Spurious correlation #4,897 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Wind power generated in Denmark. The chart goes from 2015 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Wind power generated in Denmark. The chart goes from 2015 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As the wind power in Denmark increases, it creates a surge of excitement in the air. This excitement somehow translates to the LockPickingLawyer's creativity, leading to even more fun and thrilling video titles. It's as if the gusts of wind are whispering punny ideas to him, making lock-picking an unexpectedly entertaining endeavor. Who knew renewable energy and the art of picking locks could be connected in such a whimsical way? It's a real 'wind-win' situation for both the viewers and the environment!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting the LockPickingLawyer at his cluttered desk set against the backdrop of the Danish countryside with wind turbines spinning rapidly in the distance. As the wind picks up, a playful grin crosses his face as he excitedly scribbles down a new YouTube video title. The gusts seem to whisper creative ideas to him, infusing his lock-picking endeavors with unexpected entertainment. The setting should have an otherworldly, futuristic feel akin to 'Star Wars.' The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Wind power generated in Denmark. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Hyper-realistic Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Realistic
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Wind power generated in Denmark, in the following situation: As the wind power in Denmark increases, it creates a surge of excitement in the air. This excitement somehow translates to the LockPickingLawyer's creativity, leading to even more fun and thrilling video titles. It's as if the gusts of wind are whispering punny ideas to him, making lock-picking an unexpectedly entertaining endeavor. Who knew renewable energy and the art of picking locks could be connected in such a whimsical way? It's a real 'wind-win' situation for both the viewers and the environment!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The LockPickingLawyer sits at his desk, surrounded by various locks and tools. Outside his window, wind turbines spin rapidly in the Danish countryside. As the wind picks up, a playful grin crosses his face, and he excitedly scribbles down a new YouTube video title. The gusts seem to whisper creative ideas to him, infusing his lock-picking endeavors with unexpected entertainment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: The LockPickingLawyer sits at his desk, surrounded by various locks and tools. Outside his window, wind turbines spin rapidly in the Danish countryside. As the wind picks up, a playful grin crosses his face, and he excitedly scribbles down a new YouTube video title. The gusts seem to whisper creative ideas to him, infusing his lock-picking endeavors with unexpected entertainment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting the LockPickingLawyer at his cluttered desk set against the backdrop of the Danish countryside with wind turbines spinning rapidly in the distance. As the wind picks up, a playful grin crosses his face as he excitedly scribbles down a new YouTube video title. The gusts seem to whisper creative ideas to him, infusing his lock-picking endeavors with unexpected entertainment. The setting should have an otherworldly, futuristic feel akin to 'Star Wars.'

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are caused Wind power generated in Denmark to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark

The Journal of Applied Windology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Wind power generated in Denmark. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the quirky world of YouTube video titles and renewable energy to uncover a surprising connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer's videos and the wind power generated in Denmark. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to answer the delightfully absurd question: Could there be a link between the captivating titles of lock picking videos and the renewable energy landscape?

Our research team discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9770050 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With tongue firmly in cheek, we reflect on the sheer absurdity and amusement of uncovering such a connection, reminding ourselves that science often unearths the unexpected.

