about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,041 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and the second variable is Global shipwrecks .  The chart goes from 1980 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the support for the Libertarian candidate in Arkansas surged, more and more people were drawn to the concept of freedom on the open seas. This led to a sudden spike in amateur boating and sailing excursions, as individuals sought to experience a taste of liberty on the water. However, lacking the necessary maritime skills and knowledge, these newfound enthusiasts unintentionally disrupted the established norms of naval navigation. The seas became congested with erratic and uncoordinated vessel movements, ultimately culminating in a rise in global shipwrecks. In this unexpected twist, it wasn't the political landscape that was rocked, but rather the high seas themselves, as the waves of change swept through the nautical world. Remember, with great electoral power comes great nautical responsibility!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create a pop art style visual depicting a busy Arkansas landscape with a long line of voters at polling stations. In the midst of this, showcase a chaotic scene at sea with amateur boats and ships colliding, causing maritime havoc and shipwrecks. The contrast between the serene landscape and the chaotic seas should be the focal point of the image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art Cutsy graphics Pop art Photorealism Surrealism
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks , in the following situation: As the support for the Libertarian candidate in Arkansas surged, more and more people were drawn to the concept of freedom on the open seas. This led to a sudden spike in amateur boating and sailing excursions, as individuals sought to experience a taste of liberty on the water. However, lacking the necessary maritime skills and knowledge, these newfound enthusiasts unintentionally disrupted the established norms of naval navigation. The seas became congested with erratic and uncoordinated vessel movements, ultimately culminating in a rise in global shipwrecks. In this unexpected twist, it wasn't the political landscape that was rocked, but rather the high seas themselves, as the waves of change swept through the nautical world. Remember, with great electoral power comes great nautical responsibility!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the lush Arkansas landscape, a surge of voters lined up at the polls to cast their ballots for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, out at sea, a chaotic mess unfolded as amateur boats and ships veered off course, colliding and wreaking havoc on the open waters, resulting in a sudden increase in global shipwrecks. The once serene waters were now filled with the unintended consequences of newfound freedom seekers, as their nautical inexperience led to maritime chaos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the lush Arkansas landscape, a surge of voters lined up at the polls to cast their ballots for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, out at sea, a chaotic mess unfolded as amateur boats and ships veered off course, colliding and wreaking havoc on the open waters, resulting in a sudden increase in global shipwrecks. The once serene waters were now filled with the unintended consequences of newfound freedom seekers, as their nautical inexperience led to maritime chaos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create a pop art style visual depicting a busy Arkansas landscape with a long line of voters at polling stations. In the midst of this, showcase a chaotic scene at sea with amateur boats and ships colliding, causing maritime havoc and shipwrecks. The contrast between the serene landscape and the chaotic seas should be the focal point of the image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas caused Global shipwrecks to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

The Journal of Nautical Political Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2014.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between political choices and real-world outcomes has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry in the realms of social science. This curiosity has driven researchers to explore the connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, often unearthing surprising correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In a similar vein, our study endeavors to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the incidence of global shipwrecks.

The choice of the Libertarian candidate in a particular state may seem, at first glance, entirely divorced from maritime disasters occurring across the oceans. However, as we sail into the depths of this peculiar subject, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate currents of human behavior and its ripple effects on a global scale. The silver lining in this endeavor is not just the statistical association we reveal, but also the wider implications it holds for our understanding of societal decision-making and its ramifications on a nautical stage.

As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our pursuit. While statistics and data analysis are crucial to our exploration, it is equally important to navigate through the waves of this investigation with a spirit of intellectual curiosity and perhaps the occasional buoyant pun. After all, what better way to navigate the treacherous waters of academic inquiry than with a touch of levity, even if it may seem a bit "ship-shape"?

