Report an error
Wind power generated in Denmark correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.99 | 41yrs | No |
Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
How fun LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.98 | 7yrs | Yes! |
US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
US Shoe Store Sales | r=0.95 | 30yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.79 | 42yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Denmark also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)