This study not only calls attention to the unforeseen interplay of seemingly unrelated domains but also underscores the potential for lighthearted inspiration in unforeseen places. As we unravel this enigmatic correlation, we invite readers to join us in delighting in the whimsical nature of scientific discovery and the absurdity that occasionally accompanies serious research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of lock picking and wind power may seem about as likely as a penguin in the desert, but the mysterious universe of correlations has once again thrown us a curveball. In this whimsically absurd inquiry, we embark on a delightful romp through the world of YouTube titles and renewable energy, chasing the elusive connection between the captivating titles of LockPickingLawyer's videos and the wind power output in Denmark.
While one may expect lock picking and renewable energy to be as far removed from each other as a cat and a canary, our curiosity was piqued by the absurd notion that there might be a deeper connection lurking beneath the surface—like finding a hidden compartment in an old wooden chest. Leveraging cutting-edge AI analysis and data from the Energy Information Administration, our study dives headfirst into this bizarre pairing, prepared to uncover a correlation as unexpected as a kangaroo in a kayak.
As we embark on this unconventional quest, we invite you to suspend disbelief, open your mind to whimsy, and join us on a journey that promises to unveil the delightful, the ridiculous, and the truly unexpected. So buckle up, because we're about to unlock a conundrum that's as surprising as finding a treasure map in a game of Jenga.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious connection between lock picking YouTube video titles and wind power in Denmark, while undeniably whimsical at first glance, has sparked a fervor of inquiry in the academic community. Not since the likes of Smith's groundbreaking work on renewable energy and Doe's seminal research on unconventional correlations have we witnessed such an unexpected intersection. In "Renewable Realms: Unveiling the Secrets of Sustainable Energy," Smith et al. touch on the possibility of unanticipated correlations within the renewable energy landscape, laying the groundwork for our own lighthearted investigation.

Moreover, the work of Jones in "Eccentric Entanglements: Exploring Unconventional Correlations" provides a fitting backdrop to our own exploration of the offbeat relationship between lock picking YouTube titles and wind power generation. Jones delves into the realm of inexplicable connections, paving the way for our own foray into this uproarious inquiry that promises to tickle the funny bone of even the most serious scientific minds.

Yet, as we transcend the staid confines of conventional literature, we impishly turn to works that, while not explicitly scientific in nature, provide a whimsical lens through which to view our seemingly ludicrous investigation. "The Art of Picking Locks" by Smith offers a quirky dive into the world of lock picking, serving as a lighthearted literary companion to our offbeat research. Additionally, "The Wind Whispers Secrets" by Doe beckons readers into the enigmatic realm of wind power with a touch of whimsy, setting the stage for our comically unconventional exploration.

But let us not confine our perspectives to the world of non-fiction alone. Consider, if you will, the serendipitous resonance of fictional works that, through sheer coincidence or perhaps a touch of cosmic irony, bear uncanny relevance to our seemingly unorthodox study. "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, though not a treatise on renewable energy or lock picking, inadvertently nudges us towards contemplation of unseen connections, much like the wind itself whispers of hidden secrets. Furthermore, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown playfully prods us to consider the cryptic nature of correlations, reminding us that the most unexpected confluences may be lurking beneath the surface, waiting to be unlocked like a puzzle box of academic intrigue.

And let us not forget, in the pursuit of scholarly farce, television has also played a role in shaping our mirthful musings. "Mysteries of the Abandoned" presents a captivating exploration of enigmatic relics of the past, perhaps offering a cheeky nod to the unanticipated linkage we seek to unearth. Similarly, "How It's Made" offers a delightful romp through the production of mundane objects, underscoring the peculiar yet amusing nature of our own investigation into the whimsical interplay of lock picking videos and wind power.

As we traverse the scholarly landscape, we dare to embrace the absurd with open arms, savoring the delight of unearthing connections as improbable as a unicorn in a physics lab. So join us, dear reader, as we embark on this uproarious expedition, ready to unlock the hilarious and unexpected facets of seemingly unrelated fields.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Wind power generated in Denmark. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the quirky world of YouTube video titles and renewable energy to uncover a surprising connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer's videos and the wind power generated in Denmark. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to answer the delightfully absurd question: Could there be a link between the captivating titles of lock picking videos and the renewable energy landscape?

Our research team discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9770050 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With tongue firmly in cheek, we reflect on the sheer absurdity and amusement of uncovering such a connection, reminding ourselves that science often unearths the unexpected.

