about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,025 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in air pollution led to larger, stickier spider webs, making it easier to trap spiders without needing to search for techniques. It seems like those spiders were just hanging around for cleaner air!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image depiction of a quiet neighborhood in Watertown, Wisconsin, where the air is fresher than ever. The scene is bright and serene, with clear blue skies and sunlight streaming onto freshly cleaned houses and streets. In the forefront of the image, showcase glistening, intricately woven spider webs spanning from trees to fences, catching the light and creating an aesthetic contrast against the clear backdrop. The visual should emphasize the sense of newfound clarity and serenity in the environment, with the improved air quality contributing to a peaceful and natural scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Cybernetic art Realistic Brutalism A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider', in the following situation: The decrease in air pollution led to larger, stickier spider webs, making it easier to trap spiders without needing to search for techniques. It seems like those spiders were just hanging around for cleaner air!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet neighborhood in Watertown, Wisconsin, the air is now cleaner than ever. The sky is clear and the sun shines brightly. As the gentle breeze blows, it carries away the remnants of air pollution, leaving behind a fresh, crisp scent. Among the freshly washed houses and streets, larger and stickier spider webs glisten in the sunlight, spanning from trees to fences. It seems as though the spiders are basking in the improved air quality, their intricate webs now easy to spot without the need to search.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet neighborhood in Watertown, Wisconsin, the air is now cleaner than ever. The sky is clear and the sun shines brightly. As the gentle breeze blows, it carries away the remnants of air pollution, leaving behind a fresh, crisp scent. Among the freshly washed houses and streets, larger and stickier spider webs glisten in the sunlight, spanning from trees to fences. It seems as though the spiders are basking in the improved air quality, their intricate webs now easy to spot without the need to search. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image depiction of a quiet neighborhood in Watertown, Wisconsin, where the air is fresher than ever. The scene is bright and serene, with clear blue skies and sunlight streaming onto freshly cleaned houses and streets. In the forefront of the image, showcase glistening, intricately woven spider webs spanning from trees to fences, catching the light and creating an aesthetic contrast against the clear backdrop. The visual should emphasize the sense of newfound clarity and serenity in the environment, with the improved air quality contributing to a peaceful and natural scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin caused how to trap a spider (Google searches for 'how to trap a spider') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

Journal of Anthropo-Arachnological Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old adage goes, "a tangled web we weave," and the connection between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to trap a spider" certainly weaves a fascinating web of intrigue. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a line from pollutant particles to panicked arachnophobes, our research delves deep into this unlikely correlation, aiming to untangle the threads of environmental stress and spider-related anxieties.

Watertown, Wisconsin, nestled amid the tranquil beauty of the Midwest, has unfortunately not been immune to the ever-present concerns of air pollution. Industries, vehicular emissions, and other sources contribute to the composition of the local air, creating a complex atmospheric concoction. At the same time, the internet serves as a virtual repository of knowledge and curiosity, and where else to turn for help when facing an eight-legged visitor with a potential "indoor" designation?

Our investigation seeks to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated occurrences. The spidery escapades of Watertown residents, whether real or cybernetic, have captured our attention. By analyzing data spanning over a decade, we endeavor to reveal the web of interconnections between air quality and arachnophobia, as reflected in Google search trends.

In this paper, we present our findings and delve into the implications of this uncanny correlation. We aim to stimulate discussion on the broader ramifications of environmental stressors on human behavior and the innovative ways in which individuals seek to cope with their insectoid foes. So, buckle up, as we embark on this arachnophobic analysis of air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and prepare to navigate the labyrinth of spider traps and statistical webs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "a tangled web we weave," and the connection between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to trap a spider" certainly weaves a fascinating web of intrigue. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a line from pollutant particles to panicked arachnophobes, our research delves deep into this unlikely correlation, aiming to untangle the threads of environmental stress and spider-related anxieties.
Watertown, Wisconsin, nestled amid the tranquil beauty of the Midwest, has unfortunately not been immune to the ever-present concerns of air pollution. Industries, vehicular emissions, and other sources contribute to the composition of the local air, creating a complex atmospheric concoction. At the same time, the internet serves as a virtual repository of knowledge and curiosity, and where else to turn for help when facing an eight-legged visitor with a potential "indoor" designation?
Our investigation seeks to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated occurrences. The spidery escapades of Watertown residents, whether real or cybernetic, have captured our attention. By analyzing data spanning over a decade, we endeavor to reveal the web of interconnections between air quality and arachnophobia, as reflected in Google search trends.
In this paper, we present our findings and delve into the implications of this uncanny correlation. We aim to stimulate discussion on the broader ramifications of environmental stressors on human behavior and the innovative ways in which individuals seek to cope with their insectoid foes. So, buckle up, as we embark on this arachnophobic analysis of air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and prepare to navigate the labyrinth of spider traps and statistical webs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The impact of air pollution on human health and behavior has garnered significant attention in scholarly literature over the years. Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated a clear link between air pollution and respiratory illnesses, while Doe and Jones (2018) highlighted the broader influence of environmental stressors on mental well-being. These studies lay the groundwork for understanding the potential implications of air quality on human behavior, setting the stage for our investigation into the more obscure realm of arachnophobic responses to airborne contaminants.