So, batten down the hatches and trim the sails as we delve into the surprising synergy between political preferences in Arkansas and the fate of seafaring vessels across the globe. In the words of the renowned philosopher, John F. Kennedy, "We are tied to the ocean. And when we go back to the sea—whether it is to sail or to watch it—we are going back from whence we came." In a similar spirit, let us set our course for an intellectual voyage that promises not only to uncover statistical relationships but also to unfurl the sails of curiosity and mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between political choices and real-world outcomes has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry in the realms of social science. This curiosity has driven researchers to explore the connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, often unearthing surprising correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In a similar vein, our study endeavors to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the incidence of global shipwrecks.
The choice of the Libertarian candidate in a particular state may seem, at first glance, entirely divorced from maritime disasters occurring across the oceans. However, as we sail into the depths of this peculiar subject, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate currents of human behavior and its ripple effects on a global scale. The silver lining in this endeavor is not just the statistical association we reveal, but also the wider implications it holds for our understanding of societal decision-making and its ramifications on a nautical stage.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our pursuit. While statistics and data analysis are crucial to our exploration, it is equally important to navigate through the waves of this investigation with a spirit of intellectual curiosity and perhaps the occasional buoyant pun. After all, what better way to navigate the treacherous waters of academic inquiry than with a touch of levity, even if it may seem a bit "ship-shape"?
So, batten down the hatches and trim the sails as we delve into the surprising synergy between political preferences in Arkansas and the fate of seafaring vessels across the globe. In the words of the renowned philosopher, John F. Kennedy, "We are tied to the ocean. And when we go back to the sea—whether it is to sail or to watch it—we are going back from whence we came." In a similar spirit, let us set our course for an intellectual voyage that promises not only to uncover statistical relationships but also to unfurl the sails of curiosity and mirth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The pursuit of uncovering the intricate web of relationships between seemingly incongruous events has been a longstanding endeavor within the field of social science. In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2009) examined the voting patterns in various states alongside diverse global phenomena, shedding light on unexpected correlations. However, despite the wealth of research on political preferences and its far-reaching effects, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and global shipwrecks has remained largely uncharted.

Turning to sources that elucidate the complexities of maritime mishaps, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the historical underpinnings of sea disasters, painting a vivid picture of the perils faced by seafarers. While their work offers a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to shipwrecks, it regrettably omits any consideration of political elections in the state of Arkansas. The dearth of literature examining these seemingly disparate subjects leaves a gaping chasm in our understanding, one that this present inquiry seeks to bridge.

Furthermore, in "The Shipwrecked Mind" by Mark Lilla, the author explores the philosophical underpinnings of societal shifts, drawing parallels between political upheaval and the metaphorical shipwrecks of civilization. Though not directly aligned with our specific research focus, Lilla's reflection on the ebb and flow of societal currents offers a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation. Additionally, the fictional work "Ship of Theseus" by V.M. Straka presents an allegorical tale of identity and transformation, albeit devoid of empirical data or statistical analyses.

Expanding the scope of our inquiry to more lighthearted sources illuminates an equally compelling perspective. The animated series "SpongeBob SquarePants" has showcased numerous maritime misadventures, albeit in a markedly whimsical and anthropomorphized manner. The witty banter and nautical escapades peppered throughout the show offer a delightful divergence from our rigorous analyses, yet serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of maritime narratives and their enduring appeal.

In essence, the convergence of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and global shipwrecks presents an enigmatic puzzle that beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to navigate through the sea of data with intellectual buoyancy. As we sail further into this uncharted territory, it is imperative to maintain a scholarly demeanor, while also embracing the occasional witticism for buoyancy's sake.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2014

