about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,848 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas and the second variable is Google searches for 'ice bath'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Libertarians voted, there was a surge in demand for freedom, leading to a sudden chill in the political climate. This shift caused Kansans to search for ways to cool off, inadvertently boosting the interest in ice baths. One-liner: Looks like the political race wasn't the only thing heating up in Kansas!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic Kansas skyline, with sleek, high-tech buildings rising up amidst a shimmering, crystalline landscape. In the foreground, show individuals calmly walking along the icy pathways, while a glowing blue light shines from the windows of the buildings. Reflect the atmosphere of a society embracing advanced technology and navigating the unexpected political climate shift with a sense of cool composure. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim High-tech An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cute 2D animation a meme
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath', in the following situation: As more Libertarians voted, there was a surge in demand for freedom, leading to a sudden chill in the political climate. This shift caused Kansans to search for ways to cool off, inadvertently boosting the interest in ice baths. One-liner: Looks like the political race wasn't the only thing heating up in Kansas!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Kansas, as the number of Libertarian votes for Senators rose, there was a sudden chill in the political climate. This unexpected shift caused Kansans to search for ways to cool off, leading to a surge in Google searches for 'ice bath'.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Kansas, as the number of Libertarian votes for Senators rose, there was a sudden chill in the political climate. This unexpected shift caused Kansans to search for ways to cool off, leading to a surge in Google searches for 'ice bath'. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic Kansas skyline, with sleek, high-tech buildings rising up amidst a shimmering, crystalline landscape. In the foreground, show individuals calmly walking along the icy pathways, while a glowing blue light shines from the windows of the buildings. Reflect the atmosphere of a society embracing advanced technology and navigating the unexpected political climate shift with a sense of cool composure.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas caused ice bath (Google searches for 'ice bath') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

The Journal of Political Psychology and Leisure Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of politics and peculiar behavior often yields unexpected insights. In this study, we explore the curious link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The connection, or should I say, the "cool" correlation, emerged as a surprising finding during our examination of political and internet search data. One cannot help but wonder what chilling appeal an ice bath could have in common with political preferences. As the saying goes, perhaps the frigid plunge into the world of politics resonates with some voters on a deeper, more, "sub-zero" level.

The state of Kansas, known for its plains and prairies, might not be the first place that comes to mind when contemplating the connection between individual political leanings and a desire for an icy dip. However, our research reveals an intriguing relationship that cannot be "frozen" out of the analysis. The question beckons: do Kansan libertarians possess a penchant for both political independence and the refreshing embrace of an ice bath's bracing embrace? One might even venture to imagine that the political landscape in Kansas is not the only thing experiencing a "chill."

Before diving into the analysis, it's important to "break the ice" and acknowledge the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation. At first glance, it may appear as frosty as the concept of jumping into a freezing bath voluntarily. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to explore every avenue, even if it leads us down an icy "slippery slope." The relationship between political choices and thermodynamics, or should I say "voter-dynamics," is indeed an intriguing subject, worthy of scholarly investigation.

Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, delving into the potential implications for voter behavior and the broader societal implications. As we embark on this frosty expedition, our findings may provide a window into the mysterious allure of political choices and the "chilling" motivations underlying them. Let us proceed then, as we venture into the sub-zero realm of analysis, armed with data, statistical methods, and perhaps a mental blanket or two to ward off the frosty insights that lie ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and peculiar behavior often yields unexpected insights. In this study, we explore the curious link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The connection, or should I say, the "cool" correlation, emerged as a surprising finding during our examination of political and internet search data. One cannot help but wonder what chilling appeal an ice bath could have in common with political preferences. As the saying goes, perhaps the frigid plunge into the world of politics resonates with some voters on a deeper, more, "sub-zero" level.
The state of Kansas, known for its plains and prairies, might not be the first place that comes to mind when contemplating the connection between individual political leanings and a desire for an icy dip. However, our research reveals an intriguing relationship that cannot be "frozen" out of the analysis. The question beckons: do Kansan libertarians possess a penchant for both political independence and the refreshing embrace of an ice bath's bracing embrace? One might even venture to imagine that the political landscape in Kansas is not the only thing experiencing a "chill."
Before diving into the analysis, it's important to "break the ice" and acknowledge the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation. At first glance, it may appear as frosty as the concept of jumping into a freezing bath voluntarily. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to explore every avenue, even if it leads us down an icy "slippery slope." The relationship between political choices and thermodynamics, or should I say "voter-dynamics," is indeed an intriguing subject, worthy of scholarly investigation.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, delving into the potential implications for voter behavior and the broader societal implications. As we embark on this frosty expedition, our findings may provide a window into the mysterious allure of political choices and the "chilling" motivations underlying them. Let us proceed then, as we venture into the sub-zero realm of analysis, armed with data, statistical methods, and perhaps a mental blanket or two to ward off the frosty insights that lie ahead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Examining the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath' opens a Pandora's box of intriguing research and academic inquiries. While the initial reaction to such an association may elicit a bemused eyebrow raise, a closer examination of related studies and literature paints a broader, yet chilly, landscape.

In "The Political Behavior of Kansas Citizens" by Smith et al., the authors find no mention of any peculiar affinity for cold water immersion among Libertarian voters in Kansas. However, a dive into the vast expanse of literature yields unexpected connections. Doe's "Voter Psychology and Decision Making" hints at the role of subconscious metaphors and associations in influencing political preferences, but unfortunately fails to dip into the chilly depths of ice bath symbolism. Jones, in "Google Searches and Political Sentiment," brings us closer to our topic by highlighting the potential insights gleaned from online search behaviors, albeit focusing on a more conventional range of topics.

Expanding the scope of our review, "Ice Baths and Their Therapeutic Potential" by Dr. Chill, Dr. Freeze, and Dr. Frost outlines the physiological and psychological benefits of submerging oneself in icy waters. One cannot help but wonder if this therapeutic potential extends to the political realm, offering a refreshing cleanse from the turbulent waves of partisan debates.

In the realm of fiction, works such as "The Frozen Frontier: Political Intrigue in Icebound Kansas" and "Icy Votes: A Chilling Tale of Libertarian Triumph" provide a whimsical glimpse into speculative connections between cold environments and political fervor, albeit in a more metaphorical sense.

Movies too have flirted with the idea of chilly elections, as seen in "The Polar Polls" and "Frosted Franchise: A Senatorial Saga," where political campaigns unfold in wintry landscapes, perhaps teasing at the underlying correlation we are eager to unravel.

As we immerse ourselves in this frigid fusion of politics and cold pursuits, we cannot help but marvel at the uncanny interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms. The stage set by the confluence of Libertarian votes and ice bath searches beckons for a closer examination of the underlying motivations, mechanisms, and appeals at play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and peculiar behavior often yields unexpected insights. In this study, we explore the curious link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The connection, or should I say, the "cool" correlation, emerged as a surprising finding during our examination of political and internet search data. One cannot help but wonder what chilling appeal an ice bath could have in common with political preferences. As the saying goes, perhaps the frigid plunge into the world of politics resonates with some voters on a deeper, more, "sub-zero" level.
The state of Kansas, known for its plains and prairies, might not be the first place that comes to mind when contemplating the connection between individual political leanings and a desire for an icy dip. However, our research reveals an intriguing relationship that cannot be "frozen" out of the analysis. The question beckons: do Kansan libertarians possess a penchant for both political independence and the refreshing embrace of an ice bath's bracing embrace? One might even venture to imagine that the political landscape in Kansas is not the only thing experiencing a "chill."
Before diving into the analysis, it's important to "break the ice" and acknowledge the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation. At first glance, it may appear as frosty as the concept of jumping into a freezing bath voluntarily. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to explore every avenue, even if it leads us down an icy "slippery slope." The relationship between political choices and thermodynamics, or should I say "voter-dynamics," is indeed an intriguing subject, worthy of scholarly investigation.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, delving into the potential implications for voter behavior and the broader societal implications. As we embark on this frosty expedition, our findings may provide a window into the mysterious allure of political choices and the "chilling" motivations underlying them. Let us proceed then, as we venture into the sub-zero realm of analysis, armed with data, statistical methods, and perhaps a mental blanket or two to ward off the frosty insights that lie ahead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the enigmatic relationship between Libertarian votes in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath,' our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey, navigating the vast digital expanse to uncover the threads that bind these apparently unrelated phenomena. Our methodology for this study encompassed the utilization of data from multiple reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. We collected data covering the period from 2004 to 2020, casting a wide net to capture the ebbs and flows of electoral choices and frosty inquiries.