Moving on to more unconventional sources, "Spiders and Society: A Comparative Analysis" by Arachno-Research Institute (2017) provides an in-depth exploration of the interaction between spiders and human society, though its relevance to air pollution may be a stretch. On the other hand, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study of Environmental Factors" by Environmental Watch Group (2019) offers valuable insights into the multifaceted effects of air pollution, providing a solid foundation for our research.

In the realm of fiction, perhaps J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" and its vivid depiction of spider encounters could provide some peripheral insight into the psychological impact of arachnids. Similarly, "Charlotte's Web" by E.B. White, while a heartwarming tale, might offer a whimsical perspective on the unexpected alliances formed between humans and spiders - if only the real world were as endearing!

On a more tangential note, the classic board game "Mouse Trap" serves as a colorful reminder of the diverse methods employed to capture elusive creatures, and while the game’s focus is on rodents, it hints at the ingenuity required to ensnare a creature that resists easy containment.

The literature reviewed above demonstrates the diverse avenues that can shed light on the improbable link between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the surge in Google searches related to spider trapping. As we delve further into our analysis, we aim to untangle the unexpected correlation, all the while weaving in a touch of humor to lighten the mood within this intricate web of investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "a tangled web we weave," and the connection between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to trap a spider" certainly weaves a fascinating web of intrigue. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a line from pollutant particles to panicked arachnophobes, our research delves deep into this unlikely correlation, aiming to untangle the threads of environmental stress and spider-related anxieties.
Watertown, Wisconsin, nestled amid the tranquil beauty of the Midwest, has unfortunately not been immune to the ever-present concerns of air pollution. Industries, vehicular emissions, and other sources contribute to the composition of the local air, creating a complex atmospheric concoction. At the same time, the internet serves as a virtual repository of knowledge and curiosity, and where else to turn for help when facing an eight-legged visitor with a potential "indoor" designation?
Our investigation seeks to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated occurrences. The spidery escapades of Watertown residents, whether real or cybernetic, have captured our attention. By analyzing data spanning over a decade, we endeavor to reveal the web of interconnections between air quality and arachnophobia, as reflected in Google search trends.
In this paper, we present our findings and delve into the implications of this uncanny correlation. We aim to stimulate discussion on the broader ramifications of environmental stressors on human behavior and the innovative ways in which individuals seek to cope with their insectoid foes. So, buckle up, as we embark on this arachnophobic analysis of air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and prepare to navigate the labyrinth of spider traps and statistical webs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on a spirited web search to gather relevant data for this study. We spun our virtual nets far and wide but ultimately found ourselves ensnared in the multifarious troves of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) database. We deftly extracted air quality measurements, including levels of particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, from various monitoring stations in the vicinity of Watertown, Wisconsin. Our arduous data collection journey also led us to the expansive vaults of Google Trends, where we retrieved the search volume index for the phrase "how to trap a spider" within the same geographical area.

Data Analysis:
Armed with our trusty statistical tools, we embarked on the arduous task of unraveling the intricate threads of data entwining air pollution and spider apprehension. Our initial exploratory analysis involved calculating descriptive statistics to gain a nuanced understanding of the temporal patterns in air pollution levels and the frequency of spider-related searches. Subsequently, we employed a series of statistical techniques that would have made even the most agile arachnid envious, including correlation analyses and time series modeling. We nestled snugly into the intricate web of statistical analyses, examining the correlation coefficient and p-value to assess the strength and significance of the association between air pollution and spider-wary internet queries.

Temporal Analysis:
To capture the dynamic interplay between air pollution and arachnophobic tendencies, we conducted a time series analysis of the data spanning from 2007 to 2021. This allowed us to observe how the ebb and flow of air pollution levels corresponded with the waxing and waning interest in spider trapping methodologies. In doing so, we uncovered intriguing temporal patterns that seemed to reflect the seasonal vicissitudes of both environmental pollutants and the likelihood of spider encounters.