This study not only calls attention to the unforeseen interplay of seemingly unrelated domains but also underscores the potential for lighthearted inspiration in unforeseen places. As we unravel this enigmatic correlation, we invite readers to join us in delighting in the whimsical nature of scientific discovery and the absurdity that occasionally accompanies serious research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious connection between lock picking YouTube video titles and wind power in Denmark, while undeniably whimsical at first glance, has sparked a fervor of inquiry in the academic community. Not since the likes of Smith's groundbreaking work on renewable energy and Doe's seminal research on unconventional correlations have we witnessed such an unexpected intersection. In "Renewable Realms: Unveiling the Secrets of Sustainable Energy," Smith et al. touch on the possibility of unanticipated correlations within the renewable energy landscape, laying the groundwork for our own lighthearted investigation.
Moreover, the work of Jones in "Eccentric Entanglements: Exploring Unconventional Correlations" provides a fitting backdrop to our own exploration of the offbeat relationship between lock picking YouTube titles and wind power generation. Jones delves into the realm of inexplicable connections, paving the way for our own foray into this uproarious inquiry that promises to tickle the funny bone of even the most serious scientific minds.
Yet, as we transcend the staid confines of conventional literature, we impishly turn to works that, while not explicitly scientific in nature, provide a whimsical lens through which to view our seemingly ludicrous investigation. "The Art of Picking Locks" by Smith offers a quirky dive into the world of lock picking, serving as a lighthearted literary companion to our offbeat research. Additionally, "The Wind Whispers Secrets" by Doe beckons readers into the enigmatic realm of wind power with a touch of whimsy, setting the stage for our comically unconventional exploration.
But let us not confine our perspectives to the world of non-fiction alone. Consider, if you will, the serendipitous resonance of fictional works that, through sheer coincidence or perhaps a touch of cosmic irony, bear uncanny relevance to our seemingly unorthodox study. "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, though not a treatise on renewable energy or lock picking, inadvertently nudges us towards contemplation of unseen connections, much like the wind itself whispers of hidden secrets. Furthermore, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown playfully prods us to consider the cryptic nature of correlations, reminding us that the most unexpected confluences may be lurking beneath the surface, waiting to be unlocked like a puzzle box of academic intrigue.
And let us not forget, in the pursuit of scholarly farce, television has also played a role in shaping our mirthful musings. "Mysteries of the Abandoned" presents a captivating exploration of enigmatic relics of the past, perhaps offering a cheeky nod to the unanticipated linkage we seek to unearth. Similarly, "How It's Made" offers a delightful romp through the production of mundane objects, underscoring the peculiar yet amusing nature of our own investigation into the whimsical interplay of lock picking videos and wind power.
As we traverse the scholarly landscape, we dare to embrace the absurd with open arms, savoring the delight of unearthing connections as improbable as a unicorn in a physics lab. So join us, dear reader, as we embark on this uproarious expedition, ready to unlock the hilarious and unexpected facets of seemingly unrelated fields.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our offbeat investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9770050 with an r-squared of 0.9545387, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical findings suggest a remarkably strong and significant relationship between the captivating titles of LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos and the wind power output in Denmark. It appears that the winds of change are blowing, and they may just be carrying a set of lockpicking tools with them.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables; it's almost as if the data points are waltzing in perfect harmony, much like a lock clicking open in the deft hands of a skilled locksmith. This visual representation captures the unmistakable connection we've uncovered, reinforcing the notion that science can indeed be full of surprises, much like receiving a bouquet of flowers from a locksmith instead of a key to your front door.
Our findings leave us marveling at the bizarre interplay of distinct domains, reminding us that the world of research is full of unexpected puzzles waiting to be unlocked. As we parse through the statistical significance with a mixture of disbelief and delight, it's as if we've stumbled upon a hidden chamber within a labyrinth, finding not treasure, but a new lens through which to view the world around us. Who would have thought that the colorful allure of lock picking could be, in some minuscule way, intertwined with the subtle dance of wind turbines in Denmark? We certainly didn't, at least not until we embarked on this curious escapade.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has provocatively teased apart the enigmatic connection between the enchanting titles of LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos and the wind power bounty of Denmark, leaving us pondering the delightful dance of unexpected correlations. In the realm of statistical validation, our findings not only corroborate but also embellish upon the prior research in the domain of improbable connections.

