about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,926 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Drenching rain in San Diego.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the rain pours down in San Diego, the local birds seek shelter and happen to nest near LockPickingLawyer's home. To express their frustration with the wet weather, they chirp loudly, disrupting the audio quality of his recordings. As a result, the LockPickingLawyer is unable to produce his usual high-quality content with subpar bird noise in the background, leading to a decrease in the goodness of his video titles. It's a true case of "fowl" play impacting the world of lock-picking entertainment.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a soaked San Diego street, with frustrated birds seeking shelter near LockPickingLawyer's home. The rain pours down heavily, and the birds' loud chirping disrupts his recording, visually representing the frustration of the situation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Parallax art a funny image macro Hyper-realistic Pop art
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego, in the following situation: As the rain pours down in San Diego, the local birds seek shelter and happen to nest near LockPickingLawyer's home. To express their frustration with the wet weather, they chirp loudly, disrupting the audio quality of his recordings. As a result, the LockPickingLawyer is unable to produce his usual high-quality content with subpar bird noise in the background, leading to a decrease in the goodness of his video titles. It's a true case of "fowl" play impacting the world of lock-picking entertainment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The rain pours down in San Diego, soaking the streets as frustrated birds seek shelter near LockPickingLawyer's home. Their loud chirping disrupts his recording, lowering the goodness of his video titles due to the subpar audio quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: The rain pours down in San Diego, soaking the streets as frustrated birds seek shelter near LockPickingLawyer's home. Their loud chirping disrupts his recording, lowering the goodness of his video titles due to the subpar audio quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a soaked San Diego street, with frustrated birds seeking shelter near LockPickingLawyer's home. The rain pours down heavily, and the birds' loud chirping disrupts his recording, visually representing the frustration of the situation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are caused Drenching rain in San Diego to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

Journal of Mysterious Meteorology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9118282 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of academic inquiry is often a realm of serious and solemn pursuit, where scholars cautiously tread the hallowed grounds of empirical evidence and theoretical musings. But every so often, a conundrum arises that defies conventional logic, leaving researchers grasping at the tendrils of the absurd and the unforeseen. Such is the puzzle that has captivated our attention—a perplexing enigma that juxtaposes the esoteric art of lock-picking with the decidedly more tangible deluge of rain in the sun-kissed city of San Diego.

At first glance, the connection between the intricacies of lock-picking and the capricious nature of rainfall might seem as tangential as a damp sponge in a locksmith's toolkit. However, as we delved into the heart of this peculiar anomaly, the tendrils of correlation began to intertwine and weave a tale of unforeseen harmonies. The wry smile of serendipity seemed to play across the lips of causality as we embarked on this quest to unravel the mysteries of atmospheric caprice and digital dexterity.

The LockPickingLawyer, an enigmatic figure in the realms of YouTube, has carved out a niche for himself with his captivating and often eyebrow-raising video titles. The allure of his content, much like a shimmering mirage in the digital desert, beckons viewers to partake in the exhilarating world of lock manipulation. As we entered this surreal landscape of virtual tumblers and hydraulic wonders, the surprising connection to the meteorological marvels of San Diego began to crystallize in unforeseen patterns.

In this paper, we present the fruits of our labor—a meticulous study that twines together the seemingly disparate threads of lock-picking intrigue and rain-soaked reveries. Through the lens of statistical analyses and a healthy dose of bemused curiosity, we seek to shed light on this unlikely intersection of realms. For as Douglas Adams once observed, "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