Drawing from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, we retrieved comprehensive information on Libertarian votes cast for Senators in Kansas across the selected time frame. Leaving no stone unturned, our team meticulously combed through the data to ensure accuracy and completeness, all while remaining wary of the metaphorical frostbite that comes with working with large datasets.

Concurrently, we delved into the frostbitten world of Google Trends, with 'ice bath' as our search term of choice. By scrutinizing the search patterns and frequencies over years, we sought to uncover any shivering spikes in interest that might align with the electoral events in Kansas. The task was not without its perils, as navigating the slippery slopes of search engine data mining requires both agility and a good pair of virtual crampons.

With the data securely harnessed, our next endeavor involved the application of statistical analyses to unearth the hidden nuances within the numerical bedrock. Employing correlation coefficients, regression models, and other icy statistical tools, we sought to tease out the strength and significance of the link between Libertarian votes and frigid searches.

Our statistical journey was guided by the beacon of reason and scholarly rigor, ensuring that our analysis remained impervious to the chilling winds of speculation. Each calculated parameter was scrutinized, refined, and examined through the proverbial lenses of both "frozen" objectivity and intellectually warm discernment.

In sum, our methodology encapsulated a daring amalgamation of data wrangling, statistical fortitude, and a healthy dash of curiosity, all in pursuit of unraveling the peculiar dance between political inclinations and the allure of an icy bath. As researchers, we embraced the cold with enthusiasm, recognizing that within the frosty depths of these unexpected connections, lies the potential to illuminate new vistas in both politics and individual pursuits, proving once and for all that the icy embrace of curiosity knows no temperature bounds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9462760, r-squared of 0.8954382, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and peculiar behavior often yields unexpected insights. In this study, we explore the curious link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The connection, or should I say, the "cool" correlation, emerged as a surprising finding during our examination of political and internet search data. One cannot help but wonder what chilling appeal an ice bath could have in common with political preferences. As the saying goes, perhaps the frigid plunge into the world of politics resonates with some voters on a deeper, more, "sub-zero" level.
The state of Kansas, known for its plains and prairies, might not be the first place that comes to mind when contemplating the connection between individual political leanings and a desire for an icy dip. However, our research reveals an intriguing relationship that cannot be "frozen" out of the analysis. The question beckons: do Kansan libertarians possess a penchant for both political independence and the refreshing embrace of an ice bath's bracing embrace? One might even venture to imagine that the political landscape in Kansas is not the only thing experiencing a "chill."
Before diving into the analysis, it's important to "break the ice" and acknowledge the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation. At first glance, it may appear as frosty as the concept of jumping into a freezing bath voluntarily. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to explore every avenue, even if it leads us down an icy "slippery slope." The relationship between political choices and thermodynamics, or should I say "voter-dynamics," is indeed an intriguing subject, worthy of scholarly investigation.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, delving into the potential implications for voter behavior and the broader societal implications. As we embark on this frosty expedition, our findings may provide a window into the mysterious allure of political choices and the "chilling" motivations underlying them. Let us proceed then, as we venture into the sub-zero realm of analysis, armed with data, statistical methods, and perhaps a mental blanket or two to ward off the frosty insights that lie ahead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis reveal a striking correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This strong correlation is further supported by the r-squared value of 0.8954382, suggesting that approximately 89.54% of the variation in Google searches for 'ice bath' can be explained by the Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables, showcasing the unison of political choices and the quest for a brisk, refreshing dip. The data points exhibit a clear pattern, echoing the harmony of political independence and the invigorating allure of an ice bath.

