Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
Report an error
How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of advertising sales agents in Wyoming | r=1 | 8yrs | Yes! |
| The distance between Jupiter and the Sun | r=0.99 | 9yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Caroline | r=0.99 | 8yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Juliana | r=0.99 | 8yrs | No |
| The number of public relations specialists in Pennsylvania | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Germany | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of salespeople in New York | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
| The distance between Jupiter and Earth | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of conservation scientists in Nevada | r=0.95 | 8yrs | No |
| The distance between Jupiter and Mercury | r=0.95 | 9yrs | No |
| xkcd comics published about programming | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with UPS | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of bill collectors in Utah | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
| Drenching rain in San Diego | r=0.91 | 8yrs | Yes! |
| The distance between Jupiter and Venus | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
How good LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)