As we venture forth into the inscrutable hinterlands of YouTube video titles and atmospheric musings, our hope is to invite our esteemed colleagues to partake in the convivial camaraderie of scientific whimsy and perceptual peculiarity. For in the end, perhaps the most intriguing discoveries lie not in the familiar corridors of expectation, but in the serendipitous alleys of the unexpected and the improbable. Welcome to a tale of tumblers and torrents, where the wits of whimsy meet the capricious dance of raindrops in a city where the sun usually claims dominion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academic inquiry is often a realm of serious and solemn pursuit, where scholars cautiously tread the hallowed grounds of empirical evidence and theoretical musings. But every so often, a conundrum arises that defies conventional logic, leaving researchers grasping at the tendrils of the absurd and the unforeseen. Such is the puzzle that has captivated our attention—a perplexing enigma that juxtaposes the esoteric art of lock-picking with the decidedly more tangible deluge of rain in the sun-kissed city of San Diego.
At first glance, the connection between the intricacies of lock-picking and the capricious nature of rainfall might seem as tangential as a damp sponge in a locksmith's toolkit. However, as we delved into the heart of this peculiar anomaly, the tendrils of correlation began to intertwine and weave a tale of unforeseen harmonies. The wry smile of serendipity seemed to play across the lips of causality as we embarked on this quest to unravel the mysteries of atmospheric caprice and digital dexterity.
The LockPickingLawyer, an enigmatic figure in the realms of YouTube, has carved out a niche for himself with his captivating and often eyebrow-raising video titles. The allure of his content, much like a shimmering mirage in the digital desert, beckons viewers to partake in the exhilarating world of lock manipulation. As we entered this surreal landscape of virtual tumblers and hydraulic wonders, the surprising connection to the meteorological marvels of San Diego began to crystallize in unforeseen patterns.
In this paper, we present the fruits of our labor—a meticulous study that twines together the seemingly disparate threads of lock-picking intrigue and rain-soaked reveries. Through the lens of statistical analyses and a healthy dose of bemused curiosity, we seek to shed light on this unlikely intersection of realms. For as Douglas Adams once observed, "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
As we venture forth into the inscrutable hinterlands of YouTube video titles and atmospheric musings, our hope is to invite our esteemed colleagues to partake in the convivial camaraderie of scientific whimsy and perceptual peculiarity. For in the end, perhaps the most intriguing discoveries lie not in the familiar corridors of expectation, but in the serendipitous alleys of the unexpected and the improbable. Welcome to a tale of tumblers and torrents, where the wits of whimsy meet the capricious dance of raindrops in a city where the sun usually claims dominion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the annals of academic research, the interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has often beckoned scholars to embark on voyages of intellectual whimsy. Such is the case with the curious juxtaposition of the LockPickingLawyer’s enthralling YouTube video titles and the capricious downpours in San Diego. To embark on this intellectual odyssey, we first turn to the work of Smith (2018), whose seminal study delved into the psychology of captivating titles in digital media. Smith’s analysis sheds light on the nuanced art of crafting attention-grabbing headlines, a skillset that the LockPickingLawyer has honed to a fine and often mischievous edge.

Delving further into the subtle intricacies of digital content, Doe (2019) illuminated the unexpected neurological responses evoked by surprising and enigmatic stimuli in online environments. Combining this with the work of Jones (2020), who unearthed startling correlations between consumer behavior and atmospheric conditions, we witness the precipice of a convergence between the realms of the virtual and the meteorological.

Transitioning from the domain of empirical investigations, we turn our gaze to the world of literature, where the thematic threads of intrigue and aqueous reveries intertwine. In "The Art of Intrigue" by Curious Mind (2017), the author delves into the enigmatic allure of unexpected connections, showcasing how the LockPickingLawyer’s video titles exemplify the art of captivating enigma. Simultaneously, "Rainy Days and Mysterious Ways" by Weather Enthusiast (2019) presents a charming exploration of meteorological caprice, setting the stage for the convergence of atmospheric whimsy with the digital artistry of lock-picking escapades.

Embarking into the realm of fiction, we encounter "The Mystery of Whispering Pines" by A. Novel (2015), a tantalizing tale where unexpected secrets lurk amidst the palpitating deluge of the Pacific coast. Moving further afield, we juxtapose this with the whimsical escapades of "The Adventures of Soggy Sam" by Puddle Jumper (2018), a narrative that dances between the fantastical and the meteorological in a refreshing brew of storytelling.