The significance level of p < 0.01 underscores the robustness of the relationship, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This affirmation adds weight to the intriguing link between Kansan libertarian voting behavior and the inclination towards seeking the bracing embrace of an ice bath.

This unexpected relationship prompts reflection on the complex interplay of individuals' political inclinations and the appeal of submerging oneself in icy waters. The findings of this study impel us to contemplate the depths of human behavior and the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface of political preferences and chilly pursuits.

The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere statistical intrigue and delve into the intricate fabric of human motivations. As we digest these results, it becomes evident that every vote cast and every search typed may indeed hold a frosty secret, waiting to be thawed by the fires of scholarly inquiry.

Uncovering this correlation has not only shed light on the curious link between political choices and ice bath searches but has also opened the door to further explorations of the enigmatic pathways that bind individual preferences and societal dynamics. It is with a sense of wonder and a touch of bemusement that we present these results, inviting readers to ponder the unexpected threads that intertwine politics and polar pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Examining the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath' opens a Pandora's box of intriguing research and academic inquiries. While the initial reaction to such an association may elicit a bemused eyebrow raise, a closer examination of related studies and literature paints a broader, yet chilly, landscape.
In "The Political Behavior of Kansas Citizens" by Smith et al., the authors find no mention of any peculiar affinity for cold water immersion among Libertarian voters in Kansas. However, a dive into the vast expanse of literature yields unexpected connections. Doe's "Voter Psychology and Decision Making" hints at the role of subconscious metaphors and associations in influencing political preferences, but unfortunately fails to dip into the chilly depths of ice bath symbolism. Jones, in "Google Searches and Political Sentiment," brings us closer to our topic by highlighting the potential insights gleaned from online search behaviors, albeit focusing on a more conventional range of topics.
Expanding the scope of our review, "Ice Baths and Their Therapeutic Potential" by Dr. Chill, Dr. Freeze, and Dr. Frost outlines the physiological and psychological benefits of submerging oneself in icy waters. One cannot help but wonder if this therapeutic potential extends to the political realm, offering a refreshing cleanse from the turbulent waves of partisan debates.
In the realm of fiction, works such as "The Frozen Frontier: Political Intrigue in Icebound Kansas" and "Icy Votes: A Chilling Tale of Libertarian Triumph" provide a whimsical glimpse into speculative connections between cold environments and political fervor, albeit in a more metaphorical sense.
Movies too have flirted with the idea of chilly elections, as seen in "The Polar Polls" and "Frosted Franchise: A Senatorial Saga," where political campaigns unfold in wintry landscapes, perhaps teasing at the underlying correlation we are eager to unravel.
As we immerse ourselves in this frigid fusion of politics and cold pursuits, we cannot help but marvel at the uncanny interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms. The stage set by the confluence of Libertarian votes and ice bath searches beckons for a closer examination of the underlying motivations, mechanisms, and appeals at play.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a striking correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This strong correlation is further supported by the r-squared value of 0.8954382, suggesting that approximately 89.54% of the variation in Google searches for 'ice bath' can be explained by the Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables, showcasing the unison of political choices and the quest for a brisk, refreshing dip. The data points exhibit a clear pattern, echoing the harmony of political independence and the invigorating allure of an ice bath.
The significance level of p < 0.01 underscores the robustness of the relationship, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This affirmation adds weight to the intriguing link between Kansan libertarian voting behavior and the inclination towards seeking the bracing embrace of an ice bath.
This unexpected relationship prompts reflection on the complex interplay of individuals' political inclinations and the appeal of submerging oneself in icy waters. The findings of this study impel us to contemplate the depths of human behavior and the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface of political preferences and chilly pursuits.
The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere statistical intrigue and delve into the intricate fabric of human motivations. As we digest these results, it becomes evident that every vote cast and every search typed may indeed hold a frosty secret, waiting to be thawed by the fires of scholarly inquiry.
Uncovering this correlation has not only shed light on the curious link between political choices and ice bath searches but has also opened the door to further explorations of the enigmatic pathways that bind individual preferences and societal dynamics. It is with a sense of wonder and a touch of bemusement that we present these results, inviting readers to ponder the unexpected threads that intertwine politics and polar pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study unveil a captivating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath,' adding a new layer of intrigue to the complex tapestry of voter behavior. While at first glance, the linking of political choices with the quest for a refreshingly icy soak might appear to be as unlikely as a snowstorm in July, our findings support and extend the existing literature on the subtle influences shaping political preferences.

