about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,824 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the second variable is The number of economists in Alabama.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Simone's unconventional approach to robotics and engineering gained more attention, it inadvertently sparked a new wave of interest in innovative problem-solving. This led to a sudden surge in Alabama residents deciding to pursue careers in economics, believing that they could also 'think outside the box' to stimulate the state's economy. After all, who wouldn't want to apply their expertise in supply and demand to the pressing issue of creating more impractical yet delightful robots? The unexpected connection left many baffled, but also strangely inspired to consider the economic impact of incorporating more humor and creativity into their work. Before they knew it, there was a growing demand for 'economists with a knack for wacky inventions' across the state, all thanks to the offbeat charm of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel. It just goes to show that when it comes to influencing career choices, Simone's videos were truly a 'robotic' force to be reckoned with!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cyberpunk ] prompt: In a bustling Alabama town, a group of economists gathers in a neon-lit, holographic conference room surrounded by towering skyscrapers. The room is filled with futuristic technology and floating data visualizations, projecting graphs and charts that represent the local economy. Among the economists, some wear augmented reality glasses, immersed in virtual brainstorming sessions while others discuss animatedly with robotic assistants hovering nearby. Meanwhile, on a giant screen towering over the town square, Simone Giertz's YouTube video displays a futuristic graph of her rapidly increasing average views, reflecting the growing interest in her eccentric robotics projects. The scene captures the unexpected convergence of unconventional robotics and innovative economic thinking, as the residents find inspiration from Simone's unique approach, spurring a surge in economists with a flair for inventive problem-solving. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Cybernetic art Cyberpunk Cyberpunk Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama, in the following situation: As Simone's unconventional approach to robotics and engineering gained more attention, it inadvertently sparked a new wave of interest in innovative problem-solving. This led to a sudden surge in Alabama residents deciding to pursue careers in economics, believing that they could also 'think outside the box' to stimulate the state's economy. After all, who wouldn't want to apply their expertise in supply and demand to the pressing issue of creating more impractical yet delightful robots? The unexpected connection left many baffled, but also strangely inspired to consider the economic impact of incorporating more humor and creativity into their work. Before they knew it, there was a growing demand for 'economists with a knack for wacky inventions' across the state, all thanks to the offbeat charm of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel. It just goes to show that when it comes to influencing career choices, Simone's videos were truly a 'robotic' force to be reckoned with!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Alabama town, a group of economists gathers to discuss creative ideas for stimulating the local economy. Meanwhile, on a nearby screen, Simone Giertz's YouTube video displays a skyrocketing graph of her average views, reflecting the growing interest in her eccentric robotics projects. The scene captures the unexpected convergence of unconventional robotics and innovative economic thinking, as the residents find inspiration from Simone's unique approach, spurring a surge in economists with a flair for inventive problem-solving.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Alabama town, a group of economists gathers to discuss creative ideas for stimulating the local economy. Meanwhile, on a nearby screen, Simone Giertz's YouTube video displays a skyrocketing graph of her average views, reflecting the growing interest in her eccentric robotics projects. The scene captures the unexpected convergence of unconventional robotics and innovative economic thinking, as the residents find inspiration from Simone's unique approach, spurring a surge in economists with a flair for inventive problem-solving. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cyberpunk ] prompt: In a bustling Alabama town, a group of economists gathers in a neon-lit, holographic conference room surrounded by towering skyscrapers. The room is filled with futuristic technology and floating data visualizations, projecting graphs and charts that represent the local economy. Among the economists, some wear augmented reality glasses, immersed in virtual brainstorming sessions while others discuss animatedly with robotic assistants hovering nearby. Meanwhile, on a giant screen towering over the town square, Simone Giertz's YouTube video displays a futuristic graph of her rapidly increasing average views, reflecting the growing interest in her eccentric robotics projects. The scene captures the unexpected convergence of unconventional robotics and innovative economic thinking, as the residents find inspiration from Simone's unique approach, spurring a surge in economists with a flair for inventive problem-solving.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos caused The number of economists in Alabama to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

The Journal of Social Media Analytics and Pop Culture Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of social media and economic trends has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex, and often surprising, interplay between digital media and societal behaviors. The inexplicable connection between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the number of economists in Alabama is a case in point. As Mark Twain once humorously quipped, "Economists have a lot in common with quantum physics – whenever you think you understand it, it changes." Our study aims to illuminate this unexpected relationship, shedding light on a correlation that, much like economic forecasts, can often defy conventional wisdom.

Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed "Queen of Shitty Robots," has carved out a unique niche in the online world with her lighthearted and inventive approach to robotics and engineering. In the words of our very own dad joke enthusiast, Geno-ME-ology meets Simone, a match made in Alabama!"

But amidst the laughter and whimsy of Giertz's content, there lies a curious phenomenon linking her YouTube viewership to the economist population of Alabama. Our research dives deep into this enigma, applying rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic bond between a Swedish robot enthusiast and the practitioners of the dismal science in the heart of the American South. It's almost like two disparate worlds colliding, creating a financial fusion implosion – talk about an economic "wow" factor!

The aim of our study is not only to broaden our understanding of the unconventional connections in the digital age but also to bring forth the scholarly merit of looking at correlations in a light-hearted manner. As Albert Einstein once joked, "Did you hear about the economist who was insistent on proving that correlation implies causation? It was a taxing endeavor."

By exploring this unorthodox relationship, we hope to spark further inquiry into the unexpected ties that bind seemingly unrelated domains, all while infusing a bit of levity into the often serious realm of academic research. It's not every day that the worlds of YouTube entertainment and economic study collide, but when they do, the results are anything but predictable.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of social media and economic trends has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex, and often surprising, interplay between digital media and societal behaviors. The inexplicable connection between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the number of economists in Alabama is a case in point. As Mark Twain once humorously quipped, "Economists have a lot in common with quantum physics – whenever you think you understand it, it changes." Our study aims to illuminate this unexpected relationship, shedding light on a correlation that, much like economic forecasts, can often defy conventional wisdom.
Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed "Queen of Shitty Robots," has carved out a unique niche in the online world with her lighthearted and inventive approach to robotics and engineering. In the words of our very own dad joke enthusiast, Geno-ME-ology meets Simone, a match made in Alabama!"
But amidst the laughter and whimsy of Giertz's content, there lies a curious phenomenon linking her YouTube viewership to the economist population of Alabama. Our research dives deep into this enigma, applying rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic bond between a Swedish robot enthusiast and the practitioners of the dismal science in the heart of the American South. It's almost like two disparate worlds colliding, creating a financial fusion implosion – talk about an economic "wow" factor!
The aim of our study is not only to broaden our understanding of the unconventional connections in the digital age but also to bring forth the scholarly merit of looking at correlations in a light-hearted manner. As Albert Einstein once joked, "Did you hear about the economist who was insistent on proving that correlation implies causation? It was a taxing endeavor."
By exploring this unorthodox relationship, we hope to spark further inquiry into the unexpected ties that bind seemingly unrelated domains, all while infusing a bit of levity into the often serious realm of academic research. It's not every day that the worlds of YouTube entertainment and economic study collide, but when they do, the results are anything but predictable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have explored the relationship between online content consumption and professional interests. In "Smith et al.'s Empirical Analysis of YouTube Viewer Behavior," the authors find that individuals tend to consume content that aligns with their personal or professional interests, with potential career influencers often linked to the videos that garner the most attention. This notion is further reinforced in "Doe's Analysis of Online Engagement and Career Aspirations," where the authors delve into the impact of online content on career choices and aspirations among internet users.

Now, onto some real page-turners – in "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors present a compelling exploration of the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, much like the surprising correlation we observe between Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the economist count in Alabama. Additionally, "Nudge" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein offers insights into behavioral economics, providing a fitting backdrop for our examination of the unnoticed influences on economic interests in relation to digital content consumption.

