about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,986 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Searches for 'never gonna give you up' and the second variable is Google searches for 'who is elon musk'.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'never gonna give you up' meme gained traction, more and more people couldn't resist clicking on mysterious links, leading them down internet rabbit holes. One minute they're enjoying a retro rickroll, the next they're questioning the nature of reality and the enigmatic presence of a certain real-life Tony Stark.

Create a meme inspired by the never gonna give you up meme that in some way references Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme caused who is elon musk (Google searches for 'who is elon musk') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

The Journal of Internet Culture Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the whimsical world of internet memes, where the rickroll reigns supreme and the enigma that is Elon Musk captures the intrigue of netizens worldwide. In this study, we embark on a journey through the digital jungle to unravel the peculiar correlation between the pervasive 'never gonna give you up' meme and the curious quest for understanding 'who is Elon Musk'. Strap in, dear readers, as we embark on a scientific and oh-so-slightly absurd exploration of the interplay between rickrolling and curiosity about the man behind the memes.

With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge in our hearts, we venture into the realm of correlation coefficients and p-values to uncover the unexpected link between two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we dive into the data provided by Google Trends, we must be prepared for surprises, for in the land of statistics and variables, anything can happen. Much like a classic rickroll, the findings of this study are bound to elicit both a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.

We stand at the crossroads of internet hijinks and genuine inquisition, wielding the tools of research to shed light on the bizarre and the whimsical. So buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on this expedition into the uncharted territory where memes and Musk collide, for it is sure to be a journey filled with laughter, head-scratching, and perhaps a dash of scientific absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of internet memes, where the rickroll reigns supreme and the enigma that is Elon Musk captures the intrigue of netizens worldwide. In this study, we embark on a journey through the digital jungle to unravel the peculiar correlation between the pervasive 'never gonna give you up' meme and the curious quest for understanding 'who is Elon Musk'. Strap in, dear readers, as we embark on a scientific and oh-so-slightly absurd exploration of the interplay between rickrolling and curiosity about the man behind the memes.
With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge in our hearts, we venture into the realm of correlation coefficients and p-values to uncover the unexpected link between two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we dive into the data provided by Google Trends, we must be prepared for surprises, for in the land of statistics and variables, anything can happen. Much like a classic rickroll, the findings of this study are bound to elicit both a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
We stand at the crossroads of internet hijinks and genuine inquisition, wielding the tools of research to shed light on the bizarre and the whimsical. So buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on this expedition into the uncharted territory where memes and Musk collide, for it is sure to be a journey filled with laughter, head-scratching, and perhaps a dash of scientific absurdity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2010) examined the impact of internet memes on popular culture and found that these digital phenomena possess a remarkable ability to infiltrate and shape societal norms. Meanwhile, Doe's (2015) investigation into the enigmatic allure of public figures highlighted the intrigue surrounding individuals shrouded in mystery, such as the enigmatic Elon Musk.

In "The Memetic Manifesto" (Jones, 2018), the authors expounded on the evolution of internet memes and their profound influence on contemporary discourse. Likewise, "The Psychology of Curiosity" (Smith, 2017) delved into the intricacies of human inquisitiveness, shedding light on the quirky ways in which curiosity manifests in the digital age.

On a more fictional note, "The Meme-Weaver's Odyssey" (Robinson, 2008) and "Elon and the Rickroll Revelations" (Adams, 2013) offered imaginative insights into the whimsical intersection of memes and the enigma that is Elon Musk. These fictional works, though not grounded in empirical research, provided an entertaining backdrop for contemplating the unlikely connection between rickrolling and Musk-related curiosity.

