both baking soda and patience during a messy experiment. The implications of this discovery are as profound as the depths of space, sparking reflections on the intricate interplay between intellectual engagement and practical utility – a phenomenon we have playfully termed the 'bromine-tinged enlightenment'. Indeed, the findings beckon further examination, for the intersection of knowledge and commodity offers a veritable Goldilocks conundrum: not too esoteric, not too mundane, but just the right blend of intellect and convenience.
Our investigation serves as a beacon, illuminating the oft-overlooked avenues of inquiry that meander through the digital landscape. It demonstrates that even in the realm of scientific ponderings, the pull of domestic duties and the lure of quips and jests may prove to be inextricably intertwined. As we peel back the layers of this enigma, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this intellectual escapade, armed with statistical tools and, if need be, protective gear against accidental bleach spills.
In summary, our preliminary findings emphasize the need to embrace the humor and whimsy that underpin our scientific pursuits. They also highlight the value of charting new frontiers in research, where unexpected correlations and the occasional dad joke await with open arms, beckoning us to unravel the tangled web of teas and T-shirts – that is, ties between unrelated phenomena.
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' yielded a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8552044 (r-squared = 0.7313745, p < 0.01). This robust correlation suggests a compelling relationship between the instructional allure of physics tutorials and the quest for household cleaning supplies.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It is as clear as a freshly cleaned glassware in a laboratory, highlighting the unmistakable association between intellectual engagement with scientific content and the subsequent desire to procure bleach – lest one leaves behind unsightly stains akin to the persistent mysteries of quantum mechanics.
The findings evoke a humorous yet thought-provoking analogy akin to the attraction between celestial bodies, reminiscent of Newton's law of universal gravitation but with a twist: "The larger the fascination with minutephysics, the greater the gravitational pull towards bleach — a correlation as inviolable as the laws of thermodynamics, yet yielding unexpected insights into human behavior and consumer tendencies."
The implications of this substantial correlation cannot be bleached over; they underscore the interplay between educational content and domestic consumption patterns, illuminating a noteworthy crossover between the pursuit of knowledge and the practicalities of maintaining a tidy living space. It is as if the universe, in its infinite wisdom, has sown the seeds of peculiar consumer behaviors in the fertile soil of intellectual curiosity, yielding a harvest of statistical significance and whimsical revelations.
In the immortal words of Benjamin Franklin, "In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in physics there are bleach runs." Indeed, this discovery prompts a reimagining of the nexus between intellectual enlightenment and a desire for household sanitation, compelling further exploration into the unexpected yet undeniably present connections that underscore the rich tapestry of human behavior and interests.
Overall, these findings invite scholars and industry stakeholders alike to contemplate the unanticipated intersections between educational content and consumer behavior, reminding us that even when grappling with serious subjects, a sprinkle of humor and wit may yield insights as refreshing as a lemon-scented solution to life's mysteries.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' has uncovered a significant and surprisingly robust connection between the realms of educational content and household consumer behavior. It seems that as viewers dive into the depths of quantum mechanics, they are equally compelled to plunge into the quest for household cleaning solutions. This correlation is as clear as the force behind an inevitable pun – it cannot be denied.
Our findings not only illustrate the intriguing crossroads where intellectual stimulation meets the practicalities of domestic upkeep but also provide a rich tapestry of jests and puns, much like a well-loved collection of dad jokes. As we reflect on the implications of our research, it becomes evident that the search for knowledge and the quest for household necessities are intertwined in curious and unexpected ways, echoing the sentiments of an astrophysicist in a hardware store: "One’s quest for enlightenment often leads to pondering the best deals on bleach."
We firmly assert that no more research is needed in this area; the correlation has been bleached clean, allowing for a fresh and lemon-scented understanding of the humorous and profound connections between educational phenomena and consumer behaviors. Just as gravitational waves are expected to behave in a predictable manner, so too should our exploration of this correlation stand as a testament to the inextricable links between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This sentiment, much like the best punchlines, is crystal clear.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Digital Eccentricities
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Whimsical Scientific Inquiry
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach with an abstract of This study delves into the often overlooked correlation between the average views of minutephysics YouTube videos and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Our research team embarked on this merry adventure to unravel the mysterious connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We found that there is indeed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8552044 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2011 to 2023.
It appears that the popularity of minutephysics videos may stir a curious urge within viewers to seek out not just cosmic understanding, but also the mundane necessity of household cleaning products. In the immortal words of Newton, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or in this case, "For every physics lesson, there is an inevitable bleach run." Who knew that the pursuit of scientific knowledge could also lead one to ponder the best deals on bleach?
This unexpected connection opens the door to further research on the influence of educational content on consumer behavior. It also raises the possibility of niche marketing crossroads, where intellectual enlightenment meets the practical considerations of keeping the home clean. Our findings underscore the importance of probing seemingly incongruous relationships, for it is often in these curious connections that profound insights and dad jokes alike may await.
ChatGPT:
minutephysics, YouTube views, correlation, Google searches, bleach, where to buy bleach, consumer behavior, educational content, niche marketing, scientific knowledge, household cleaning products, physics lessons
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Average views of minutephysics YouTube videosDetailed data title: Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
See what else correlates with Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos
Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7313745 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where to buy bleach') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos) over the 13 years from 2011 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00019. 0.0001940967547184878700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,152 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.58, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos (Average views) | 2327580 | 2305140 | 2066400 | 2634460 | 2094050 | 1615090 | 2020930 | 981799 | 1309930 | 2862660 | 1055470 | 1656900 | 368237 |
Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' (Rel. search volume) | 32.5833 | 36.6667 | 32.3333 | 30.25 | 31.4167 | 25.3333 | 24.8333 | 22.75 | 21.4167 | 35.75 | 20.9167 | 18.75 | 17.5 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2327580,2305140,2066400,2634460,2094050,1615090,2020930,981799,1309930,2862660,1055470,1656900,368237,])
array_2 = np.array([32.5833,36.6667,32.3333,30.25,31.4167,25.3333,24.8333,22.75,21.4167,35.75,20.9167,18.75,17.5,])
array_1_name = "Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Tenuous Tie between Techie Tutorials and Troublesome Trend: Average Views of minutephysics and the Quest for Quarts of Bleach
I'm grateful for your review!
Correlation ID: 5052 · Black Variable ID: 25509 · Red Variable ID: 1366