Moving from non-fiction to fiction, let's not discount the potential relevance of literature in unraveling this perplexing correlation. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, the intergalactic adventures parallel the unexpected journey we find ourselves on as we explore the link between YouTube viewership and the economist count in Alabama. Furthermore, "The Rosie Project" by Graeme Simsion presents a quirky, comedic narrative that mirrors the tone of Simone Giertz's content, perhaps harboring concealed clues to the intricate bond between technology, humor, and economic fascination.

Furthermore, the dynamic nature of social media platforms has been documented in various online discussions. On Twitter, @EconEnthusiast93 remarked, "Just spent the day binge-watching Simone Giertz's YouTube channel, and now I'm seriously contemplating a career in economics – anyone else feeling the sudden urge to analyze supply and demand curves? #QuirkyEconomist." This anecdotal tweet sheds light on the potential influence of Giertz's videos on cultivating interest in economics, provoking a chuckle and a contemplation of the unexpected links between digital entertainment and professional inclinations.

Hopping from online discussions to dry economic reports, the findings of our study align with the theories of digital content influence and professional inclinations, though we acknowledge that our correlation prompts more amusement than solemn contemplation. Nevertheless, our research unveils an unlikely connection, leaving readers with a humorously enigmatic puzzle to ponder. As Henny Youngman once joked, "I always wanted to become an economist, but I just didn't have enough interest in money – now, if only YouTube could have guided my vocational pursuits!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2014 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of social media and economic trends has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex, and often surprising, interplay between digital media and societal behaviors. The inexplicable connection between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the number of economists in Alabama is a case in point. As Mark Twain once humorously quipped, "Economists have a lot in common with quantum physics – whenever you think you understand it, it changes." Our study aims to illuminate this unexpected relationship, shedding light on a correlation that, much like economic forecasts, can often defy conventional wisdom.
Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed "Queen of Shitty Robots," has carved out a unique niche in the online world with her lighthearted and inventive approach to robotics and engineering. In the words of our very own dad joke enthusiast, Geno-ME-ology meets Simone, a match made in Alabama!"
But amidst the laughter and whimsy of Giertz's content, there lies a curious phenomenon linking her YouTube viewership to the economist population of Alabama. Our research dives deep into this enigma, applying rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic bond between a Swedish robot enthusiast and the practitioners of the dismal science in the heart of the American South. It's almost like two disparate worlds colliding, creating a financial fusion implosion – talk about an economic "wow" factor!
The aim of our study is not only to broaden our understanding of the unconventional connections in the digital age but also to bring forth the scholarly merit of looking at correlations in a light-hearted manner. As Albert Einstein once joked, "Did you hear about the economist who was insistent on proving that correlation implies causation? It was a taxing endeavor."
By exploring this unorthodox relationship, we hope to spark further inquiry into the unexpected ties that bind seemingly unrelated domains, all while infusing a bit of levity into the often serious realm of academic research. It's not every day that the worlds of YouTube entertainment and economic study collide, but when they do, the results are anything but predictable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation, we embarked on a digital odyssey, scouring the vast expanse of the internet for data on Simone Giertz's YouTube channel. Much like Giertz's famous "Shitty Robot" builds, we encountered a few glitches in the process but eventually compiled a comprehensive dataset spanning the period from 2014 to 2021. Our team of dedicated researchers then sifted through countless videos, carefully noting the average views garnered by each upload. It was a task akin to finding the best economist joke – you really have to dig through some dry material before striking comedic gold.

Simultaneously, our quest for data on economists in Alabama led us to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we uncovered the numerical representation of this esteemed profession within the state. Juggling spreadsheets and statistical software, we endeavored to draw correlations from the data that would make any seasoned economist proud - or at the very least, crack a smile! We even had a lively debate about whether to include "Alabama Man's" economic influence in the dataset.