Embracing the levity of unexpected influences, we drew insights from the spirited world of animation and children’s programming. Our perusal of classic cartoons such as "Mickey Mouse and the Mysterious Puddle" and "SpongeBob SquarePants: LockPicking Lunacy" unearthed subtle nods to the intersecting motifs of intrigue and aqueous musings, underscoring the permeation of unexpected connections in the fabric of popular culture.

In traversing the corridors of serious inquiry and whimsical detours, our literature review begets an amalgam of unconventional musings and unexpected encounters. As we navigate the uncharted waters of synergistic revelations, we invite our scholarly companions to join us in the ebullient dance of intellectual curiosity and spirited inquiry. After all, as J.K. Rowling once quipped, "It is our choices... that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." And in the choice to revel in the offbeat and the unexpected, lies the essence of scholarly camaraderie and intellectual fraternity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academic inquiry is often a realm of serious and solemn pursuit, where scholars cautiously tread the hallowed grounds of empirical evidence and theoretical musings. But every so often, a conundrum arises that defies conventional logic, leaving researchers grasping at the tendrils of the absurd and the unforeseen. Such is the puzzle that has captivated our attention—a perplexing enigma that juxtaposes the esoteric art of lock-picking with the decidedly more tangible deluge of rain in the sun-kissed city of San Diego.
At first glance, the connection between the intricacies of lock-picking and the capricious nature of rainfall might seem as tangential as a damp sponge in a locksmith's toolkit. However, as we delved into the heart of this peculiar anomaly, the tendrils of correlation began to intertwine and weave a tale of unforeseen harmonies. The wry smile of serendipity seemed to play across the lips of causality as we embarked on this quest to unravel the mysteries of atmospheric caprice and digital dexterity.
The LockPickingLawyer, an enigmatic figure in the realms of YouTube, has carved out a niche for himself with his captivating and often eyebrow-raising video titles. The allure of his content, much like a shimmering mirage in the digital desert, beckons viewers to partake in the exhilarating world of lock manipulation. As we entered this surreal landscape of virtual tumblers and hydraulic wonders, the surprising connection to the meteorological marvels of San Diego began to crystallize in unforeseen patterns.
In this paper, we present the fruits of our labor—a meticulous study that twines together the seemingly disparate threads of lock-picking intrigue and rain-soaked reveries. Through the lens of statistical analyses and a healthy dose of bemused curiosity, we seek to shed light on this unlikely intersection of realms. For as Douglas Adams once observed, "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
As we venture forth into the inscrutable hinterlands of YouTube video titles and atmospheric musings, our hope is to invite our esteemed colleagues to partake in the convivial camaraderie of scientific whimsy and perceptual peculiarity. For in the end, perhaps the most intriguing discoveries lie not in the familiar corridors of expectation, but in the serendipitous alleys of the unexpected and the improbable. Welcome to a tale of tumblers and torrents, where the wits of whimsy meet the capricious dance of raindrops in a city where the sun usually claims dominion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our data collection strategy employed a multifaceted approach, embracing both the virtual expanse of the internet and the empirical archives of meteorological chronicles. A key facet of the data acquisition process involved leveraging advanced AI algorithms to scrape and analyze the metadata of all LockPickingLawyer's YouTube video titles from 2015 to 2022. This intricate endeavor brought us face to face with the tantalizing tapestry of textual nuances and thematic motifs woven into the engaging titles. Our team then embarked on the forensic task of distilling the essence of lock-picking allure from this digital menagerie, entangling ourselves within the web of virtual tumblers and pinning down the elusive correlations hidden within the titles.