Multivariate Regression:
In a bid to disentangle the complexities of this tangled web, we further employed multivariate regression models to account for potential confounding variables. We carefully wove a statistical shroud to control for factors such as weather patterns, temporal trends, and other environmental stressors that might snugly cozy alongside air pollution and influence the propensity to engage in spider containment maneuvers.

Sense of Humor Detection:
As a whimsical aside, we developed a unique algorithm to detect and quantify the presence of a sense of humor in web-based content related to spider trapping techniques. This tongue-in-cheek approach provided an additional layer of insight into the psychological underpinnings of arachnophobic behavior in response to environmental stressors.

Limitations:
While our methodology was as thorough as an arachnid's silk-spinning process, it is important to note the inherent limitations of our study. The reliance on secondary data sources, the potential for ecological fallacy, and the inability to capture individual-level behavioral responses are among the strands that may have introduced a degree of fuzziness to our findings.

In summary, our research methodology has involved an intricate blend of data collection, statistical analyses, temporal investigations, and a dash of arachnid-inspired humor detection. Our approach, much like a spider's web, has aimed to ensnare the elusive nuances of human behavior in the face of environmental pressures and eight-legged foes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8585879, r-squared of 0.7371732, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old adage goes, "a tangled web we weave," and the connection between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to trap a spider" certainly weaves a fascinating web of intrigue. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a line from pollutant particles to panicked arachnophobes, our research delves deep into this unlikely correlation, aiming to untangle the threads of environmental stress and spider-related anxieties.
Watertown, Wisconsin, nestled amid the tranquil beauty of the Midwest, has unfortunately not been immune to the ever-present concerns of air pollution. Industries, vehicular emissions, and other sources contribute to the composition of the local air, creating a complex atmospheric concoction. At the same time, the internet serves as a virtual repository of knowledge and curiosity, and where else to turn for help when facing an eight-legged visitor with a potential "indoor" designation?
Our investigation seeks to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated occurrences. The spidery escapades of Watertown residents, whether real or cybernetic, have captured our attention. By analyzing data spanning over a decade, we endeavor to reveal the web of interconnections between air quality and arachnophobia, as reflected in Google search trends.
In this paper, we present our findings and delve into the implications of this uncanny correlation. We aim to stimulate discussion on the broader ramifications of environmental stressors on human behavior and the innovative ways in which individuals seek to cope with their insectoid foes. So, buckle up, as we embark on this arachnophobic analysis of air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and prepare to navigate the labyrinth of spider traps and statistical webs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Additionally, the high r-squared value of 0.7371732 indicates that approximately 73.72% of the variance in spider trapping queries can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant.

Figure 1 illustrates this remarkable correlation, displaying a scatterplot that visually depicts the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for "how to trap a spider." The data points form a discernible upward trend, emphasizing the increasing volume of spider trapping queries with rising air pollution levels. This visual depiction offers a compelling representation of the interconnectedness between environmental stressors and arachnophobic behaviors.

These findings not only unveil the unexpected association between air quality and spider-related anxieties but also prompt further exploration into the multifaceted ways in which individuals respond to environmental stressors. The implications of this entangled web of connections call for continued investigation into the profound effects of air pollution on human behavior and the inventive strategies employed to grapple with our arachnid adversaries.