As the authors delved deeper, they encountered an unexpected treasure trove of information - the backs of shampoo bottles. While not traditionally considered scholarly sources, the quirky musings found on these bottles offered a refreshing perspective on correlation, leaving the researchers both amused and perplexed by the sheer randomness of it all.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends . You used data from 2006 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of internet memes, where the rickroll reigns supreme and the enigma that is Elon Musk captures the intrigue of netizens worldwide. In this study, we embark on a journey through the digital jungle to unravel the peculiar correlation between the pervasive 'never gonna give you up' meme and the curious quest for understanding 'who is Elon Musk'. Strap in, dear readers, as we embark on a scientific and oh-so-slightly absurd exploration of the interplay between rickrolling and curiosity about the man behind the memes.
With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge in our hearts, we venture into the realm of correlation coefficients and p-values to uncover the unexpected link between two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we dive into the data provided by Google Trends, we must be prepared for surprises, for in the land of statistics and variables, anything can happen. Much like a classic rickroll, the findings of this study are bound to elicit both a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
We stand at the crossroads of internet hijinks and genuine inquisition, wielding the tools of research to shed light on the bizarre and the whimsical. So buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on this expedition into the uncharted territory where memes and Musk collide, for it is sure to be a journey filled with laughter, head-scratching, and perhaps a dash of scientific absurdity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the perplexing web of rickrolling and Elon Musk intrigue, our research team embarked on a bizarre and whimsical quest, utilizing data from the esoteric realm of Google Trends. Our methodology has been carefully crafted to capture the essence of digital hijinks while harnessing the power of statistical analysis.

We commenced our expedition by delving into the vast expanse of Google Trends, where we embarked on a data mining adventure unlike any other. With a fervent spirit of curiosity and the tenacity of digital explorers, we sought to capture the ever-evolving popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the curious inclination to unveil the enigma of Elon Musk.

Our data collection spanned the years from 2006 to 2023, embracing the full spectrum of the rickrolling phenomenon and Elon Musk's enigmatic rise to notoriety. With the guidance of Google Trends, we navigated through the peaks and valleys of internet memes and search queries, armed with spreadsheets and a flair for the unexpected.

As with any daring escapade into the realm of research, our methodology integrated robust statistical analyses, computing correlation coefficients and p-values with the precision of digital sleuths. We utilized the arcane arts of correlation analysis to uncover the peculiar dance between the popularity of 'never gonna give you up' and the quest to unravel the mysteries surrounding Elon Musk.

In the spirit of embracing the unexpected, our methodology also encapsulated a touch of whimsy and the occasional tongue-in-cheek observation. After all, in the realm of memes and Musk, a dash of levity is a prerequisite for navigating the digital labyrinth.

With this eclectic blend of data mining, statistical wizardry, and a sprinkle of internet whimsy, our research team set out to illuminate the uncanny connection between rickrolling and the quest to demystify Elon Musk, armed with nothing but a hearty sense of humor and a determination to uncover the unexpected in the digital landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends .

For the time period 2006 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9155212, r-squared of 0.8381790, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the whimsical world of internet memes, where the rickroll reigns supreme and the enigma that is Elon Musk captures the intrigue of netizens worldwide. In this study, we embark on a journey through the digital jungle to unravel the peculiar correlation between the pervasive 'never gonna give you up' meme and the curious quest for understanding 'who is Elon Musk'. Strap in, dear readers, as we embark on a scientific and oh-so-slightly absurd exploration of the interplay between rickrolling and curiosity about the man behind the memes.
With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge in our hearts, we venture into the realm of correlation coefficients and p-values to uncover the unexpected link between two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we dive into the data provided by Google Trends, we must be prepared for surprises, for in the land of statistics and variables, anything can happen. Much like a classic rickroll, the findings of this study are bound to elicit both a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
We stand at the crossroads of internet hijinks and genuine inquisition, wielding the tools of research to shed light on the bizarre and the whimsical. So buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on this expedition into the uncharted territory where memes and Musk collide, for it is sure to be a journey filled with laughter, head-scratching, and perhaps a dash of scientific absurdity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon delving into the data, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk', spanning the years 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 stunned even the most seasoned meme enthusiasts in our midst, showcasing a connection that is as enticing as it is surprising. As we regaled ourselves with these statistical marvels, we also unveiled an r-squared value of 0.8381790, affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous phenomena. And let's not forget the ever-important p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a probability so low it's almost as rare as stumbling upon an actual "Rick Astley" music video when expecting something else.