Simultaneously, we delved into the historical climate records as housed within the NOAA National Climate Data Center. Like intrepid meteorological sleuths, we dug deep into the archives, unearthing the empirical manifestations of San Diego's atmospheric caprices. Rainfall data became our vital quarry, and we meticulously charted the tempestuous escapades of precipitation, striving to capture the ephemeral dance of raindrops with chronometric precision. Our endeavor was akin to chasing a mirage amidst the data desert, as we sought to unravel the enigmatic connections between the 10101010s of lock-picking and the aqueous embrace of San Diego's clime.

Data Analysis:
The process of data analysis presented us with a cornucopia of statistical conundrums and epistemic perplexities. Employing robust statistical methodologies, including correlation analyses and regression models, we sought to unveil insights hidden within the matrices of information. The AI algorithms, nurtured in the hallowed virtual gardens of machine learning, toiled tirelessly to distill the quintessence of semantic patterns and subliminal messages from the LockPickingLawyer's video titles.

We summoned the specter of correlation coefficients to navigate the labyrinth of data, endeavoring to discern the forlorn whispers of connectivity amidst the cacophony of raw information. Our journey into the statistical hinterlands unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, a figure that left us bemused by its resounding resonance. The statistical significance of this correlation, achieving p < 0.01, further accentuated the inexplicable nature of the entwined phenomena under scrutiny.

Purged with a healthy dose of academic skepticism and a pinch of irreverent audacity, we ventured to unravel the complexities embroiled in this tango of textual allure and meteorological reverie. While causality remained an elusive specter, flitting at the periphery of our statistical findings, the tale of correlation unfolded with an unexpected resonance.

Ethical Considerations:
In our pursuit of unwrapping this perplexing mystery, we remained steadfast in our commitment to ethical principles. The utilization of AI algorithms for data scraping aligned with best practices, ensuring compliance with copyright protocols and respecting the intellectual property of content creators. Furthermore, in handling the meteorological archives, we upheld the sanctity of historical records, guarding against the encroachment of data manipulation or adulteration.

Our ethical compass guided us through the labyrinthine corridors of data analysis, preserving the integrity of our study while upholding the veracity of digital and meteorological narratives. With a wry nod to the paramountcy of ethical conduct, our journey of inquiry brimmed with scholarly probity, even amidst the zephyrs of whimsical curiosity that enlivened our pursuit.

The methodology we adopted, emerging from the crucible of empirical rigor and intellectual whimsy, serves as a testament to our commitment to unraveling even the most unexpected of enigmas. Our collective endeavor danced on the precipice of the unforeseen, engaging with the realms of lock-picking yore and rain-drenched reveries with academic ardor and a whisper of jest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9118282, r-squared of 0.8314308, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of academic inquiry is often a realm of serious and solemn pursuit, where scholars cautiously tread the hallowed grounds of empirical evidence and theoretical musings. But every so often, a conundrum arises that defies conventional logic, leaving researchers grasping at the tendrils of the absurd and the unforeseen. Such is the puzzle that has captivated our attention—a perplexing enigma that juxtaposes the esoteric art of lock-picking with the decidedly more tangible deluge of rain in the sun-kissed city of San Diego.
At first glance, the connection between the intricacies of lock-picking and the capricious nature of rainfall might seem as tangential as a damp sponge in a locksmith's toolkit. However, as we delved into the heart of this peculiar anomaly, the tendrils of correlation began to intertwine and weave a tale of unforeseen harmonies. The wry smile of serendipity seemed to play across the lips of causality as we embarked on this quest to unravel the mysteries of atmospheric caprice and digital dexterity.
The LockPickingLawyer, an enigmatic figure in the realms of YouTube, has carved out a niche for himself with his captivating and often eyebrow-raising video titles. The allure of his content, much like a shimmering mirage in the digital desert, beckons viewers to partake in the exhilarating world of lock manipulation. As we entered this surreal landscape of virtual tumblers and hydraulic wonders, the surprising connection to the meteorological marvels of San Diego began to crystallize in unforeseen patterns.
In this paper, we present the fruits of our labor—a meticulous study that twines together the seemingly disparate threads of lock-picking intrigue and rain-soaked reveries. Through the lens of statistical analyses and a healthy dose of bemused curiosity, we seek to shed light on this unlikely intersection of realms. For as Douglas Adams once observed, "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
As we venture forth into the inscrutable hinterlands of YouTube video titles and atmospheric musings, our hope is to invite our esteemed colleagues to partake in the convivial camaraderie of scientific whimsy and perceptual peculiarity. For in the end, perhaps the most intriguing discoveries lie not in the familiar corridors of expectation, but in the serendipitous alleys of the unexpected and the improbable. Welcome to a tale of tumblers and torrents, where the wits of whimsy meet the capricious dance of raindrops in a city where the sun usually claims dominion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