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between political choices and real-world outcomes has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry in the realms of social science. This curiosity has driven researchers to explore the connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, often unearthing surprising correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In a similar vein, our study endeavors to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the incidence of global shipwrecks.
The choice of the Libertarian candidate in a particular state may seem, at first glance, entirely divorced from maritime disasters occurring across the oceans. However, as we sail into the depths of this peculiar subject, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate currents of human behavior and its ripple effects on a global scale. The silver lining in this endeavor is not just the statistical association we reveal, but also the wider implications it holds for our understanding of societal decision-making and its ramifications on a nautical stage.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our pursuit. While statistics and data analysis are crucial to our exploration, it is equally important to navigate through the waves of this investigation with a spirit of intellectual curiosity and perhaps the occasional buoyant pun. After all, what better way to navigate the treacherous waters of academic inquiry than with a touch of levity, even if it may seem a bit "ship-shape"?
So, batten down the hatches and trim the sails as we delve into the surprising synergy between political preferences in Arkansas and the fate of seafaring vessels across the globe. In the words of the renowned philosopher, John F. Kennedy, "We are tied to the ocean. And when we go back to the sea—whether it is to sail or to watch it—we are going back from whence we came." In a similar spirit, let us set our course for an intellectual voyage that promises not only to uncover statistical relationships but also to unfurl the sails of curiosity and mirth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To navigate the uncharted waters of our research endeavor, we embarked on a methodological odyssey that combined rigorous data collection with the art of sailing the statistical seas. Our study harnessed data sources from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and even set sail into the tumultuous waters of Wikipedia, where we cast our nets wide to capture the nuances of presidential vote tallies and maritime mishaps. The period under scrutiny spanned from 1980 to 2014, during which we meticulously charted the electoral winds blowing through Arkansas and the perilous voyages of vessels navigating the global maritime expanse.

The heart of our investigation lay in the intertwining currents of quantitative analysis. To commence our data exploration, we cast a wide net over the statistical ocean, capturing the vote tallies for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas across the chosen time frame. Anchoring ourselves in the waters of econometric modeling, we harnessed time-series analysis to traverse the undulating waves of electoral preferences. Concurrently, we ventured into the maritime terrain of shipwreck occurrences, engaging in detailed scrutiny of global incidents that left vessels submerged in the depths of the ocean. Our voyage led us to decipher the geographical coordinates and temporal markers of each shipwreck, allowing us to chart the ebbs and flows of catastrophic events on the high seas.

The crux of our statistical sail lay in unraveling the interconnected currents between the political choices of Arkansas voters and the capricious fate of seaborne vessels. We employed correlation analysis, casting our gaze upon the intricate dance of numerical relationships between the votes for the Libertarian candidate and the occurrence of shipwrecks. The statistical weaponry of the Pearson correlation coefficient and its formidable companion, the p-value, served as vital tools in our quest to discern the degree of association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon the culmination of our statistical odyssey, we were confronted with a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and a staggering p-value of less than 0.01. This robust statistical tether underscored a compelling connection between the electoral tides in Arkansas and the maritime misfortunes befalling seafaring vessels across the globe. However, in our scholarly sojourn, it is imperative to acknowledge that correlation, while powerful and alluring, does not inherently imply causation. Thus, while we acknowledge the striking statistical association we unveil, we approach it with the prudent circumspection of seasoned navigators, cognizant of the reefs of spurious relationships that may lurk beneath the statistical surface.

In the spirit of intellectual adventure, we charted our course through uncharted waters by approaching this analysis with a degree of methodological playfulness. As we sailed through the waves of data collection and statistical analysis, we heeded the call of curiosity and embraced the occasional gust of levity, recognizing that the journey of scholarly inquiry is not merely a quest for empirical truths but also an opportunity for intellectual exploration.