Having collected this wealth of information, we employed a bevy of statistical methods to bring clarity to our investigation. We lovingly dubbed this phase of our research "statistical storytelling" - much like crafting a punchline, it involves layering data and context to reveal an unexpected connection that leaves everyone nodding in surprise and appreciation. The correlation coefficient, akin to the perfect setup line for a joke, emerged as the main protagonist in our data analysis, providing the numerical backbone for our findings.

Furthermore, we employed sophisticated time-series analysis to unravel the temporal dynamics of the relationship between YouTube video views and the economist count in Alabama. It was a bit like watching a comedy sketch evolve over time, with unexpected twists and turns that kept us on the edge of our seats. And just like a well-timed punchline, our statistical model revealed a compelling narrative that articulated the intricacies of this unusual correlation. We were almost tempted to insert a laugh track at each significant statistical discovery.

To complement our quantitative analysis, we conducted qualitative surveys among individuals in Alabama to gauge their awareness of Simone Giertz's content and their interest in economics. It was eye-opening to witness the unexpected intersections of humor and economics in the responses, affirming that our research was tapping into a rich vein of curiosity and laughter - much like finding a hidden punchline amidst dry economic theory.

As the final act of our methodology, we subjected our findings to rigorous sensitivity analysis, akin to scrutinizing the delivery of a witty remark to ensure it lands just right. We sought to discern if external factors, such as changes in YouTube algorithms or economic policies, influenced the observed correlation. This investigative process was not without its moments of levity, as we debated whether the algorithm updates were the "straight men" to Simone's "punchline" videos.

In sum, our methodological journey, much like a stand-up comedy set, involved finding the perfect balance between empirical integrity and engaging storytelling. We endeavored to infuse a bit of humor into our research process, taking inspiration from the charismatic wit of Simone Giertz herself. And just as she has masterfully blended humor and technology, we sought to bring a dash of whimsy to the oft-perceived seriousness of academic methodologies. It's what makes the pursuit of knowledge a truly humorous and captivating endeavor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2014 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9316871, r-squared of 0.8680408, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of social media and economic trends has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex, and often surprising, interplay between digital media and societal behaviors. The inexplicable connection between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the number of economists in Alabama is a case in point. As Mark Twain once humorously quipped, "Economists have a lot in common with quantum physics – whenever you think you understand it, it changes." Our study aims to illuminate this unexpected relationship, shedding light on a correlation that, much like economic forecasts, can often defy conventional wisdom.
Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed "Queen of Shitty Robots," has carved out a unique niche in the online world with her lighthearted and inventive approach to robotics and engineering. In the words of our very own dad joke enthusiast, Geno-ME-ology meets Simone, a match made in Alabama!"
But amidst the laughter and whimsy of Giertz's content, there lies a curious phenomenon linking her YouTube viewership to the economist population of Alabama. Our research dives deep into this enigma, applying rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic bond between a Swedish robot enthusiast and the practitioners of the dismal science in the heart of the American South. It's almost like two disparate worlds colliding, creating a financial fusion implosion – talk about an economic "wow" factor!
The aim of our study is not only to broaden our understanding of the unconventional connections in the digital age but also to bring forth the scholarly merit of looking at correlations in a light-hearted manner. As Albert Einstein once joked, "Did you hear about the economist who was insistent on proving that correlation implies causation? It was a taxing endeavor."
By exploring this unorthodox relationship, we hope to spark further inquiry into the unexpected ties that bind seemingly unrelated domains, all while infusing a bit of levity into the often serious realm of academic research. It's not every day that the worlds of YouTube entertainment and economic study collide, but when they do, the results are anything but predictable.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our study revealed a strong positive correlation between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. Over the period of 2014 to 2021, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9316871, with an r-squared of 0.8680408, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a compelling relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

Our analysis indicates that as the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos increase, there is a corresponding increase in the number of economists in Alabama. It's as if the residents of Alabama simply can't resist the allure of Simone's witty robotics banter, which inadvertently stirs up an interest in economics. As the saying goes, "When you find yourself browsing through Simone's robot creations, you might just end up taking an interest in making cents of the economy.”

Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables, providing visual support for our statistical findings.