During the period of investigation spanning from 2015 to 2022, our research unearthed a striking correlation between the evocative video titles meticulously crafted by the LockPickingLawyer and the intermittent downpours that graced the region of San Diego. The correlation coefficient of 0.9118282 illustrates a strong positive relationship, signifying a compelling linkage between the two seemingly incongruous phenomena.

Moreover, the R-squared value of 0.8314308 affirms that a substantial proportion of the variance in the occurrence of drenching rain in San Diego can be elucidated by the intriguing composition of LockPickingLawyer's video titles. This statistical association is further underscored by the level of significance, with p < 0.01 highlighting the striking nature of this unexpected rapport.

In particular, Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation through a scatterplot, providing a visual testament to the surprising nexus between LockPickingLawyer's engaging video titles and the atmospheric caprice of San Diego.

The unanticipated convergence of lock-picking allure and inclement weather in San Diego, as evidenced by these results, beckons further inquiry into the intricacies of our digital and meteorological landscapes. While the causality underlying this phenomenon eludes definitive explication, our findings invite contemplation of the serendipitous and often whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate domains.

In the timeless words of William Shakespeare, "the rain it raineth every day," yet it seems that the enigmatic allure of lock-picking content may hold unforeseen sway over the capricious dance of raindrops in the renowned city of San Diego. This correlation, while at first glance a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, now stands as a testament to the boundless curiosity and quirkiness of the world we inhabit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the annals of academic research, the interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has often beckoned scholars to embark on voyages of intellectual whimsy. Such is the case with the curious juxtaposition of the LockPickingLawyer’s enthralling YouTube video titles and the capricious downpours in San Diego. To embark on this intellectual odyssey, we first turn to the work of Smith (2018), whose seminal study delved into the psychology of captivating titles in digital media. Smith’s analysis sheds light on the nuanced art of crafting attention-grabbing headlines, a skillset that the LockPickingLawyer has honed to a fine and often mischievous edge.
Delving further into the subtle intricacies of digital content, Doe (2019) illuminated the unexpected neurological responses evoked by surprising and enigmatic stimuli in online environments. Combining this with the work of Jones (2020), who unearthed startling correlations between consumer behavior and atmospheric conditions, we witness the precipice of a convergence between the realms of the virtual and the meteorological.
Transitioning from the domain of empirical investigations, we turn our gaze to the world of literature, where the thematic threads of intrigue and aqueous reveries intertwine. In "The Art of Intrigue" by Curious Mind (2017), the author delves into the enigmatic allure of unexpected connections, showcasing how the LockPickingLawyer’s video titles exemplify the art of captivating enigma. Simultaneously, "Rainy Days and Mysterious Ways" by Weather Enthusiast (2019) presents a charming exploration of meteorological caprice, setting the stage for the convergence of atmospheric whimsy with the digital artistry of lock-picking escapades.
Embarking into the realm of fiction, we encounter "The Mystery of Whispering Pines" by A. Novel (2015), a tantalizing tale where unexpected secrets lurk amidst the palpitating deluge of the Pacific coast. Moving further afield, we juxtapose this with the whimsical escapades of "The Adventures of Soggy Sam" by Puddle Jumper (2018), a narrative that dances between the fantastical and the meteorological in a refreshing brew of storytelling.
Embracing the levity of unexpected influences, we drew insights from the spirited world of animation and children’s programming. Our perusal of classic cartoons such as "Mickey Mouse and the Mysterious Puddle" and "SpongeBob SquarePants: LockPicking Lunacy" unearthed subtle nods to the intersecting motifs of intrigue and aqueous musings, underscoring the permeation of unexpected connections in the fabric of popular culture.
In traversing the corridors of serious inquiry and whimsical detours, our literature review begets an amalgam of unconventional musings and unexpected encounters. As we navigate the uncharted waters of synergistic revelations, we invite our scholarly companions to join us in the ebullient dance of intellectual curiosity and spirited inquiry. After all, as J.K. Rowling once quipped, "It is our choices... that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." And in the choice to revel in the offbeat and the unexpected, lies the essence of scholarly camaraderie and intellectual fraternity.