To harken back to our whimsical foray into literary and cinematic references in the literature review, it is indeed remarkable how works of fiction and film, such as "The Frozen Frontier: Political Intrigue in Icebound Kansas" and "The Polar Polls," while crafted in the spirit of imaginative storytelling, inadvertently touch upon the intersection of cold environments and political fervor. In the vein of comedic happenstance, reality seems to have outpaced fiction in revealing this unexpected linkage between ice bath quests and libertarian voting tendencies.

Doe's "Voter Psychology and Decision Making" hinted at the role of subconscious metaphors and associations in shaping political preferences, albeit without a direct plunge into the chilly depths of ice bath symbolism. Our results echo and extend this theme, suggesting that such subconscious influences might indeed play a more significant role than previously assumed. The chilly waters of voter behavior, it appears, may run deeper than anticipated, inviting further investigation into the nuanced interplay of psychological associations and political choices.

Moving from the realm of icy metaphors to the tangible realm of web searches, Jones's exploration of "Google Searches and Political Sentiment" provided a bridge to our investigation, underscoring the value of online search behaviors in uncovering insights into voter inclinations. Our findings reinforce and expand on this, demonstrating the potential for unconventional search queries, such as 'ice bath,' to reveal surprising connections to political preferences. Just as an unexpected ice bath might offer a bracing respite from the heat, our results offer a refreshing plunge into the unexpected correlations shaping political landscapes.

In embracing the unexpected linkage between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath,' our study not only underscores the entwined nature of political choices and chilly pursuits but also hints at the immeasurable depths of human motivation. It is with both scholarly curiosity and a hint of whimsy that we extend an invitation for further exploration of the frigid frontier of political psychology and the unexpected chill that permeates the voting landscape. After all, in the unconventional terrains of research, who knows what frosty revelations may emerge from beneath the surface?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and peculiar behavior often yields unexpected insights. In this study, we explore the curious link between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The connection, or should I say, the "cool" correlation, emerged as a surprising finding during our examination of political and internet search data. One cannot help but wonder what chilling appeal an ice bath could have in common with political preferences. As the saying goes, perhaps the frigid plunge into the world of politics resonates with some voters on a deeper, more, "sub-zero" level.
The state of Kansas, known for its plains and prairies, might not be the first place that comes to mind when contemplating the connection between individual political leanings and a desire for an icy dip. However, our research reveals an intriguing relationship that cannot be "frozen" out of the analysis. The question beckons: do Kansan libertarians possess a penchant for both political independence and the refreshing embrace of an ice bath's bracing embrace? One might even venture to imagine that the political landscape in Kansas is not the only thing experiencing a "chill."
Before diving into the analysis, it's important to "break the ice" and acknowledge the eyebrow-raising nature of this correlation. At first glance, it may appear as frosty as the concept of jumping into a freezing bath voluntarily. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to explore every avenue, even if it leads us down an icy "slippery slope." The relationship between political choices and thermodynamics, or should I say "voter-dynamics," is indeed an intriguing subject, worthy of scholarly investigation.
Our study aims to shed light on this unexpected connection, delving into the potential implications for voter behavior and the broader societal implications. As we embark on this frosty expedition, our findings may provide a window into the mysterious allure of political choices and the "chilling" motivations underlying them. Let us proceed then, as we venture into the sub-zero realm of analysis, armed with data, statistical methods, and perhaps a mental blanket or two to ward off the frosty insights that lie ahead.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a striking correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' The correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This strong correlation is further supported by the r-squared value of 0.8954382, suggesting that approximately 89.54% of the variation in Google searches for 'ice bath' can be explained by the Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables, showcasing the unison of political choices and the quest for a brisk, refreshing dip. The data points exhibit a clear pattern, echoing the harmony of political independence and the invigorating allure of an ice bath.
The significance level of p < 0.01 underscores the robustness of the relationship, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This affirmation adds weight to the intriguing link between Kansan libertarian voting behavior and the inclination towards seeking the bracing embrace of an ice bath.
This unexpected relationship prompts reflection on the complex interplay of individuals' political inclinations and the appeal of submerging oneself in icy waters. The findings of this study impel us to contemplate the depths of human behavior and the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface of political preferences and chilly pursuits.
The implications of this correlation extend beyond mere statistical intrigue and delve into the intricate fabric of human motivations. As we digest these results, it becomes evident that every vote cast and every search typed may indeed hold a frosty secret, waiting to be thawed by the fires of scholarly inquiry.
Uncovering this correlation has not only shed light on the curious link between political choices and ice bath searches but has also opened the door to further explorations of the enigmatic pathways that bind individual preferences and societal dynamics. It is with a sense of wonder and a touch of bemusement that we present these results, inviting readers to ponder the unexpected threads that intertwine politics and polar pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath' presents a chilly conundrum that defies conventional wisdom. The robust correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables raises eyebrows, along with the question of whether the call for political independence coincides with a desire for an invigorating plunge into icy waters. This unexpected harmony between political choices and thermodynamic pursuits challenges our understanding of voter behavior and human motivations.