Our results also highlight the potential for further research into the underlying factors driving this unexpected correlation, and perhaps even uncovering the mechanisms through which Simone Giertz's online presence influences economic sentiments in Alabama. As we delve deeper into this unanticipated relationship, we are reminded of the timeless joke, "Why did the economist cross the road? To get to Simone's latest invention launch, of course—where else would one find such a unique blend of entertainment and economic inspiration?"

Through this study, we have successfully unveiled the surprising connection between Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the economist count in Alabama, opening up a new avenue for exploring the intersection of digital media and economic trends. It is our hope that this investigation sparks further interest in the whimsical yet meaningful connections that weave through the fabric of our society. As we continue to peer through this academic looking glass, we recognize that sometimes, the most unexpected correlations can yield the most profound insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have explored the relationship between online content consumption and professional interests. In "Smith et al.'s Empirical Analysis of YouTube Viewer Behavior," the authors find that individuals tend to consume content that aligns with their personal or professional interests, with potential career influencers often linked to the videos that garner the most attention. This notion is further reinforced in "Doe's Analysis of Online Engagement and Career Aspirations," where the authors delve into the impact of online content on career choices and aspirations among internet users.
Now, onto some real page-turners – in "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors present a compelling exploration of the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, much like the surprising correlation we observe between Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the economist count in Alabama. Additionally, "Nudge" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein offers insights into behavioral economics, providing a fitting backdrop for our examination of the unnoticed influences on economic interests in relation to digital content consumption.
Moving from non-fiction to fiction, let's not discount the potential relevance of literature in unraveling this perplexing correlation. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, the intergalactic adventures parallel the unexpected journey we find ourselves on as we explore the link between YouTube viewership and the economist count in Alabama. Furthermore, "The Rosie Project" by Graeme Simsion presents a quirky, comedic narrative that mirrors the tone of Simone Giertz's content, perhaps harboring concealed clues to the intricate bond between technology, humor, and economic fascination.
Furthermore, the dynamic nature of social media platforms has been documented in various online discussions. On Twitter, @EconEnthusiast93 remarked, "Just spent the day binge-watching Simone Giertz's YouTube channel, and now I'm seriously contemplating a career in economics – anyone else feeling the sudden urge to analyze supply and demand curves? #QuirkyEconomist." This anecdotal tweet sheds light on the potential influence of Giertz's videos on cultivating interest in economics, provoking a chuckle and a contemplation of the unexpected links between digital entertainment and professional inclinations.
Hopping from online discussions to dry economic reports, the findings of our study align with the theories of digital content influence and professional inclinations, though we acknowledge that our correlation prompts more amusement than solemn contemplation. Nevertheless, our research unveils an unlikely connection, leaving readers with a humorously enigmatic puzzle to ponder. As Henny Youngman once joked, "I always wanted to become an economist, but I just didn't have enough interest in money – now, if only YouTube could have guided my vocational pursuits!"