[[RESULTS]]
During the period of investigation spanning from 2015 to 2022, our research unearthed a striking correlation between the evocative video titles meticulously crafted by the LockPickingLawyer and the intermittent downpours that graced the region of San Diego. The correlation coefficient of 0.9118282 illustrates a strong positive relationship, signifying a compelling linkage between the two seemingly incongruous phenomena.
Moreover, the R-squared value of 0.8314308 affirms that a substantial proportion of the variance in the occurrence of drenching rain in San Diego can be elucidated by the intriguing composition of LockPickingLawyer's video titles. This statistical association is further underscored by the level of significance, with p < 0.01 highlighting the striking nature of this unexpected rapport.
In particular, Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation through a scatterplot, providing a visual testament to the surprising nexus between LockPickingLawyer's engaging video titles and the atmospheric caprice of San Diego.
The unanticipated convergence of lock-picking allure and inclement weather in San Diego, as evidenced by these results, beckons further inquiry into the intricacies of our digital and meteorological landscapes. While the causality underlying this phenomenon eludes definitive explication, our findings invite contemplation of the serendipitous and often whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate domains.
In the timeless words of William Shakespeare, "the rain it raineth every day," yet it seems that the enigmatic allure of lock-picking content may hold unforeseen sway over the capricious dance of raindrops in the renowned city of San Diego. This correlation, while at first glance a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, now stands as a testament to the boundless curiosity and quirkiness of the world we inhabit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkable correlation between the compelling video titles of the LockPickingLawyer and the capricious rains in San Diego not only defies conventional expectations but also invites spirited contemplation. Our findings concur with previous scholarship that has delved into the enigmatic allure of captivating digital content, which, as Smith (2018) illuminated, has the inexplicable magnetism to enthrall audiences. Taking this into account, the allure of lock-picking as portrayed in the video titles may indeed possess an uncanny and profound connection with the atmospheric vagaries of San Diego, as Doe (2019) hinted at in their exploration of unexpected neurological responses to online stimuli.

The nexus between consumer behavior and atmospheric caprice, as observed by Jones (2020), offers an intriguing parallel to our own findings. The intersection of seemingly unrelated domains in the digital and the meteorological elevates this correlation to an inimitable realm of intellectual whimsy and spirited conjecture—a confluence where the unexpected reigns supreme. It is almost as if the atmospheric conditions of San Diego are themselves spellbound by the captivating intrigue woven into the fabric of lock-picking conundrums, mirroring the delightful literary ponderings of Curious Mind (2017) and the meteorological reveries of Weather Enthusiast (2019).

Moreover, in our investigation, the playful nod to classic cartoons and children's programming, where we unearthed subtle motifs of intrigue and aqueous musings, serves as an enlightening testament to the interwoven fabric of popular culture with our present inquiry. The unanticipated convergence of whimsical content and meteorological musings mirrors the levity and unpredictability that often pervades the recesses of the human experience and cultural expression. As we ponder this convoluted dance between lock-picking allure and San Diego rain, the threads of unexpected connections in whimsical narratives, be they literary, animated, or empirical, weave a vibrant tapestry of intellectual curiosity and jovial discovery.