Figure 1 accompanies our intriguing findings, boasting a scatterplot that graphically encapsulates the striking correlation we've unearthed. While we can't help but find the juxtaposition of analyzing memes and the enigmatic Elon Musk comically absurd, the strength of the relationship depicted in the scatterplot is a sight to behold. It's almost as if the data itself is pulling an elaborate rickroll on us, revealing a connection that defies expectation and embraces the delightful chaos of the digital realm.

In essence, our research not only unveils an unexpected link between the whimsical world of internet memes and the genuine curiosity surrounding Elon Musk, but it also serves as a testament to the unpredictable and endlessly amusing nature of online phenomena. So, as we raise our data-driven glasses to toast this inconceivable correlation, we invite readers to join us in contemplating the marvels and mysteries that transpire when statistics, memes, and an inextinguishable curiosity collide in the expanse of cyber space. Cheers to the delightfully unexpected, for science never fails to surprise, even in the most unconventional of investigations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2010) examined the impact of internet memes on popular culture and found that these digital phenomena possess a remarkable ability to infiltrate and shape societal norms. Meanwhile, Doe's (2015) investigation into the enigmatic allure of public figures highlighted the intrigue surrounding individuals shrouded in mystery, such as the enigmatic Elon Musk.
In "The Memetic Manifesto" (Jones, 2018), the authors expounded on the evolution of internet memes and their profound influence on contemporary discourse. Likewise, "The Psychology of Curiosity" (Smith, 2017) delved into the intricacies of human inquisitiveness, shedding light on the quirky ways in which curiosity manifests in the digital age.
On a more fictional note, "The Meme-Weaver's Odyssey" (Robinson, 2008) and "Elon and the Rickroll Revelations" (Adams, 2013) offered imaginative insights into the whimsical intersection of memes and the enigma that is Elon Musk. These fictional works, though not grounded in empirical research, provided an entertaining backdrop for contemplating the unlikely connection between rickrolling and Musk-related curiosity.
As the authors delved deeper, they encountered an unexpected treasure trove of information - the backs of shampoo bottles. While not traditionally considered scholarly sources, the quirky musings found on these bottles offered a refreshing perspective on correlation, leaving the researchers both amused and perplexed by the sheer randomness of it all.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the data, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk', spanning the years 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 stunned even the most seasoned meme enthusiasts in our midst, showcasing a connection that is as enticing as it is surprising. As we regaled ourselves with these statistical marvels, we also unveiled an r-squared value of 0.8381790, affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous phenomena. And let's not forget the ever-important p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a probability so low it's almost as rare as stumbling upon an actual "Rick Astley" music video when expecting something else.
Figure 1 accompanies our intriguing findings, boasting a scatterplot that graphically encapsulates the striking correlation we've unearthed. While we can't help but find the juxtaposition of analyzing memes and the enigmatic Elon Musk comically absurd, the strength of the relationship depicted in the scatterplot is a sight to behold. It's almost as if the data itself is pulling an elaborate rickroll on us, revealing a connection that defies expectation and embraces the delightful chaos of the digital realm.
In essence, our research not only unveils an unexpected link between the whimsical world of internet memes and the genuine curiosity surrounding Elon Musk, but it also serves as a testament to the unpredictable and endlessly amusing nature of online phenomena. So, as we raise our data-driven glasses to toast this inconceivable correlation, we invite readers to join us in contemplating the marvels and mysteries that transpire when statistics, memes, and an inextinguishable curiosity collide in the expanse of cyber space. Cheers to the delightfully unexpected, for science never fails to surprise, even in the most unconventional of investigations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has shed light on the delightfully unexpected and intertwined relationship between the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the enigmatic allure of the one and only Elon Musk. As we reflect on the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212, we find ourselves marveling at the quirky and capricious nature of internet culture. It seems that as the rickrolling craze infiltrated the digital sphere, so too did the curiosity surrounding the man behind the SpaceX and Tesla empire. This correlation is as captivating as stumbling upon a hidden gem in the depths of the internet - a rare and wondrous occurrence that defies logic and embraces the whimsical chaos of the cyber world.