In this section of our academic vessel named methodology, we have navigated an expansive coastline of data collection and statistical analysis, anchoring ourselves in the robust methodologies of quantitative exploration while remaining attuned to the whims of curiosity and the occasional gust of academic mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.9238940, r-squared of 0.8535801, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between political choices and real-world outcomes has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry in the realms of social science. This curiosity has driven researchers to explore the connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, often unearthing surprising correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In a similar vein, our study endeavors to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the incidence of global shipwrecks.
The choice of the Libertarian candidate in a particular state may seem, at first glance, entirely divorced from maritime disasters occurring across the oceans. However, as we sail into the depths of this peculiar subject, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate currents of human behavior and its ripple effects on a global scale. The silver lining in this endeavor is not just the statistical association we reveal, but also the wider implications it holds for our understanding of societal decision-making and its ramifications on a nautical stage.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our pursuit. While statistics and data analysis are crucial to our exploration, it is equally important to navigate through the waves of this investigation with a spirit of intellectual curiosity and perhaps the occasional buoyant pun. After all, what better way to navigate the treacherous waters of academic inquiry than with a touch of levity, even if it may seem a bit "ship-shape"?
So, batten down the hatches and trim the sails as we delve into the surprising synergy between political preferences in Arkansas and the fate of seafaring vessels across the globe. In the words of the renowned philosopher, John F. Kennedy, "We are tied to the ocean. And when we go back to the sea—whether it is to sail or to watch it—we are going back from whence we came." In a similar spirit, let us set our course for an intellectual voyage that promises not only to uncover statistical relationships but also to unfurl the sails of curiosity and mirth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from 1980 to 2014 has unveiled an eyebrow-raising correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the frequency of global shipwrecks. The correlation coefficient of 0.9238940, accompanied by an impressive r-squared value of 0.8535801, and a p-value less than 0.01, signifies a robust and noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This statistical evidence is akin to discovering buried treasure in the depths of the sea of data, leaving us both bewildered and intrigued by the unexpected bounty.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. The alignment of these data points resembles the alignment of stars in the night sky, prompting contemplation on the cosmic dance of human decision-making and its consequences in the maritime realm.

The strength of this correlation not only defies conventional expectations but also underscores the uncanny interconnectedness of human actions and global events. While the statistical rigor of our analysis is a testament to the empirical foundation of this discovery, it also beckons a deeper exploration into the underlying mechanisms that may drive this unexpected association. It appears that the world of statistics, much like the open sea, continues to harbor mysteries that beckon exploration, yielding surprising connections that defy the bounds of conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The pursuit of uncovering the intricate web of relationships between seemingly incongruous events has been a longstanding endeavor within the field of social science. In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2009) examined the voting patterns in various states alongside diverse global phenomena, shedding light on unexpected correlations. However, despite the wealth of research on political preferences and its far-reaching effects, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and global shipwrecks has remained largely uncharted.
Turning to sources that elucidate the complexities of maritime mishaps, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the historical underpinnings of sea disasters, painting a vivid picture of the perils faced by seafarers. While their work offers a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to shipwrecks, it regrettably omits any consideration of political elections in the state of Arkansas. The dearth of literature examining these seemingly disparate subjects leaves a gaping chasm in our understanding, one that this present inquiry seeks to bridge.
Furthermore, in "The Shipwrecked Mind" by Mark Lilla, the author explores the philosophical underpinnings of societal shifts, drawing parallels between political upheaval and the metaphorical shipwrecks of civilization. Though not directly aligned with our specific research focus, Lilla's reflection on the ebb and flow of societal currents offers a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation. Additionally, the fictional work "Ship of Theseus" by V.M. Straka presents an allegorical tale of identity and transformation, albeit devoid of empirical data or statistical analyses.
Expanding the scope of our inquiry to more lighthearted sources illuminates an equally compelling perspective. The animated series "SpongeBob SquarePants" has showcased numerous maritime misadventures, albeit in a markedly whimsical and anthropomorphized manner. The witty banter and nautical escapades peppered throughout the show offer a delightful divergence from our rigorous analyses, yet serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of maritime narratives and their enduring appeal.
In essence, the convergence of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and global shipwrecks presents an enigmatic puzzle that beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to navigate through the sea of data with intellectual buoyancy. As we sail further into this uncharted territory, it is imperative to maintain a scholarly demeanor, while also embracing the occasional witticism for buoyancy's sake.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1980 to 2014 has unveiled an eyebrow-raising correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the frequency of global shipwrecks. The correlation coefficient of 0.9238940, accompanied by an impressive r-squared value of 0.8535801, and a p-value less than 0.01, signifies a robust and noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This statistical evidence is akin to discovering buried treasure in the depths of the sea of data, leaving us both bewildered and intrigued by the unexpected bounty.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. The alignment of these data points resembles the alignment of stars in the night sky, prompting contemplation on the cosmic dance of human decision-making and its consequences in the maritime realm.
The strength of this correlation not only defies conventional expectations but also underscores the uncanny interconnectedness of human actions and global events. While the statistical rigor of our analysis is a testament to the empirical foundation of this discovery, it also beckons a deeper exploration into the underlying mechanisms that may drive this unexpected association. It appears that the world of statistics, much like the open sea, continues to harbor mysteries that beckon exploration, yielding surprising connections that defy the bounds of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and global shipwrecks has unfurled a trove of unexpected findings that resonate with the existing body of literature in both subtle and overt ways. As we embark on an intellectually buoyant exploration of our results, it is imperative to acknowledge the stern yet humorous undercurrent that permeates this curious connection.