In spirit, these findings beckon the scholarly community to revel in the ebullient dance of intellectual camaraderie and inquiry, underscoring the essence of the unexpected and unorthodox within the corridors of rigorous inquiry. As J.K. Rowling wisely articulated, "It is our choices... that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." In the choice to pivot toward the offbeat and the unexpected, we honor the embodiment of intellectual camaraderie and scholarly fraternity, where the convergence of lock-picking allure and drenching San Diego rain stands as a whimsical testament to the effervescent caprice of our scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in San Diego. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled

[[ABSTRACT]]
The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.

Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.

The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.

In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of academic inquiry is often a realm of serious and solemn pursuit, where scholars cautiously tread the hallowed grounds of empirical evidence and theoretical musings. But every so often, a conundrum arises that defies conventional logic, leaving researchers grasping at the tendrils of the absurd and the unforeseen. Such is the puzzle that has captivated our attention—a perplexing enigma that juxtaposes the esoteric art of lock-picking with the decidedly more tangible deluge of rain in the sun-kissed city of San Diego.
At first glance, the connection between the intricacies of lock-picking and the capricious nature of rainfall might seem as tangential as a damp sponge in a locksmith's toolkit. However, as we delved into the heart of this peculiar anomaly, the tendrils of correlation began to intertwine and weave a tale of unforeseen harmonies. The wry smile of serendipity seemed to play across the lips of causality as we embarked on this quest to unravel the mysteries of atmospheric caprice and digital dexterity.
The LockPickingLawyer, an enigmatic figure in the realms of YouTube, has carved out a niche for himself with his captivating and often eyebrow-raising video titles. The allure of his content, much like a shimmering mirage in the digital desert, beckons viewers to partake in the exhilarating world of lock manipulation. As we entered this surreal landscape of virtual tumblers and hydraulic wonders, the surprising connection to the meteorological marvels of San Diego began to crystallize in unforeseen patterns.
In this paper, we present the fruits of our labor—a meticulous study that twines together the seemingly disparate threads of lock-picking intrigue and rain-soaked reveries. Through the lens of statistical analyses and a healthy dose of bemused curiosity, we seek to shed light on this unlikely intersection of realms. For as Douglas Adams once observed, "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
As we venture forth into the inscrutable hinterlands of YouTube video titles and atmospheric musings, our hope is to invite our esteemed colleagues to partake in the convivial camaraderie of scientific whimsy and perceptual peculiarity. For in the end, perhaps the most intriguing discoveries lie not in the familiar corridors of expectation, but in the serendipitous alleys of the unexpected and the improbable. Welcome to a tale of tumblers and torrents, where the wits of whimsy meet the capricious dance of raindrops in a city where the sun usually claims dominion.

[[RESULTS]]
During the period of investigation spanning from 2015 to 2022, our research unearthed a striking correlation between the evocative video titles meticulously crafted by the LockPickingLawyer and the intermittent downpours that graced the region of San Diego. The correlation coefficient of 0.9118282 illustrates a strong positive relationship, signifying a compelling linkage between the two seemingly incongruous phenomena.
Moreover, the R-squared value of 0.8314308 affirms that a substantial proportion of the variance in the occurrence of drenching rain in San Diego can be elucidated by the intriguing composition of LockPickingLawyer's video titles. This statistical association is further underscored by the level of significance, with p < 0.01 highlighting the striking nature of this unexpected rapport.
In particular, Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation through a scatterplot, providing a visual testament to the surprising nexus between LockPickingLawyer's engaging video titles and the atmospheric caprice of San Diego.
The unanticipated convergence of lock-picking allure and inclement weather in San Diego, as evidenced by these results, beckons further inquiry into the intricacies of our digital and meteorological landscapes. While the causality underlying this phenomenon eludes definitive explication, our findings invite contemplation of the serendipitous and often whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate domains.
In the timeless words of William Shakespeare, "the rain it raineth every day," yet it seems that the enigmatic allure of lock-picking content may hold unforeseen sway over the capricious dance of raindrops in the renowned city of San Diego. This correlation, while at first glance a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, now stands as a testament to the boundless curiosity and quirkiness of the world we inhabit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the culmination of our odyssey through the realms of statistical jiggery-pokery and improbable correlations, we arrive at an intriguing juncture where the engaging allure of lock-picking musings and the capricious caprice of San Diego rain coalesce in an unexpected waltz of statistical significance. While the connection between these seemingly incongruous phenomena may elicit a wry smile of bemusement, our results stand as a testament to the unfathomable intricacies that enliven our everyday experiences. As we bid adieu to this whimsical expedition, it becomes clear that the universe has once again unveiled a vista of the inexplicable, reminding us that the most extraordinary discoveries are often found in the unlikeliest of places.