As we wrap up our analysis, it is evident that this frosty correlation merits further contemplation, puns, and all, leaving us with an "icy" uncertainty that lingers like a drafty wind. The implications of this correlation extend far beyond statistical curiosities, hinting at the enigmatic links that underlie individual preferences and societal dynamics. While the allure of an ice bath may seem far removed from the realm of politics, our findings suggest a surprisingly close bond, perhaps as inseparable as ice and cold.

We hope that our study has sparked both academic interest and a sense of bemusement, much like the unexpected delight of finding an ice cream truck at the polar ice caps. However, in the spirit of academic inquiry, we must acknowledge that even the most entertaining correlations can reach a frosty end. Therefore, we assert with the utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eye that no more research is needed in this area. As the saying goes, sometimes it's best to let a "cool" correlation rest in peace.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Psychology and Leisure Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Political Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Political Chill: Libertarian Votes in Kansas and Google Searches for the Ice Bath Thrill with an abstract of This study presents a cross-sectional analysis of the fascinating correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Kansas and Google searches for 'ice bath.' Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team examined the period from 2004 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9462760 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This unexpected connection begs the question, "What do libertarians have in common with those seeking a frigid plunge?" Our paper delves into this mysterious pairing, offering insight into the potential influences on voter behavior and the rather chilling allure of political choices. Indeed, the results may leave many pondering the depths of the human psyche and the intriguing intersection of politics and polar pursuits.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian votes Kansas, Google searches ice bath, correlation analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political behavior, voter preferences, political choices, psychological influences, intersection of politics and personal interests, correlation coefficient, Google Trends data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Kansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas

Google searches for 'ice bath'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'ice bath' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'ice bath'

Correlation r = 0.9462760 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8954382 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'ice bath') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0043. 0.0042518770168240910000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.43% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 235 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420082010201420162020
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas (Percentage of votes)1.934592.124992.139454.325725.582714.99088
Google searches for 'ice bath' (Rel. search volume)8.916679.6666712.251920.333323.75




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.93459,2.12499,2.13945,4.32572,5.58271,4.99088,])
array_2 = np.array([8.91667,9.66667,12.25,19,20.3333,23.75,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'ice bath'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4848 · Black Variable ID: 26388 · Red Variable ID: 1408
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0