Returning to the exuberant literary musings that acted as our scholarly guides, we find a newfound reverence for their ostensibly whimsical insights. Smith's "Renewable Realms" now emerges as a prescient beacon illuminating the unexplored fringes of parallel phenomena within renewable energy landscapes. In a similar vein, Jones' exploration of "Eccentric Entanglements" unfurls as a prophetic overture to our own tryst with the nonsensical serendipity of lock picking video titles and wind power generation. Who would have thought that Jones was onto something other than a misplaced set of keys?

Furthermore, the playful ambience evoked by both "The Art of Picking Locks" and "The Wind Whispers Secrets" assumes an unexpectedly substantive hue, underscoring the thematic resonance we have plucked from the seemingly frivolous. If ever there were a treatise capable of unlocking the bizarre merger of lock picking and wind power, it would undoubtedly be these literary companions.

Reflecting on our own fortuitous discovery, it seems our analysis has provided an inadvertent validation of the farcical connections contemplated in "Gone with the Wind" and "The Da Vinci Code." The hidden currents of causality alluded to therein appear less fantastical and more palpable in light of our findings. As for the television references, "How It's Made" takes on a newfound allure, inviting us to consider the whimsical interplay of seemingly incongruous elements, not unlike our own revelatory juxtaposition of lock picking videos and renewable energy.

In this light, our study doesn't merely tread the bounds of absurdity; it serves as a joyous celebration of unfettered inquiry and the sheer delightful unpredictability of scientific exploration. After all, what is science if not the unwrapping of surprises, like a lock yielding to an unexpected turn of a pick?

In conclusion, our research not only opens new avenues for reimagining the interconnections in diverse disciplines but also beckons fellow scholars to embrace the peculiar with open arms. It's high time we welcomed the whimsical and the bizarre into the scientific fold, for who knows what ingenious curios we might stumble upon beneath the veneer of the seemingly trivial and the ostensibly inconsequential.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Wind power generated in Denmark. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the quirky world of YouTube video titles and renewable energy to uncover a surprising connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer's videos and the wind power generated in Denmark. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to answer the delightfully absurd question: Could there be a link between the captivating titles of lock picking videos and the renewable energy landscape?

Our research team discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9770050 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With tongue firmly in cheek, we reflect on the sheer absurdity and amusement of uncovering such a connection, reminding ourselves that science often unearths the unexpected.

This study not only calls attention to the unforeseen interplay of seemingly unrelated domains but also underscores the potential for lighthearted inspiration in unforeseen places. As we unravel this enigmatic correlation, we invite readers to join us in delighting in the whimsical nature of scientific discovery and the absurdity that occasionally accompanies serious research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of lock picking and wind power may seem about as likely as a penguin in the desert, but the mysterious universe of correlations has once again thrown us a curveball. In this whimsically absurd inquiry, we embark on a delightful romp through the world of YouTube titles and renewable energy, chasing the elusive connection between the captivating titles of LockPickingLawyer's videos and the wind power output in Denmark.
While one may expect lock picking and renewable energy to be as far removed from each other as a cat and a canary, our curiosity was piqued by the absurd notion that there might be a deeper connection lurking beneath the surface—like finding a hidden compartment in an old wooden chest. Leveraging cutting-edge AI analysis and data from the Energy Information Administration, our study dives headfirst into this bizarre pairing, prepared to uncover a correlation as unexpected as a kangaroo in a kayak.
As we embark on this unconventional quest, we invite you to suspend disbelief, open your mind to whimsy, and join us on a journey that promises to unveil the delightful, the ridiculous, and the truly unexpected. So buckle up, because we're about to unlock a conundrum that's as surprising as finding a treasure map in a game of Jenga.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our offbeat investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9770050 with an r-squared of 0.9545387, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical findings suggest a remarkably strong and significant relationship between the captivating titles of LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos and the wind power output in Denmark. It appears that the winds of change are blowing, and they may just be carrying a set of lockpicking tools with them.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables; it's almost as if the data points are waltzing in perfect harmony, much like a lock clicking open in the deft hands of a skilled locksmith. This visual representation captures the unmistakable connection we've uncovered, reinforcing the notion that science can indeed be full of surprises, much like receiving a bouquet of flowers from a locksmith instead of a key to your front door.
Our findings leave us marveling at the bizarre interplay of distinct domains, reminding us that the world of research is full of unexpected puzzles waiting to be unlocked. As we parse through the statistical significance with a mixture of disbelief and delight, it's as if we've stumbled upon a hidden chamber within a labyrinth, finding not treasure, but a new lens through which to view the world around us. Who would have thought that the colorful allure of lock picking could be, in some minuscule way, intertwined with the subtle dance of wind turbines in Denmark? We certainly didn't, at least not until we embarked on this curious escapade.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unearthed a correlation of the most intriguing and unexpected nature. Who would have thought that the whimsical world of LockPickingLawyer's video titles holds a key, or rather, a lock, to the wind power output in Denmark? It appears that the winds of change carry with them an unassuming connection that may make even the most weathered statistician do a double-take.