In essence, our research has untangled a web of statistical significance, revealing a fascinating link between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and the virtual spider-catching endeavors of its inhabitants. The implications of this unexpected correlation are not to be brushed aside, and we invite the scientific community to join us in unraveling the threads of this peculiar entanglement between environmental stress and spider trappings.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The impact of air pollution on human health and behavior has garnered significant attention in scholarly literature over the years. Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated a clear link between air pollution and respiratory illnesses, while Doe and Jones (2018) highlighted the broader influence of environmental stressors on mental well-being. These studies lay the groundwork for understanding the potential implications of air quality on human behavior, setting the stage for our investigation into the more obscure realm of arachnophobic responses to airborne contaminants.
Moving on to more unconventional sources, "Spiders and Society: A Comparative Analysis" by Arachno-Research Institute (2017) provides an in-depth exploration of the interaction between spiders and human society, though its relevance to air pollution may be a stretch. On the other hand, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study of Environmental Factors" by Environmental Watch Group (2019) offers valuable insights into the multifaceted effects of air pollution, providing a solid foundation for our research.
In the realm of fiction, perhaps J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" and its vivid depiction of spider encounters could provide some peripheral insight into the psychological impact of arachnids. Similarly, "Charlotte's Web" by E.B. White, while a heartwarming tale, might offer a whimsical perspective on the unexpected alliances formed between humans and spiders - if only the real world were as endearing!
On a more tangential note, the classic board game "Mouse Trap" serves as a colorful reminder of the diverse methods employed to capture elusive creatures, and while the game’s focus is on rodents, it hints at the ingenuity required to ensnare a creature that resists easy containment.
The literature reviewed above demonstrates the diverse avenues that can shed light on the improbable link between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the surge in Google searches related to spider trapping. As we delve further into our analysis, we aim to untangle the unexpected correlation, all the while weaving in a touch of humor to lighten the mood within this intricate web of investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Additionally, the high r-squared value of 0.7371732 indicates that approximately 73.72% of the variance in spider trapping queries can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 illustrates this remarkable correlation, displaying a scatterplot that visually depicts the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for "how to trap a spider." The data points form a discernible upward trend, emphasizing the increasing volume of spider trapping queries with rising air pollution levels. This visual depiction offers a compelling representation of the interconnectedness between environmental stressors and arachnophobic behaviors.
These findings not only unveil the unexpected association between air quality and spider-related anxieties but also prompt further exploration into the multifaceted ways in which individuals respond to environmental stressors. The implications of this entangled web of connections call for continued investigation into the profound effects of air pollution on human behavior and the inventive strategies employed to grapple with our arachnid adversaries.
In essence, our research has untangled a web of statistical significance, revealing a fascinating link between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and the virtual spider-catching endeavors of its inhabitants. The implications of this unexpected correlation are not to be brushed aside, and we invite the scientific community to join us in unraveling the threads of this peculiar entanglement between environmental stress and spider trappings.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results leave us entangled in the web of surprise, as we have indeed validated the, let's say, peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the spike in Google searches for “how to trap a spider.” Who would have thought that a town's struggle with airborne contaminants could lead to an uptick in the internet's virtual spider-catching endeavors? As we ventured into this uncharted territory, we were reminded of the famous words of E.B. White – "the sentimental spider sways." While our focus may differ slightly, the notion of spiders taking center stage in human affairs is undeniably prevalent.

The evidence we uncovered strengthens the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who laid the groundwork of how environmental stressors impact human behaviors – perhaps inadvertently hinting at the intriguing web of interconnection between air quality and arachnophobic responses. It seems that spiders and society, though a stretch, as examined by the Arachno-Research Institute (2017), may have unwittingly danced closer to our discoveries. Kudos to the Environmental Watch Group's (2019) comprehensive study, which indeed shed ample light on the multifaceted effects of air pollution, inadvertently setting our stage to illuminate a different aspect of human reaction to environmental stressors.

Indeed, life seems to imitate art, or perhaps fiction, as we were lured into the fanciful world of "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" and "Charlotte's Web." While we refrain from drawing direct parallels between literature and our findings, one couldn't help but ponder the whimsical and unexpected ways in which spiders come to occupy our thoughts.

The impeccable symbolism of the board game "Mouse Trap" serves as a tangible reminder of the creativity and ingenuity employed to contain elusive creatures, which, when interpreted metaphorically, may mirror our endeavor to encapsulate the elusive nature of the correlation between air pollution and spider-related queries.

In summary, our results shine a light on the unsuspecting relationship between environmental stress and the human quest to outwit our eight-legged foes. In doing so, we have unveiled a web of statistical significance, calling for a continued investigation into the unexpected ways in which we grapple with our arachnid adversaries in the face of environmental challenges. Join us as we further untangle and delight in the unexpected connections, for the world of research, as it turns out, can be as fascinating and unpredictable as the allure of a spider’s intricate web.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "a tangled web we weave," and the connection between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the frequency of Google searches for "how to trap a spider" certainly weaves a fascinating web of intrigue. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a line from pollutant particles to panicked arachnophobes, our research delves deep into this unlikely correlation, aiming to untangle the threads of environmental stress and spider-related anxieties.
Watertown, Wisconsin, nestled amid the tranquil beauty of the Midwest, has unfortunately not been immune to the ever-present concerns of air pollution. Industries, vehicular emissions, and other sources contribute to the composition of the local air, creating a complex atmospheric concoction. At the same time, the internet serves as a virtual repository of knowledge and curiosity, and where else to turn for help when facing an eight-legged visitor with a potential "indoor" designation?
Our investigation seeks to shed light on the curious relationship between these seemingly unrelated occurrences. The spidery escapades of Watertown residents, whether real or cybernetic, have captured our attention. By analyzing data spanning over a decade, we endeavor to reveal the web of interconnections between air quality and arachnophobia, as reflected in Google search trends.
In this paper, we present our findings and delve into the implications of this uncanny correlation. We aim to stimulate discussion on the broader ramifications of environmental stressors on human behavior and the innovative ways in which individuals seek to cope with their insectoid foes. So, buckle up, as we embark on this arachnophobic analysis of air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and prepare to navigate the labyrinth of spider traps and statistical webs.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Additionally, the high r-squared value of 0.7371732 indicates that approximately 73.72% of the variance in spider trapping queries can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 illustrates this remarkable correlation, displaying a scatterplot that visually depicts the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for "how to trap a spider." The data points form a discernible upward trend, emphasizing the increasing volume of spider trapping queries with rising air pollution levels. This visual depiction offers a compelling representation of the interconnectedness between environmental stressors and arachnophobic behaviors.
These findings not only unveil the unexpected association between air quality and spider-related anxieties but also prompt further exploration into the multifaceted ways in which individuals respond to environmental stressors. The implications of this entangled web of connections call for continued investigation into the profound effects of air pollution on human behavior and the inventive strategies employed to grapple with our arachnid adversaries.
In essence, our research has untangled a web of statistical significance, revealing a fascinating link between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin and the virtual spider-catching endeavors of its inhabitants. The implications of this unexpected correlation are not to be brushed aside, and we invite the scientific community to join us in unraveling the threads of this peculiar entanglement between environmental stress and spider trappings.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has spun a web of statistical significance and revealed an intriguing connection between air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the cybernetic spider-catching pursuits of its inhabitants. The association between environmental stressors and arachnophobic behaviors has been underscored by the strong positive relationship identified in our analysis. This unexpected correlation is a reminder that sometimes, the seemingly disparate can entangle themselves in surprising ways, beckoning us to look beyond the obvious and dig deeper into the complexities of human responses to environmental challenges.

The implications of our findings are far-reaching, challenging us to ponder the ways in which individuals cope with their leggy intruders and thrusting into the limelight the role of internet search engines as an unlikely ally in the battle against arachnids. The tangled web of connections we've uncovered opens up a myriad of avenues for further exploration, inviting us to untangle the threads of this peculiar entanglement between air pollution and spider trappings.

As we contemplate the labyrinthine nature of this unexpected correlation, it's clear that further investigation is warranted to disentangle the various contributing factors and manifestations of this intriguing association. However, in the spirit of lightheartedness and a fondness for puns, we daresay that when it comes to the link between air pollution and online spider trapping queries, it seems we've hit upon a sticky situation that certainly "sticks" out among other scientific curiosities. In any case, we confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Anthropo-Arachnological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ecological Arachnid Analysis and Protection


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Caught in the Web: A Arachnophobic Analysis of Air Pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin with an abstract of This paper investigates the surprisingly tangled web of connectivity between air pollution levels in Watertown, Wisconsin, and the volume of Google searches for "how to trap a spider." By examining data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2007 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8585879 and p-value less than 0.01 suggest a strong statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking association between increasing air pollution levels and a surge in online queries related to arachnid capture techniques. The implications of this unexpected correlation may expand our understanding of human behavior in response to environmental stressors, and call for further investigation into the effects of air quality on entomophobia and the utilization of internet search engines as an escape hatch for encountering eight-legged intruders.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Watertown Wisconsin, Google searches, how to trap a spider, EPA data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, statistical relationship, environmental stressors, air quality, entomophobia, internet search behavior, environmental impact, arachnophobia

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Watertown-Fort Atkinson, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin

Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to trap a spider' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'

Correlation r = 0.8585879 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7371732 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to trap a spider') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-5. 0.0000417690055193245940000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.0042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,941 random variables You don't actually need 23 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.62, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin (Bad air quality days)0.059782600.005555560.005154640.01036270.06217620.0155440.020512800.019900500.0082304500.01904760.00480769
Google searches for 'how to trap a spider' (Rel. search volume)12.91675.666674.4166745.1666712.91678.255.56.666674.166675.757.166675.666676.755.83333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0597826,0,0.00555556,0.00515464,0.0103627,0.0621762,0.015544,0.0205128,0,0.0199005,0,0.00823045,0,0.0190476,0.00480769,])
array_2 = np.array([12.9167,5.66667,4.41667,4,5.16667,12.9167,8.25,5.5,6.66667,4.16667,5.75,7.16667,5.66667,6.75,5.83333,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Watertown, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5025 · Black Variable ID: 21776 · Red Variable ID: 1448
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0