Our findings corroborate the work of Smith et al. (2010), who emphasized the remarkable influence of internet memes on societal norms. The enduring popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme has not only incited groans and laughter but also wielded a surprising gravitational pull on public curiosity, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. This peculiar relationship not only challenges conventional wisdom but also underscores the profound interconnectedness of seemingly disparate online phenomena. It's as if the digital universe itself conspired to orchestrate this serendipitous dance between memes and genuine intrigue.

Moreover, our results align with the whimsical musings found on the backs of shampoo bottles, which, despite their lighthearted nature, inadvertently touched upon the essence of correlation in the most unexpected of places. The parallels are undeniable - just as the chance encounter with amusing shampoo bottle trivia can bring a smile to one's face, so too can our unearthing of a robust correlation between internet shenanigans and intellectual curiosity spark joy and elicit a sense of wonder.

The strength of our correlation, indicated by the r-squared value of 0.8381790, confirms that the relationship between the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk' is not merely a fluke but a bona fide statistical marvel. Additionally, the resoundingly low p-value further solidifies the legitimacy of this correlation, almost as rare as convincing a room full of statisticians to engage in a spontaneous group rendition of "Never Gonna Give You Up."

As we don our metaphorical data-driven party hats to celebrate this inconceivable correlation, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in reveling in the wonder and amusement inherent in our findings. The cyber world, it seems, is a place where the unexpected reigns supreme, and where statistical marvels and internet memes collide in the most entertaining and surprising ways. Cheers to the whimsical and the wondrous, for in the realm of online phenomena, the only constant is delightful unpredictability.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of internet memes, where the rickroll reigns supreme and the enigma that is Elon Musk captures the intrigue of netizens worldwide. In this study, we embark on a journey through the digital jungle to unravel the peculiar correlation between the pervasive 'never gonna give you up' meme and the curious quest for understanding 'who is Elon Musk'. Strap in, dear readers, as we embark on a scientific and oh-so-slightly absurd exploration of the interplay between rickrolling and curiosity about the man behind the memes.
With a twinkle in our eye and a quest for knowledge in our hearts, we venture into the realm of correlation coefficients and p-values to uncover the unexpected link between two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we dive into the data provided by Google Trends, we must be prepared for surprises, for in the land of statistics and variables, anything can happen. Much like a classic rickroll, the findings of this study are bound to elicit both a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
We stand at the crossroads of internet hijinks and genuine inquisition, wielding the tools of research to shed light on the bizarre and the whimsical. So buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on this expedition into the uncharted territory where memes and Musk collide, for it is sure to be a journey filled with laughter, head-scratching, and perhaps a dash of scientific absurdity.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the data, our research team uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk', spanning the years 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 stunned even the most seasoned meme enthusiasts in our midst, showcasing a connection that is as enticing as it is surprising. As we regaled ourselves with these statistical marvels, we also unveiled an r-squared value of 0.8381790, affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous phenomena. And let's not forget the ever-important p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a probability so low it's almost as rare as stumbling upon an actual "Rick Astley" music video when expecting something else.
Figure 1 accompanies our intriguing findings, boasting a scatterplot that graphically encapsulates the striking correlation we've unearthed. While we can't help but find the juxtaposition of analyzing memes and the enigmatic Elon Musk comically absurd, the strength of the relationship depicted in the scatterplot is a sight to behold. It's almost as if the data itself is pulling an elaborate rickroll on us, revealing a connection that defies expectation and embraces the delightful chaos of the digital realm.
In essence, our research not only unveils an unexpected link between the whimsical world of internet memes and the genuine curiosity surrounding Elon Musk, but it also serves as a testament to the unpredictable and endlessly amusing nature of online phenomena. So, as we raise our data-driven glasses to toast this inconceivable correlation, we invite readers to join us in contemplating the marvels and mysteries that transpire when statistics, memes, and an inextinguishable curiosity collide in the expanse of cyber space. Cheers to the delightfully unexpected, for science never fails to surprise, even in the most unconventional of investigations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we conclude this eccentric expedition through the gloriously bizarre landscape of internet memes and Elon Musk inquiries, we are left with an inexplicably entertaining correlation that has both tickled our funny bones and piqued our scholarly curiosity. The stupefying correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and the p-value of less than 0.01 present a statistical spectacle unlike any other, akin to stumbling upon an anomaly in the multiverse. It's as if the very fabric of the digital universe conspired to intertwine the antics of Rick Astley with the enigma of Elon Musk, resulting in a harmonious yet uproariously unexpected connection.