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study revealed a strong positive correlation between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. Over the period of 2014 to 2021, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9316871, with an r-squared of 0.8680408, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a compelling relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our analysis indicates that as the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos increase, there is a corresponding increase in the number of economists in Alabama. It's as if the residents of Alabama simply can't resist the allure of Simone's witty robotics banter, which inadvertently stirs up an interest in economics. As the saying goes, "When you find yourself browsing through Simone's robot creations, you might just end up taking an interest in making cents of the economy.”
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables, providing visual support for our statistical findings.
Our results also highlight the potential for further research into the underlying factors driving this unexpected correlation, and perhaps even uncovering the mechanisms through which Simone Giertz's online presence influences economic sentiments in Alabama. As we delve deeper into this unanticipated relationship, we are reminded of the timeless joke, "Why did the economist cross the road? To get to Simone's latest invention launch, of course—where else would one find such a unique blend of entertainment and economic inspiration?"
Through this study, we have successfully unveiled the surprising connection between Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the economist count in Alabama, opening up a new avenue for exploring the intersection of digital media and economic trends. It is our hope that this investigation sparks further interest in the whimsical yet meaningful connections that weave through the fabric of our society. As we continue to peer through this academic looking glass, we recognize that sometimes, the most unexpected correlations can yield the most profound insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that there exists a significant, positive correlation between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. This unusual linkage opens up a realm of inquiry into the curious interplay between online content consumption and professional inclinations. It seems that as Simone Giertz's wit and humor draw viewers in, they inadvertently find themselves drawn towards the world of economics, much like a good ol' Southern tale of two unlikely companions on a winding country road.
Undoubtedly, our results reinforce the previous establishment from "Smith et al.'s Empirical Analysis of YouTube Viewer Behavior" and "Doe's Analysis of Online Engagement and Career Aspirations," as our study underlines the powerful influence of digital content on career interests. Furthermore, the unexpected parallels between our findings and the thematic essence of "Freakonomics," "Nudge," "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," and "The Rosie Project" cannot be ignored. Sometimes, the strangest bedfellows make for the most engaging narratives, much like the union of robotics and economics in the heart of Alabama.
The strong correlation we observed resonates with the anecdotal tweet from @EconEnthusiast93, illustrating the potential for Simone Giertz's videos to foster an interest in economics among viewers. Indeed, it seems that Giertz's brand of unorthodox entertainment serves as a gateway to economic musings, not unlike how a good dad joke can sneak its way into any serious discussion, transcending the boundaries of levity and profundity.
As we continue to unravel the enigmatic bond between Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the economist count in Alabama, we are reminded of the peculiar ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can intertwine, much like the unpredictable quirks of a Southern summer thunderstorm. Our study acknowledges the lighthearted charm interwoven with the rigorous pursuit of knowledge and understanding, much like how a true Southern belle embodies an unwavering sense of grace and a playful spirit.

Stay tuned for the dry, serious conclusion; I will add a conclusion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos and The number of economists in Alabama. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.

Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."

Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of social media and economic trends has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex, and often surprising, interplay between digital media and societal behaviors. The inexplicable connection between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the number of economists in Alabama is a case in point. As Mark Twain once humorously quipped, "Economists have a lot in common with quantum physics – whenever you think you understand it, it changes." Our study aims to illuminate this unexpected relationship, shedding light on a correlation that, much like economic forecasts, can often defy conventional wisdom.
Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed "Queen of Shitty Robots," has carved out a unique niche in the online world with her lighthearted and inventive approach to robotics and engineering. In the words of our very own dad joke enthusiast, Geno-ME-ology meets Simone, a match made in Alabama!"
But amidst the laughter and whimsy of Giertz's content, there lies a curious phenomenon linking her YouTube viewership to the economist population of Alabama. Our research dives deep into this enigma, applying rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic bond between a Swedish robot enthusiast and the practitioners of the dismal science in the heart of the American South. It's almost like two disparate worlds colliding, creating a financial fusion implosion – talk about an economic "wow" factor!
The aim of our study is not only to broaden our understanding of the unconventional connections in the digital age but also to bring forth the scholarly merit of looking at correlations in a light-hearted manner. As Albert Einstein once joked, "Did you hear about the economist who was insistent on proving that correlation implies causation? It was a taxing endeavor."
By exploring this unorthodox relationship, we hope to spark further inquiry into the unexpected ties that bind seemingly unrelated domains, all while infusing a bit of levity into the often serious realm of academic research. It's not every day that the worlds of YouTube entertainment and economic study collide, but when they do, the results are anything but predictable.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study revealed a strong positive correlation between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. Over the period of 2014 to 2021, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9316871, with an r-squared of 0.8680408, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a compelling relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our analysis indicates that as the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos increase, there is a corresponding increase in the number of economists in Alabama. It's as if the residents of Alabama simply can't resist the allure of Simone's witty robotics banter, which inadvertently stirs up an interest in economics. As the saying goes, "When you find yourself browsing through Simone's robot creations, you might just end up taking an interest in making cents of the economy.”
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables, providing visual support for our statistical findings.
Our results also highlight the potential for further research into the underlying factors driving this unexpected correlation, and perhaps even uncovering the mechanisms through which Simone Giertz's online presence influences economic sentiments in Alabama. As we delve deeper into this unanticipated relationship, we are reminded of the timeless joke, "Why did the economist cross the road? To get to Simone's latest invention launch, of course—where else would one find such a unique blend of entertainment and economic inspiration?"
Through this study, we have successfully unveiled the surprising connection between Simone Giertz's YouTube channel and the economist count in Alabama, opening up a new avenue for exploring the intersection of digital media and economic trends. It is our hope that this investigation sparks further interest in the whimsical yet meaningful connections that weave through the fabric of our society. As we continue to peer through this academic looking glass, we recognize that sometimes, the most unexpected correlations can yield the most profound insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated the remarkable correlation between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. This unexpected relationship, akin to a serendipitous encounter of comedy and calculus, not only underscores the surprising intersections in the digital age but also invites a reimagining of the ways in which social media and economic interests intertwine. As the age-old joke goes, "Why did the economist start a YouTube channel? To monetize on those 'views' and 'subscribers'… of economic theories, of course!"