Our results uncover a robust and conspicuous correlation, affirming earlier research that delved into seemingly disparate phenomena. Smith et al. (2009) laid the groundwork for our investigation by elucidating unexpected correlations in voting patterns and diverse global events. Although their work did not specifically hone in on shipwrecks, it provided a conceptual compass for navigating uncharted research territories. Indeed, the compass has guided our study to a metaphorical "x marks the spot," revealing a treasure trove of statistically significant associations.

In a surprising twist that echoes the unexpected findings of this study, the work of V.M. Straka in "Ship of Theseus" serves as an allegorical allegory of identity and transformation. While devoid of empirical data, this fictional work cleverly foreshadows our discovery of an unforeseen connection amidst the sea of data. Lilla's exploration of societal shifts, though not directly aligned with our specific research focus, offers an intriguing backdrop for our investigation, underscoring the unanticipated twists and turns that accompany scholarly pursuits.

The formidable correlation coefficient we uncovered serves as a beacon of statistical significance, illuminating the path for future investigations to navigate through the depths of this intriguing association. Our findings echo the spirited escapades featured in the animated series "SpongeBob SquarePants," albeit in a markedly more data-driven and sober fashion. This subtle nod to the multifaceted nature of maritime misadventures mirrors the complexity of our results, encapsulating the intellectual buoyancy necessary for navigating through uncharted territories of research.

In conclusion, our findings substantiate the existence of a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and global shipwrecks, unveiling a treasure trove of unexpected connections. As we navigate the choppy waters of statistical research, it is imperative to maintain a scholarly demeanor while embracing the occasional flourish of humor to stay afloat. These findings prompt further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this unmistakable association and reinforce the idiosyncrasies that underpin the tapestry of human choices and their far-reaching implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Global shipwrecks . Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between political choices and real-world outcomes has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry in the realms of social science. This curiosity has driven researchers to explore the connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, often unearthing surprising correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In a similar vein, our study endeavors to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the incidence of global shipwrecks.
The choice of the Libertarian candidate in a particular state may seem, at first glance, entirely divorced from maritime disasters occurring across the oceans. However, as we sail into the depths of this peculiar subject, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate currents of human behavior and its ripple effects on a global scale. The silver lining in this endeavor is not just the statistical association we reveal, but also the wider implications it holds for our understanding of societal decision-making and its ramifications on a nautical stage.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, it is essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our pursuit. While statistics and data analysis are crucial to our exploration, it is equally important to navigate through the waves of this investigation with a spirit of intellectual curiosity and perhaps the occasional buoyant pun. After all, what better way to navigate the treacherous waters of academic inquiry than with a touch of levity, even if it may seem a bit "ship-shape"?
So, batten down the hatches and trim the sails as we delve into the surprising synergy between political preferences in Arkansas and the fate of seafaring vessels across the globe. In the words of the renowned philosopher, John F. Kennedy, "We are tied to the ocean. And when we go back to the sea—whether it is to sail or to watch it—we are going back from whence we came." In a similar spirit, let us set our course for an intellectual voyage that promises not only to uncover statistical relationships but also to unfurl the sails of curiosity and mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1980 to 2014 has unveiled an eyebrow-raising correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the frequency of global shipwrecks. The correlation coefficient of 0.9238940, accompanied by an impressive r-squared value of 0.8535801, and a p-value less than 0.01, signifies a robust and noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This statistical evidence is akin to discovering buried treasure in the depths of the sea of data, leaving us both bewildered and intrigued by the unexpected bounty.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. The alignment of these data points resembles the alignment of stars in the night sky, prompting contemplation on the cosmic dance of human decision-making and its consequences in the maritime realm.
The strength of this correlation not only defies conventional expectations but also underscores the uncanny interconnectedness of human actions and global events. While the statistical rigor of our analysis is a testament to the empirical foundation of this discovery, it also beckons a deeper exploration into the underlying mechanisms that may drive this unexpected association. It appears that the world of statistics, much like the open sea, continues to harbor mysteries that beckon exploration, yielding surprising connections that defy the bounds of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unearthed a captivating correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the incidence of global shipwrecks. This unexpected association, akin to stumbling upon a message in a bottle, has broad implications for our understanding of the intricate interplay between human preferences and nautical misadventures. The robust correlation coefficient and p-value less than 0.01 serve as a lighthouse guiding our attention to this enigmatic phenomenon.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the statistical realm into the philosophical depths of human agency and its ripple effects on a global scale. The alignment of these variables, as depicted in Fig. 1, resembles the orchestrated choreography of a maritime ballet, prompting contemplation on the whimsical waltz of voter preferences and maritime fate.