Our findings not only shed light on the whimsical interplay between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity but also serve as a testament to the unpredictability of the digital domain. In the grand spectacle of scientific exploration, this correlation stands as a unique enigma, much like a well-crafted meme that provokes laughter and contemplation in equal measure.

In light of these revelatory findings, we dare to assert that no further research in this area is necessary. For who can top a correlation so delightfully surprising and aptly reflective of the capricious nature of the online world? As we bid adieu to this peculiar yet utterly enthralling correlation, we do so with a nod to the joyful absurdity of science and statistics, always ready to serenade us with their curious tunes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Internet Meme Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rickrolling Over Elon: A Meme-orable Correlation with an abstract of In the wacky world of internet memes, the 'never gonna give you up' phenomenon has taken the digital sphere by storm, inflicting joy and groans alike as individuals get unexpectedly rickrolled. Meanwhile, the enigmatic figure of Elon Musk has captured public curiosity, with many turning to Google to unravel the mysteries shrouding his persona. This study delves into the unlikely relationship between the popularity of the 'never gonna give you up' meme and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk'. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our research team unveils a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9155212 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2023. Our findings suggest that as the rickrolling craze surged, so did the interest in deciphering the enigma of Elon Musk, illuminating an unexpectedly intertwined link between internet shenanigans and genuine curiosity. This research not only provides a unique lens into online trends but also highlights the bizarre and whimsical nature of the digital world.

ChatGPT:

Rickrolling, Elon Musk, internet memes, Google searches, correlation analysis, Google Trends, rickrolling phenomenon, Elon Musk persona, online trends, digital world, internet shenanigans

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Searches for 'never gonna give you up'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'never gonna give you up' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Searches for 'never gonna give you up'

Google searches for 'who is elon musk'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'who is elon musk' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'who is elon musk'

Correlation r = 0.9155212 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8381790 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'who is elon musk') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Searches for 'never gonna give you up') over the 18 years from 2006 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.0E-7. 0.0000000998058978363807000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.0E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,019,448 random variables You don't actually need 10 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' (Relative popularity)2.1666711.166726.916720.916718.916720.166715.751413.416719.083319.7519.916717.833315.666731.083342.666760.539.4167
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' (Rel. search volume)0.08333330.08333330.09090910.1111110000.7511.583331.666673.666678.416676.0833315.416726.33334326.8889




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.16667,11.1667,26.9167,20.9167,18.9167,20.1667,15.75,14,13.4167,19.0833,19.75,19.9167,17.8333,15.6667,31.0833,42.6667,60.5,39.4167,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0833333,0.0833333,0.0909091,0.111111,0,0,0,0.75,1,1.58333,1.66667,3.66667,8.41667,6.08333,15.4167,26.3333,43,26.8889,])
array_1_name = "Searches for 'never gonna give you up'"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'who is elon musk'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4986 · Black Variable ID: 25160 · Red Variable ID: 1487
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0