While the temptation to delve further into this captivating conundrum may tug at the sleeves of our inquisitiveness, we dare to pronounce that the resplendent saga of lock-picking intrigue and rain-soaked reveries has been unraveled to a satisfactory extent. With a nod to the whimsy of academic exploration, we assert that no more research is needed in this area, leaving the intersection of LockPickingLawyer's YouTube titles and San Diego rainfall as a delightful musing in the annals of scholarly peculiarities.

In the immortal words of Mark Twain, "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in Heaven." And so, dear colleagues, let us revel in the whimsy of the inexplicable, for it is in the serendipitous zephyrs of the unforeseen that the true spirit of academic inquiry thrives.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Mysterious Meteorology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Peculiar Phenomena Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rain in San Diego, LockPickingLawyer's Video Titles, and the Mystery Unveiled with an abstract of The enigmatic relationship between the engaging video titles produced by the LockPickingLawyer on YouTube and the occurrence of drenching rain in the typically arid climes of San Diego has long intrigued scholars and armchair scientists alike. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our study delves into this curiosity, examining the correlation between the wording and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the amount of rainfall in San Diego over the years 2015 to 2022.
Hypothesizing that there may be a subliminal connection between the captivating allure of lock-picking and the atmospheric conditions of Southern California, we meticulously harvested and analyzed data from the YouTube platform using advanced AI algorithms. Concurrently, we sourced historical meteorological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, bringing these seemingly unrelated realms into a surprising nexus.
The results of our inquiry reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9118282, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, during the aforementioned temporal span. While the causality behind this correlation eludes definitive explanation, our findings posit a tantalizing link between the captivating allure of lock-picking content and the atmospheric phenomenon of drenching rain in San Diego.
In unraveling this uncommon synergy, we invite the scholarly community to consider the possibility of unconventional influences and unlikely relationships at play in our everyday experiences.

ChatGPT:

LockPickingLawyer, video titles, San Diego rainfall, correlation analysis, lock-picking content, atmospheric phenomenon, data analysis, YouTube algorithm, meteorological data, NOAA, Southern California, unconventional influences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are

Drenching rain in San Diego
Detailed data title: Highest daily total of precipitation in the year at SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CA US
Source: NOAA National Climate Data Center
See what else correlates with Drenching rain in San Diego

Correlation r = 0.9118282 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8314308 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Drenching rain in San Diego) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0016. 0.0016023499239566838000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 624 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10))77.11547.11987.03646.86126.59416.53186.47
Drenching rain in San Diego (Inches of rain)1.631.652.341.81.371.160.980.84




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,7.1154,7.1198,7.0364,6.8612,6.5941,6.5318,6.47,])
array_2 = np.array([1.63,1.65,2.34,1.8,1.37,1.16,0.98,0.84,])
array_1_name = "How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Drenching rain in San Diego"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4926 · Black Variable ID: 25769 · Red Variable ID: 25408
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0