While our study has navigated the waves of statistical analysis, it is essential to acknowledge the lighthearted nature of our pursuit. Although the link between libertarian votes and shipwrecks may raise eyebrows, it also serves as a reminder of the whimsical and unpredictable nature of human choices and their far-reaching consequences. After all, who would have thought that the political landscape of Arkansas could cast such a wide net across the vast expanse of global waters?

In light of these revelatory findings, it seems that further research on this peculiar correlation would be akin to searching for treasure in uncharted waters. However, given the robustness of our statistical evidence, it is safe to say that delving deeper into this unexpected alliance would be like trying to find a needle in a (ship)wreckage - a futile pursuit.

In the grand scheme of academic inquiry, our study stands as a testament to the serendipitous discoveries that await those willing to traverse the uncharted seas of statistical analysis. With this, we affirm that no more research is needed in this area, and instead, we set our sights on unearthing new, equally captivating curiosities in the vast ocean of human behavior and its improbable connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Nautical Political Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Maritime Political Studies and Analytical Research (IMPSAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sailing the Waves of Political Preferences: Unraveling the Connection Between Libertarian Presidential Votes in Arkansas and Global Shipwrecks with an abstract of This study delves into the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. Using data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning from 1980 to 2014. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9238940 and p < 0.01 emerged, substantiating a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the intricacies of voter preferences and maritime mishaps but also evoke contemplation on the interconnectedness of human choices and global maritime activities. This research prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms governing this unanticipated association and underscores the idiosyncrasies in the tapestry of human behavior and its wide-ranging impacts.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian presidential votes, Arkansas, global shipwrecks, correlation analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, voter preferences, maritime mishaps, statistical analysis, voter behavior, human choices, interconnectedness, human behavior, global maritime activities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas

Global shipwrecks
Detailed data title: Ships sunk, foundered, grounded, or otherwise lost during the year
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Global shipwrecks

Correlation r = 0.9238940 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8535801 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Global shipwrecks ) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas) over the 8 years from 1980 through 2014.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0010401. 0.0010400933742924618000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.10401% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 961 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819962000200420082012
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas (Total votes)897022213297307627812352477616276
Global shipwrecks (Wrecks)34332915141831111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8970,2221,3297,3076,2781,2352,4776,16276,])
array_2 = np.array([34,33,29,15,14,18,31,111,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Global shipwrecks "

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5041 · Black Variable ID: 25953 · Red Variable ID: 504
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0