Our findings provide compelling evidence of a strong positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, prompting deeper contemplation of the potential mechanisms underlying this curious connection. The statistical rigor of our analysis, coupled with the unexpected charm of this correlation, "e-connomically" masters the art of surprising juxtaposition – a revelation that is as refreshing as a cool breeze on a hot economic forecast.

It is clear that our study not only adds levity to the often-serious domain of academic research but also prompts further inquiry into the unconventional ties that bind social media and economic trends. Our findings prod at the boundaries of conventional wisdom, inspiring reflection on the interplay between digital entertainment and economic curiosities. As the ancient proverb goes, "When Simone's robots dance, Alabama's economists take a chance – in the realm of financial romance!"

It is our firm belief that no further research is needed in this area, as our work has encapsulated the joy of unexpected discoveries and the humor in unlikely correlations. Therefore, we confidently assert that this research marks the culmination of this comedic yet illuminating journey into the unexplored territory of YouTube views and economist demographics.

This is where we bid adieu, just as an economist might say, "Goodbye, and may your investments always yield dividends – both economic and comedic."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Social Media Analytics and Pop Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Research Advancement (SQRA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled That's the Way the YouTube Video Views Go: A Correlation Study of Simone Giertz's Channel and the Economist Count in Alabama with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the fascinating relationship between the average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the number of economists in Alabama. We employed data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze this unorthodox connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316871 with p < 0.01 for the period of 2014 to 2021 leaves no uncertainty about the concurrence of these seemingly disparate variables.
Astonishingly, our findings consistently demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, prompting the question: do economics enthusiasts flock to Simone Giertz's channel, or does her quirky content inspire more Alabamian interest in economics? As the data unravel the correlation, we also unveil an unexpected joke: "Did you hear about the economist who was addicted to YouTube? He had the best 'monetized' mind in the business."
Our research sheds light on this humorous yet thought-provoking relationship, offering a new lens through which to view the mysteries of social media influence and economic zeal.

ChatGPT:

Simone Giertz, YouTube, video views, Alabama, Economist, correlation study, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, economics enthusiasts, social media influence, economic zeal, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of Simone Giertz YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos

The number of economists in Alabama
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of economists in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of economists in Alabama

Correlation r = 0.9316871 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8680408 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of economists in Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos) over the 8 years from 2014 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00076. 0.0007567066155092050000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.076% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,322 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20142015201620172018201920202021
Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos (Average views)49156889999281706921760701247840358738018534701313270
The number of economists in Alabama (Economists)3030405050705040




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([491568,899992,817069,2176070,1247840,3587380,1853470,1313270,])
array_2 = np.array([30,30,40,50,50,70,50,40,])
array_1_name = "Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "The number of economists in Alabama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 4824 · Black Variable ID: 25680 · Red Variable ID: 4468
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0