The statistical relationship we've unveiled is as undeniable as trying to resist the allure of one of LockPickingLawyer's enticing videos – it's simply impossible. Not since the days of Newton's apple has there been a correlation this unexpected. We've deftly picked the lock of mystery, and the door has swung open to reveal a connection that tickles the imagination in ways akin to a perfectly executed knock-knock joke.

As our study draws to a close, we do so with a newfound appreciation for the quirkiness of scientific inquiry. The world of research is often like stumbling upon a punchline to a joke that you didn't even know was being told. Our findings underscore the incredibly delightful and absurd nature of uncovering correlations in the most unexpected of places. We can't help but marvel at the sheer whimsy of it all, like finding a unicorn in a field of statistical analyses.

In light of our findings, we assert with absolute certainty that no further research in this area is needed. For we have unraveled a mystery as captivating as a magician's disappearing act, and the world of lock picking and wind power will forever be seen through a lens tinged with a quirky and unexpectedly delightful hue. It's time to wind down this peculiar investigation and revel in the chuckle-worthy correlation we've uncovered.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Applied Windology

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

International Society for Wind Metrics and Anomalous Associations

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the quirky world of YouTube video titles and renewable energy to uncover a surprising connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer's videos and the wind power generated in Denmark. Leveraging data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to answer the delightfully absurd question: Could there be a link between the captivating titles of lock picking videos and the renewable energy landscape?
Our research team discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9770050 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2015 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. With tongue firmly in cheek, we reflect on the sheer absurdity and amusement of uncovering such a connection, reminding ourselves that science often unearths the unexpected.
This study not only calls attention to the unforeseen interplay of seemingly unrelated domains but also underscores the potential for lighthearted inspiration in unforeseen places. As we unravel this enigmatic correlation, we invite readers to join us in delighting in the whimsical nature of scientific discovery and the absurdity that occasionally accompanies serious research.

ChatGPT:

LockPickingLawyer, YouTube titles, wind power, Denmark, renewable energy, correlation coefficient, AI analysis, Energy Information Administration, statistical relationship, absurdity, scientific discovery

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: ^{See full details} I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are

Wind power generated in Denmark
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Denmark in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Denmark

Correlation r = 0.9770050 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9545387 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Denmark) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are) over the 7 years from 2015 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00015.^Show 0.0001521135112763852400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,574 random variables^Note Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are (Fun score (out of 10))	5.4545	5.1385	5.5579	5.3773	5.7416	5.698	5.6474
Wind power generated in Denmark (Billion kWh)	14.1331	12.7817	14.78	13.902	16.1498	16.1498	16.0344

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.4545,5.1385,5.5579,5.3773,5.7416,5.698,5.6474,])
array_2 = np.array([14.1331,12.7817,14.78,13.902,16.1498,16.1498,16.0344,])
array_1_name = "How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Denmark"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are
Line chart for only Wind power generated in Denmark
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Unlocking Renewable Riddles: The Surprising Correlation Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Titles and Wind Power in Denmark

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!

Correlation ID: 4897 · Black Variable ID: 25764 · Red Variable ID: 23628


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: